Skip to main content

Domain Decomposition Algorithms for Neural Network Approximation of Partial Differential Equations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXVII (DD 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering ((LNCSE,volume 149))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With the success of deep learning technology in many application areas, there have been pioneering approaches to approximate solutions of partial differential equations by neural network functions [2, 10, 12, 13]. Such approaches have advantages over the classical approximation methods in that they can be used without generating meshes adaptive to problem domains or developing equation dependent numerical schemes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Badea, L. andWang, J. An additive Schwarz method for variational inequalities. Mathematics of Computation 69(232), 1341–1354 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  2. E, W., Han, J., and Jentzen, A. Deep learning-based numerical methods for high-dimensional parabolic partial differential equations and backward stochastic differential equations. Commun. Math. Stat. 5(4), 349–380 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jacot, A., Gabriel, F., and Hongler, C. Neural tangent kernel: Convergence and generalization in neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jagtap, A. D. and Karniadakis, G. E. Extended physics-informed neural networks (xpinns): A generalized space-time domain decomposition based deep learning framework for nonlinear partial differential equations. Communications in Computational Physics 28(5), 2002–2041 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jagtap, A. D., Kharazmi, E., and Karniadakis, G. E. Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 365, 113028 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kim, H. H. and Yang, H. J. Domain decomposition algorithms for physics-informed neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Domain Decomposition Methods (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kim, H. H. and Yang, H. J. Additive Schwarz algorithms for neural network approximate solutions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00225 (2022).

  8. Li, K., Tang, K.,Wu, T., and Liao, Q. D3M: A deep domain decomposition method for partial differential equations. IEEE Access 8, 5283–5294 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Li, W., Xiang, X., and Xu, Y. Deep domain decomposition method: Elliptic problems. In: Mathematical and Scientific Machine Learning, 269–286. PMLR (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Long, Z., Lu,Y., and Dong, B. PDE-Net 2.0: learning PDEs from data with a numeric-symbolic hybrid deep network. J. Comput. Phys. 399, 108925, 17 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moseley, B., Markham, A., and Nissen-Meyer, T. Finite basis physics-informed neural networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07871 (2021).

  12. Raissi, M., Perdikaris, P., and Karniadakis, G. E. Physics-informed neural networks: a deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 378, 686–707 (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sirignano, J. and Spiliopoulos, K. DGM: a deep learning algorithm for solving partial differential equations. J. Comput. Phys. 375, 1339–1364 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Toselli, A. andWidlund, O. Domain decomposition methods—algorithms and theory, Springer Series in Computational Mathematics, vol. 34. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, S., Yu, X., and Perdikaris, P. When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspective. Journal of Computational Physics 449, 110768 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xu, J. and Zikatanov, L. The method of alternating projections and the method of subspace corrections in Hilbert space. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 15(3), 573–597 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The first author is supported by NRF-2022R1A2C100388511

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyea Hyun Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kim, H.H., Yang, H.J. (2024). Domain Decomposition Algorithms for Neural Network Approximation of Partial Differential Equations. In: Dostál, Z., et al. Domain Decomposition Methods in Science and Engineering XXVII. DD 2022. Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering, vol 149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50769-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics