Abstract
The chapter focuses on the biopolitical challenges of the rise a postmortal society as a result of the burgeoning research and business connected with technologies concerned with assuring biological and digital immortality (such as “immortality drugs”, cloning, mind uploading, simulated friends, mindfiles, digital counterparts, etc.). The central thesis of the chapter is that the postmortal society is a kind of biopolitical utopia, in the sense of a pursued ideal and a driving force for biopolitics and bioeconomy, but also a scheme of biopower, rooted deeply in the past imaginations about immortal societies: today dubbed “postmortal” and fundamentally dependent on the concepts from the range of posthumanism. The chapter aims to enrich the debate over postmortalism, bringing to the forefront its utopian character, and attempts to answer the questions about the biopolitics of a society made of digital postselves and technobiological posthumans.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term “posthuman” has been owned by various contemporary discourses, and exists on the spectrum from Lyotard’s inhuman through to Haraway’s posthuman. Its variegated nature is reflected in the many interpretive angles that are given in The Posthuman Glossary (2018) edited by Rosi Braidotti and Maria Hlavajova. Usually, the most frequent distinction—and one important to this chapter—is the distinction between posthumanism and transhumanism, which also uses the term “posthuman” (e.g., in The Transhumanist Reader, 2013). The difference between the two movements lies mostly in their relations to the anthropocentric humanism. Whereas posthumanism would look to the weakening the central position of humans in relation to other beings, transhumanism concentrates on humans and on enhancing their capacities, making them superior to nature that is seen as enemy. In the present chapter, we can see the trends connecting both, although more akin to transhumanism, for example, in its attempt to transcend death, and in seeking fusion with technology. However, the character of the inhabitants of the digital spaces seems to correspond also with the tenets of posthumanism, as it assumes a fluid character of data bodies and cyber-identities (as discussed, e.g., by Roden in The Posthuman Life, 2015).
References
Baden, David, and Maggi Savin-Baden. 2019. Virtual Humans. Today and Tomorrow. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Bauman, Zygmunt. 1992. Mortality, Immortality and Other Life Strategies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Baxi, Upendra. 2009. Human Rights in a Posthuman World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Belic, Moreno. 2017. Data Bodies: The Gray Area of Surveillance. Medium. https://medium.com/@morenobelic/data-bodies-the-gray-area-of-surveillance-9783c549f1fb. Accessed 11 January 2023.
Berriman, Liam, and Giovanna Mascheroni. 2019. Exploring the Affordances of Smart Toys and Connected Play in Practice. New Media & Society 21 (4): 797–814. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818807119.
Bogost, Ian. 2012. Alien Phonomenology, or What It’s Like to Be a Thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Braidotti, Rosi, and Maria Hlavajova, eds. 2018. The Posthuman Glossary. London, New York: Bloomsbury.
Brown, Guy. 2017. The Future of Death and the Four Pathways to Immortality. In Postmortal Society: Towards a Sociology of Immortality, ed. Michael Hviid Jacobsen, 40–56. London: Routledge.
Bryson, Joanna J., Mihailis E. Diamantis, and Thomas D. Grant. 2017. Of, For, and By the People: The Legal Lacuna of Synthetic Persons. Artificial Intelligence and Law 25: 273–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-017-9214-9.
Bugajska, Anna. 2021. The Future of Utopia in the Posthuman World. Academia Letters, Article 155. https://www.academia.edu/44986903/The_Future_of_Utopia_in_the_Posthuman_World. Accessed 11 January 2023.
———. 2022. The Posthuman: Around the Vanishing Point of Utopia. In Utopian Thinking in Law, Politics, Architecture and Technology, ed. Bart van Klink, Marta Soniewicka, and Leon van den Broeke, 267–284. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Burr, Christopher, and Luciano Floridi, eds. 2020. Ethics of Digital Wellbeing: A Multidisciplinary Approach. New York: Springer.
Calvino, Italo. 1978. Invisible Cities. San Diego: Harcourt Brace and Company.
van Dijck, José. 2013. ‘You Have One Identity’: Performing the Self on Facebook and LinkedIn. Media, Culture & Society 35 (2): 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712468605.
Elias, Ana Sofia, and Rosalind Gill. 2017. Beauty Surveillance: The Digital Self-monitoring Cultures of Neoliberalism. European Journal of Cultural Studies 21 (1): 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549417705604.
Esposito, Roberto. 2008. Bios. Biopolitics and Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Foucault, Michel. 2010. El cuerpo utópico. Las heterotopías. Buenos Aires: Ediciones Nueva Vision.
Han, Byung-Chul. 2017. Psychopolitics: Neoliberalism and New Technologies of Power. London, New York: Verso.
Harari, Yuval Noah. 2016. Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow. New York: Harper.
Hillis, Ken. 1999. Digital Sensations. Space, Identity, and Embodiment in Virtual Reality. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jacobsen, Michael Hviid, ed. 2017. Postmortal Society: Towards a Sociology of Immortality. London: Routledge.
Kearl, Michael C. 2017. The Proliferation of Postselves in American Civic and Popular Cultures. In Postmortal Society: Towards a Sociology of Immortality, ed. Michael Hviid Jacobsen, 216–233. London: Routledge.
Kurki, Visa A.J., and Tomasz Pietrzykowski. 2017. Legal Personhood: Animals, Artificial Intelligence and the Unborn. New York: Springer.
Misseri, Lucas E. 2016. Evantropia and Dysantropia: A Possible New Stage in the History of Utopias. In More after More: Essays Commemorating the Five-Hundredth Anniversary of Thomas More’s Utopia, ed. Ksenia Olkusz, Michał Kłosiński, and Krzysztof M. Maj, 26–43. Kraków: Facta Ficta Research Centre.
More, Max, and Natasha Vita-More, eds. 2013. The Transhumanist Reader. Classical and Contemporary Essays on the Science, Technology, and Philosophy of the Human Future. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Parsons, Thomas D. 2019. Ethical Challenges in Digital Psychology and Cyberpsychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pilsch, Andrew. 2017. Transhumanism. Evolutionary Futurism and the Human Technologies of Utopia. Minneapolis, London: University of Minnesota Press.
Roden, David. 2015. Posthuman Life: Philosophy at the Edge of Human. London, New York: Routledge.
Savin-Baden, Maggi, and Victoria Mason-Robbie, eds. 2020. Digital Afterlife. Death Matters in a Digital Age. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Schilderink, Melissa, and Eric Venbrux. 2019. The Postself in Blogs about Terminal Illness. Thanatos 8 (2): 144–164.
Sisto, Davide. 2020. Immortality, Memory and Grief in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
———. 2022. Porcospini digitali. Vivere e mai morire online. Turin: Bollati Boringhieri.
Stokes, Patrick. 2021. Digital Souls: A Philosophy of Online Death. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
UNESCO. 2019. I’d Blush If I Could. Closing Gender Divides in Digital Skills Through Education. https://en.unesco.org/Id-blush-if-I-could. Accessed 11 January 2023.
Vincent, Jane, and Leopoldina Fortunati. 2009. Electronic Emotion: The Mediation of Emotion via Information and Communication Technologies. Bern: Peter Lang.
Zuboff, Shoshana. 2019a. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism. The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. London: Profile.
———. 2019b. ‘We Make Them Dance’: Surveillance Capitalism, the Rise of Instrumentarian Power, and the Threat to Human Rights. In Human Rights in the Age of Platforms, ed. Rikke Frank Jørgensen, 3–51. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Zwart, Hub. 2017. ‘Extimate’ Technologies and Techno-Cultural Discontent: A Lacanian Analysis of Pervasive Gadgets. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 21 (1): 24–55. https://doi.org/10.5840/techne20174560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bugajska, A. (2024). In the World of Postselves and Posthumans: The Biopolitical Utopia of Postmortalism. In: Urabayen, J., León Casero, J. (eds) Post-Apocalyptic Cultures. Palgrave Studies in Utopianism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50510-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50510-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50509-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50510-2
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)