Skip to main content

Abstract

 Engineering design processes have undergone transformative changes over time, driven by a confluence of factors that have enhanced their efficacy and pertinence. This evolution is intricately tied to technological advancements, shifting societal needs and values. In response to the dynamic needs and perspectives within the industry, design research has evolved into a user-centred, data-driven, and socially responsible field closely aligned with technological advancements. This shift has led to fundamental principles in design research, emphasizing quality, innovation, and creativity. Initially confined to engineering design, the members of The Design Society broadened their research scope into trans-disciplinary realms, showcasing the interdisciplinary nature of modern design research. This transformation was evident in a workshop in Zagreb, where participants reflected on the triad of quality, creativity, and innovation in design research. The introduction chapter of this book sets a scene, bringing a brief overview of the developments through time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albers, A., Alink, T., Thau, S., Matthiesen, S. (2008). Support of system analyses and improvement in industrial design through the contact and channel model. In: Marjanović, D. Štorga, M. Pavković, N. & Bojčetić, N. (eds.). Proceedings of the DESIGN 2008, 10th International Design Conference, University of Zagreb, Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alger, J. R. M., & Hays, C. V. (1964). Creative Synthesis in Design. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amaresh, C. A., & Lindemann, U. (2015). Impact of design research on industrial practice tools. Technology, and Training, Springer Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19449-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen M. M., & McAloone T. C. (2008). Applications of the Theory of Technical Systems—Experiences From the “Copenhagen School, AEDS (Workshop, Pilsen).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, M. M., Howard, T.J., & Lomholt Brun, H. P. (2014). Domain theory, its models and concepts in A. In: Chakrabarti, L. T. M. Blessing (eds.), An Anthology of Theoriesand Models of Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_9 Springer-verlag, London

  • Andreasen, M. M. (2011). 45 Years with design methodology. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(5)

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1954) Artist versus engineer. Design, 67, 13–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1963d). Systematic method for designers: Part four: Examining the evidence. Design, 179, 68–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1963a). Systematic method for designers: Part one: Aesthetics and logic. Design, 172, 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1963c). Systematic method for designers: Part three: getting the brief. Design, 176, 52–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1963b). Systematic method for designers: Part two: Design and system. Design, 174, 70–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1964a). Systematic method for designers: Part five: the creative leap. Design, 181, 50–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1964b). Systematic method for designers: Part six: The donkey work. Design, 185, 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1964c). Systematic method for designers: Part seven: The final steps. Design, 188, 56–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archer, L. B. (1981). A View of the Nature of the Design Research in Design: Science: Method. In: R. Jacques, J. A. Powell (eds.), Guilford, Surrey: IPC Business Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asimov, M. (1962). Introduction to design. Englewood Cliffs, New York, Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayazit, N. (2004). Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Design Issues, 20(1), pp 16-29), MIT. https://doi.org/10.1162/074793604772933739

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhofer, H. (2011). The Future of Design Methodology. Springer-Verlag London Limited. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3

  • Bischoff, W., & Hansen, F. (1953). Rationelles Konstruieren Konstruktionsbücher. Bd. 5. Berlin: VEBVerlag Technik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blessing, L. T. M. (2002). What is this thing called design research? Annals of the (2002 international CIRP Design Seminar, Hong Kong, 16–18 May, pp. 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd Davis, S., & Gristwood, S. (2016). The structure of design processes: Ideal and Reality in Bruce Archer’s (1968 Doctoral Thesis. In Proceedings of DRS 2016, Design Research Society 50th Anniversary Conference. Brighton, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86, 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash, P. (2020). Where next for design research? Understanding Research Impact and Theory Building, Design Studies, 68, 113–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2020.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarti, A., & Blessing, L. T. M. (eds.). (2014). An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design, Philosophy, Approaches and Empirical Explorations. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1

  • Cross, N. (2006). Designerly Ways of knowing. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross, N. (1993). A history of design methodology. In: M. J. de Vries et aL (eds.), Design Methcdology and Relationships with Science, (pp. 15–27). Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culley, S. J., Allen, R. D., & Hicks, B. J. (2002). Informal information in engineering design—a classification. In Proceedings of DESIGN (2002, the 7th International Design Conference, Dubrovnik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culley, S. J. (2014). Revisiting design as an information processing activity. In: A. Chakrabarti, L. T. M. Blessing (eds.), An Anthology of Theories and Models of Design. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-6338-1_18. Springer-Verlag London.

  • Dixon, J. R. (1966). Design Engineering: Invetiviness, Analysys and Decision Making. New York McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlenspiel, K. (1985). Kostengünstig Konstruiren. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erkens, A. (1928). Beiträge Zur Konstruktionserziehung. z. VDI, 72(1928), 17–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzaneh, H. H., Lindemann, U. (2018). A Practical Guide to Bio-inspired Design. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57684-7

  • Feilden, G. B. R. (1963). Engineering design: report of a committee appointed by the council for scientific and industrial research to consider the present standing of mechanical engineering design. By Council for Scientific and Industrial Research (Great Britain).

    Google Scholar 

  • Finger, S., & Dixon, J. R. (1989). A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle. Research in Engineering Design, 1, 121–137 (1989) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580205

  • Finger, S., & Dixon, J. R. (1989a). A review of research in mechanical engineering design. part I: descriptive, prescriptive, and computer-based models of design processes. Research in Engineering Design, 1, 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01580003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, M. J. (1985). Conceptual Design for Engineers. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg u. Design Council, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, K. (2003). Theory construction in design research: criteria: approaches, and methods. Design Studies, 24, 507e522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gericke, K., & Blessing, L. (2012). An analysis of design process models across disciplines. In: Marjanović, D. Štorga, M. Pavković, N. & Bojčetić, N. (eds.). Proceedings of the DESIGN 2012, 12th International Design Conference, University of Zagreb, Zagreb.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gero, J. (1990). Design prototypes: A knowledge representation schema for design. AI Magazine, 11, 26–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glegg, G. L. (1973). The Science of Design. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, W. J. J. (1961). Synectics: The development of creative capacity. Collier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hales, C. (2005). Adding value to design research. In: Clarkson, J. & Huhtala, M. (eds.), Engineering Design Theory and Practice. EDC University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. (1966). (1966) Konstruktionssystematik. VEB Verlag Technik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, F. (1974). Konstruktionswissenschaft—Grundlagen und Methoden, München. Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (2003). A New Approach of Innovative Design: An Introduction to C-K Theory. In: Norell, M. (ed.), International Conference on Engineering Design (ICED’03), Stockholm, Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváth, I. (2004). A treatise on order in engineering design research. Research in Engineering Design, 15, 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. A. (2010). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2008.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V. (1974). Theorie der Maschinesysteme. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V. (1980). Allgemeines Vogehensmodell des Konstruirens. Fachpresse Goldach.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V. (1982). Principles of Engineering Design. Butterworth Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V., & Eder, E. (1987). A Scientific approach to engineering design. Design Studies, 8(3), 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V., & Eder, E. (1988). Theory of Technical Systems: A Total Concept Theory for Engineering Design. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V., & Eder, E. (1992). Priniciples of Engineering Design—General Procedural Model of Engineering Design. London: Butterworth & Co. (1982. (reprinted in WDK series by Heurista, (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V., & Eder, E. (1996). Design Science. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka, V. (1983). J. Dietrich zum Konstruieren Grundlegende Gedanken, Schriftereihe WDK 9, Heurista, Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C., & Thornley, D. G. (Eds.). (1963). Conference on Design Methods. UK, Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. C. (1966). Design methods compared 1: strategies. Design, 212, 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keates, S., & Clarkson, P. J. (2003). Countering Design Exclusion: An Introduction to Inclusive Design. Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-0013-3

  • Kesselring, F. (1942). Die starke Konstruktion. VDI-Z. 86 pp. 321–330, 749–752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring, F. (1951). Bewertung von Konstruktionen. VDI-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring, F. (1954b). Technische Kompositionslehre. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring, F. (1955). Morpfologisch-analytische Konstruktionsmethode. VDI-Z, 97, 327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring, F. (1954). Technische Kompositionslehre. Berlin Göttingen. Heidelberg, Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koller, R. (1985). Konstruktionslehre für den Maschinenbau. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause, D., Heyden, E. (eds.). (2022). Design Methodology for Future Products—Data Driven, Agile and Flexible. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78368-6

  • Kroes, P., Vermaas, P. E., Light, A., & Moore, S.A. (2008). Design in Engineering and architecture: towards an integrated philosophical understanding. In: Philosophy and Design. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6591-0_1

  • Lindemann, U. (2006). Methodische Entwicklung technischer Produkte: Methoden flexibel und situationsgerecht anwenden. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, U. (2009). Structural Complexity Management. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, U. (1998). Human Behaviour in Design Individuals, Teams, Tools.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P., & Bohemia, E. (eds.). (2016). In: Proceedings of DRS2016: Design + Research + Society—Future-Focused Thinking, Vol. 1–10, DRS. https://www.drs2016.org/ddr8

  • Marjanović, D. (1996). Design process representation for the development of an ICAD system”. AUTOMATIKA, 37(3–4), 127–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marjanović, D., & Pavković, N. (1995). The Structure of an ICAE System, International conference on engineering design—ICED 95, Prague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matousek, R. (1957). Konstruktionslehre des allgemeinen Maschinenbaus. Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, C., Giess, M., & Culley, S. (2005). Information management for through life product support: the curation of digital engineering dana. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management 1(1): 1743–5129 ISSN (online).

    Google Scholar 

  • Niemann, G. (1975). Maschinenelemente, Bd. 1. Berlin: Springer 1. Aufl. (1950), 2. Aufl. (1965), 3. Aufl. (1975) (unter Mitwirkung von M. Hirt).

    Google Scholar 

  • Olesen, J. (1992). Concurrent Development In Manufacturing—Based Upon Dispositional Mechanisms. Dissertation, Technical University of Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, A. F. (1963). Applied Imagination—Principles and Procedure of Creative Thinking. Scribners, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1977). Konstruktionslehre. Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G., Beitz, W., Feldhausen, J., & Grote, K. H. (2007). Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1984). Engineering Design. In: Wallace, K.M. (ed.)(1st edn), The Design Council, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papalambros, P. (2015). Design science: why, what and how. Design Science, 1, E1. https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2015.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petric Maretic, H. (2014). Dynamic Network Analysis—Evolution of the Research Field Based on the Papers Published at the International DESIGN Conference 2002–2014 (in Croatian) URL: https://cadlab.fsb.hr/en/education/projects/dynamic-network-analysis-evolution-of-the-research-field-based-on-the-papers-published-at-the-international-design-conference-2002-2014-5

  • Ponn, J., & Lindeman, U. (2011). Konzeptentwicklung und Gestaltung technischer Produkte Systematisch von Anforderungen zu Konzepten und Gestaltlösungen. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reuleaux, F. (1861). Der Constructeur. Vieweg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuleaux, F. (1875). Theoretiche Kinematik, Braunschweig, Vieweg, (1875/1900).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuleaux, F. (1891). Technology and Civilization, From the Smithsonian report for 1890. Washington, Gov. Printing office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenacker, W.G.; Claussen, U. (1973). Regeln des Methodischen Konstruierens/T. 1. Regeln 1 bis 4. Mainz: Krausskopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenacker, W.G., Claussen, U. (1975). Regeln des Methodischen Konstruierens/Regeln 5 bis 8. Mainz: Krausskopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenacker, W.G. (1970). Methodisches Konstruieren. Konstruktionsbücher, Bd. 27. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozenburg, N. F. M., Eekels, J. (1995). Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. Wiley, Chichester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, K. (1982). Konstruieren mit Konstruktionskatalogen. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1969). The Sciences of the Artificial. The MIT Presss.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, N.P. (2001). Axiomatic Design. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjalve, E. (1976). A short course in industrial design. Newnes-Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomiyama, T. & Yoshikawa, H. (1986). Extended general design theory. Technical Report CS-R8604, Centre For Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, K.T., & Eppinger, S.D. (2004). Product design and development. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, K., & Blessing, L. (2000). Observations on some German contributions to engineering design in memory of professor Wolfgang Beitz. Research in Engineering Design, 12, 2–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001630050019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C., Birkhofer, H. (2007). Today’s Requirements on engineering design science. In: Proceedings of ICED 07:785–786 (Exec. Summary), Paper-no. 511 (Full Paper, CD-ROM), École Centrale Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. (2005). CPM/PDD—an extended theoretical approach to modelling products and product development processes. In: Proceedings of the 2nd German-Israeli Symposium on Advances in Methods and Systems for Development of Products and Processes, pp. 159–179. Berlin, Germany, Fraunhofer-IRB-Verlag, Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, C. (2008). How to derive application-specific design methodologies. In: Proceedings of DESIGN, vol. 1, pp. 69–80, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Naval Architecture, University of Zagreb

    Google Scholar 

  • Wögerbauer, H. (1943). Die Technik des Konstruierens (2nd ed.). Oldenbourg.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshikawa, T. (1981). General Design Theory and a CAD system. In: Sata, T. and Warman, E. (eds). Man-Machine Communication in CAD/CAM, Proceedings of The IFIP WG5.2–5.3 Working Conference (1980), pp. 35–37. North-Holland, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwicky, F. (1966). Entdecken. Forschen im Morphologischen Weltbild, München/Zürich, Droemer Knaur Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dorian Marjanović .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Marjanović, D., Štorga, M., Škec, S. (2024). Introduction. In: Marjanović, D., Štorga, M., Škec, S. (eds) Design Research: The Sociotechnical Aspects of Quality, Creativity, and Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50488-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50488-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50487-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50488-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics