Skip to main content

Bibliometric Review on a Hybrid Learning Model with VLEs from a Higher Education Context

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Systems, Smart Technologies and Innovation for Society (CITIS 2023)

Abstract

This study combines a systematic review of scientific literature focused on practices, experiences and criteria of design and implementation of the hybrid teaching and learning modality, to propose a conceptual approach that minimally defines it, as well as to describe the main challenges that universities and faculty face for its effective implementation. At the same time, a descriptive study of the perceptions of a group of professors regarding the challenges defined and the way in which they have been addressed in this post-pandemic period by the institutions and in their own teaching practice is developed. The survey technique is applied to 53 professors who, from the areas of technical sciences of the Universidad Politécnica Salesiana in the city of Guayaquil, Ecuador, and who have been working continuously since March 2020 to the present. In general terms, the professors assume that the challenges of the hybrid modality are being assumed positively and, at the same time, that this modality allows responding to the challenges of university education in the new post-pandemic normality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Srivatanakul, T.: Emerging from the pandemic: instructor reflections and students’ perceptions on an introductory programming course in blended learning. Educ. Inf. Technol. 28(5), 5673–5695 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11328-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Sholi, H.Y., Shadid, O.R., Alshare, K.A., Lane, M.: An agile educational framework: a response for the covid-19 pandemic. Cogent Educ. 8, 1980939 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2021.1980939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernard, R.M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R.F., Tamim, R.M., Abrami, P.C.: A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: from the general to the applied. J. Comput. High. Educ. 26, 87–122 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pellas, N., Kazanidis, I.: On the value of second life for students’ engagement in blended and online courses: a comparative study from the higher education in Greece. Educ. Inf. Technol. (Dordr) 20, 445–466 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-013-9294-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferguson, R.: Learning analytics: drivers, developments and challenges. Int. J. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 4, 304–317 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang, G.-J., Tsai, C.-C.: Research trends in mobile and ubiquitous learning: a review of publications in selected journals from 2001 to 2010. Br. J. Edu. Technol. 42, E65–E70 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ryan, S., Kaufman, J., Greenhouse, J., She, R., Shi, J.: The effectiveness of blended online learning courses at the community college level. Commun. Coll. J. Res. Pract. 40, 285–298 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/10668926.2015.1044584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bervell, B., Umar, I.N., Kamilin, M.H.: Towards a model for online learning satisfaction (MOLS): re-considering non-linear relationships among personal innovativeness and modes of online interaction. Open Learn.: J. Open Dist. e-Learn. 35, 236–259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2019.1662776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Volkov, A., et al.: Using digital tools to teach soft skill-oriented subjects to university students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Educ. Sci. (Basel) 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050335

  10. Stahl, G.: Redesigning Mathematical Curriculum for Blended Learning. Educ. Sci. (Basel) 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11040165

  11. Howell, E.: HyFlex model of higher education: understanding the promise of flexibility. On Horizon: Int. J. Learn. Futures 30, 173–181 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/OTH-04-2022-0019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Naylor, D., Stewart, M.F., Li, L.: Comparison of online and in-class instruction in introductory fluid mechanics. Int. J. Eng. Educ. 36, 1967–1975 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zamborová, K., Stefanutti, I., Klimová, B.: CercleS survey: impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on foreign language teaching in Higher Education. Lang. Learn. High. Educ. 11, 269–283 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayes, S., Tucker, H.: Using synchronous hybrid pedagogy to nurture a community of inquiry: Insights from a tourism Master’s programme. J. Hosp. Leis. Sport Tour. Educ. 29, 100339 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhlste.2021.100339

  15. Ayub, E., Lim, C.L., Yeo, D.C.H., Ismail, S.R.: Developing a solution for hybrid classroom: a pilot study from a malaysian private university. Front. Educ. (Lausanne) 7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.841363

  16. Noguera Fructuoso, I., Albó, L., Beardsley, M.: University students’ preference for flexible teaching models that foster constructivist learning practices. Aust. J. Educ. Technol. 38, 22–39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7968

  17. Nortvig, A.-M., Petersen, A.K., Balle, S.H.: A literature review of the factors influencing e-learning and blended learning in relation to learning outcome, student satisfaction and engagement. Electron. J. E-Learn. 16, 46–55 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Detyna, M., Sanchez-Pizani, R., Giampietro, V., Dommett, E.J., Dyer, K.: Hybrid flexible (HyFlex) teaching and learning: climbing the mountain of implementation challenges for synchronous online and face-to-face seminars during a pandemic. Learn. Environ. Res. 26, 145–159 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09408-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Howard, N.-J.: Navigating blended learning, negotiating professional identities. J. Furth. High. Educ. 45, 654–671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1806214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanik, M., Hadizadeh, A.: An exploration of EFL teachers’ challenges and strategies during the pandemic: a case of emergency blended synchronous education. Regist. J. 15, 1–19 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Aluko, F.R.: Access for success: exploring affordances theory in a new hybrid model teacher education programme. Independent J. Teach. Learn. 16, 43–56 (2021). https://doi.org/10.10520/ejc-jitl1-v16-n1-a6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pevneva, I., Edmunds, P.: Online learning vs. extreme learning in mining higher education under COVID. In: E3S Web Conference, vol. 174 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Wut, T.M., Xu, J. (Bill), Lee, S.W., Lee, D.: University student readiness and its effect on intention to participate in the flipped classroom setting of hybrid learning. Educ. Sci. (Basel). 12 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070442

  24. Ronen, I.K., Sachyani, D.: Hybrid language as a tool for enhancing involvement in learning a biochemistry process: a self-study. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 1–21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2150527

  25. Moodie, D.R.: Comparing the outcomes of the different teaching modes: all-in-person, hybrid, and online, for different student demographic groups in a business school. Online Learn. 25, 362–387 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. DeMara, R., Tian, T., Howard, W.: Longitudinal learning outcomes from engineering-specific adaptions of hybrid online undergraduate instruction. Int. J. Emerg. Technol. Learn. (iJET) 16, 171–201 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McKenna, K., Gupta, K., Kaiser, L., Lopes, T., Zarestky, J.: Blended learning: balancing the best of both worlds for adult learners. Adult Learn. 31, 139–149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1045159519891997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Alstete, J.W., Flavian, H., Petrova, K.: Guest editorial: hybrid, blended and mixed-mode learning quality: more lessons learned in the COVID pandemic and beyond. Qual. Assur. Educ. 31, 1–3 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-02-2023-205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bevacqua, J., Colasante, M.: No lines: observations from a pilot project to re-imagine, design and implement a flexible student-centred approach to study mode selection. J. Univ. Teach. Learn. Pract. 16, 2 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joe Llerena-Izquierdo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ayala-Carabajo, R., Llerena-Izquierdo, J. (2024). Bibliometric Review on a Hybrid Learning Model with VLEs from a Higher Education Context. In: Salgado-Guerrero, J.P., Vega-Carrillo, H.R., García-Fernández, G., Robles-Bykbaev, V. (eds) Systems, Smart Technologies and Innovation for Society. CITIS 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 871. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52090-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics