Skip to main content

Proposals of “Open Air” Tourism, Associated with Scientific Investigation in the Wild, Ready as Psychological Health Care in the Period of Covid 2019 Pandemic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Managing Natural and Cultural Heritage for a Durable Tourism

Abstract

The necessity to avoid crowding situations someway braked mass tourism during the COVID pandemic period. This necessity allowed the discovery of already existing proposals of tourism in the wild (eco-tourism) for small number of participants and in open air situations. Among the already structured eco-tourism proposals, a particular role is played by the guided observation of animals in the wild (birdwatching and whale watching). Also the not diffused Research Tourism (for even smaller numbers of tourists) has been re-launched embracing also the other proposals under the common purpose of obtaining scientific results, by the helping of citizens in direct collaboration with researchers during their expeditions in the wild. The Res-Tourism, however, is different from the Citizen Science in the fact that participants are under the direct control of scientists and not independent in the collection and communication of data. This aspect of eco-tourism simply waits for cumulative definitions and ethical rules, being the organization aspects (as in the case of birdwatching and whale watching) already structured and economically valuated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.riservaventotene.it/centri-visita-dettaglio.php?id=1017

  2. 2.

    https://issuu.com/ardea_naturalis/docs/migrandata_-_la_storia

  3. 3.

    https://napoli.repubblica.it/cronaca/2020/08/25/foto/sul_matese_con_ardea_alla_ricerca_del_piviere_tortolino-265439527/1/

  4. 4.

    https://taxonexpeditions.com/

  5. 5.

    https://taxonexpeditions.com/

  6. 6.

    https://www.lifegate.it/nuova-specie-scarabeo-chiamata-come-leonardo-dicaprio

  7. 7.

    https://rivistanatura.com/il-birdwatching-al-tempo-del-covid/

  8. 8.

    https://worldbirds.com/what-is-birding/

  9. 9.

    News 31/12/22 https://www.ornitho.it/index.php?m_id=1164

  10. 10.

    https://deltadelpo.eu/it/83-fiera-del-birdwatching

  11. 11.

    https://conservationmag.org/en/photography/nikon-p1000-review-safari-wildlife-bird-photography

  12. 12.

    https://www.nhbs.com/where-to-watch-birds-in-sardinia-book

  13. 13.

    https://www.ciso-coi.it/cnt/uploads/2020/04/COI-rep-22.pdf

  14. 14.

    https://iwc.int/management-and-conservation/whalewatching

References

  • ACCOBAMS. (2016). Resolution 6.20 commercial cetacean watching activities in the ACCOBAMS area (pp. 1–25), from: https://www.accobams.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/ACCOBAMS_MOP6_Res6.20.pdf

  • ACCOBAMS-ECS-WK Threats. (2017). Inputs to the ACCOBAMS ongoing effort to map human threats on cetaceans in the Mediterranean and Black Threats/2017/Report, 31st ECS Conference, 30th April 2017, Middelfart, Denmark. Retrieved 3 June, 2020, from https://www.accobams.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/ 06/Report_workshop_Threats_31_ECS.pdf

  • Albert, C., Luque, G. M., & Courchamp, F. (2018). The twenty most charismatic species. PLoS One, 13(7), e0199149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. S., & Miller, M. L. (2006). Onboard marine environmental education: Whale watching in the San Juan Islands, Washington. Tourism in Marine Environments, 2(2), 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balestrieri, R., Vento, R., Viviano, A., Mori, E., Gili, C., & Monti, F. (2023). Razorbills Alca torda in Italian Seas: A massive irruption of historical relevance and role of social network monitoring. Animals, 13, 656. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani13040656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow, M. (1998). A passion for birds. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, M., Russo, L. F., Russo, V. G., Senese, A., & Bernardo, N. (2021). Birds seen and not seen during the COVID-19 pandemic: The impact of lockdown measures on citizen science bird observations. Biological Conservation, 256, 109079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejder, L. (2005). Linking short and long-term effects of nature-based tourism on cetaceans. Doctoral Thesis Dalhousie University Canada. Dalhousie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belmonte, G., & Miglietta, A. M. (2022). La natura, risorsa turistica. Edizioni Grifo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Citizen science. Next steps for citizen science. Strategic investments and coordination are needed for citizen science to reach its full potential. Science, 343, 6178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlucci, R., Manea, E., Ricci, P., Cipriano, G., Fanizza, C., Maglietta, R., & Gissi, E. (2021). Managing multiple pressures for cetaceans’ conservation with an ecosystem-based marine spatial planning approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 287, 112240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M., Sumaila, U. R., Kaschner, K., & Pauly, D. (2010). The global potential for whale watching. Marine Policy, 34(6), 1273–1278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, D., Malinauskaite, L., Davíðsdóttir, B., Ögmundardóttir, H., & Roman, J. (2020). Reflections on the ecosystem services of whales and valuing their contribution to human Well-being. Ocean & Coastal Management, 186, 105100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corkeron, P. J. (2004). Whale watching, iconography, and marine conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 847–849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currey, R. J. C. (2008). Conservation biology of bottlenose dolphins in Fiordland, New Zealand. Conservation Biology, 192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currey, R. J. C., Dawson, S. M., & Slooten, E. (2007). New abundance estimates suggest Doubtful Sound bottlenose dolphins are declining. Pacific Conservation Biology, 13(4), 265–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currey, R. J. C., Rowe, L. E., Dawson, S. M., & Slooten, E. (2008). Abundance and population structure of bottlenose dolphins s in Dusky Sound, New Zealand, inferred from dorsal fin photographs. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 42, 439–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, S. (2010). What makes for memorable wildlife encounters? Revelations from “serious” wildlife tourists. Journal of Ecotourism, 9(2), 149–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Minn, E., Fraser, I., Slotow, R., & MacMillan, D. C. (2012). Understanding heterogeneous preference of tourists for big game species: Implications for conservation and management. Animal Conservation, 16(3), 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ducarme, F., Luque, G. M., & Courchamp, F. (2013). What are “charismatic species” for conservation biologists. BioSciences Master Reviews, 10(2013), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffus, D. A., & Dearden, P. (1990). Non-consumpt ive wildlife-oriented recreat ion: A conceptual framework. Biological Conservation, 53(3), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffus, D. A., & Dearden, P. (1993). Recreational use, valuation and management of killer whales (Orcinus orca) on Canada’s Pacific coast. Environmental Conservation, 20(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892900037656

  • Elejabeitia, C., Urquiola, E., Verborgh, P., & de Stephanis, R. (2012). Towards a sustainable whale-watching industry in the Mediterranean Sea. New trends towards Mediterranean tourism sustainability. Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrod, B., & Wilson, J. C. (2003). Marine ecotourism: Issues and experiences. Aspects of tourism. Channel View Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hausmann, A., Slotow, R., Fraser, I., & Di Minin, E. (2016). Ecotourism marketing alternative to charismatic megafauna can also support biodiversity conservation. Animal Conservation, 20(1), 91–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, E. (2005). Marine protected areas for whales, dolphins and porpoises: A world handbook for cetacean habitat conservation. Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, E. (2007). A blueprint for dolphin and whale watching development. Humane Society International (HSI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, E. (2009). Whale watching. In Encyclopedia of marine mammals (pp. 1223–1227). Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoyt, E., & Parsons, E. C. M. (2014). The whale-watching industry. In J. Higham, L. Bejder, & R. Williams (Eds.), Whale-watching: Sustainable tourism and ecological management (pp. 57–70). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain, S. A., Badola, R., Sharma, R., & Rao, R. J. (2013). Planning conservation for Chambal River basin taking gharial Gavialis gangeticus and Ganges River dolphin Platanista gangetica as umbrella species. In B. K. Sharma, S. Kulshreshtha, & A. R. Rahmani (Eds.), Faunal Heritage of Rajasthan: Conservation and Management of Vertebrates, India (pp. 135–156). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kerlinger, P. (1993). Birding economics and birder demographics studies as conservation tools. In D. M. Finch, & P. W. Stangel (Eds.), Status and management of neotropical migratory birds: September 21-25, 1992, Estes Park, Colorado. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-229. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service (pp. 32–38).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiper, T. (2013). Role of ecotourism in sustainable development. In M. Özyavuz (Ed.), Advances in landscape architecture. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/55749

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leader-Williams, N., & Dublin, H. T. (2000). Charismatic megafauna as ‘flagship species’. In A. Entwistle & N. Dunstone (Eds.), Priorities for the conservation of mammalian diversity: Has the panda had its day (pp. 53–81). Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lien, J. (2001). The conservation basis for the regulation of whale watching in Canada by the Department of Fisheries and Oceans: A precautionary approach. Canadian Technical Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 2363, vi + 38 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, J., Marques, B., & Jenkin, G. (2022). The role of courtyards within acute mental health wards: Designing with recovery in mind. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 11414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191811414

  • O’Connor, S.O., Campbell, R., Cortez, H., & Knowles, T. (2009). Whale watching worldwide: Tourism numbers, expenditures and expanding economic benefits. A special report from the International Fund for Animal Welfare, IFAW and Economists at Large, Yarmouth, Mass, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orams, M. B. (1994). Creating effective interpretation for managing interaction between tourists and wildlife. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 10, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orams, M. B. (1995). Towards a more desirable form of ecotourism. Tourism Management, 16(1), 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, E. C. M. (2012). The negative impacts of whale-watching. Journal of Marine Biology, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, P., & Braithwaite, D. (2001). Towards a conceptual framework for wildlife tourism. Tourism Management, 22, 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwacke, L. H., Gulland, F. M., & White, S. (2013). Sentinel species in oceans and human health. In E. A. Laws (Ed.), Environmental toxicology: Selected entries from the encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology (pp. 503–528). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sekercioglu, C. H. (2003). Conservation through commodification. Birding, 35(4), 394–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepsich, P., Borroni, A., Zorgno, M., Rosso, M., & Moulins, A. (2020). Whale watching in the Pelagos sanctuary: Status and quality assessment. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7, 596848.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres, L. G., & Urban, D. (2004). Using spatial analysis to assess bottlenose dolphins as an indicator of healthy fish habitat. In S. A. Bortone (Ed.), Estuarine Indicators (pp. 423–435). CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Yang, Y., Yang, F., Li, Y., Li, L., Lin, D., He, T., Liang, B., Zhang, T., Lin, Y., Li, P., & Liu, W. (2016). A framework for the assessment of the spatial and temporal patterns of threatened coastal delphinids. Scientific Reports, 6, 19883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinrich, M. (2005). A review of collisions between whales and whale watch boats. Paper SC/57/BC12. International Whaling Commission Scientific Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeppel, H., & Muloin, S. (2008). Conservation benefits of interpretation on marine wildlife tours. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 13(4), 280–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genuario Belmonte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Belmonte, G., Balestrieri, R., Santacesaria, F.C., Fanizza, C. (2024). Proposals of “Open Air” Tourism, Associated with Scientific Investigation in the Wild, Ready as Psychological Health Care in the Period of Covid 2019 Pandemic. In: Trono, A., Castronuovo, V., Kosmas, P. (eds) Managing Natural and Cultural Heritage for a Durable Tourism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52041-9_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-52041-9_23

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-52040-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-52041-9

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics