Skip to main content

Work in Progress: Course Design and E-Learning-Environment for Scientific Competency Development for Bachelor’s Degree Students Within the Framework of Self-determination Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Towards a Hybrid, Flexible and Socially Engaged Higher Education (ICL 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 899))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 115 Accesses

Abstract

We present both design and a mixed method evaluation scheme of a semester-long course for scientific literature work. Focus of this contribution lies on the implementation for an e-learning environment with a clearly structured overview as key requirement, reflecting teaching concepts used, that is designed to reduce complexity of usage. Teaching concepts are derived from Self-Determination Theory and are assumed to provide learning conditions to support an optimal motivation profile by focusing on autonomy support, involvement, and structure. Demand-driven student-teacher communication is possible through hybrid communication structures. Approaches to flexibility are reflected by students’ own choice of research focus. Situated in 5th semester within a bachelor curriculum, Artificial Neural Networks are used as a thematical framework which easily can be adapted to other subjects. Teaching analysis poll is conducted to obtain timely feedback by students to identify helping and hindering factors for learning, followed by a questionnaire reflecting the acquisition of competences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Due to a midterm in a parallel course, affected students wisely chose preparation time over feedback. For this semesters course presented in this contribution, we integrated evaluation in course content and expect a higher number of participants.

References

  1. Moritz, R.E.: Der frühe Vogel - wissenschaftliches Schreiben im akademischen Curriculum. In: Schreibwissenschaft als Disziplin, in JoSch—Journal für Schreibwissenschaft, vol. 11. wbv Publikation (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Prätsch, J., Rossig, W.E.: Erstellung und Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Arbeiten. In: Neues Handbuch Hochschullehre, DUZ Medienhaus (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dansereau, D., Carmichael, L., Hotson, B.: Research and teaching: building first-year science writing skills with an embedded writing instruction program. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 049(03) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee, S.E., Woods, K.J., Tonissen, K. F.: Writing activities embedded in bioscience laboratory courses to change students’ attitudes and enhance their scientific writing (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grogan, K.E.: Writing science: what makes scientific writing hard and how to make it easier. Bull. Ecol. Soc. Am. 102(1) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davila, Y., Leigh, A., Griffith, N., England, A.: An embedded, flipped and interactive approach to scientific writing. University of Technology Sydney. https://tinyurl.com/mvx3yp4j (2015). Accessed 5 Jul 2023

  7. Gökçe, O., Prada, J., Nikolov, N.I., Gu, N., Hahnloser, R.H.R.: Embedding-based scientific literature discovery in a text editor application. In: Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Zheng, S., Rosson, M.B., Shih, P.C., Carroll, J.M.: Understanding student motivation, behaviors and perceptions in MOOCs. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, in CSCW’15 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Can. Psychol. 49(3) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Badali, M., Hatami, J., Banihashem, S.K., Rahimi, E., Noroozi, O., Eslami, Z.: The role of motivation in MOOCs’ retention rates: a systematic literature review. Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn. 17(1), 1–20 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kursbeschreibung: Literature-Seminar. Course description (in German). https://eva2.inf.h-brs.de/studium/curriculum/2017/matrix/bi/326/de/ (2023). Accessed 26 Mai 2023

  12. Fryer, L.K., Ginns, P., Howarth, M., Anderson, C., Ozono, S.: Individual differences and course attendance: Why do students skip class? Educ. Psychol. 38(4), 470–486 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McMillan, J.: Course change and attrition from higher education (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guay, F., Ratelle, C.F., Chanal, J.: Optimal learning in optimal contexts: the role of self-determination in education. Can. Psychol. 49(3), 233 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Legault, L.: Self-determination theory. In: Zeigler-Hill, V., Shackelford, T.K., Hrsg. Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences. Springer International (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ilias.de. https://www.ilias.de/. Accessed 27 May 2023

  17. Li, K.C., Wong, B.Y.Y.: Revisiting the definitions and implementation of flexible learning. In: Li, K.C., Yuen, K.S., Wong, B.T.M., Hrsg. Innovations in Open and Flexible Education, Education Innovation Series. Springer, Singapore (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Burdett, J.: Making groups work: university students’ perceptions. Int. Educ. J. 4(3), 177–191 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Collins, A., Brown, J.S., Newman, S.E.: Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics. Technical Report No. 403 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jick, T.D.: Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: triangulation in action. Adm. Sci. Q. 24(4), 602 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frank, A., Fröhlich, M., Lahm, S.: Zwischenauswertung im Semester: Lehrveranstaltungen gemeinsam verändern. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Penny, A.R., Coe, R.: Effectiveness of consultation on student ratings feedback: a meta-analysis. Rev. Educ. Res. 74(2), 215–253 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hurney, C.A., Harris, N.L., Bates Prins, S.C., Kruck, S.E.: The impact of a learner-centered, mid-semester course evaluation on students. J. Fac. Dev. 28(3), 55–62 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Doerthe Vieten .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Vieten, D., Reher, A., Gross, I. (2024). Work in Progress: Course Design and E-Learning-Environment for Scientific Competency Development for Bachelor’s Degree Students Within the Framework of Self-determination Theory. In: Auer, M.E., Cukierman, U.R., Vendrell Vidal, E., Tovar Caro, E. (eds) Towards a Hybrid, Flexible and Socially Engaged Higher Education. ICL 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 899. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51979-6_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics