Skip to main content

Part of the book series: History of Physics ((HIPHY))

  • 68 Accesses

Abstract

In 1953, the publication of the second edition of Whittaker’s book entitled History of the Theories of Ether and Electricity sparked off a heated controversy over the authorship of the special theory of relativity. Since then, many scientists and historians of science have sought to prove that either Poincaré or Einstein was the sole author of this theory. After summarizing the main results presented in this book, i.e. that Poincaré’s contributions predate Einstein’s paper and are identical, we will be finally able to answer this question: Why didn’t Poincaré claim the authorship of the special theory of relativity? and then we will put a definitive end to this long-running controversy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Einstein, A. (1921). L’éther et la théorie de la relativité (Ether and the Theory of Relativity). Paris, Gauthier-Villars: Traduction française par Maurice Solovine.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Einstein, A. (1935). “Elementary Derivation of the Equivalence of Mass and Energy,” Bulletin (New Series) of the American Mathematical Society, 37(1), 39-44.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frank, P. (1947). Einstein: His Life and Times, New York. A. A: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goldberg, S. (1970). Poincaré’s Silence and Einstein’s Relativity: The Role of Theory and Experiment in Poincaré’s Physics. The British Journal for the History of Science, 5(1), 73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaufmann, W. (1905). “Über die Konstitution des Elektrons,” (On the Constitution of the Electron) Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 45, pp. 949-956, 30 November 1905.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Keswani, G. H. (1964). Origin and concept of relativity (I). British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15(60), 286–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Langevin, P. (1913). Henri Poincaré, le physicien. Revue de métaphysique et de morale, numéro, 5, 675–718.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michelmore, P. (1962). Einstein profile of the man, New York, Dood, Mead & C\(^o\).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Miller, A.I. (1973). A Study of Henri Poincaré’s “Sur la Dynamique de l’Électron”. In: Frontiers of Physics: 1900-1911. Birkhäuser Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miller, A.I. (1980). “On some other approaches to electrodynamics in 1905,” in Harry Woolf (ed.), Some strangeness in the proportion: A centennial symposium to celebrate the achievements of Albert Einstein, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 66-93.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Miller, A. I. (1981). Albert Einstein’s Special Theory of Relativity: Emergence (1905) and Early Interpretation (1905–1911). Massachusetts, Addison Wesley: Reading.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pais, A. (1982). Subtle Is the Lord: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Planck, M. (1906). “Die Kaufmannschen Messungen der Ablenkbarkeit der \(\beta \)-Strahlen in ihrer Bedeutung für die Dynamik der Elektronen," (The Measurements of Kaufmann on the Deflectability of \(\beta \)-Rays in their Importance for the Dynamics of the Electrons). Physikalische Zeitschrift, 7, 753–761.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Planck, M. (1907). “Nachtrag zu der Besprechung der Kaufmannschen Ablenkungsmessungen," (Addendum to the discussion of Kaufmann’s deflection measurements). Verhandlungen der Deutschen Physikalischen Gesellschaft, 9(14), 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Poincaré, H. (1900). “La théorie de Lorentz et le principe de réaction," Recueil de travaux offerts par les auteurs à H. A. Lorentz à l’occasion du 25e anniversaire de son doctorat le 11 décembre 1900. Archives néerlandaises des sciences exactes et naturelles, 5, 252–278.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Poincaré, H. (1902). 1902. Flammarion, Paris: La Science et l’Hypothèse.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rouse Ball, W. W. (1908). A Short Account of the History of Mathematics, 4\(^{th}\) edition, Macmillan And Co., Limited St. Martin’s Street, London.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenthal-Schneider, I. (2013). Begegnungen mit Einstein, von Laue und Planck: Realität und wissenschaftliche Wahrheit (Encounters with Einstein, von Laue and Planck: Reality and scientific truth), Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Whittaker, E. (1953). A History of the Theories of Æther and Electricity: The Modern Theories 1900–1926. Sons Ltd, London Edinburgh Paris Melbourne Toronto and New York, 1953, 40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Marc Ginoux .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ginoux, JM. (2024). Conclusion. In: Poincaré, Einstein and the Discovery of Special Relativity. History of Physics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51387-9_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics