Abstract
Dynamics related to intimacy, sexuality in LATT relationships, and diverse ways of coping are the focus of this chapter. How do these couples view and maintain sexual intimacy without bodily immediacy? The participants are placed in two categories. Firstly, those foregrounding physical intimacy, and secondly, those with varied physical intimacy salience between the partners. The chapter explores how some couples manage explicit longing for bodily intimacy through multiple social media, especially sexting-sending/ receiving sexually explicit messages and visuals. It highlights why some couples prefer not to engage in online sexual activities (OSA), underlining mistrust and potential misuse of social media. Moreover, this chapter reveals that some participants experience the partner as a ‘stranger’ after separation and a need for emotional reconnection before sexual intimacy again, overlooked in the existing studies. Lastly, a consensual non-monogamous (CNM) relationship (open relationship) when apart, for jealousy avoidance and trust enhancement for one same-sex couple, is taken up.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Some maintain that sexuality usually refers to sexual preference and sexual orientation, I use the term sexual intimacy in a broader sense. I also use the term physical intimacy almost interchangeably with sexual intimacy, despite the former being a broader concept. Physical intimacy does not have to include sex, though sex and its associated acts are one way you might cultivate physical intimacy.
- 2.
I tease out the centrality of the body influenced by Grosz’s (1994, p. 146) understanding that the “body is that materiality, … on which power operates and through which it functions”.
- 3.
Many self-selected individuals (8040) via a secure online platform designed ad hoc, in different developmental stages ranging from young adolescents, young adults (18–25), middle adults (26–40), older adults (41–60), and elderly (over 60) participated in the research project, males and females. Adult males spent an average of 7.1 h weekly online, while adult females spent around one hour online for sexual purposes.
- 4.
Online data was collected from 77 long-distance couples focused on their sexual and emotional boundaries and motives (McRae & Cobb, 2020). I assume the participants included some LATT couples, although it is not mentioned explicitly. The couples had previously lived geographically close, and their current geographical separation ranged from 114 to 12,800 km, with a mean separation of 5.089 km.
- 5.
Chatroulette is an online chat website that pairs random users with a choice between two other users for webcam-based conversations. Visitors to the website begin an online chat with another visitor. Either user may leave the current chat at any point by initiating another random connection.
References
Alsamarei, A. A., Şener, B. (2023). Remote social touch framework: a way to communicate physical interactions across long distances. J Multimodal User Interfaces 17, 79–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12193-023-00402-z.
Ballester-Arnal, J., Castro-Calvo, M., García-Barba, E., & Ruiz-Palomino, M. D. (2021). Gil-Llario problematic and non-problematic engagement in online sexual activities across the lifespan. Computers in Human Behavior, 120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.106774
Benjamin, J. (2004). Beyond doer and done to: An intersubjective view of thirdness. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 73(1), 5–46.
Benjamin, J. (2018). Beyond doer and done to recognition theory, inter subjectivity, and the shared third. Routledge.
Bhatia, S. (2018). Decolonizing psychology: Globalization, social justice, and Indian youth identities. Oxford University Press.
Blasband, D., & Peplau, L. (1985). Sexual exclusivity versus openness in gay couples. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 14(5), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01542001
Carter, J., Duncan, S., Stoilova, M., & Phillips, P. (2016). Sex, love and security: Accounts of distance and commitment in living apart together relationships. Sociology, 50(3), 576–593.
Darko, D. (2019). Bogen er blevet så stor, fordi seksualiteten er blevet er så stor [the book is huge, because sexuality has grown so huge]. Psykologernes fagmagasin nr. 11, 10–14.
Debrabander, F. (2017). What Plato can teach you about finding a soulmate. https://theconversation.com/what-plato-can-teach-you-about-finding-a-soulmate-72715. Retrieved 25 January 2023
Duncan, S. & Carter, J. (2013). Why do people live apart together? Families, Relationships, and Societies, 2(3), 323–338. http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/35887
Ellis, D., & Tucker, I. (2015). Social psychology of emotion. Sage.
Experimentarium (2021). https://www.experimentarium.dk/kroppen/kram-saetter-kaerlig-stroem-til-din-krop. Retrieved November 2, 2021.
Frank, L. (2020). Største af alt: Om kærlighedens natur [Greatest of all: About the nature of love]. Politikens Forlag.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love, and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge University Press.
Giles, J. (2008). The nature of sexual desire. University Press of America.
Goldsmith, K., & Byers, S. (2020). Maintaining long-distance relationships: Comparison to geographically close relationships. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 35(3), 338–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2018.1527027
Graugaard, C, & Frisch, M. (2019). Voksenalderens seksualitet [Sexuality of the adults] In Graugaard, Giraldi, & Møhl (red.), Sexologi: Faglige perspektiver på seksualitet (pp.259–278). Munksgaard.
Grimshaw, M. (2017). Digital society and capitalism. Palgrave Communication Humanities Social Sciences Business. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0020-5.
Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies: Toward a corporeal feminism. Indiana University press
Haptics (2024). https://bus237-haptics.blogspot.com/p/advantages-disadvantages.html.
Hewitt, P. & Shulman, D. (2011). Self and Society: A Symbolic Interactionist Social Psychology. Allyn & Bacon.
Holmes, M. (2014). Distance relationships: Intimacy and emotions amongst academics and their partners in dual–locations. Palgrave Macmillan.
McRae, L. & Cobb, R. (2020). ‘A qualitative analysis of themes in long-distance couples’ relationship boundary discussions. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 29 (2), 212–220. https://www.utpjournals.press/loi/cjhs
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self, and society: From the standpoint of a social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press.
Merolla, A. (2012). Connecting here and there: A model of long-distance relationship maintenance. Personal Relationships, 19(4), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01392.x
Nelson, A.J., Jankowiak, W. (2021). Love’s Ethnographic Record: Beyond the Love/Arranged Marriage Dichotomy and Other False Essentialisms. In: Mayer, CH., Vanderheiden, E. (eds.), International Handbook of Love. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-45996-3_3.
Oxlund, B., Møhl, B., & Graugaard, C. (2019). Ældrelivets seksualitet. Sexuality in the Life of elderly. In C. Graugaard, A. Giraldi, & B. Møhl (red.), Sexologi: Faglige perspektiver på seksualitet (pp. 279–299). Munksgaard.
Perel, E. (2017). Mating in Captivity: Unlocking Erotic Intelligence. HarperCollins.
Shenoy, P. (2015). Why we love the way we do. Westland Limited.
Sigman, S. (1991). Handling the discontinuous aspects of continuing social relationships: Towards research on the persistence of social forms. Communication Theory, 1, 106–127.
Stafford, L. (2005). Maintaining long-distance and cross-residential relationships. Routledge.
Sternberg, R. (1986). A triangular theory of love. Psychological Review, 93, 119–135.
Turkle, S. (2011). Alone together: Why we expect more from technology and less from Each Other Basic Books.
Wendy, L. (2022). How to keep sexual intimacy burning in long-distance relationships. In Sexual intimacy burning. https://www.limarzicounselling.ca/keep-sexual-intimacy-long-distance-relationships/. Accessed September 27, 2022.
Whitty, M. & Carr, A. (2006). Cyberspace Romance: The Psychology of Online Relationships. Palgrave Macmillan
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singla, R. (2024). Sexual Intimacy—Intersections Between Material and Social. In: Living Apart Together Transnationally (LATT) Couples. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52205-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52205-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52204-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52205-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)