Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adapting to Change

Abstract

This chapter serves as an introduction to the study of alternative finance tools, their risks and opportunities for firms, and their interaction with Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors in finance. The chapter begins by defining alternative finance and describing its various tools. It examines the opportunities these tools offer to firms, as well as the associated risks. The focus then shifts to how ESG factors are assessed in finance, discussing the determinants of ESG scores and their impact on firm risk, profitability, and value. The chapter also explores the evolving relationships between banks and firms in the context of alternative finance and ESG practices, highlighting how these factors are changing traditional financial relationships. Finally, the chapter outlines the research objectives, setting the stage for a deeper exploration of these themes. It concludes by providing a structured overview of the monograph, detailing the focus and content of the subsequent chapters. This layout effectively sets the tone for a thorough investigation into the intricate interplay between bank-firm relationships, ESG factors, and alternative finance in the modern financial landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agrawal, A., Catalini, C., & Goldfarb, A. (2014). Some simple economics of crowdfunding. Innovation Policy and the Economy, 14(1), 63–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, F., Carletti, E., & Gu, X. (2008). The roles of banks in financial systems. Oxford handbook of banking, 32–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ameer, R., & Othman, R. (2012). Sustainability practices and corporate financial performance: A study based on the top global corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 108, 61–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artiach, T., Lee, D., Nelson, D., & Walker, J. (2010). The determinants of corporate sustainability performance. Accounting & Finance, 50(1), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atif, M., & Ali, S. (2021). Environmental, social and governance disclosure and default risk. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3937–3959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auboin, M., & Engemann, M. (2014). Testing the trade credit and trade link: Evidence from data on export credit insurance. Review of World Economics, 150, 715–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltas, K., Fiordelisi, F., & Mare, D. S. (2022). Alternative finance after natural disasters. British Journal of Management, 33(1), 117–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnea, A., & Rubin, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between shareholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 97, 71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassen, A., & Senkl, D. (2011). ESG-environmental, social, governance issues. Die Betriebswirtschaft, 71(5), 506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. Journal of Business, 351–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharath, S. T., Dahiya, S., Saunders, A., & Srinivasan, A. (2011). Lending relationships and loan contract terms. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(4), 1141–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodhanwala, S., & Bodhanwala, R. (2018). Does corporate sustainability impact firm profitability? Evidence from India. Management Decision, 56(8), 1734–1747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonini, S., Capizzi, V., & Zocchi, P. (2019). The performance of angel-backed companies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 100, 328–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouslah, K., Kryzanowski, L., & M’zali, B. (2013). The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(4), 1258–1273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boutin-Dufresne, F., & Savaria, P. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and financial risk. The Journal of Investing, 13(1), 57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, C. S. (2012). Crowdfunding and the federal securities laws. Colum. Bus. L. Rev., 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Business Bank (2019). Small Business Finance Markets report 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boffo, R., Marshall, C., & Patalano, R. (2020). ESG investing: Environmental pillar scoring and reporting. Retrived, 14, 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boot, A. W., & Thakor, A. V. (2000). Can relationship banking survive competition? The journal of Finance, 55(2), 679–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, D., Saleuddin, R., & Mcmahon, C. (2019). Alternative finance: A historical perspective. Financial History Review, 26(2), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemla, G., & Tinn, K. (2020). Learning through crowdfunding. Management Science, 66(5), 1783–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H. M., Kuo, T. C., & Chen, J. L. (2022). Impacts on the ESG and financial performances of companies in the manufacturing industry based on the climate change related risks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 380, 134951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M., & Hasan, I. (2023). Firm ESG Practices and the Terms of Bank Lending. Sustainable finance and ESG: Risk, management, regulations, and implications for financial institutions (pp. 91–124). Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, M., & Qu, Y. (2020). Does bank FinTech reduce credit risk? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 63, 101398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney, C., Dutta, S., & Li, Y. (2017). Resolving information asymmetry: Signaling, endorsement, and crowdfunding success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 265–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D. (2008). Contracts and exits in venture capital finance. The Review of Financial Studies, 21(5), 1947–1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Johan, S., & Reardon, R. (2023). Global fintech trends and their impact on international business: A review. Multinational Business Review, 31(3), 413–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, D., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2019). Investors’ choices between cash and voting rights: Evidence from dual-class equity crowdfunding. Research Policy, 48(8), 103740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dass, N., & Massa, M. (2011). The impact of a strong bank-firm relationship on the borrowing firm. The Review of Financial Studies, 24(4), 1204–1260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Degryse, H., & Van Cayseele, P. (2000). Relationship lending within a bank-based system: Evidence from European small business data. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(1), 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, D. W. (1984). Financial intermediation and delegated monitoring. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(3), 393–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EBA. (2020). Guidelines on loan origination and monitoring. EBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • EBA. (2021). On Management and supervision of ESG Risks for Credit Institutions and Investment Firms.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama, E. F. (1985). What’s different about banks? Journal of Monetary Economics, 15(1), 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farag, H., & Johan, S. (2021). How alternative finance informs central themes in corporate finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 101879.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fasano, F., & Cappa, F. (2022). How do banking fintech services affect SME debt? Journal of Economics and Business, 121, 106070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatemi, A., Fooladi, I., & Tehranian, H. (2015). Valuation effects of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Banking & Finance, 59, 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferri, G., & Messori, M. (2000). Bank–firm relationships and allocative efficiency in Northeastern and Central Italy and in the South. Journal of Banking & Finance, 24(6), 1067–1095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiordelisi, F., Soana, M. G., & Schwizer, P. (2014). Reputational losses and operational risk in banking. The European Journal of Finance, 20(2), 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E. (1984). Corporate views of the public interest.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Dmytriyev, S. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2021). Stakeholder theory and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1757–1770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). Comment on Tobin. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 84(2), 318–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: A meta-analysis of event studies. Business & Society, 36(3), 221–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabison G. (2014). Understanding crowdfunding and its regulations. EUR 26992. Luxembourg (Luxembourg): Publications Office of the European Union; 2014. JRC92482

    Google Scholar 

  • Galema, R., Plantinga, A., & Scholtens, B. (2008). The stocks at stake: Return and risk in socially responsible investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(12), 2646–2654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GerÅ¡l, A., & Jakubík, P. (2011). Relationship lending in emerging markets: Evidence from the Czech Republic. Comparative Economic Studies, 53, 575–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, O., & Moore, J. (1999). Foundations of incomplete contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 66(1), 115–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, M. K., Chiaramonte, L., Dreassi, A., Paltrinieri, A., & Piserà, S. (2021). The crossroads of ESG and religious screening on firm risk. Research in International Business and Finance, 58, 101500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornuf, L., Schmitt, M., & Stenzhorn, E. (2020). Does a local bias exist in equity crowdfunding? Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper, (16–07).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. N., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: An empirical analysis of venture capital contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 70(2), 281–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M. A. (2022). ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. D., & McLaughlin, C. P. (1996). The impact of environmental management on firm performance. Management Science, 42(8), 1199–1214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, K., Vicze, G., Végh, A., Balogh, A., & Dobos, A. (2020). White paper on alternative finance, altfinator. Ref. Ares, 2020, 2323913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. D., & Faff, R. W. (2009). Corporate sustainability performance and idiosyncratic risk: A global perspective. Financial Review, 44(2), 213–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Feng, L., Pan, Z., & Sohail, H. M. (2022). ESG performance and stock prices: evidence from the COVID-19 outbreak in China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, Y. (2022). ESG and firm’s default risk. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, D. (2022). ESG, liquidity, and stock returns. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 78, 101526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J. D., Elfenbein, H. A., & Walsh, J. P. (2009). Does it pay to be good... and does it matter? A meta-analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. And does it matter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, B. B. (2004). The effect of firm financial characteristics and the availability of alternative finance on IPO underpricing. Journal of Economics and Finance, 28(1), 88–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenny, A. F., Allison, T. H., Ketchen, D. J., Jr., Short, J. C., & Ireland, R. D. (2017). How should crowdfunding research evolve? A survey of the entrepreneurship theory and practice editorial board. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(2), 291–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordea. (2017). Nordea Equity Research, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2016. OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2020). Financing SMEs and Entrepreneurs 2020: An OECD Scoreboard. OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ongena, S., & Smith, D. C. (2001). The duration of bank relationships. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 449–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, E., Ferilli, G. B., Stefanelli, V., Geretto, E. F., & Polato, M. (2023a). Assessing the influence of ESG score, industry, and stock index on firm default risk: A sustainable bank lending perspective. Finance Research Letters, 57, 104274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, E., Geretto, E. F., & Polato, M. (2023a). ESG default risk mitigation effect: A time-sectorial analysis. In New challenges for the banking industry: Searching for balance between corporate governance, sustainability and innovation (pp. 79–98). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. A., & Rajan, R. G. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships: Evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R. M., & Marshall, R. S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(4), 336–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 95–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralcheva, A., & Roosenboom, P. (2020). Forecasting success in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 55, 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., Klinke, A., & Van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. Ambio, 40, 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. J., & Welker, M. (2001). Social disclosure, financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Accounting, organizations and society, 26(7–8), 597–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86, 867–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwert, M. (2018). Bank capital and lending relationships. The Journal of Finance, 73(2), 787–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senadheera, S. S., Gregory, R., Rinklebe, J., Farrukh, M., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2022). The development of research on environmental, social, and governance (ESG): A bibliometric analysis. Sustainable Environment, 8(1), 2125869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharfman, M. P., & Fernando, C. S. (2008). Environmental risk management and the cost of capital. Strategic Management Journal, 29(6), 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shneor, R., Ziegler, T., Garvey, K., Wenzlaff, K., Yerolemou, N., Rui, H., & Zhang, B. (2018). Expanding horizons: The 3rd European alternative finance industry report. Available at SSRN 3106911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, K. V., & Tung, F. (2016). Law and project finance. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 25, 154–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakor, A. V. (2020). Fintech and banking: What do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 41, 100833.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirloni, G., & Antonietti, A. (2020). Le nuove linee guida EBA sulla concessione e monitoraggio del credito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treepongkaruna, S., Kyaw, K., & Jiraporn, P. (2022). Shareholder litigation rights and ESG controversies: A quasi-natural experiment. International Review of Financial Analysis, 84, 102396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida, S., & Hashimoto, T. (2019). Social indicators in corporate activities considering SDGs: the profit maximization criteria of companies and SDGs. International Association for Impact Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations—UN. (2019). UN Global Compact Progress Report 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallee, B., & Zeng, Y. (2019). Marketplace lending: A new banking paradigm? The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1939–1982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veena Iyer, S. (2020). Venture debt: A catalyst for Indian entrepreneurship. Venture Capital, 22(3), 215–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). Quality of management and quality of stakeholder relations: Are they synonymous? Business & Society, 36(3), 250–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendel, C. B. (2015). The impact of alternative finance on the equipment finance and leasing industry. Journal of Equipment Lease Financing, 33(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, W. C., Batten, J. A., Mohamed-Arshad, S. B., Nordin, S., & Adzis, A. A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters, 39, 101593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, L., Liu, Q., Li, B., & Ma, C. (2022). Fintech business and firm access to bank loans. Accounting & Finance, 62(4), 4381–4421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasar, B. (2021). The new investment landscape: Equity crowdfunding. Central Bank Review, 21(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, B., Wardrop, R., Rau, P. R., & Gray, M. (2015). Moving mainstream: Benchmarking the European alternative finance market. Journal of Financial Perspectives, 3(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, X., Fang, L., & Zhang, K. (2023). Online search attention, firms’ ESG and operating performance. International Review of Economics & Finance, 88, 223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, T., Shneor, R., Wenzlaff, K., Wang, B., Kim, J., Paes, F. F. D. C., Suresh, K., Zhang, B. Z., Mammadova, L., & Adams, N. (2021). The global alternative finance market benchmarking report. Available at SSRN 3771509.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Egidio Palmieri .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palmieri, E., Geretto, E.F. (2023). Introduction. In: Adapting to Change. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50265-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50265-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50264-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50265-1

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics