Abstract
An abundance of research in music focused on composers who identify as women and/or lesbians has emerged since the 1980s, but the impacts of undertaking this work as a researcher has not been examined. The chapter thus asks whether working as a feminist and/or queer researcher has negative impacts, noting that in the 1990s Susan McClary claimed that undertaking such work would be tantamount to committing professional suicide. In her recently published work—which is corroborated by her own reflection piece for the present chapter—McClary goes further to reveal that she has also had to contend with violence, including rape and death threats. Is this a common story for researchers in this field? While the chapter’s intention is not to present a definitive answer, it nevertheless suggests that women like McClary who hold tenured academic music positions, and who are clever and outspoken, pose a threat to the musicological establishment and must be silenced. Five female academics—Susan McClary, Elizabeth Wood, Judith Lochhead, Jennifer Shaw, and Gillian Rodger—have been chosen because they represent two countries (the US and Australia), thereby giving a glimpse into a geographical exchange, as well as generational and work status differences, were asked to write short reflection pieces about their experiences. How do they negotiate a field that is/has been hostile? Is it easier to work in feminist and queer musicology in the present day than it was in the 1990s? Drawing on new materialist philosophy, especially that of physicist Karen Barad, the author (Macarthur) carries out a series of diffractive readings of the contributors’ reflections. In a Baradian sense, diffraction is to do with the behaviour of light and sound waves, the idea that when waves overlap or encounter obstructions, they form patterns of difference. If we transpose this idea to feminist and queer musicology, patterns of difference emerge that counter the usual positive versus negative binary constructions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
American Musicological Society. 2023. Doctoral dissertations in musicology. https://www.ams-net.org/ddm/.
Ammer, Christine. 1980. Unsung: A history of women in American music. Westport, CT, London, England: Greenwood Press.
Barad, Karen. 2007. Meeting the universe Halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
———. 2010. Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today 3 (2): 240–268.
———. 2014. Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Paralax 20 (3): 168–187.
Bloch, Adrienne Fried, and Carol Neuls-Bates, eds. 1979. Women in American music: A bibliography of music and literature. Westport, Conn: Greenwood Press.
Bowers, Jane, and Judith Tick. 1986. Women making music: The Western art tradition, 1150–1950. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Bozalek, Vivienne, and Karin Murris. 2022. Diffraction. In A glossary for doing Postqualitative, new materialist and Posthumanist research across disciplines, ed. Karin Murris, 54–57. London and New York: Routledge.
Bozalek, Vivienne, and Weili Zhao. 2022. Difference. In A glossary for doing Postqualitative, new materialist and Posthumanist research across disciplines, ed. Karin Murris, 52–53. London and New York: Routledge.
Brett, Philip, Elizabeth Wood, and Gary C. Thomas, eds. 1994. Queering the pitch: The new gay and lesbian musicology. New York and London: Routledge.
Briscoe, James R., ed. 1987. Historical anthology of music by women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
———., ed. 1997. Contemporary anthology of music by women. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Cameron-Lewis, Vanessa. 2019. Sexuality as movement. Educational Philosophy and Theory 51 (8): 841–851.
Citron, Marcia J. 1993. Gender and the musical canon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crutzen, P., and E. Stoermer. 2000. The Anthropocene. Global change newsletter 41 (1): 17–18.
Fuller, Sophie. 1994. The Pandora guide to women composers: Britain and the United States 1628-present. London: Pandora.
Giocondo, Ian. 2018. Feminine beginnings: An interview with Susan McClary. Van Magazine. https://van-magazine.com/mag/susan-mcclary/.
Hamessley, Lydia, Todd Borgerding, Fred Maus, Bill Meredith, and Ruth Solie 1997. The 1997 Philip Brett Award of the Gay and Lesbian Study Group of the American Musicological Society. Unpublished document made available by Wood to the authors.
Jezic, Diane Peacock. [1988] 1994. Women composers: The lost tradition found. New York: The Feminist Press.
Kouvaras, Linda, Maria Grenfell, and Natalie Williams, eds. 2022. A century of composition by women: Music against the odds. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Lochhead, Judith. 2015. Reconceiving structure in contemporary music: New tools in music theory and analysis. New York: Routledge.
———. 2020. Music’s vibratory enchantments and epistemic injustices: Reflecting on thirty years of feminist thought in music theory. Zeitschrift der Gesellschaft für Musiktheorie 17 (1): 15–29.
———. 2021. ‘Who is responsible?: A manifesto’, lightning talk for the scholars for social responsibilities interest group, Society for Music Theory. (online conference). Posted at Academia.com, https://www.academia.edu/61680165/Who_is_Responsible_A_Manifesto_Judith_Lochhead_Stony_Brook_University.
———. 2023. Undisciplined. Music Theory Spectrum 45 (1): 137–141.
Macarthur, Sally. 2016. Renovating music analysis. Musicology Australia 38 (2): 182–193.
Macarthur, Sally, and Julja Szuster. 2017. Transposing musicology: An essay in honour of Elizabeth Wood. Musicology Australia 39 (1): 46–64.
McClary, Susan. 1991. Feminine endings: Music, gender, and sexuality. Minneapolis and Oxford: University of Minnesota Press.
———. 1993. Reshaping a discipline: Musicology and feminism in the 1990s. Feminist Studies 19 (2): 399–423.
———. 1987. The blasphemy of talking politics during Bach year. In Music and society: The politics of composition, performance and reception, ed. Richard Leppert and Susan McClary, 13–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2019. Lives in musicology: A life in musicology—Stradella and me. Acta Musicologica 91 (1): 5–20.
McGuire v Western Morning News Company Ltd 1903. 2 K.B. 100 at 109 (Sir Richard Henn Collins M.R., [English] Court of Appeal).
Murris, Karin, and Weili Zhao. 2022. Re-turning. In A glossary for doing Postqualitative, new materialist and Posthumanist research across disciplines, ed. Karin Murris, 112–113. London and New York: Routledge.
Pendle, Karin, ed. 1991. Women and music: A history. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Rodger, Gillian M. 2010. Champagne Charlie and Pretty Jemima: Variety theater in the nineteenth century. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
———. 2018. Just one of the boys: Female-to-male cross-dressing on the American variety stage. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois Press.
Sadie, Julie Anne, and Rhian Samuel, eds. 1994. The new grove dictionary of women composers. London: Macmillan Press.
Solie, Ruth A. 1993. Musicology and Difference: Gender and Sexuality in Music Scholarship. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.
Steffen, W., W. Broadgate, L. Deutsch, O.C. Gaffney, and C. Ludwig. 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: The great acceleration. The Anthropocene Review 2 (1): 81–98.
Tomlinson, Barbara. 2010. Feminism and affect at the scene of argument: Beyond the trope of the angry feminist. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
———. 2019. Undermining intersectionality: The perils of power and feminism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Wood, Elizabeth, [1988] 1994). ‘Foreword’. In Women composers: The lost tradition found, edited by Diane Peacock Jezic, xi-xiv. New York: The Feminist Press.
———. 1980. Review essay: Women in music. Signs 6: 283–297.
———. 1993. Lesbian fugue: Ethel Smyth’s contrapuntal arts. In Musicology and difference: Gender and sexuality in music scholarship, ed. Ruth Solie, 164–183. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
———. 1994. Sapphonics. In Queering the pitch: The new gay and lesbian musicology, ed. Philip Brett, Elizabeth Wood, and Gary C. Thomas, 27–66. New York and London: Routledge.
———. 1995. Performing rights: A sonography of women’s suffrage. Musical Quarterly 79 (4): 606–643.
Zabrodska, Katerina, Sheridan Linnell, Cath Laws, and Bronwyn Davies. 2011. Bullying as intra-active process in neoliberal universities. Quantum Inquiry 17 (8): 709–719.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Macarthur, S., McClary, S., Wood, E., Lochhead, J., Shaw, J., Rodger, G. (2024). Reconfiguring Gender, Sexuality, Music, and Higher Education. In: Macarthur, S., Szuster, J., Watt, P. (eds) Cultures of Work, the Neoliberal Environment and Music in Higher Education. Palgrave Critical University Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50388-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50388-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50387-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50388-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)