Abstract
This study investigates the link between the Big Five personality traits and the well-being of teleworkers while considering potential gender differences. The sample consisted of 230 teleworkers who answered an online questionnaire. Then, a path analysis was employed to explore the relationships between the variables. Findings indicate that distinct personality traits can affect employees’ attitudes towards teleworking, with a discernible impact on their subjective well-being. While both genders exhibit similar patterns of relationships between personality traits and telework outcomes (positive feelings for extraversion and agreeableness, and negative feelings for neuroticism), there are differences in the magnitude and significance of some of these relationships, particularly in the case of conscientiousness, where its impact on negative feelings towards telework is more pronounced for men. Findings have important practical implications for organizations and individuals in the evolving work landscape.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Keywords
1 Introduction
The current pandemic crisis has changed lifestyles and work habits of people worldwide, who had to work productively and stay in touch with their work obligations and workloads [1, 2]. The mandatory work from home (WFH), caused different effects on people’s well-being [3]. The main advantages of teleworking refer to program flexibility, time and cost savings and promotion of work life balance and mental health [4]. On the contrary, many scholars [4, 6] mention increased work stress due to extended working hours, constant accessibility of the remote worker, lack of control in communication and task overload, reduction in professional development opportunities, complexity of communication, and time required to resolve such issues [6]. There has been limited research on the association between personality and teleworkers’ well-being [1, 6,7,8]. Many scholars point that telework heightens job satisfaction, strengthens supervisor collaboration, and fosters better work-family equilibrium [9]. On the contrary, studies highlight possible drawbacks, including amplified work stress and depression occurring at higher levels, burnout and poor sleep, due to constant availability, communication ambiguity, task overload, and escalated work-family conflicts [1, 5] which can significantly impact both on productivity and subjective well-being [10]. The present study aims to investigate the impact of the telework environment on the negative and positive feelings of subjective well-being for the five-factor model of personality, underlining any differences between males and females, which is the main contribution of the research.
2 Big Five Personality Traits and Affect Toward Work from Home (WFH)
There is relationship between the Big Five personality traits and peoples’ attitudes toward work from home [7, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. Conscientiousness is characterized by being cautious, responsible, organized, efficient, and competent [16, 21]. Time management, self-organization, and self-motivation are some of the fundamental qualities that teleworkers should have and they are mainly found among female teleworkers [16, 19, 20, 22,23,24]. Conscientiousness and Openness to Experience are positively associated with higher productivity from home, especially for females who do not have parenting obligations [26]. However, Entringer and Gosling [27] showed that loneliness increased significantly for women and for conscientious individuals. Taking these into account, we suggest that: H1. There is a positive relationship between consciousness and positive feelings towards teleworking. Extroverts tend to prefer sociability and interaction with others, and teleworking provides them opportunities to increase their contacts with people outside of work [14]. Men’s preference to teleworking is related to their greater extraversion levels, which thrive on social connections [20, 24]. On the other hand, extrovert females, especially mothers who had to take heavier responsibilities for caring, even teaching children, did not prefer teleworking, because they did not have time to communicate with other people [28]. The effects of extraversion on the acceptability of WFH and its effects on employees’ mental health need further investigation [16]. As a result, we expect that: H2. Extraversion has a positive relationship with positive feelings towards teleworking.
Agreeable people appear to have an easier time engaging with social situations and achieving goals, both of which lead to the development of a sense of well-being [17]. People with agreeable personalities enjoy teleworking because they believe it matches their nature and is more flexible and handier. Boca et al. [19] proposed that gender-based attitudes toward working from home based on parental responsibilities resonates with the agreeableness trait. Women's heightened agreeableness inclines them to accommodate their family’s needs, making telework an attractive option [14, 25, 29, 30]. Meanwhile, men's lower agreeableness could contribute to their preference for conventional work setups [19]. From the above, we suggest that: H3. Agreeableness has a positive relationship with positive feelings towards teleworking for women and a negative relationship for men. As telework relies on new technological processes and work methods, it is assumed that employees who are open to experience are better suited to these unconventional work environments [14]. People with high scores on that trait, are more adventurous and open to new responsibilities [31]. As a result, it is anticipated that the experience of teleworking would be enjoyable for them [14, 18]. On the contrary, in some sectors such as the public sector, employees have showed less flexibility and a strong resistance to this change mainly from women [32]. Research [33] found males to be higher in openness to experience. However, teleworking increased the workload for women, leading to a clash between their family and work roles [34], leading to a negative attitude to this new way of working [35]. Thus, we expect that: H4. Openness has a positive relationship with positive feelings towards teleworking. Finally, insecurity, instability, and emotionality are all related with neuroticism [36]. Neurotic people are more prone to be pressured by daily duties, making them unsatisfied and unhappy [13, 18]. Smith et al. [8] mentioned that neurotic personalities may struggle to adjust to remote work since telework may enhance their anxiety. Regarding the differences between genders, studies agree that females are higher in neuroticism [14, 37, 38] due to their strong need to manage boundaries (for example between work and family obligations) which is very complicated in teleworking conditions. Taking these into account, we propose that: H5. Neuroticism has a negative relationship with positive feelings towards teleworking.
3 Materials and Methods
After defining the research objective and assessing its complexity during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (February–April 2021), the authors conducted a quantitative online survey. The relationships between variables were examined using a 20-item questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale. The sample was convenient as it comprised 230 teleworkers who were easily accessible, allowing for a cost-effective and efficient data collection process ad enabling us to apply a reasonable statistical analysis and come to valid conclusions. The sample was divided into males and females and a regression analysis determined whether the five personality factors are related to positive and negative feelings in each group. The data was empirically tested using SPSS software version 24 and R language. To ensure the credibility of the research, we compared the current results with those in the literature.
4 Results
The linear components in the data were verified using a PCA with Varimax rotation. Rotated component Matrix is presented in Table 1. The 69.54% of the variance in the dependent variable can be explained by the independent variables (openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, neuroticism, positive feelings, and negative feelings). There is an alpha coefficient of 0.72 for openness, 0.74 for conscientiousness, 0.77 for extraversion, 0.72 for neuroticism, 0.68 for agreeableness, 0.71 for negative feelings and 0.78 for positive feelings. Regression analysis for males (Table 2) indicated that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between extraversion with positive feelings, agreeableness with positive feelings and neuroticism with negative feelings. There is also a statistically significant and negative relationship between conscientiousness with negative feelings and neuroticism with positive feelings. Regression analysis for females (Table 3) showed that there is a statistically significant and positive relationship between extraversion with positive feelings, agreeableness with positive feelings and neuroticism with negative feelings.
5 Discussion and Conclusions
This study examined the dynamic relationship between Big Five personality traits and teleworkers’ well-being, taking into account possible gender differences. The results suggest that certain personality traits may indeed influence workers’ attitudes toward teleworking, with a remarkable effect on their well-being. Extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were associated with positive attitudes toward telework, whereas neuroticism had a negative effect on teleworkers’ well-being. These results are consistent with recent studies [8, 14,15,16,17]. There were significant gender differences in the relationships between personality traits and teleworkers’ well-being. In particular, a negative relationship between conscientiousness and negative feelings toward telecommuting was more pronounced in men, a finding that contrasts with current research [16, 19, 20] and supports the findings of Entringer and Gosling [27]. The remaining three hypotheses were all confirmed and aligned with the literature. The results include the use of personality traits during the telework process, the promotion of employee well-being related to telework experiences based on gender differences. They can significantly help organizations to plan better teleworking policies and provide a tailored support, enhancing job satisfaction and productivity as well as employees’ well-being.
References
Beckel JL, Fisher GG (2022) Telework and worker health and well-being: A review and recommendations for research and practice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 3879. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19073879
Scheibe S, De Bloom J, Modderman T (2022) Resilience during crisis and the role of age: Involuntary telework during the COVID-19 pandemic. International journal of environmental research and public health 19:1762. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031762
Bellotti L, Zaniboni S, Balducci C, Grote G (2021) Rapid review on COVID-19, work-related aspects, and age differences. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 5166. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18105166
Raišienė AG, Rapuano V, Varkulevičiūtė K, Stachová K (2020) Working from home—Who is happy? A survey of Lithuania’s employees during the COVID-19 quarantine period. Sustainability 12: 5332. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12135332
Charalampous Grant CA, Tramontano C, Michailidis E (2019) Systematically reviewing remote e-workers’ well-being at work: A multidimensional approach. European journal of work and organizational psychology 28: 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1541886
O'Neill TA, Hambley LA, Greidanus NS, MacDonnell R, Kline TJ (2009) Predicting teleworker success: An exploration of personality, motivational, situational, and job characteristics. New Technology, Work and Employment 24: 144–162. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-005X.2009.00225.x
Ferrara B, Pansini M, De Vincenzi C, Buonomo I, Benevene P (2022) Investigating the role of remote working on employees’ performance and well-being: an evidence-based systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 12373. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912373
Smith SA, Patmos A, Pitts MJ (2018) Communication and teleworking: A study of communication channel satisfaction, personality, and job satisfaction for teleworking employees. International Journal of Business Communication 55: 44-68. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329488415589101
Raišienė AG, Rapuano V, Masilionytė G, Raišys SJ (2022) “White collars” on self-reported well-being, health and work performance when teleworking from home. Problems and perspectives in management 20: 497–510. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.41. https://doi.org/10.21511/ppm.20(2).2022.41
Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE, Smith HL (1999) Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological bulletin 125: 276. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276
Sahinidis AG, Xanthopoulou PI, Tsaknis PA, Vassiliou EE (2021) Age and prior working experience effect on entrepreneurial intention. Corporate & Business Strategy Review 2: 18–26. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv2i1art2
Tsaknis PA, Sahinidis AG, Xanthopoulou PI, Vassiliou EE (2022) The impact of personality and entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial intention. Corp. Gov 6:130–138. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p9
Parent-Lamarche A, Marchand A (2019) Well-being at work from a multilevel perspective: what is the role of personality traits?. International Journal of Workplace Health Management 12: 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-05-2019-0066
Clark LA, Karau SJ, Michalisin MD (2012) Telecommuting attitudes and the ‘big five’personality dimensions. Journal of management Policy and Practice 13: 31–46. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Telecommuting-Attitudes-and-the-%27Big-Five%27-Clark-Karau/37ac20804b5b968043b913ed0f3020586a1e07b2
Gainey TW, Clenney BF (2006) Flextime and telecommuting: Examining individual perceptions. Southern Business Review 32:13–21. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/sbr/vol32/iss1/4
Marhadi AB, Hendarman AF (2020) Identifying the Relationship between The Big Five Personality Traits and Attitudes towards Teleworking of Generation Z. American International Journal of Business Management 3: 76–85. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:229183647
McCrae RR, Costa PT (1991) Adding Liebe und Arbeit: The full five-factor model and well-being. Personality and social psychology bulletin 17: 227–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616729101700217
Cernas-Ortiz DA, Wai-Kwan L (2021) Conectividade social e satisfação no trabalho em teletrabalhadores mexicanos durante a pandemia: o papel mediador do bem-estar afetivo. Estudios Gerenciales 37: 37-48. https://doi.org/10.18046/j.estger.2021.158.4322.
Del Boca D, Oggero N, Profeta P, Rossi M (2020) Women’s and men’s work, housework and childcare, before and during COVID-19. Review of Economics of the Household 18: 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-020-09502-1
Brynjolfsson E, Horton JJ, Ozimek A, Rock D, Sharma G, TuYe HY (2020) COVID-19 and remote work: An early look at US data (No. w27344). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27344
Tsaknis PA, Xanthopoulou PI, Patitsa CD, Sahinidis AG (2022) HEXACO personality towards entrepreneurial intention: The mediating effect of career adaptability. Corporate Governance and Organizational Behavior Review 6: 168–176. https://doi.org/10.22495/cgobrv6i1p13
Iscan O. F, Naktiyok A (2005) Attitudes towards telecommuting: the Turkish case. Journal of Information Technology 20: 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000023
Lyttelton T, Zang E, Musick K (2020) Gender differences in telecommuting and implications for inequality at home and work. Available at SSRN 3645561.https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3645561
Gueguen G, Senik C (2022) Adopting Telework. The causal impact of working from home on subjective wellbeing. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjir.12761
Rodriguez-Besteiro S, Tornero-Aguilera JF, Fernández-Lucas J, Clemente-Suárez VJ (2021) Gender differences in the COVID-19 pandemic risk perception, psychology, and behaviors of Spanish university students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18: 3908. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083908.
Miller RS, Perlman D (2009) Intimate relationships Internat. McGraw-Hill,Texas.
Entringer TM, Gosling SD (2022) Loneliness during a nationwide lockdown and the moderating effect of extroversion. Social Psychological and Personality Science 13: 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211037871
Montazer S, Brumley KM, Pineault L, Maguire K, Baltes B (2022) COVID-19 onset, parental status, and psychological distress among full-time employed heterosexual adults in dual-earning relationships: The explanatory role of work-family conflict and guilt. Society and Mental Health 12:119–136. https://doi.org/10.1177/21568693221096189
Nguyen MH, Armoogum J (2021) Perception and preference for home-based telework in the covid-19 era: A gender-based analysis in Hanoi, Vietnam. Sustainability 13:3179. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063179
Grippaldi JJ (2002) An empirical study of attitudes towards telecommuting among government finance professionals. https://doi.org/10.34917/1647583
Patitsa CD, Sahinidis AG, Tsaknis PA, Giannakouli V (2021) Big Five personality traits and students’ satisfaction with synchronous online academic learning (SOAL). Corporate & Business Strategy Review 2: 8–16. https://doi.org/10.22495/cbsrv2i2art1.
Xanthopoulou P, Sahinidis A, Bakaki Z (2022) The impact of strong cultures on organisational performance in public organisations: the case of the greek public administration. Social Sciences, 11: 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11100486
Vianello M, Schnabel K, Sriram N, Nosek B (2013) Gender differences in implicit and explicit personality traits. Personality and individual differences 55: 994–999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.008
Adisa TA, Aiyenitaju O, Adekoya OD (2021) The work–family balance of British working women during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Work-Applied Management 13: 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-07-2020-0036
Costa PT, Terracciano A, McCrae RR (2001) Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of personality and social psychology 81:322. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
Goldberg LR (1990) An alternative” description of personality”: the big-five factor structure. Journal of personality and social psychology 59:1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
Olowookere EI, Omonijo DO, Odukoya JA, Anyaegbunam MC (2020) Exploring the effect of gender and personality characteristics on educational performance. Journal of educational and social research 10: 98–107. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0091
Liu G, Zhang Z, Smith C, Xu S, Pillon K, Guo H (2021) Plagiarism and information literacy workshops for international students. In Multidisciplinary Perspectives on International Student Experience in Canadian Higher Education (pp. 240–264). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5030-4.ch013
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xanthopoulou, P. et al. (2024). Exploring Gender Differences: The Relationship Between Personality and Teleworking Preferences. In: Kavoura, A., Borges-Tiago, T., Tiago, F. (eds) Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism. ICSIMAT 2023. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51038-0_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51038-0_42
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-51037-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-51038-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)