Skip to main content

From Brehms Tierleben to “A Report to an Academy”: Franz Kafka’s Animal Story Read as a Critical Commentary on Writing About Nature

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
German-Language Nature Writing from Eighteenth Century to the Present

Part of the book series: Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment ((LCE))

  • 3 Accesses

Abstract

Under the influence of cultural (literary) animal studies, a kind of paradigmatic shift has taken place among the Kafka studies community. No longer is it seen as self-evident that one can only understand the animals in Kafka’s stories as symbols or allegories for human existence or behavior. The biological, zoological, or evolutionary knowledge incorporated into Kafka’s representations of animals has become increasingly obvious, so much so that the animal as animal and the human–animal relation have now been revealed as central topics. Joining these new perspectives, this chapter goes one step further by asking whether and how far Kafka’s animal stories are part of a German tradition in nature writing. Brehms Tierleben, a popular work of German natural history by Alfred Edmund Brehm, which has not yet been discussed as a work of nature writing, was a major source for many of Kafka’s animal stories. In the case of Kafka’s short story “A Report to an Academy” (“Ein Bericht für eine Akademie”), for example, it will be shown that the story can be read as both a critical comment on Alfred Brehm’s writing about apes and as a literary deconstruction of contemporary nature writing in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    All translations in this chapter are mine, with the exception of Kafka’s “Report.”

  2. 2.

    The English translation is taken from: Kafka, Franz: “A Report to an Academy,” translated by Willa and Edwin Muir. 1979. In The Basic Kafka. Washington Square Press.

  3. 3.

    Cf. the contribution in this volume of Tanja van Hoorn about this field.

  4. 4.

    The German word by Kafka (1979) is “Kistenwand,” which could also be translated as “crate wall.”

  5. 5.

    Cf. the contributions of Gunter Pakendorf (1995, 2000) for further reflections; see reference list.

  6. 6.

    Goodbody, however, reads the “Report to an Academy”—based on Karlheinz Fingerhut—more traditionally as an allegory of human entry into modernity, cf. p. 20.

References

  • Barth, Rudolf. 1970. Die Tierwelt nach Brehm. München: Südwest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, Walter. 1977. Über den Begriff der Geschichte. In Id.: Illuminationen. Ausgewählte Schriften, 251–261. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benninghoff-Lühl, Sibylle. 2004. The Kingdom of Animals and Their Interpreter. In Mit Deutschland um die Welt. Eine Kulturgeschichte des Fremden in der Kolonialzeit, ed. Alexander Honold, Klaus R. Scherpe, 36–40 Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, Hartmut. 1975. Kafka-Kommentar zu sämtlichen Erzählungen. München: Winkler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder, Hartmut. 1983. Kafka. Der Schaffensprozess. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgards, Roland (ed.). 2016. Tiere. Kulturwissenschaftliches Handbuch. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, Alfred. 1864. Illustriertes Thierleben. Hildburghausen: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, Alfred. 1883. Brehms Thierleben. Second Ed. Leipzig: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brensing, Karsten. 2018. Alfred Brehm und die Gefühle der Tiere. Eine Einführung. In Brehms Tierleben. Die Gefühle der Tiere. Berlin: Duden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brod, Max. Literarischer Abend des Klubs jüdischer Frauen und Mädchen. Selbstwehr, No. 1, 04.01.1918.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crist, Eileen. 1999. Images of Animals. Anthropomorphism and Animal Mind. Philadelphia: Temple University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Charles. 2018. Die Abstammung des Menschen. Transl. by Heinrich Schmidt 1908. Hamburg: Nikol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2010. Das Tier, das ich also bin. Transl. by Markus Sedlaczek. Wien: Passagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, Helene. 2015. Franz Kafkas Ein Bericht für eine Akademie. Sabotage der anthropologischen Maschine. In Kafkas narrative Verfahren/Kafkas Tiere (Vol. 3 and 4), ed. Harald Neumeyer, Wilko Steffens, 271–292. Würzburg: Koenigshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emrich, Wilhelm. 1958. Franz Kafka. Bonn: Athena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fingerhut, Karl Heinz. 1969. Die Funktion der Tierfiguren im Werke Franz Kafkas. Offfene Erzählgerüste und Figurenspiele. Bonn: Bouvier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, Ludwig. 2019. Natur im Sinn. Naturwahrnehmung und Literatur. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodbody, Axel. 2016. Animal Studies: Kafka’s Animal Stories. In Handbook of Ecocriticism and Cultural Ecology. Handbook of English and American Studies. Vol. 2, 249–272. Berlin: de Gruyter.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, Paul. 1989. Franz Kafka. Wissenschaft und Wissenschaftskritik. Tübingen: Stauffenberg Colloquium.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoorn, Tanja van. 2016. Naturgeschichte in der ästhetischen Moderne. Max Ernst, Ernst Jünger, Ror Wolf, W. G. Sebald. Göttingen: Wallstein.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kafka, Franz. 1979. A Report to an Academy, translated by Willa and Edwin Muir. In The Basic Kafka. Washington Square Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Hans-Gerd. 1994. Ein Bericht für eine Akademie. In Interpretationen. Franz Kafka. Romane und Erzählungen, ed. Michael Müller, 173–196. Stuttgart: Reclam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepenies, Wolf. 1976. Das Ende der Naturgeschichte. München, Wien: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, Thomas J. 1996. A Taxonomy of Nature Writing. In The Ecocriticism Reader, ed. Cheryll Glotfelty and Harold Fromm, 276–281. Athens and London: University of Georgia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macfarlane, Robert. 2013. New words on the wild. In Nature, 13(6): 166–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitsch, Hans J. and Harald Welzer. 2006. Das autobiographische Gedächtnis. Hirnorganische Grundlagen und biosoziale Entwicklung. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meijer, Eva. 2018. Die Sprachen der Tiere. Berlin: Matthes & Seitz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, Patrick D. 2000. Farther Afield in the Study of Nature-Oriented Literature. Charlottesville and London: University of Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeyer, Harald. 2013. Franz Kafka: Ein Bericht für eine Akademie (1917). In Literatur und Wissen. Ein interdisziplinäres Handbuch, ed. Roland Borgards et al., 390–394. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumeyer, Harald and Wilko Steffens (ed.). 2015. Kafkas narrative Verfahren/Kafkas Tiere (Vol. 3 and 4). Würzburg: Koenigshausen & Neumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakendorf, Gunther 1995. Kafkas Anthropologie. In Weimarer Beiträge 41: 410–426.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pakendorf, Gunther. 2002. Betrifft: Kafkas Affen. In Grenzgänge. Studien zur Literatur der Moderne., ed. Helmut Koopmann and Manfred Misch, 113–125. Paderborn: Mentis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pechuel-Loesche, Eduard (ed.). 1900. Brehms Tierleben. Third Ed. Leipzig, Wien: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheese, Don. 2002. Nature Writing: The Pastoral Impulse in America. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Simone. 2018. Deskription. Introspektion. Reflexion. Der Naturessay als ökologisches Genre in der deutschsprachigen Literatur seit 1800. In Ökologische Genres. Naturästhetik – Umweltethik – Wissenspoetik, ed. Evi Zemanek, 337–353. Göttingen: Vandenhoek & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokel, Walter H. 1964. Franz Kafka – Tragik und Ironie. Zur Struktur seiner Kunst. München, Wien: Langen/Müller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strassen, Otto zur (ed.). 1911–1918: Brehms Tierleben. Fourth, new ed. Leipzig, Wien: Bibliographisches Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thode-Arora, Hilke. 2013. Hagenbeck: Tierpark und Völkerschau. In Kein Platz an der Sonne. Erinnerungsorte der deutschen Kolonialgeschichte, ed. Jürgen Zimmerer, 244–256 Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tischel, Alexandra. 2018. Affen wie wir. Was die Literatur über uns und über unsere nächsten Verwandten erzählt. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wild, Markus. 2016. Anthropologische Differenz. In Tiere. Kulturwissenschaftliches Handbuch, ed. Roland Borgards, 47–59. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marita Meyer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meyer, M. (2024). From Brehms Tierleben to “A Report to an Academy”: Franz Kafka’s Animal Story Read as a Critical Commentary on Writing About Nature. In: Dürbeck, G., Kanz, C. (eds) German-Language Nature Writing from Eighteenth Century to the Present. Literatures, Cultures, and the Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50910-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics