Skip to main content

Making Sense of Social Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Sustainability in Unsustainable Society

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 67))

  • 114 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter takes a hybrid interpretation of social sustainability from the domains of policy, economics and sociology. We argue that the concept inherits a certain epistemological outlook that leaves the potential of socially sustainable organizing tied to vision-centric values of Western knowledge. Taking a point of departure in the lack of multi-sensory development in the contemporary discourse of social sustainability, we address the dominance of vision (as purportedly the most accurate sense for gaining knowledge) that has been on the radar of philosophical critique for much of the twentieth Century (Jay M. Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. University of California Press, 1993). The chapter is theoretically positioned within the so-called ‘sensory turn’ that emerged in history and anthropology from the 1980s (Bull M & Howes D. Senses Soc 11(1):1–2, 2016); we build on the gradual additions of more bodily experiences to what was deemed ‘legitimate’ social science (Luker K. Salsa dancing into the social sciences. Harvard University Press, 2009), and propose three alternative models to mono-sensory thinking. Some central feminist epistemological principles contribute to our understanding of the sensory turn – including a separation from nature, a linear view of time, and emotional dislocation from worldly ‘objects’. This chapter brings these insights to bear on the question of how alternative sensory ways of knowing and acting collectively might give new credence to social sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (1996). Cyberfeminism with a difference. New Forma, 29, 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, M., & Howes, D. (2016). The expanding field of sensory studies. The Senses and Society, 11(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calás, M. B., Ergene, S., & Smircich, L. (2018). Becoming possible in the Anthropocene? Becomingsocialentrepreneurship as more-than-capitalist practice. In Social entrepreneurship (pp. 264–293). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cavarero, A. (2002). Politicizing theory. Political Theory, 30(4), 506–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavarero, A., & Bertolino, E. (2008). Beyond ontology and sexual difference: An interview with the Italian feminist philosopher Adriana Cavarero. Differences, 19(1), 128–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Classen, C. (1998). The color of angels: Cosmology, gender, and the aesthetic imagination. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, M. (2009). Social sustainability: A potential for politics? Local Environment, 14(7), 607–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de La Bellacasa, M. P. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds (Vol. 41). University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining social enterprise. Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, 7, 3–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Discovering hands. (2023). ihre fragen – unsere antworten (your questions – our answers). https://www.discovering-hands.de/initiative/faq. Accessed 6 Oct 2023.

  • Dupret, K. (2010). Innovating mental health care: A configurative case study in intangible, incoherent and multiple efforts. Aarhus Universitet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupret, K. (2020). Teknologisk medieret solidaritet som social bæredygtighed. In L. L. Langergaard & K. Dupret (Eds.), Social bæredygtighed: begreb, felt og kritik (s. 57–80). Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dupret, K., & Langergaard, L. L. (2020). Social bæredygtighed: begreb, felt og kritik. Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, C. L. (2020). Broad band: The untold story of the women who made the internet. Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaglio, G., Godin, B., & Pfotenhauer, S. (2019). X-innovation: Re-inventing innovation again and again. Novation: Critical Studies of Innovation, 1, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A. (2005). Towards the entrepreneurial university: Entrepreneurship education as a lever for change. NCGE Policy Paper Series, 15, 1–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godin, B., Gaglio, G., & Vinck, D. (2021). Introduction to the handbook on alternative theories of innovation. In Handbook on alternative theories of innovation (pp. 1–9). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, D. (2005). Entrepreneurship and ‘the social’: Towards a deference-emotion theory. Human Relations, 58(5), 617–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, D. (2005). Hyperesthesia, or, the sensual logic of late capitalism. Julkaisussa: Howes, David (toim.) Empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader (pp. 281–303).

    Google Scholar 

  • Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakubowska, H. (2019). The sociological analysis of sensory knowledge: Its understanding, construction and acquisition. Society Register, 3(1), 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (1993). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2012). Sensory indiscipline and affect: A study of commuter cycling. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(6), 645–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S., & Underwood, S. (2013). How do educators recognise and account for students’ emotional responses to entrepreneurship education. In Inaugural ECSB entrepreneurship education conference (pp. 29–31).

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lautermann, C. (2013). The ambiguities of (social) value creation: Towards an extended understanding of entrepreneurial value creation for society. Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), 184–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luker, K. (2009). Salsa dancing into the social sciences. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Magis, K., & Shinn, C. (2008). Emergent principles of social sustainability. In Understanding the social dimension of sustainability (pp. 31–60). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F., & MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced introduction to social innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model (s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2019). Social innovation: How societies find the power to change. Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin, J. (2010). Rhetoric: Writing, reading and producing the visual. In The Routledge companion to research in the arts (pp. 182–196). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paschalidis, G. (2017). Introduction – Semiotics and the senses. Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, 3(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roio, D., Sachy, M., Lucarelli, S., Lietaer, B., Bria, F., 2015. Design of social digital currency (Decentralised citizens engagement technologies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schachtel, E. G. (1959). General attitude, perceptual mode, and their shifts. In Metamorphosis: On the development of affect, perception, attention, and memory (pp. 213–236). Basic Books.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheman, N. (1993). Thinking about quality in women’s visual art. In Engenderings: Constructions of knowledge, authority, and privilege (pp. 158–159). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (2008). The stranger. In T. Oakes & P. L. Price (Eds.), The cultural geography reader (pp. 323–327). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (2011). The philosophy of money. Routledge Classics.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sotiropoulou, I. (2020). Social and solidarity economy: A quest for appropriate quantitative methods. Review of Economics and Economic Methodology, VI(1), 131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, M. (2019). Reassembling difference? Rethinking inclusion through/as embodied ethics. Human Relations, 72(1), 48–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kai Roland Green .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Green, K.R., Dupret, K. (2023). Making Sense of Social Sustainability. In: Krøjer, J., Langergaard, L.L. (eds) Social Sustainability in Unsustainable Society. Ethical Economy, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51365-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51366-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics