Abstract
This study examined the involvement of facework in main clause omissions employed by patients when performing requests. The data were drawn from a corpus of videotaped primary care visits collected from Korean medical practitioners. Drawing on previous work on facework in politeness research, requests in conversation analytic research, and main clause ellipsis in Korean, the study found that main clause omissions provided a mechanism for patients to minimize any threats to the participants’ face when requesting a prescription for a treatment plan. By employing this practice, patients were able to prove the relevance for a proposed treatment without directly requesting it. By only providing the relevance for a specific type of treatment by omitting the main clause, the patient allowed the doctor to indirectly reject or grant the request. The analysis allowed the notion of facework to be respecified as one emerging from both participants’ joint construction of the sequential unfolding of the interaction. This study supports the view that face is a discursive, interactional, and social accomplishment by examining a linguistic practice employed primarily by patients in Korean medical interactions. The role of epistemic imbalance and asymmetry in this setting is also discussed.
Chapter PDF
References
Atkinson, J. M., & Drew, P. (1979). Order in court. Oxford Socio-legal studies. NJ.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Harvard University Press.
Blum-Kulka, S., & Olshtain, E. (1984). Requests and apologies: A cross-cultural study of speech act realization patterns (CCSARP). Applied Linguistics, 5(3), 196–213.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Byon, A. S. (2006). The role of linguistic indirectness and honorifics in achieving linguistic politeness in Korean requests. Journal of Politeness Research, 2, 247–276.
Chevalier, F. H. G. (2009). The facework of unfinished turns in French conversation. Discourse Studies, 11(3), 267–284.
Cordella, M. (2007). No, no, I haven’t been taking it doctor: Noncompliance, face-saving, and face-threatening acts in medical consultations. In M. E. Placencia & C. Garcia (Eds.), Research on politeness in the Spanish speaking world (pp. 191–212). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Domenici, K., & Littlejohn, S. W. (2006). Facework. Sage.
Durkheim, E. (1915). The elementary forms of the religious life. Macmillan.
Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome Publishing.
Evans, N. (2006). Who said polysynthetic languages avoid subordination? Multiple Subordination Strategies in Dalabon. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 26, 31–58.
Evans, N. (2007). Insubordination and its uses. In I. Nikolaeva (Ed.), Finiteness: Theoretical and Empirical Foundations (pp. 366–431). Oxford University Press.
Evans, N. (2009). Insubordination and the grammaticalisation of interactive presuppositions. Paper presented at Methodologies in Determining Morphosyntactic Change Conference, Museum of Ethnography, Osaka, March 2009.
Evans, N., & Watanabe, H. (Eds.). (2016). Insubordination. John Benjamins.
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face-to-face Behavior. Doubleday Anchor Books.
Grainger, K., Jennings, M., & Masterson, S. (2005). ‘Things aren’t the same, are they?’: The management of ad news delivery in the discourse of stroke care. Communication and Medicine, 2(1), 35–44.
Haakana,M.(2001).Laughter as a patient’s resource: Dealing with delicate aspects of medical interaction.Text, 21, https://doi.org/10.1515/text.1.21.1-2.187
Haiman, J. (1988). Inconsequential clauses in Hua and the typology of clauses. In J. Haiman & S. Thompson (Eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse (pp. 49–71). John Benjamins.
Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. The University of Chicago Press.
Heritage, J. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Polity Press.
Heritage, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: Sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 45(1), 30–52.
Heritage, J., & Maynard, D. (Eds.). (2006). Communication in Medical Care: Interaction Between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J., & Sefi, S. (1992). Dilemmas of advice: Aspects of the delivery and reception of advice in interactions between health visitors and first time mothers. In P. Drew & J. Heritage (Eds.), Talk at work (pp. 359–417). Cambridge University Press.
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in assessment sequences. Social Psychology Quarterly, 68(1), 15–38.
Hutchby, I. (2008). Participants’ orientations to interruptions, rudeness and other impolite acts in talk-in-interaction. Journal of Politeness Research, Special Issue: ‘Impoliteness and Rudeness’, 4(2), 221–241.
Kàdàr, D. Z., & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Karagoti, E. (2021). Negotiating preferred norms in requests and offers: Is the (dis)preferred answer so obviously (im)polite? Journal of Pragmatics, 173, 134–147.
Kim, H. S. (2015). Resisting the terms of polar questions through ani (‘no’)-prefacing in Korean conversation. Discourse Processes, 52(4), 311–334.
Kravitz, R. L., Bell, R. A., Azari, R., Kelly-Reif, S., Krupat, E., & Thomm, D. H. (2003). Direct observation of requests for clinical services in office practice: What do patients want and do they get it? Arch Internal Medicine, 163(14), 1673–1681.
Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. Longman.
Locher, M. A. (2004). Power and Politeness in Action: Disagreements in Oral Communication. Mouton de Gruyter.
Locher, M. A. (2011). Situated impoliteness: The interface between relational work and identity construction. Situated politeness (pp. 187–208). Continuum.
Locher, M. A. (2013). Relational work and interpersonal pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 145–149.
Locher, M. A., & Watts, R. J. (2005). Politeness theory and relational work. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(1), 9–33.
Mangione-Smith, R., McGlynn, E., Elliott, M., Krogstad, P., & Brook, R. (1999). The Relationship Between Perceived Parental Expectations and Pediatrician Antimicrobial Prescribing Behavior. Pediatrics, 103(4), 711–718.
Ohori, T. (1995). Remarks on suspended clauses: a contribution to Japanese phraseology. In Shibatani, M. and S. A. Thompson (eds.), Essays in Semantics and Pragmatics in Honor of Charles J. Fillmore. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 201–218.
Park, Y.-Y. (2009). The Korean connective nuntey in conversational discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 191–218.
Park, Y.-J. (2017). A closing-implicative practice in Korean primary medical care openings. Journal of Pragmatics, 108, 1–16.
Peräkylä, A. (1998). Authority and accountability: The delivery of diagnosis in primary healthcare. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(4), 301–320.
Peräkylä, A. (2006). Communicating and responding to diagnosis. In J. Heritage, & D.Maynard (Eds.), Communication inmedical care: Interaction between primary care physicians and patients (pp. 214e247). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Pilnick, A., & Dingwall, R. (2011). On the remarkable persistence of asymmetry in doctor patient interaction: A critical review. Social Science and Medicine, 72, 1374–1382.
Pilnick, A., Hindmarsh, J., & Gill, V. T. (2009). Beyond ‘doctor and patient’: Developments in the study of healthcare interactions. Social Health Illness, 31(6), 787–802.
Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 57–101). Cambridge University Press.
Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2013). Preference. In J. Sidnell, & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis (pp. 210–229). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1972). A grammar of contemporary English. Longman.
Rhee, S. H. (2008). Ellipsis and functional shifts. Studies in Modern Grammar, 52, 169–194.
Rhee, S. H. (2014). Analogy-driven grammaticalization: A case of grammaticalization of sentence-final markers from concomitance-connectives. Linguistic Research, 31(3), 591–614.
Rhee, S. H. (2020). The Power of the Unspoken: Ellipsis and Grammaticalization in Korean and Beyond. Studies in Linguistic, 56, 1–36.
Robins, L. S., & Wolf, F. M. (1988). Confrontation and politeness strategies in physician-patient interaction. Social Science and Medicine, 27(3), 217–221.
Robinson, J. D. (1998). Getting down to business: Talk, gaze, and body orientation during openings of doctor–patient consultations. Human Communication Research, 25(1), 97–123.
Sacks, H. (1987). On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation. In G. Button & J. R. E. Lee (Eds.), Talk and Social Organisation (pp. 54–69). Multilingual Matters.
Sacks, H., & Schegloff, E. A. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.
Schegloff, E. A. (1968). Sequencing in Conversational Openings. American Anthropologist, 70(6), 1075–1095.
Schegloff, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation. In P. Drew & A. Wootton (Eds.), Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order (pp. 89–135). Polity Press.
Schegloff, E., & A. (1995). Discourse as an Interactional Achievement III: The Omnirelevance of Action. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 28(2), 185–211.
Schegloff, E. A. (2006). On possible. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 141–157l.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Silverman, Jonathan, Suzanne, Kurtz, Draper, Juliet (2005). Skills for communicating with patients. Radcliffe Medical Press.
Sohn, H.-M. (1986). Linguistic Expeditions. Hanshin Publishing Company.
Sohn, S.-O.S. (2003). On the emergence of intersubjectivity: An analysis of the sentence-final nikka in Korean. Japanese/korean Linguistics, 12, 52–63.
Stainton, R., & J. (2006). Words and thoughts: Subsentences, ellipsis, and the philosophy of language. Oxford University Press.
Stivers, T. (2002). Participating in decisions about treatment: Overt parent pressure for antibiotic medication in pediatric encounters. Social Science & Medicine, 54, 1111–1130.
Stivers, T. (2008). Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41, 31–57.
Stivers, T., Mondada, L., & Steensig, J. (2011). Knowledge, morality, and affiliation in social interaction. In T. Stivers, L. Mondada, & J. Steensig (Eds.), The Morality of Knowledge in Conversation (pp. 3–24). Cambridge University Press.
West, C. (1984). When the doctor is a ‘lady’; power, status, and gender in physician-patient encounters. Symbolic Interaction, 7, 87–106.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Park, Y. (2024). Facework in Patient Requests for Treatment Recommendations in Korean Medical Interactions: The Use of Main Clause Omission. In: Kim, M.S. (eds) Exploring Korean Politeness Across Online and Offline Interactions. Advances in (Im)politeness Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50698-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50698-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50697-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50698-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)