Skip to main content

Even More Work for Mother? Online Schooling and Asymmetric Parental Involvement during the Pandemic in Indonesia

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
After Latour: Globalisation, Inequity and Climate Change (IFIPJWC 2023)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate accounts of what online schools meant for the paid and unpaid work done by women during Covid-19. When schools closed, and online schools started in Indonesia, parents were faced with restructuring the activities their children had earlier carried out at school and that were now centered at home. They also dealt with the introduction of digital technology in households. How did women (mothers specifically) negotiate these changes and what were the implications of these changes for their work burden? To understand this, we carried out a study in Batu, Indonesia, with heterosexual families that had multiple primary school-age children dealing with the transition from in-person to online schooling between March and May 2021.

Rather than a silver bullet for freeing up time, the introduction of information systems and digital technology into schooling merely added another task to the list of unpaid work that women perform. We use an Actor-Network lens but bring in the role of ideology to understand how networks are configured in times of change. How did mothers cope with the disproportionate burden of tasks related to online schooling that fell on them? Throughout, we found that mothers remained the dominant actors organizing their children’s online schooling, regardless of which parent earned more, had more free time from paid work, or was more digitally literate. We argue that since a gendered ideology underpins this reality, interventions such as online schooling cannot be designed in a gender-blind or gender-neutral manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See Maseiro (2020) and Oreglia and Srinivasan (2016) for a review of this literature and the range of themes covered.

  2. 2.

    The possession of benggol (money) and bonggol (sexual virility) are seen as desirable masculine attributes [15] with Lelananging Jagad (or the most masculine man in the entire universe) being one that’s powerful, handsome and has many wives [44]. Women and the attributes associated with them, on the other hand, ​​are considered subordinate [15]. The very term “Wanita,” which stands for “Women” in Javanese comes from the words wani (brave) and tapa (suffering). Wanita means someone who dares to suffer for others [18]. The widely used adage “Suwarga nunut neraka katut” – that the husband decides whether his wife will go to heaven or hell – indicates how a woman/wife is expected to fit into the family of the man, and the extent to which a wife’s life should depend on her husband’s. Thus, when a husband goes to heaven or hell, so does his wife. This happens even where a wife’s own actions may have earned her paradise but her husband’s would lead her to hell – the wife’s position is in hell merely because that is where her husband is headed, and her fate depends on her husband’s [24].

  3. 3.

    The pandemic was challenging for Susi’s family. At the pandemic’s beginning, Ridho, Susi’s husband, had a nervous breakdown. As a result, the family had to stop using cars because only Ridho could drive a car. In the end, Susi had to open a kiosk and sell her wares. However, she earned very little, and the family had to sell its car to make ends meet during the pandemic. Ridho often complained about the difficulty of even getting food for them.

References

  1. Tampubolon, H.U.: Interaction between parental involvement in online school and division of household labour in Batu, East Java, Indonesia. Bangalore (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Andrew, A., et al.: Inequalities in children’s experiences of home learning during the COVID-19 lockdown in England. Fisc. Stud. 41(3), 653–683 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Antonopoulos, R.: The unpaid care work - paid work connection. Policy Integration and Statistics Department International Labour Office (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bannan, B., Cook, J., Pachler, N.: Reconceptualizing design research in the age of mobile learning. Interact. Learn. Environ. 24(5), 938–953 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barley, S.R.: What can we learn from the history of technology? J. Eng. Tech. Manage. 15, 237–255 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bijker, W.E.: Women walking through plans: technology, democracy, and gender identity. Technol. Cult. 41(3), 485–515 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Boca, D.D.: Did COVID-19 Affect the Division of Labor within the Household? Evidence from Two Waves of the Pandemic in Italy. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP16257 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boczkowski, P.: Future avenues for research on online news production. Making Online News 2, 161–165 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borgonovi, F. e. (2018). Bridging the digital gender divide. OECD

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chauhan, P.: Gendering COVID-19: Impact of the pandemic on women’s burden of unpaid work in India. Gend. Issues 38(4), 395–419 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-020-09269-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chung, H., Birkett, H., Forbes, S., Seo, H.: Covid-19, flexible working, and implications for gender equality in the United Kingdom. Gend. Soc. 35(2), 218–232 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cockburn, C.: The Circuit of Technology: Gender, Identity and Power. In: Consuming Technologies: Media and Information in Domestic Spaces, pp. 33–42 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Craig, L.: Dual-Earner Parent Couples. Work and Care during COVID-19’. Gender, Work & Organization n/a (n/a) (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao12497

  14. Darwin, M.: Maskulinitas: Posisi laki-laki dalam masyarakat patriarkis. Center Popul. Policy Stud. Gadjah Mada Univ. 4, 1–10 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fachrani, J.I.: Manifestasi wanita dalam budaya patriarki: ideologi dalam Serat Candraning Wanita dan refleksi pada iklan era modern. Jurnal Linguistik Terapan 1–14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Farré, L.F., Farré, L., Fawaz, Y., Gonzalez, L., Graves, J.: How the Covid-19 lockdown affected gender inequality in paid and unpaid work in Spain. Institute of Labor Economics. (No. IZA Discussion Paper No. 13434) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fraser, N.: Contradictions of capital and care. New Left Rev. 100(99), 117 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Handayani, C.S.: Kuasa wanita jawa. LKIS PELANGI AKSARA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hariwijaya. Seks Jawa klasik. Yogyakarta: Niagara (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hill, N.E.: Parental school involvement and children’s academic achievement: pragmatics and issues. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 13(4), 161–164 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hochschild, A.: The second shift: working families and the revolution at home. Penguin (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Indonesia, P.R.: Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia nomor 12 tahun 2020 tentang penetapan bencana non alam penyebaran corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) sebagai bencana nasional tanggal 13 April 2020. Jakarta: Republik Indonesia: Presiden RI (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  23. ITU. The world takes a small step towards digital gender parity. International Telecommunication Union (2022). https://www.itu.int/itu-d/reports/statistics/2022/11/24/ff22-the-gender-digital-divide/

  24. Lestari, D.P.: Pembagian peran dalam rumah tangga pada pasangan suami istri Jawa. J. Penelitian Humaniora 16(1), 72–85 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Macevičiūtė, E., Wilson, T.D.: Digital means for reducing digital inequality: literature review. Inf. Sci. Int. J. Emerg. Transdisc. 21, 269–287 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. MacKenzie, D., Wajcman, J. (eds.): The Social Shaping Of Technology, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Miller, Claire Cain.: “How Society Pays When Women’s Work Is Unpaid.” The New York Times (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. OECD. OECD Policy Responses to Coronavirus (COVID-19) Caregiving in Crisis: Gender inequality in paid and unpaid work during COVID-19. OECD (2021). https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/caregiving-in-crisis-gender-inequality-in-paid-and-unpaid-work-during-covid-19-3555d164/

  29. Oreglia, E., Srinivasan, J.: ICT, intermediaries, and the transformation of gendered power structures. MIS Q. 40(2), 501–510 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Pandey, D.O.: COVID-19: a framework for effective delivering of online classes during lockdown. Hu Arenas 5, 322–336 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Pirus, M.S.: Javanese women identity regarding 3M: Macak-manak-masak values. International. J. Cult. History 7(2), 54 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rahmawati, A.: Harmoni dalam keluarga perempuan karir: upaya mewujudkan kesetaraan dan keadilan gender dalam keluarga. PALASTREN J. Studi Gender 8(1), 1–34 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ribeiro, L.M.: Parental Involvement during pandemic times: challenges and opportunities. Educ. Sci. 11(6), 302 (2021). MDPI AG. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci110603

  34. Ross, C.E.: The division of labor at home. Soc. Forces 65(3), 816–833 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sevilla, A., Smith, S.: Baby steps: the gender division of childcare during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 1, S169–S186 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/graa027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Shafer, K.S.: The division of domestic labor before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada: Stagnation versus shifts in fathers’ contributions. Can. Rev. Sociol./Revue canadienne de sociologie 57(4), 523–549 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Spitze, G.: The division of task responsibility in US households: longitudinal adjustments to change. Soc. Forces 64(3), 689–701 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Turvey, K., Pachler, N.: Problem spaces: a framework and questions for critical engagement with learning technologies in formal educational contexts. In: The Wiley Handbook of Learning Technology, pp. 113–130 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Van Dijk, J.A.: The evolution of the digital divide-the digital divide turns to inequality of skills and usage. In: Digital Enlightenment Yearbook, pp. 57–75. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wajcman, J.: Reflections on gender and technology studies: in what state is the art? Soc. Stud. Sci. 30(3), 447–464 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Waters, L.H., Menchaca, M.P., Borup, J.: Parental involvement in K-12 online and blended learning. In: Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning, p. 303 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  42. WHO: Pengawasan global untuk COVID-19 yang disebabkan oleh infeksi manusia dengan virus COVID-19: panduan sementara. (No. WHO/2019-nCoV/SurveillanceGuidance/2020.6) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Widiatmoko, H.: Ketika Anakku Siap Menikah. Elex Media Komputindo (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Ronika, R.: Lakon Semar Mbangun Kahyangan Dalam Perspektif Aksiologis Max Scheler (Relevansinya terhadap pembangunan mental masyarakat). Refleksi 16(1), 71 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was carried out as part of the first author’s masters thesis at the International Institute of Information Technology Bangalore, (IIITB), supervised by the second author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hotma Uli Octavia Tampubolon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Annexure 1

figure a

Annexure 2

Table of Respondent

Family members

Relationship

School

Job

Mischa

Sarmi

Mother

 

Food seller

Thomas

Father

 

Driver

Gilang

1st Son

 

hotel broker

Agnes

1st daughter

Public

student

Hana

2nd daughter

Private

student

Grace

3rd daughter

Public

student

Mischa

4th daughter

Public

student

Jio

Susi

Mother

 

Kiosk seller

Ridho

Father

  

Aza

1st Daughter

Private

student

Jio

2nd Son

Private

student

Olivia

Rina

Mother

 

Private School Teacher

John

Father

 

car/motorcycle repair worker

Jevon

Son

Private

student

Olivia

daughter

Private

student

Atta

Nina

Mother

 

Food seller

Baro

Father

 

Food seller

Atta

Son

Public

student

Aro

Son

Public

student

Ipah

Sela

Mother

 

Village treasure and Villa caretaker

Opik

Father

 

Hotel employee

Ipah

Daughter

Public

student

Aloysius

Gina

Mother

 

Civil servant

Supratman

Father

 

Cook

Aloysius

Son

Public

student

Juni

Elvira

Mother

 

Public School Teacher

Ari

Father

 

Private sector worker

Juni

daughter

Private

student

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Tampubolon, H.U.O., Srinivasan, J. (2023). Even More Work for Mother? Online Schooling and Asymmetric Parental Involvement during the Pandemic in Indonesia. In: Jones, M.R., Mukherjee, A.S., Thapa, D., Zheng, Y. (eds) After Latour: Globalisation, Inequity and Climate Change. IFIPJWC 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 696. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50153-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50154-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics