Abstract
This chapter takes a hybrid interpretation of social sustainability from the domains of policy, economics and sociology. We argue that the concept inherits a certain epistemological outlook that leaves the potential of socially sustainable organizing tied to vision-centric values of Western knowledge. Taking a point of departure in the lack of multi-sensory development in the contemporary discourse of social sustainability, we address the dominance of vision (as purportedly the most accurate sense for gaining knowledge) that has been on the radar of philosophical critique for much of the twentieth Century (Jay M. Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. University of California Press, 1993). The chapter is theoretically positioned within the so-called ‘sensory turn’ that emerged in history and anthropology from the 1980s (Bull M & Howes D. Senses Soc 11(1):1–2, 2016); we build on the gradual additions of more bodily experiences to what was deemed ‘legitimate’ social science (Luker K. Salsa dancing into the social sciences. Harvard University Press, 2009), and propose three alternative models to mono-sensory thinking. Some central feminist epistemological principles contribute to our understanding of the sensory turn – including a separation from nature, a linear view of time, and emotional dislocation from worldly ‘objects’. This chapter brings these insights to bear on the question of how alternative sensory ways of knowing and acting collectively might give new credence to social sustainability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.
Boström, M. (2012). A missing pillar? Challenges in theorizing and practicing social sustainability: Introduction to the special issue. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy, 8(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908080
Braidotti, R. (1996). Cyberfeminism with a difference. New Forma, 29, 9–25.
Bull, M., & Howes, D. (2016). The expanding field of sensory studies. The Senses and Society, 11(1), 1–2.
Butler, J. (2015). Notes toward a performative theory of assembly. Harvard University Press.
Calás, M. B., Ergene, S., & Smircich, L. (2018). Becoming possible in the Anthropocene? Becomingsocialentrepreneurship as more-than-capitalist practice. In Social entrepreneurship (pp. 264–293). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Cavarero, A. (2002). Politicizing theory. Political Theory, 30(4), 506–532.
Cavarero, A., & Bertolino, E. (2008). Beyond ontology and sexual difference: An interview with the Italian feminist philosopher Adriana Cavarero. Differences, 19(1), 128–167.
Classen, C. (1998). The color of angels: Cosmology, gender, and the aesthetic imagination. Psychology Press.
Davidson, M. (2009). Social sustainability: A potential for politics? Local Environment, 14(7), 607–619.
de La Bellacasa, M. P. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds (Vol. 41). University of Minnesota Press.
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2006). Defining social enterprise. Social enterprise: At the crossroads of market, public policies and civil society, 7, 3–27.
Discovering hands. (2023). ihre fragen – unsere antworten (your questions – our answers). https://www.discovering-hands.de/initiative/faq. Accessed 6 Oct 2023.
Dupret, K. (2010). Innovating mental health care: A configurative case study in intangible, incoherent and multiple efforts. Aarhus Universitet.
Dupret, K. (2020). Teknologisk medieret solidaritet som social bæredygtighed. In L. L. Langergaard & K. Dupret (Eds.), Social bæredygtighed: begreb, felt og kritik (s. 57–80). Frydenlund Academic.
Dupret, K., & Langergaard, L. L. (2020). Social bæredygtighed: begreb, felt og kritik. Frydenlund Academic.
Evans, C. L. (2020). Broad band: The untold story of the women who made the internet. Penguin.
Gaglio, G., Godin, B., & Pfotenhauer, S. (2019). X-innovation: Re-inventing innovation again and again. Novation: Critical Studies of Innovation, 1, 1–16.
Gibb, A. (2005). Towards the entrepreneurial university: Entrepreneurship education as a lever for change. NCGE Policy Paper Series, 15, 1–46.
Godin, B., Gaglio, G., & Vinck, D. (2021). Introduction to the handbook on alternative theories of innovation. In Handbook on alternative theories of innovation (pp. 1–9). Edward Elgar Publishing.
Goss, D. (2005). Entrepreneurship and ‘the social’: Towards a deference-emotion theory. Human Relations, 58(5), 617–636.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.
Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Duke University Press.
Hemmings, C. (2012). Affective solidarity: Feminist reflexivity and political transformation. Feminist Theory, 13(2), 147–161.
Howes, D. (2005). Hyperesthesia, or, the sensual logic of late capitalism. Julkaisussa: Howes, David (toim.) Empire of the senses: The sensual culture reader (pp. 281–303).
Irigaray, L. (1985). This sex which is not one. Cornell University Press.
Jakubowska, H. (2019). The sociological analysis of sensory knowledge: Its understanding, construction and acquisition. Society Register, 3(1), 121–136.
Jay, M. (1993). Downcast eyes: The denigration of vision in twentieth-century French thought. University of California Press.
Jones, P. (2012). Sensory indiscipline and affect: A study of commuter cycling. Social & Cultural Geography, 13(6), 645–658.
Jones, S., & Underwood, S. (2013). How do educators recognise and account for students’ emotional responses to entrepreneurship education. In Inaugural ECSB entrepreneurship education conference (pp. 29–31).
Latour, B. (2004). How to talk about the body? The normative dimension of science studies. Body & Society, 10(2–3), 205–229.
Lautermann, C. (2013). The ambiguities of (social) value creation: Towards an extended understanding of entrepreneurial value creation for society. Social Enterprise Journal, 9(2), 184–202.
Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Psychology Press.
Luker, K. (2009). Salsa dancing into the social sciences. Harvard University Press.
Magis, K., & Shinn, C. (2008). Emergent principles of social sustainability. In Understanding the social dimension of sustainability (pp. 31–60). Routledge.
McCloskey, D. N. (2010). Bourgeois dignity: Why economics can’t explain the modern world. University of Chicago Press.
Moulaert, F., & MacCallum, D. (2019). Advanced introduction to social innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E., & Gonzalez, S. (2005). Towards alternative model (s) of local innovation. Urban Studies, 42(11), 1969–1990.
Mulgan, G. (2019). Social innovation: How societies find the power to change. Policy Press.
Mullin, J. (2010). Rhetoric: Writing, reading and producing the visual. In The Routledge companion to research in the arts (pp. 182–196). Routledge.
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Paschalidis, G. (2017). Introduction – Semiotics and the senses. Punctum. International Journal of Semiotics, 3(1), 5–11.
Roio, D., Sachy, M., Lucarelli, S., Lietaer, B., Bria, F., 2015. Design of social digital currency (Decentralised citizens engagement technologies).
Schachtel, E. G. (1959). General attitude, perceptual mode, and their shifts. In Metamorphosis: On the development of affect, perception, attention, and memory (pp. 213–236). Basic Books.
Scheman, N. (1993). Thinking about quality in women’s visual art. In Engenderings: Constructions of knowledge, authority, and privilege (pp. 158–159). Routledge.
Schumpeter, J. A. (2013). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Routledge.
Simmel, G. (2008). The stranger. In T. Oakes & P. L. Price (Eds.), The cultural geography reader (pp. 323–327). Routledge.
Simmel, G. (2011). The philosophy of money. Routledge Classics.
Sotiropoulou, I. (2020). Social and solidarity economy: A quest for appropriate quantitative methods. Review of Economics and Economic Methodology, VI(1), 131.
Tyler, M. (2019). Reassembling difference? Rethinking inclusion through/as embodied ethics. Human Relations, 72(1), 48–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Green, K.R., Dupret, K. (2023). Making Sense of Social Sustainability. In: Krøjer, J., Langergaard, L.L. (eds) Social Sustainability in Unsustainable Society. Ethical Economy, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51365-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51366-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)