Skip to main content

Benchmarking of Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Cement Production: A Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Energy Technology 2024 (TMS 2024)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 495 Accesses

Abstract

In the pursuit of economic growth and value creation, foundation industries including cement, metals, glass, chemicals, paper, and ceramics face formidable challenges related to energy usage, emissions, and resource consumption in their manufacturing operations, all while striving to achieve ambitious Net Zero carbon and green targets. To overcome these challenges and propel sustainable progress, benchmarking emerges as a powerful ally. This study performs a benchmarking analysis of energy use and CO2 emissions for a UK cement plant as well as best available techniques (BAT) investigation to identify opportunities for performance improvement in crucial areas such as energy usage and environmental sustainability. The research utilises industrial data from a 2850 tonne per day capacity dry process cement plant. Key energy and emissions parameters, including thermal and electrical energy intensity, recovered energy and CO2 intensity, are computed per tonne of cement produced along with capacity utilisation across major process stages including raw material grinding, clinkerisation, and cement grinding. Comprehensive data sourced directly from the manufacturer is compared against literature benchmarks for global averages and best practices. Although surpassing global average values, the plant lags European best practices across all metrics, signalling room for substantial improvement. Assessment of relevant BATs for the cement industry reveals prospects to integrate vertical roller mills for cement grinding and use Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) at the clinkerisation stage. Adopting these techniques could reduce the electrical energy intensity of clinkerisation by 51% and cement grinding electrical intensity by 30%, surpassing benchmarks. While limited to a single cement plant, the study provides a standardised methodology that could be replicated across foundation industries to enable performance tracking and highlight efficiency gaps. The benchmarking approach developed can guide the implementation of energy conservation measures and the adoption of best practices by the cement industry to reduce its carbon footprint.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jolly M, Velenturf APM, Salonitis K, Paddea S (2022) The UK transforming the foundation industries research and innovation hub (TransFIRe), pp 341–353

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cai W, Liu C, Lai K, Li L, Cunha J, Hu L (2019) Energy performance certification in mechanical manufacturing industry: a review and analysis. Energy Convers Manag 186:415–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Griffin PW, Hammond GP, McKenna RC (2021) Industrial energy use and decarbonisation in the glass sector: a UK perspective. Adv Appl Energy 3:100037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adapen.2021.100037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. IEA (International Energy Agency) (2017) World energy outlook 2017 [online]. Available https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/4a50d774-5e8c-457e-bcc9-513357f9b2fb/World_Energy_Outlook_2017.pdf

  5. Garwood TL, Hughes BR, Oates MR, O’Connor D, Hughes R (2018) A review of energy simulation tools for the manufacturing sector. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 81:895–911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers JG, Cooper SJ, Norman JB (2018) Uses of industrial energy benchmarking with reference to the pulp and paper industries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 95:23–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Menghi R, Papetti A, Germani M, Marconi M (2019) Energy efficiency of manufacturing systems: a review of energy assessment methods and tools. J Clean Prod 240:118276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai W et al (2022) A review on methods of energy performance improvement towards sustainable manufacturing from perspectives of energy monitoring, evaluation, optimization and benchmarking. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 159:112227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Adewunmi YA, Iyagba R, Omirin M (2017) Multi-sector framework for benchmarking in facilities management. Benchmarking Int J 24(4):826–856. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-10-2015-0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittelman E (2018) The cement industry, one of the world’s largest CO2 emitters, pledges to cut greenhouse gases. Yale E360. 24 Nov 2018 [online]. Available https://e360.yale.edu/digest/the-cement-industry-one-of-the-worlds-largest-co2-emitters-pledges-to-cut-greenhouse-gases

  11. Junianto I, Sunardi DS (2023) The possibility of achieving zero CO2 emission in the Indonesian cement industry by 2050: a stakeholder system dynamic perspective. Sustainability 15(7):6085. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076085

  12. IEA (2018) Technology roadmap: low-carbon transition in the cement industry. Accessed 17 Aug 2023 [online]. Available https://www.iea.org/reports/technology-roadmap-low-carbon-transition-in-the-cement-industry

  13. Jaller M, Matthews S (2021) Can carbon intensity metrics help achieve net carbon reductions [online]. Available https://faculty.engineering.ucdavis.edu/jaller/wp-content/uploads/sites/298/2021/06/92021-Jaller-and-Matthews-Can-Carbon-Intensity-Metrics-Help-Achieve-Net-Carbon-Reductions.pdf

  14. Ogunsiji AS, Ladanu WK (2017) A theoretical study of performance measures in the strategic and corporate entrepreneurship of firms. Int J Life Sci 1(1):49–57. https://doi.org/10.21744/ijls.v1i1.23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gholipour Khajeh M, Iranmanesh M, Keynia F (2014) Energy auditing in cement industry: a case study. Energy Equip Syst 2(2):171–184

    Google Scholar 

  16. Madlool NA, Saidur R, Hossain MS, Rahim NA (2011) A critical review on energy use and savings in the cement industries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(4):2042–2060 [online]. Available https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.01.005

  17. IEA (2022) Cement [online]. Available https://www.iea.org/reports/cement

  18. Austrian Energy Agency (2014) industrial energy efficiency project: benchmarking report for cement sector. United Nations Industrial Development Organization. Accessed 01 Sept 2023 [online]. Available https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-05/BenchmarkingReportCementSector.pdf

  19. Prakasan S, Palaniappan S, Gettu R (2020) Study of energy use and CO2 emissions in the manufacturing of clinker and cement. J Inst Eng Ser A 101(1):221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-019-00409-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Afkhami B, Akbarian B, Beheshti N, Kakaee AH, Shabani B (2015) Energy consumption assessment in a cement production plant. Sustain Energy Technol Assessments 10:84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2015.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Omotayo JSO (2023) Economic impacts of optimizing energy recovery in clinker cooler using clinker cooler bed as a case study. J Eng Technol Res 15(1):17–26. https://doi.org/10.5897/JETR2022.0737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rasul MG, Widianto W, Mohanty B (2005) Assessment of the thermal performance and energy conservation opportunities of a cement industry in Indonesia. Appl Therm Eng 25(17–18):2950–2965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. CEMBUREAU (2023) Waste-to-energy. CEMBUREAU, The European Cement Association. https://www.cembureau.eu/policy-focus/environment/waste-to-energy/. Accessed 16 Aug 2023

  24. Sousa V, Bogas JA (2021) Comparison of energy consumption and carbon emissions from clinker and recycled cement production. J Clean Prod 306:127277 [online]. Available https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959652621014967

  25. Czigler T, Reiter S, Schulze P, Somers K (2020) Laying the foundation for zero-carbon cement. McKinsey & Company

    Google Scholar 

  26. European Union (2013) Establishing the best available techniques (BAT) conclusions under Directive 2010/75/EU of the European parliament and of the council on industrial emissions for the production of cement, lime and magnesium oxide. Official J Euro Union. Accessed 14 Aug 2023 [online]. Available https://eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/2019-11/CLM_BATC_Published.pdf

  27. Zuberi MJS, Patel MK (2017) Bottom-up analysis of energy efficiency improvement and CO2 emission reduction potentials in the Swiss cement industry. J Clean Prod 142:4294–4309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.11.178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang YH, Chang YL, Fleiter T (2016) A critical analysis of energy efficiency improvement potentials in Taiwan’s cement industry. Energy Policy 96:14–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Brunke JC, Blesl M (2014) Energy conservation measures for the German cement industry and their ability to compensate for rising energy-related production costs. J Clean Prod 82:94–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ECRA (2022) State of the Art cement manufacturing: current technologies and their future development. European Cement Research Academy. Accessed 01 Sept 2023 [online]. Available https://ecra-online.org/fileadmin/redaktion/files/pdf/ECRA_Technology_Papers_2022.pdf

  31. Kourti I, Sancho LD, Schorcht F, Roudier S, Scalet BM (2013) Best available techniques (BAT) reference document for the production of cement, lime and magnesium oxide: industrial emissions directive 2010/75/EU (integrated pollution prevention and control). Publications Office [online]. Available https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2788/12850

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to managers in the UK cement company who participated in this study and provided us the required information and data. We would also like to acknowledge the UK EPSRC-funded project “Transforming Foundation Industries Research and Innovation Hub (TransFIRe)” (EP/V054627/1) for the support of this work. All data supporting this study are provided in full in this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shoaib Sarfraz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sarfraz, S., Sherif, Z., Jolly, M., Salonitis, K. (2024). Benchmarking of Energy Consumption and CO2 Emissions in Cement Production: A Case Study. In: Iloeje, C., et al. Energy Technology 2024. TMS 2024. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50244-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics