Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards a Measurement Instrument for Assessing Capabilities When Innovating Less-Structured Business Processes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Business Process Management Workshops (BPM 2023)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 492))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 356 Accesses

Abstract

Many contemporary organizations deal with different types of business processes, including less-structured business processes (LSBP). The latter are characterized by more unpredictable situations, ad-hoc tasks, limited process details, and a stronger emphasis on the human aspects as compared to the more structured business processes (SBP). However, existing BPM approaches often encounter challenges when driving innovation within organizations that have LSBP characteristics. To address this issue, organizations still lack a measurement tool to assess their process innovation capability (PIC) that is tailored towards LSBP (as opposed to generic BPM measurement instruments). Our study fills this gap by gradually building and testing a PIC-LSBP measurement instrument. We rely on empirical data from an international Delphi study, followed by a demonstration in two real-life organizations (i.e., one manufacturing organization in Asia and one service organization in Europe). The study aims at showing the practical application of the uncovered measurement instrument, seeking to identify and effectively address process innovation in more dynamic and complex business environments. The resulting instrument consists of six main capability areas, 18 sub-areas, and 55 formative measurement items. The findings highlight the significance of leveraging an instrument as a means to assess an organization’s current innovation capability with respect to a specific process type. Based on this insight, our research contributes to a broader understanding of how organizations can assess their existing process situation and derive action plans.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Reichert, M., Weber, B.: Enabling Flexibility in Process-Aware Information Systems: Challenges, Methods, Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30409-5

  2. Zimmermann, R., Ferreira, L.M.D.F., Carrizo Moreira, A.: The influence of supply chain on the innovation process: a systematic literature review. Supply Chain Manage.: Int. J. 21(3), 289–304 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen, J.J.P., Van Den Bosch, F.A.J., Volberda, H.W.: Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Manage. Sci. 52(11), 1661–1674 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Harmon, P., Wolf, C.: The state of business process management 2014. BPTrends (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dumas, M., et al.: Introduction to business process management. Fundam. Bus. Process Manage. 1–33 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kerpedzhiev, G.D., et al.: An exploration into future business process management capabilities in view of digitalization. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 63(2), 83–96 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vom Brocke, J., Zelt, S., Schmiedel, T.: On the role of context in business process management. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 36(3), 486–495 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Szelągowski, M., Berniak-Woźny, J.: The knowledge and process continuum. Knowl. Process. Manag. 26(4), 308–320 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Ciccio, C., Marrella, A., Russo, A.: Knowledge-intensive processes: characteristics, requirements and analysis of contemporary approaches. J. Data Semant. 4, 29–57 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kemsley, S.: The changing nature of work: from structured to unstructured, from controlled to social. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, p. 2. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Karande, A.M., Kalbande, D.: Business process analyzed factors affecting business model innovation. In: 2015 International Conference on Nascent Technologies in the Engineering Field (ICNTE). IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weber, M.: The Theory of Social and Economic Organization. Simon and Schuster (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bandara, W., et al.: A call for ‘holistic’ business process management. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on BPM Problems to Solve Before We Die (PROBLEMS 2021). Sun SITE Central Europe (CEUR) (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pöppelbuß, J., et al.: Service innovation capability: proposing a new framework. In: 2011 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems (FedCSIS). IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roeser, T., Kern, E.-M.: Surveys in business process management–a literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 21(3), 692–718 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boissier, F., Rychkova, I., Grand, B.L.: Challenges in knowledge intensive process management. In: 2019 IEEE 23rd International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop (EDOCW), pp. 65–74. IEEE Computer Society (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Damanpour, F.: Organizational innovation: a meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Acad. Manag. J. 34(3), 555–590 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Davenport, T.H.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business Review Press (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Camisón, C., Villar-López, A.: Organizational innovation as an enabler of technological innovation capabilities and firm performance. J. Bus. Res. 67(1), 2891–2902 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Frishammar, J., et al.: Antecedents and consequences of firms’ process innovation capability: a literature review and a conceptual framework. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manage. 59(4), 519–529 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Damanpour, F.: Organizational Innovation: Theory, Research, and Direction (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Trkman, P., et al.: From business process management to customer process management. Bus. Process Manage. J. (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Barney, J.: Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17(1), 99–120 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bowman, C., Ambrosini, V.: How the resource-based view and the dynamic capability views of the firm inform corporate-level strategy. Br. J. Manage. 14, 289–303 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teece, D.J.: Business models and dynamic capabilities. Long Range Plan. 51(1), 40–49 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Peteraf, M.A.: The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strateg. Manag. J. 14(3), 179–191 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Paulk, M.C., et al.: Capability maturity model for software, version 1.1. Technical report. Carnegie Mellon University/Software Engineering Institute), CMU/SEI-93-TR (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  28. OMG, Business process model and notation (BPMN) version 2.0. OMG Standard (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. de Bruin, T., Rosemann, M.: Using the Delphi technique to identify BPM capability areas. In: ACIS 2007 Proceedings - 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. McCormack, K.P., Johnson, W.C.: Business Process Orientation: Gaining the e-Business Competitive Advantage. CRC Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Looy, A.V., Backer, M.D., Poels, G.: A conceptual framework and classification of capability areas for business process maturity. Enterp. Inf. Syst. 8(2), 188–224 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Van Looy, A.: Capabilities for managing business processes: a measurement instrument. Bus. Process Manage. J. (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Leavitt, H.: Applied Organizational Change in Industry. New Perspective in Organization Research. Wiley, New York (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Moore, G.C., Benbasat, I.: Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Inf. Syst. Res. 2(3), 192–222 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Petter, S., Straub, D., Rai, A.: Specifying formative constructs in information systems research. MIS Q. 623–656 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Recker, J., Rosemann, M.: A measurement instrument for process modeling research: development, test and procedural model. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 22(2), 1 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Goni, J.I.C., Van Looy, A.: Process innovation capability in less-structured business processes: a systematic literature review. Bus. Process. Manag. J. 28(3), 557–584 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., Gustafson, D.H.: Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. In: Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., Gustafson, D.H. (eds.) Management Applications Series. Scott, Foresman, Glenview (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Okoli, C., Pawlowski, S.D.: The Delphi method as a research tool: an example, design considerations and applications. Inf. Manage. 42(1), 15–29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Paré, G., et al.: A systematic assessment of rigor in information systems ranking-type Delphi studies. Inf. Manage. 50(5), 207–217 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hasson, F., Keeney, S.: Enhancing rigour in the Delphi technique research. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 78, 1695–1704 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yin, R.K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 5 edn. SAGE, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE Publications (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gerring, J.: Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Business Informatics and Operations Management, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

    Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni & Amy Van Looy

Authors
  1. Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amy Van Looy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joklan Imelda Camelia Goni .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Jochen De Weerdt

  2. TUM School of Computation, Information and Technology, Heilbronn, Germany

    Luise Pufahl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Goni, J.I.C., Van Looy, A. (2024). Towards a Measurement Instrument for Assessing Capabilities When Innovating Less-Structured Business Processes. In: De Weerdt, J., Pufahl, L. (eds) Business Process Management Workshops. BPM 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 492. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50974-2_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50974-2_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50973-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50974-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation