Skip to main content

Enviropreneurial Orientation and Industry 4.0: Mediating the Role of Enviropreneurial Marketing in an Emerging Economy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship and Innovative Technology

Abstract

Customers are willing to pay extra for environmentally friendly goods and services, which is providing new challenges and opportunities for entrepreneurs. This study intends to investigate the impact of entrepreneurial orientation (EO) on Industry 4.0 (I4.0) practices of small and medium-sized businesses in light of this scenario and to analyze the mediating role of enviropreneurial marketing (EM) strategy between EO and I4.0 practices. Drawing upon the resource advantage theory and the dynamic capability view (DCV), a framework is developed. A survey approach is adopted to collect data from the owners/managers of 257 electrical and electronics (E&E) small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. To test the study hypotheses, structural equation modeling (SEM) using the partial least squares (PLS) technique is adopted. The findings reveal that enviropreneurial orientation and enviropreneurial marketing strategy have positively influenced Industry 4.0 practices in the SMEs of an emerging economy. Furthermore, the results highlight that enviropreneurial marketing strategy positively transmits the effect of enviropreneurial orientation to I4.0 practices. The study outcomes offer some novel contributions and implications to practitioners and researchers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, K., & Johl, S. K. (2022a). Impact of total quality management on industry 4.0 readiness and practices: Does firm size matter? International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 36, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, K., & Johl, S. K. (2022b). Entrepreneurial competencies needed to improve innovation performance in industry 4.0: An artificial neural network approach. In Entrepreneurial innovations, models, and implementation strategies for industry 4.0 (pp. 1–19). CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, K., Johl, S. K., Muneer, A., Alwadain, A., & Ali, R. F. (2022). Soft and hard total quality management practices promote industry 4.0 readiness: A SEM-neural network approach. Sustainability, 14(19), 11917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borah, P. S., Pomegbe, W. W. K., & Dogbe, C. S. K. (2022). Mediating role of green marketing orientation in stakeholder risk and new product success relationship among European multinational enterprises in Ghana. Society and Business Review, 17(4), 485–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrión, G. C., Nitzl, C., & Roldán, J. L. (2017). Mediation analyses in partial least squares structural equation modeling: Guidelines and empirical examples. In Partial least squares path modeling: Basic concepts, methodological issues and applications (pp. 173–195).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, N., Chaim, O., Cazarini, E., & Gerolamo, M. (2018). Manufacturing in the fourth industrial revolution: A positive prospect in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 21, 671–678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, S. F., Horng, J. S., Liu, C. H., Yu, T. Y., & Kuo, Y. T. (2022). Identifying the critical factors for sustainable marketing in the catering: The influence of big data applications, marketing innovation, and technology acceptance model factors. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 51, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Andrea, F. A. M. C. (2020). Strategic marketing & Austrian economics: The foundations of resource-advantage theory. The Review of Austrian Economics, 33(4), 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: A comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friske, W. M., & Zachary, M. A. (2019). Regulation, new venture creation, and resource-advantage theory: An analysis of the US brewing industry. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 43(5), 999–1017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granello, D. H., & Wheaton, J. E. (2004). Online data collection: Strategies for research. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(4), 387–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J., Hollingsworth, C. L., Randolph, A. B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2017). An updated and expanded assessment of PLS-SEM in information systems research. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 117(3), 442–458. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2016-0130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Page, M., & Brunsveld, N. (2019). Essentials of business research methods. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). Rethinking some of the rethinking of partial least squares. European Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 566–584. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2018-0665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, C. L., & Stafford, E. R. (1998). Crafting ‘enviropreneurial’ value chain strategies through green alliances. Business Horizons, 41(2), 62–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Davis, D. F. (2008). Grounding supply chain management in resource-advantage theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(1), 10–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, S. D., & Morgan, R. M. (2017). The resource-advantage theory of competition: A review. Review of Marketing Research, 153–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irfan, M., Wang, M., & Akhtar, N. (2019). Impact of IT capabilities on supply chain capabilities and organizational agility: A dynamic capability view. Operations Management Research, 12, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, I. J. (2022). The role of technological absorption capacity, enviropreneurial orientation, and green marketing in enhancing business' sustainability: Evidence from fast-moving consumer goods in Tanzania. Technological Sustainability, 2(2), 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur, R., Singh, R., Gehlot, A., Priyadarshi, N., & Twala, B. (2022). Marketing strategies 4.0: Recent trends and technologies in marketing. Sustainability, 14(24), 16356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, E. H. (Ed.). (2013). Encyclopedia of management theory. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, E. A., Royhan, P., Rahman, M. A., Rahman, M. M., & Mostafa, A. (2019). The impact of enviropreneurial orientation on small firms’ business performance: The mediation of green marketing mix and eco-labeling strategies. Sustainability, 12(1), 221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khattab, S., Shaar, I., Alkaied, R., & Qutaishat, F. (2022). The relationship between big data analytics and green supply chain management by looking at the role of environmental orientation: Evidence from emerging economy. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(2), 303–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration (IJEC), 11(4), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kock, N., & Lynn, G. (2012). Lateral collinearity and misleading results in variance-based SEM: An illustration and recommendations. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13(7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Bahron, A., & Bagul, A. H. B. P. (2015). Justifying scale type for a latent variable: Formative or reflective? AIP Conference Proceedings, 1691(1), 050009. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4937091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machado, C. G., Winroth, M., Almström, P., Ericson Öberg, A., Kurdve, M., & AlMashalah, S. (2021). Digital organisational readiness: Experiences from manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 32(9), 167–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namagembe, S., Ryan, S., & Sridham, R. (2017). Enviropreneurial orientation in SME supply chains: Construct measurement development. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 13(2), 128–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namagembe, S., Sridharan, R., & Ryan, S. (2016). Green supply chain management practice adoption in Ugandan SME manufacturing firms: The role of enviropreneurial orientation. World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 13(3), 154–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nath, P., & Siepong, A. (2022). Green marketing capability: A configuration approach towards sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 354, 131727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitzl, C., Roldan, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2016). Mediation analysis in partial least squares path modeling: Helping researchers discuss more sophisticated models. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1849–1864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadas, K. K., Avlonitis, G. J., & Carrigan, M. (2017). Green marketing orientation: Conceptualization, scale development and validation. Journal of Business Research, 80, 236–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulraj, A. (2011). Understanding the relationships between internal resources and capabilities, sustainable supply management and organizational sustainability. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 47(1), 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, N. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 885(879), 1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainanto, B. H., Bon, A. T., & Purba, J. H. V. (2022). Environmental management system and pro-environmental behavior in realizing sustainable industry performance: Mediating role of green marketing management. International Journal of Global Optimization and Its Application, 1(1), 12–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randrianasolo, A. (2021). Employing enviropreneurial marketing strategies to gain legitimacy. Journal of Global Marketing, 34(2), 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). Gain more insight from your PLS-SEM results: The importance-performance map analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(9), 1865–1886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosário, A. T., & Dias, J. C. (2022). Industry 4.0 and marketing: Towards an integrated future research agenda. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 11(3), 30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahi, G. K., Gupta, M. C., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2020). The effects of strategic orientation on operational ambidexterity: A study of Indian SMEs in the industry 4.0 era. International Journal of Production Economics, 220, 107395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shift Project. (2019). LEAN ICT. Towards digital sobreity. Available online at: https://theshiftproject.org/wpcontent/uploads/2019/03/Lean-ICT-Report_TheShift-Project_2019.pdf

  • SME Corporation Malaysia. (2013). Guideline for New SME definition. https://www.smecorp.gov.my/images/pdf/Guideline_for_New_SME_Definition_7Jan2014.pdf

  • Song-Turner, H., & Polonsky, M. (2016). Enviropreneurial marketing in greening corporate activities: Evidence from four Chinese green firms. European Business Review, 28(5), 506–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stentoft, J., Adsbøll Wickstrøm, K., Philipsen, K., & Haug, A. (2021). Drivers and barriers for industry 4.0 readiness and practice: Empirical evidence from small and medium-sized manufacturers. Production Planning & Control, 32(10), 811–828. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2020.1768318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, K. (2018). Chapter 6 - survey designs. In K. Williamson & G. Johanson (Eds.), Research methods (2nd ed., pp. 159–192). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102220-7.00006-6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Thoeni, A. T., Marshall, G. W., & Campbell, S. M. (2016). A resource-advantage theory typology of strategic segmentation. European Journal of Marketing, 50(12), 2192–2215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadarajan, P. R. (1992). Marketing’s contribution to strategy: The view from a different looking glass. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(4), 335–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B. S., Ali, K., & Kanesan, T. (2022). A model of extended technology acceptance for behavioral intention toward EVs with gender as a moderator. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1080414.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thavamaran Kanesan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ali, K., Osman, A., Kanesan, T., Rui, L., Alfaisaly, R.A., Alalyani, A.S. (2024). Enviropreneurial Orientation and Industry 4.0: Mediating the Role of Enviropreneurial Marketing in an Emerging Economy. In: Hayat, N., Nawi, N.C. (eds) Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship and Innovative Technology. Contributions to Environmental Sciences & Innovative Business Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50927-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics