Skip to main content

The Humanities in Hermeneutic-Anthropological Perspective

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science, Religion, the Humanities and Hope

Abstract

This chapter aims at an understanding of the distinctive role of the humanities. The first part offers, with reference to Helmuth Plessner, an outline under which conditions it is conceivable that a specific life form might develop the capacity to strive for understanding and self-understanding. Such a foundation in philosophical anthropology is needed for the possibility of a hermeneutical understanding of the role of the human being. On the basis of this hermeneutic perspective the second part sketches how knowledge, orientation and morality are possible. The capacity of humans to judge makes ‘reflective knowledge’ possible. Likewise, morality is given with the ability of human beings to form a reflective relationship with themselves. On the basis of such a hermeneutic and critical view of the human being, the societal role of the humanities can be understood. The third part outlines this role by stressing that it is this fundamental role of the humanities, to make understanding in a methodologically reflective way possible, that gives the humanities both intrinsic importance and societal relevance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Beyleveld, D. 1991. The Dialectical Necessity of Morality. An Analysis and Defense of Alan Gewirth’s Argument to the Principle of Generic Consistency. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. 2020 (orig. 1923–1929). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. Three Volumes (trans: Lofts, S.G.). Abingdon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, N. 1994. The Inaugural Address: Understanding. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes 68: 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Lazari-Radek, K., and P. Singer. 2014. The Point of View of the Universe. Sidgwick & Contemporary Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Drees, W. 2021. What are the Humanities for? On the Value of Humanistic Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Düwell, M. 2022. Kantian Human Dignity and a “Community of Rights”. In Human Dignity and the Kingdom of Ends: Kantian Perspectives and Practical Applications, ed. J.-W. Van der Rijt and A. Cureton, 90–205. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Düwell, M., G. Bos, and N. van Steenbergen, eds. 2018. Towards the Ethics of a Green Future. The Theory and Practice of Human Rights for Future People. Abingdon, Oxon/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankfurt, H. 1971. Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person. The Journal of Philosophy 68 (1): 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen, A. 1988 (orig. 1940). Man, His Nature and Place in the World (trans: McMillan, C., and Pillemer, K., introduction by K.-S. Rehberg). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gewirth, A. 1978. Reason and Morality. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M. 1996. Reason in Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, C.M. 1996. Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Longuenesse, B. 1998. Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the ‘Critique of Pure Reason.’ Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makkreel, R.A. 2015. Orientation and Judgment in Hermeneutics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2021. Kant’s Worldview: How Judgment Shapes Human Comprehension. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1964. Cézanne’s Doubt. In Sense and Non-Sense, ed. M. Merlau-Ponty, 1–25. Evanstone: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. 1989. Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessner, H 2019 (orig. 1928). Levels of Organic Life and the Human. An Introduction to Philosophical Anthropology (trans: Hyatt, M., Introduction by J. M. Bernstein). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rolston, H., III. 1988. Environmental Ethics. Philadelphia: Temple UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. 2008 (orig. 1928). The Human Place in the Cosmos. Studies in Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (trans: Frings, M.S., introduction by E. Kelly). Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidgwick, H. 1877. Methods of Ethics. London: McMillan & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, K.R. 2016. How Hume and Kant Reconstruct Natural Law: Justifying Strict Objectivity without Debating Moral Realism. Oxford: Carendon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wunsch, M. 2017. Ziel und Gegenstand. In Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch, ed. H.-P. Krüger, 37–54. Berlin/New York: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Düwell, M. (2024). The Humanities in Hermeneutic-Anthropological Perspective. In: Runehov, A., Fuller, M. (eds) Science, Religion, the Humanities and Hope. Issues in Science and Religion: Publications of the European Society for the Study of Science and Theology, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52292-5_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics