Skip to main content
  • 18 Accesses

Abstract

This book focuses on Albania, North Macedonia and Kosovo; it explores the industrial policies currently in place in these economies and compares their effects with the situation in Slovenia, which is used as a reference country. It provides a brief introduction to some new industrial policy approaches and proposes a new industrial policy framework that focuses on development of the national innovation system through technology improvements and increased exploitation of technology to build the foundations for sustainable development. Finally, it provides an empirical analysis of the capabilities of the manufacturing firms operating in Albania, North Macedonia and Kosovo. It delves into the technical-economic properties of these Western Balkans countries and identifies some strategic options for industrial policy. It emphasizes the need for a form of governance that emphasizes on industrial development and innovation capabilities, which are required for the implementation of these new industrial policies. The analysis draws on the current industrial policy literature and work on developing (catch-up) economies, technological improvements and innovation studies, which represent current academic thinking in these fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    According to a British Chamber of Commerce Vietnam report (2022), the contribution of manufacturing to GDP in 2021 was 25.1%, compared to 13.7% in 2015; https://britchamvn.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/52856e70-f9c3-4566-83a2-d7e4c6ab8fd7.pdf.

References

  • Abramovitz, M. (1986). Catching up, forging ahead, and falling behind. The Journal of Economic History, 46(2), 385–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. (2001). The rise of ‘the rest’: Challenges to the west from late-industrializing economies. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H., & Tschang, F. (2003). A new approach to assessing the technological complexity of different categories of R&D (with examples from Singapore). Research Policy, Elsevier, 32(4), 553–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baily, M. N., & Bosworth, B. P. (2014). US manufacturing: Understanding its past and its potential future. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., & Pavitt, K. (1995). The development of technological capabilities. In I. U. Haque (Ed.), Trade, technology and international competitiveness (pp. 69–100). Economic Development Institute of the World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., Brynjolfsson, E., Foster, F., Jarmin, J., Patnaik, M., Saporta-Eksten, I., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). What drives differences in management practices? American Economic Review, 109(5), 1648–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellacci, F., & Natera, J. M. (2013). The dynamics of national innovation systems: A panel cointegration analysis of the coevolution between innovative capability and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 42(3), 579–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choung, J. Y., Hwang, H. R., & Song, W. (2014). Transitions of innovation activities in latecomer countries: An exploratory case study of South Korea. World Development, 54(2), 156–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M., Dosi, G., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). The political economy of capabilities accumulation: The past and future of policies of industrial development. In M. Cimoli, G. Dosi, & J. E. Stiglitz (Eds.), Industrial policy and development: The political economy of capabilities accumulation (pp. 1–16). Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cimoli, M., & Porcile, G. (2011). Global growth and international cooperation: A Structuralist perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 35, 383–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M. (2010). Fifty years of empirical studies of innovative activity and performance. In B. H. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation, volumes I and II (pp. 129–213). Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Criscuolo, C., Gonnei, N., Kitazawai, K., & Lalanneiet, G. (2022). Are industrial policy instruments effective?: A review of the evidence in OECD countries, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, No. 128, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/57b3dae2-en.

  • Dahlman, C. J., Ross-Larson, B., & Westphal, L. E. (1987). Managing technological development: Lessons from the newly industrializing countries. World Development, 15(6), 759–775.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damiani, M., & Uvalic, M. (2018). Structural change in the European Union and its periphery: Current challenges for the Western Balkan economies. Southeastern Europe, 42(2), 145–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., & Uvalic, M. (2014). Foreign direct investment into transition economies: Are the Balkans different? The Economics of Transition, 22(2), 281–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrin, S., & Uvalic, M. (2016). Foreign direct Investment in the Western Balkans: What role has it played during transition? Comparative Economic Studies, 58, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2005). The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerberg, J., Srholec, M., & Knell, M. (2007). The competitiveness of nations: Why some countries prosper while others fall behind. World Development, 35(10), 1595–1620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felipe, J., Kumar, U., & Galope, R. (2014). Middle-income transitions: Trap or myth? ADB Economics Working Paper Series, No. 421. for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. (1987). Technology policy and economic performance: Lesson from Japan. Pinter Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., & Soete, L. (1997). The economics of industrial innovation (3rd ed.). The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallouj, F., & Djellal, F. (2010). The handbook of innovation and services. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48(1), 37–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerschenkron, A. (1963). The early phases of industrialization in Russia: Afterthoughts and Counterthoughts. In W. W. Rostow (Ed.), The economics of take-off into sustained growth. International Economic Association series. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, I., & Kharas, H. (2015). The middle-income trap turns ten. Policy Research Working Paper No. 7403, 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B. H., & Rosenberg, N. (2010). Handbook of the economics of innovation, volumes I and II. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, U. E., & Ockwell, D. (2014). Learning and technological capability building in emerging economies: The case of the biomass power equipment industry in Malaysia. Technovation, 34(10), 617–630.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobday, M. (1995). Innovation in East Asia. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juhász, R., Lane, N. J., & Rodrik, D. (2023). The new economics of industrial policy. National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w31538.pdf

  • Kamien, M. I., & Schwartz, N. L. (1982). Market structure and innovation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanbur, R., Noman, A., & Stiglitz, J. (2019). Quality of growth in Africa. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. (Ed.). (1987). Technology generation in Latin American manufacturing industries. Macmillan Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, L., & Nelson, R. R. (2000). Technology learning and innovation: Experiences of newly industrializing economies. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S. (1992). Technological capabilities and industrialization. World Development, 20(2), 165–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Lee, K., Meissner, D., Radosevic, S., & Vonortas, N. S. (2021). Technology upgrading and economic catch-up: Context, overview, and conclusions. In The challenges of technology and economic catch-up in emerging economies. Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D. (2016). Middle innovation trap: Transition failure from implementation capability to concept design capability as a source of the middle-income trap. Paper for HSE international research conference on foresight and STI policy Moscow: The National Research University—Higher School of Economics (HSE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2005). Making a technological catch-up: Barriers and opportunities. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 13(2), 97–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2013). Capability failure and industrial policy to move beyond the middle-income trap: From trade-based to technology-based specialization. In J. E. Stiglitz & J. Y. Lin (Eds.), The industrial policy revolution! The role of government beyond ideology (pp. 244–272). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. (2019). In the art of economic catch-up: Barriers, detours and leapfrogging in innovation systems (pp. 244–269). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108588232.009

  • Lee, K., & Malerba, F. (2017). Catch-up cycles and changes in industrial leadership: Windows of opportunity and responses of firms and countries in the evolution of sectoral systems. Research Policy, 46, 338–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., Szapiro, M., & Zhuqing, M. (2018). From global value chains (GVC) to innovation systems for local value chains and knowledge creation. The European Journal of Development Research, 30(3), 424–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard-Barton, D. A. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y. (2017). Industrial policies for avoiding the middle-income trap: Anew structural economics perspective. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 15(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14765284.2017.1287539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. O., & Vonortas, N. S. (2013). Handbook on the theory and practice of program evaluation. Edward Elgar Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National Systems of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F., & McKelvey, M. (2019). Knowledge-intensive innovative entrepreneurship. NOW Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malerba, F., & Vonortas, N. S. (2009). Innovation networks in industries. Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). The evolutionary theory of economic change. Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noman, A., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2015). Economics and policy: Some lessons from Africa’s experience. In I. C. Monga & J. Y. Lin (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Africa and economics, vol. 2: Policies and practices. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2023). Industrial production (indicator). Retrieved October 06, 2023, from https://doi.org/10.1787/39121c55-en

  • Paus, E. (2017). Escaping the middle-income trap: Innovate or perish. ADBI working paper 685. Asian Development Bank Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perez, C., & Soete, L. (1988). Catching-up in technology: Entry barriers and windows of opportunity. In G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 458–479). Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, G. P., & Shih, W. C. (2012). Producing prosperity: Why America needs a manufacturing renaissance. Harvard Business Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2016a). Why do we need theory and metrics of technology upgrading? Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 24(Sup 1), 8–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2016.1207415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2016b). A new metrics of technology upgrading: The central and east European countries in a comparative perspective. In: GRINCOH working paper series, series 3 knowledge innovation, technology, paper no. 3.04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radosevic, S., & Yoruk, E. (2018). Technology upgrading of middle-income economies: A new approach and result. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 129, 56–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinstaller, A., & Unterlass, F. (2011). Sectoral innovation modes and the state of economic development: Implications for innovation policy in the new member states. In S. Radosevic & A. Kaderabkova (Eds.), Innovation policy in multi-tier Europe. The specific challenges of the central and Eastern European countries. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of the World Bank’ s economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4), 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahiti, F. (2019). The growth of firms in less developed countries: Lessons learned from Kosovo. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E. (2017). Industrial policy, learning and development. In J. Page & F. Tarp (Eds.), The practice of industrial policy: government-business coordination in Africa and East Asia (WIDER studies in development economics). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. E., Lin, J. Y., & Patel, E. (2014). The industrial policy revolution, vol. 2: Africa in the 21st Century. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stöllinger, R. (2016). Structural change and global value chains in the EU. Empirica, 43(4), 801–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stöllinger, R., Foster-McGregor, N., Holzner, M., Landesmann, M., Pöschl, J., & Stehrer, R. (2013). A manufacturing imperative in the EU—Europe’s position in global manufacturing and the role of industrial policy, WIIW research report, 391, The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szirmai, A., & Verspagen, B. (2015). Manufacturing and economic growth in developing countries, 1950–2005. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 34, 46–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tassey, G. (2007). The technology imperative. Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (2012). Dynamic capabilities: Routines versus entrepreneurial action. Journal of Management Studies, 49(8), 1395–1401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veblen, T. (1915). Imperial Germany and the industrial revolution. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vivarelli, M. (2016). The middle-income trap: A way out based on technological and structural change. Economic Change and Restructuring, 49(2–3), 159–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, L. E., Kim, L., & Dahlman, C. J. (1985). Reflections on the Republic of Korea’s acquisition of technological capability. In N. Rosenberg & C. Frischtak (Eds.), International technology transfer: Concepts, measures, and comparison. Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, J. (1990). What Washington means by policy reform. In J. Williamson (Ed.), Latin American adjustment: How much has happened? Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2012). China 2030: Building a modern, harmonious, and creative high-income society. World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fadil Sahiti .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sahiti, F. (2024). Introduction. In: Industrial Policies for Technological Upgrading in Western Balkan Countries. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51429-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51429-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51428-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51429-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics