Abstract
This chapter ventures into the question of what sustainable action looks like in practice. With the empirical case of an eco-tourism adventure guide school and river-rafting/kayaking tours business based in Nepal and Sweden, the World Risk terminology, by German sociologist Ulrich Beck is used to bring out behavioral tendencies characterized by precaution and cosmopolitanization. The empirical case example displays how entrepreneurs cope with what Beck claims to be politically skewed versions of danger turned into humanly manufactured risks, concerning particularly the global ecological crisis. The case example shows that when coping with a world risk awareness, the entrepreneurs push themselves towards an expanded praxis made up by a number of elements: Their value understanding, pragmatic and behavioral implementation of those values, personal action and initiative, community mobilization, and business strategies. The pragmatic embracing of a triple value understanding transforms the entrepreneurs into what I call sustainability ambassadors. The financial struggle, caused by choosing to give up a mere profit focus, has them actively seeking out multiple other understandings of value output, as well as other strategies for running their businesses. The cosmopolitan idealization of sustainability as concept legitimizes, maybe even pushes into, the coping strategy observed and has the entrepreneurs experiment and create practical solutions which match both global and local versions and understandings of the term ‘sustainability’. This has the sustainable eco-tourism adventure business and guide school feed into the logics of the cosmopolitan when making graduates relevant across the globe as eco-tourist guides knowledgeable about how to be in nature without ruining it, for people or the ecology. Though Beck’s point is critical of nature, the participants in this field tell of practically and experienced improved living environments when changing into practicing the expanded sustainability value understanding, even though the effort to stay financially afloat has to be rethought more often with the sustainability stragetic approach. The chapter finally discusses from a learning perspective and interest in “resistance potentiality”, how the omnipresence of a world risk society, on a political and legal level, leaves room for diverse responses, constructive or restrictive accommodative responses, depending on whether the challenges of a world at risk are met with a potentiality perception or a sense of overwhelm.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Own translation from Danish of: “de handlinger, vi tør udføre, og som afhænger af, hvor frie vi er til at træffe valg”.
- 3.
Covello and Munpower (1984) argue that risk management originated in 3200 BC with the Asipu of the Tigris- Euphrates valley. The Asipu acted as ‘consultants’ in risky decisions and, using signs from the gods, compiled data to identify the possible alternative courses of action. The word ‘risk’ probably comes from the French risque (Bellaby, 1990). Covello and Munpower (1984) trace the word back to the Greek term rhiza. Both terms describe the assessments of merchants of the chances of shiploads of goods to arrive safely in port. These assessments were used to derive appropriate levels of insurance against loss. (Footnote included in quote: Tansey, 2003: 21).
References
Beck, U. (1992). From industrial society to risk society: Questions of survival, social structure and ecological environment. Theory, Culture & Society, 9, 97–123.
Beck, U. (2008). World at risk: The new task of critical theory. Development and Society, 37(1), 1–21.
Bernard, H. R. (2006). Research methods in Anthropolgy: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). AltaMira Press.
Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 8(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
Charter, M., & Tischner, U. (2017). Introduction. In M. Charter & U. Tischner (Eds.), Sustainable solutions: Developing products and services for the future. Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
Covello, V. T., & Mumpower, J. (1984). Risk analysis and risk management: An historical perspective. Risk Analysis, 5(2), 103–120.
Eriksen, T. H. (1998). Små steder – store spørgsmål: innføring i sosialantropologi. Universitetsforlaget.
Graeber, D. (2001). Toward an anthropological theory of value: The false coin of our own dreams. Palgrave.
Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (Vol. 2nd). Sage.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (1995). Ethnography – Principles in practice. Routledge.
Hansen, H. P., Nielsen, B. S., Sriskandarajah, N., & Gunnarson, E. (Eds.). (2016). Commons, sustainability, democratization: Action research and the basic renewal of society. Routledge.
Hastrup, K. (2003). Ind i verden: en grundbog i antropologisk metode. Gyldendal.
Hulgård, L. (2007). Sociale Entreprenører – en kritisk indføring. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Illeris, K. (2001). Læring – aktuel læringsteori i spændingsfeltet mellem Piaget, Freud og Marx. Roskilde Universitetsforlag.
Jensen, C. R. (2020). Social bæredygtighed og social forandring – stabil og mobil med JUMP. In K. Dupret & L. L. Langergaard (Eds.), Social Bæredygtighed – begreb, felt, kritik. Frydenlund.
Jensen, C. R. (2023). The solutions to the future are problem-oriented: The intersection between social entrepreneurship, sustaianble skills, and problem-oriented project learning. In J. Eschweiler, K. Dupret, & L. L. Langergaard (Eds.), Learning about social entrepreneurship and management during social transformation. Cham.
Jensen, C. R., & Langergaard, L. L. (2020). The returning butterflies: Social entrepreneurs and sustainability in eco-tourism. Research and Change, 3(2), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.23865/fof.v3.2404
Jerlang, E., & Ringsted, S. (2002). Den kulturhistoriske skole: Vygotskij, Leontjew, Elkonin. In E. Jerlang (Ed.), Udviklingspsykologiske teorier (Vol. 3rd, p. 312). Gyldendal Uddannelse.
Mauss, M. (1954). The gift – The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies (Vol. W.D. Halls). Routledge.
Moberg, K. (2014). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education – From ABC to PhD. Copenhagen Business School.
Nielsen, B. S., & Nielsen, K. A. (2015). Critical utopian action research: The potentials of action research in democratization of society. In E. Gunnarson, H. P. Hansen, B. S. Nielsen, & N. Sriskandarajah (Eds.), Commons, sustainability, democratization: Action research and the basic renewal of society. Routledge.
Pestoff, V., & Brandsen, T. (2007). Co-production: The third sector and the delivery of public services. Routledge.
Piaget, J. (1959). Ligevægtsbegrebets rolle i psykologien. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Tekster om Læring (Vol. 1st, p. 26). RUC: Roskilde Universitets Forlag.
Polanyi, K. (1968). Anthropology and economic theory. In M. H. Fried (Ed.), Readings in anthropology (Vol. 2, pp. 215–238). Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
Psarikidou, K., & Szerszynski, B. (2012). Growing the social: Alternative agrofood networks and social sustainability in the urban ethical foodscape. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 8(1), 30–39. https://www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/15487733.2012.11908082
Rasborg, K. (2019). Ulrich Beck – en kritisk indføring i teorien om verdensrisikosamfundet. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Rasmussen, A., Moberg, K., & Revsbech, C. (2015). A taxonomy of entrepreneurship education: Perspectives on goals, teaching and evaluation (1st ed.). Fonden for Entreprenørskab.
Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. Random House Business Books.
Revsbech, C. (2015). Learning as social exchange in City year London: Action towards an image of greatness. Roskilde University.
Sahlins, M. (2004). Stone age economics. Routledge.
Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). Causation and effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 243.
Shane, S., & Eckhardt, J. (2003). The Indivdual-opportunity nexus. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: An interdisciplinary survey and introduction (p. 161). Springer US.
Tansey, J. (2003). The prospects for governing biotechnology in Canada. Electronic Working Papers Series. W. Maurice Young Centre for Applied Ethics. University of British Columbia. Retrieved from www.ethics.ubc.ca
Thorisdottir, T. S., & Johannsdottir, L. (2019). Sustainability within fashion business models: A systemic literature review. Sustainability, 11(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082233
Thrane, C., Blenker, P., Korsgaard, S., & Neergaard, H. (2016). The promise of entrepreneurship education: Reconceptualizing the individual-opportunity nexus as a conceptual framework. International Small Business Journal, 37(7), 905–924. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242616638422
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/%0Adocuments/21252030AgendaforSustainableDevelopmentweb.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Revsbech, C. (2023). Sustainability Practice in a World at Risk. In: Krøjer, J., Langergaard, L.L. (eds) Social Sustainability in Unsustainable Society. Ethical Economy, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51365-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51366-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)