Skip to main content

Emotions Differentiate Opportunities: Investigating Emotions as a Component in Social Sustainability in Primary School

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Sustainability in Unsustainable Society

Part of the book series: Ethical Economy ((SEEP,volume 67))

  • 84 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on emotionality in primary schools as a dimension of social sustainability. The chapter contributes to the discussion of social sustainability by elucidating how emotionality has significant influence on children’s engagement in primary school. Because emotions tend to be neglected in the general striving for an equal and just school system, this chapter advocates for the need of an increased focus on emotional sustainability within primary schools. By unfolding an empirical example of a testing situation in a Danish primary school, the chapter investigates how specific arrangements of classroom teaching promote certain emotions. The chapter shows that pupils do not have equal access to specific emotions. In the same classroom setting feelings of success and failure are distributed to different pupils, thus generating ´strong´ as well as ‘vulnerable’ pupils. The chapter argues that emotions both differentiate and stigmatise, hence imposing different opportunities on the pupils. The focus on distribution of emotions as a dividing practice reveals that emotions are a necessary component if we want to understand how social inequality is produced and maintained in a school setting. This leads to a concluding discussion emphasising that equality – as a normative principle of social sustainability – is not the only ethical strive in primary school, as objectives of inclusion and care challenge the endeavour of equality among pupils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In Denmark the so called ‘public school’ is the equivalent of the primary or elementary school. In this chapter I use the term ‘primary school’ to enhance the chapter’s relevance outside of a Danish school context, as I acknowledge that both the strive of equality and testing activities are elements in school systems around the Western world. 

    In Denmark there are 10 years (from the age of six) of compulsory teaching for all children, which means that one is allowed to receive home teaching or chose other teaching possibilities (Retsinformation, 2023). In the school year of 2021/2022, 74.7% of school-aged children attended public school, 17.9% attend private schools and 7.4% attended other teaching possibilities, for example school for those with special needs. Both public and private schools are obliged to conduct national tests and exams (Ministry of Children and Education, 2023d).

  2. 2.

    Like Ahmed I use the terms affect and emotion synonymously.

  3. 3.

    For further discussion on equality of outcome see, e.g., Phillips (2004).

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2010b). Killing joy: Feminism and the history of happiness. Signs, 35(3), 571–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2010a). Happy objects. In G. J. Seigworth & M. Gregg (Eds.), The affect theory reader. Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included. Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion. Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Au, W. W. (2008). Devising inequality: A Bernsteinian analysis of high-stakes testing and social reprofuction in education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 29(6), 639–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bjerg, H., & Staunæs, D. (2011). Self-management through shame – Uniting governmentality studies and the ‘affective turn’. Ephemera. Theory & Politics in Organization, 11(2), 138–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, S., & Knudsen, H. (2021). The organization of competition and non-competition in schools. In S. Arora-Jonsson, N. Brunsson, R. Hasse, & K. Lagerström (Eds.), Competition: What it is and why it happens. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillard, J., Dujon, V., & King, M. C. (2009). Introduction. In J. Dillard, V. Dujon, & M. C. King (Eds.), Understanding the social dimension of sustainability. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Chicago Journals, 8(4), 777–795.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). The history of sexuality: volume 1. The will to knowledge. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galløe, L. (2021). Følelser i folkeskolen [Emotions in primary schools], [Ph.D. Dissertation, Roskilde University].

    Google Scholar 

  • Galløe, L., & Krøjer, J. (2020). Folkeskolens følelsesmæssige sortbørs [The black market of emotions in primary school]. Dansk Pædagogisk Tidsskrift, 3, 98–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L. (1987). Two decades of research on teacher expectations: Findings and future directions. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(4), 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, A. (1993). Testing testing: Social consequences of the examined life. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1988). The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies, 14(3), 575–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. M., & Goodwin, N. R. (2001). Volume introduction. In J. M. Harris, T. A. Wise, K. P. Gallagher, & N. R. Goodwin (Eds.), A survey of sustainable development: Social and economic dimensions. Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemmings, C. (2005). Invoking affect. Cultural Studies, 19(5), 548–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen, B. T., & Stage, C. (2016). Introduction: Affective methodologies. In B. T. Knudsen & C. Stage (Eds.), Affective methodologies: Developing cultural research strategies for the study of affect. Palgrave Macmillan Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kousholt, K. (2016). Testing as social practice: Analysing testing in classes of young children from the children’s perspective. Theory & Psychology, 26(3), 377–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krøjer, J. (2020). Social bæredygtighed i velfærdsinstitutionelt omsorgsarbejde. In L. L. Langergaard & K. Dupret (Eds.), Social bæredygtighed – begreb, felt og kritik. Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langergaard, L. L. (2020). Den sociale dimension af social bæredygtighed: tre forståelser af det sociale. In L. L. Langergaard & K. Dupret (Eds.), Social bæredygtighed – begreb, felt og kritik. Frydenlund Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littig, B., & Griessler, E. (2005). Social sustainability: A catchword between political pragmatism and social theory. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1/2), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, S. (2004). Social sustainability: Towards some definitions. Hawke research Institute Working Paper Series, No. 27, 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Children and Education [Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet]. (2023a). Nationale test [National tests]. https://uddannelsesstatistik.dk/Pages/Reports/1790.aspx

  • Ministry of Children and Education [Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet]. (2023b). Folkeskolens mål, love, regler og politiske aftaler [Public School: Purpose, Law, and Political Resolutions]. https://www.uvm.dk/folkeskolen/folkeskolens-maal-love-og-regler/nationale-maal/om-nationale-maal

  • Ministry of Children and Education [Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet]. (2023c). Elevernes trivsel [Pupils’ thrive]. https://uddannelsesstatistik.dk/Pages/Reports/1790.aspx

  • Ministry of Children and Education [Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet]. (2023d). Elevtal for grundskolen [Student numbers in Primary schools]. https://uddannelsesstatistik.dk/Pages/Reports/1790.aspx

  • Ministry of Children and Education [Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet]. (2023e). Om test, evaluering og skoleudvikling i folkeskolen [Test, evaluation and school development in public school]. https://www.uvm.dk/folkeskolen/test-evaluering-og-skoleudvikling/om-evalueringskultur-i-folkeskolen

  • Ministry of Children and Education [Børne- og Undervisningsministeriet]. (2023f). Overgang til ungdomsuddannelse efter grundskolen [Transition from primary to secondary education]. https://uddannelsesstatistik.dk/Pages/Reports/1790.aspx

  • Phillips, A. (2004). Defending equality of outcome. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D., & William, D. (1999). I’ll be a nothing’: Structure, agency and the construction of identity through assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 25(3), 343–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Retsinformation. (2023). Folkeskoleloven [Law of Public School]. https://www.retsinformation.dk/eli/lta/2022/1396

  • Reyna, C. (2008). Ian is intelligent but Leshaun is lazy: Antecedents and consequences of attributional stereotypes in the classroom. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 23(4), 439–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (2002). Chapter 2: The Pygmalion effect and its mechanisms. In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement. Impact of psychological factors on education. A volume in Educational Psychology. Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staunæs, D., & Conad, J. S. B. (2020). The will not to know. Data leadership, necropolitics and ethnic-racialised student subjectivities. In R. Niesche & A. Heffernan (Eds.), Theorising identity and subjectivity in educational leadership research. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundén, J. (2012). Desires at play: On closeness and epistemological uncertainty. Games and Culture, 7(2), 164–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum, 42(3), 342–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warming, H. (2019). Messing with emotions of the other exploring ambiguous youth-adult relations in a residential care institution. Emotions, Space and Society, 32, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2014). Trends in the turn to affect: A social psychological critique. Body and Society, 21(2), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lotte Galløe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Galløe, L. (2023). Emotions Differentiate Opportunities: Investigating Emotions as a Component in Social Sustainability in Primary School. In: Krøjer, J., Langergaard, L.L. (eds) Social Sustainability in Unsustainable Society. Ethical Economy, vol 67. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51366-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51365-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51366-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics