Skip to main content

Challenging Established Structures: Gender and Rural Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Despite an increasing scholarly attention to understand rural entrepreneurship, the entrepreneurial processes in developing countries’ context are largely unexplored. Knowledge about different structures that configures rural entrepreneurial processes is inadequate to fully understand the phenomena from the perspectives of developing countries. More specifically, the knowledge of rurality and the gendered structures, and their influences on rural entrepreneurship, remains mostly assumptive amongst professionals and policymakers. This chapter attempts to fill this knowledge gap by exploring, analysing and discussing the influence of rurality and gendered structures on rural entrepreneurship. We achieve our objectives with the aid of three case studies of rural women entrepreneurs in the agricultural sector within Sub-Saharan African countries’ context, Tanzania in particular.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    VICOBA stands for Village Community Banks. In Tanzania, VICOBA provides a structure through which communities are able to organize themselves, provide skill-sharing and capacity building in an effort to combat poverty. Each member puts in a small amount of money every month in form of shares and can take out loans when needed. At the end of every calendar year, the amount collected from shares is distributed back to members, each receives according to her/his shares. Most groups also set aside an emergency pool, to provide support for members with a form of insurance/guarantee.

  2. 2.

    For the purpose of this study, all respondents and places have been given randomly assigned fictitious names for anonymity.

References

  • AFAWA. (2022). Unleashing Women’s Entrepreneurship Through Strategic Partnerships. www.afdb.org design.

  • Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x.

  • Akyoo, A., & Lazaro, E. (2007). The spice industry in Tanzania: General profile, supply chain structure and food standards compliance issues. In Agricultural Economics (DIIS Worki). Danish Institute for International Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson, M., & Skoldberg, K. (2018). Reflexive methodology, new vistas for qualitative researchers. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardasi, E., Blackden, C. M., & Guzman, J. C. (2007). Gender, entrepreneurship, and competitiveness in Africa. Africa Competitiveness Report, 1(69–85), 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglund, K., & Johansson, A. W. (2007). Constructions of entrepreneurship: A discourse analysis of academic publications. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 1(1), 77–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/17506200710736276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhowmick, S. (2006). Structuration in entrepreneurial opportunity Pursuit: The case of a small technology entrepreneur. In 20th ANZAM Conference, December 2006, Proceedings published in CD, ISBN 1 921047 34 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock, B. B. (2004). Fitting in and Multi-tasking: Dutch farm women’s strategies in rural entrepreneurship. Sociologia Ruralis, 44(3), 245–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.2004.00274.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridget, A., Ezeibe, C., & Dennis, O. E. (2017). Analysis of entrepreneurship development in agriculture among female groundnut farmers in Enugu state. European Journal of Business and Management, 9(32), 108–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, C. G., de Bruin, A., & Welter, F. (2009). A gender-aware framework for women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566260910942318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calas, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2007). Knowing Lisa? Feminist analyses of “gender and entrepreneurship”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calas, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the boundaries: Reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552–569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design qualitative quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Research Design Qualitative Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches, 3–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/08941939.2012.723954.

  • Dolan, C. (2001). The “Good Wife”: Struggles over resources in the Kenyan horticultural sector. Journal of Development Studies, 37(March 2012), 39–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331321961.

  • Dyck, I., & Kearns, R. A. (2006). Structuration theory: Agency, structures and everyday life. In S. Aitken & G. Valentine (Eds.), Approaches to human geography (pp. 86–97). SAGE Publications.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, W. F., & Porca, S. (2001). Investing in rural infrastructure. International Regional Science Review, 24, 103–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaddefors, J., & Anderson, A. R. (2019). Romancing the rural: Reconceptualizing rural entrepreneurship as engagement with context(s). International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 20(3), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465750318785545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Polity press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, K. D., Jennings, J. E., Brush, C., Carter, S., & Welter, F. (2012). Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(3), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00504.x.

  • ILO. (2015). Engaging Informal Women Entrepreneurs in East Africa: Approaches To Greater Formality. 1–12. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/---ifp_seed/documents/briefingnote/wcms_430946.pdf.

  • Ilomo, M., Rutashobya, L. K., Ishengoma, E. K., Pettersson, K., & Bergman Lodin, J. (2021). Doing and undoing gender in rice business and marketplaces in Tanzania. Cogent Social Sciences, 7(1), 1934981. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2021.1934981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(5), 467–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalantaridis, C., & Bika, Z. (2006). Local embeddedness and rural entrepreneurship: Case-study evidence from Cumbria England. Environment and Planning A, 38(8), 1561–1579. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kodithuwakku, S. S., & Rosa, P. (2002). The entrepreneurial process and economic success in a constrained environment. 17, 431–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, S., MĂĽller, S., & Tanvig, H. W. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural—between place and space. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2015-0216.

  • Korsgaard, S., Ferguson, R., & Gaddefors, J. (2015). The best of both worlds : How rural entrepreneurs use placial embeddedness and strategic networks to create opportunities. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1085100.

  • Langevang, T., Hansen, M. W., & Rutashobya, L. K. (2018). Navigating institutional complexities: The response strategies of Tanzanian female entrepreneurs. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 10(4), 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2018-0015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekhanya, M. L. (2018). The Digitalisation of Rural Entrepreneurship. IntechOpen., Entrepreneurship-Trends and Challenges, 13. https://doi.org/10.5772/57353.

  • Little, J., & Jones, O. (2000). Masculinity, gender, and rural policy. Rural Sociology, 65(4), 621–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2000.tb00047.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R., Harper, C., Brodbeck, S., & Page, E. (2015). How do gender norms change? Overseas Development Institute, September, 18. www.odi.org%0Awww.odi.org/facebook%0Awww.odi.org/twitter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, R., & Harper, C. (2015). Social norms, gender norms and adolescent girls: A brief guide. September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marlow, S., & McAdam, M. (2013). Gender and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate and challenging myths; exploring the mystery of the under-performing female entrepreneur. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 19(1), 114–124. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551311299288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minniti, M., & Naude, W. (2010). Introduction What Do We Know about the Patterns and Determinants of Female Entrepreneurship across Countries ? 22, 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2010.17.

  • Mori, N. G. (2014). Women’s Entrepreneurship Deveopment in Tanzania : Insights and recommendations. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.4163.1444.

  • NBS. (2020). Tanzania in figures 2019. http://www.nbs.go.tz/nbs/takwimu/references/Tanzania_in_Figures_2015.pdf%0A https://www.nbs.go.tz/nbs/takwimu/references/Tanzania_in_Figures_2019.pdf.

  • Nelson, C., & Tiernan, M. (2013). Case Studies of Women in Tanzanian Agribusiness. Woodrow Wilson international center for scholars. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12018/2709.

  • Njeru, E. H., & Njoka, J. M. (2001). Women entrepreneurs in Nairobi: The socio-cultural factors influencing their investment patterns. Negotiating social space: East African microenterprises (pp. 141–174). Africa World Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Njuki, J., Kaaria, S., Chamunorwa, A., & Chiuri, W. (2011). Linking smallholder farmers to markets,gender and intra-household Dynamics: Does the choice of commodity matter? https://doi.org/10.1057/ejdr.2011.8.

  • Ogbor, J. O. (2000). Mythicizing and reification in entrepreneurial discourse: Ideology-critique of entrepreneurial studies. Journal of Management Studies, 37(5), 605–635. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quisumbing, A. R., Rubin, D., Manfre, C., Waithanji, E., Mara, van den B., Olney, D. K., & Meinzen-Dick, R. S. (2013). Closing the gender asset gap: Learning from value chain development in Africa and Asia. February, 28. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2405716.

  • Quisumbing, A. R., & Pandolfelli, L. (2010). Promising approaches to address the needs of poor female farmers: Resources, constraints, and interventions. World Development, 38(4), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutashobya, L., Chiwona-karltun, L., Wilson, M., Ilomo, M., & Semkunde, M. A. (2021). Gender and rural entrepreneurship in digitizing sub-saharan africa, published in business in Africa in the era of digital technology (J. B. A. et al. (Eds.)). Advances i, Issue May 2022). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70538-1_5.

  • Rutashobya, L. K. (2000). Women entrepreneurship in Tanzania: Entry and performance barriers (p. 1). Faculty of Commerce and Management, University of Dar Es Salaam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutashobya, L. K. (2001). Female entrepreneurship in Tanzania: Constraints and strategic considerations. Business Management Review, 7(1), 22–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutashobya, L. K., Allan, I., & Nilsson, K. (2009). Gender, social networks, and entrepreneurial outcomes in Tanzania. Journal of African Business, 10(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228910802701387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, C. E. (2018). Situating Rural Women in Theory and Practice Portrayals (Vol. 3, Issue September). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanginga, P., Best, R., Chitsike, C., Delve, R., Kaaria, S., & Kirkby, R. (2004). Enabling rural innovation in Africa : An approach for integrating farmer participatory research and market orientation for building the assets of rural poor. Uganda Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(1), 934–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shimeles, A., Verdier-Chouchane, A., & Boly, A. (2018). Building a Resilient and Sustainable Agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa. Springer Nature.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Skuras, D., Dimara, E., & Vakrou, A. (2000). The day after grant-aid: Business development schemes for small rural firms in lagging areas of Greece. Small Business Economics, 14, 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, A., & Rutashobya, L. K. (2009). Gender-related themes in african entrepreneurship: introduction to the articles. Journal of African Business, 10(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228910802701270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stathopoulou, S., Psaltopoulos, D., & Skuras, D. (2004). Rural entrepreneurship in Europe. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 10(6), 404–425. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552550410564725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trettin, L., & Welter, F. (2011). Challenges for spatially oriented entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(7–8), 575–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985621003792988

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO. (2001). Tanzania: Sustainable Industrial Development and Competitiveness. Dar es Salaam.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO. (2011). Tanzania’s Cashew Value Chain : A diagnostic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. (2002). Comparing the performance of male- and female-controlled businesses: Relating outputs to inputs, 91–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2008). Women’s entrepreneurship from an institutional perspective: The case of Uzbekistan. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0087-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M., Rutashobya, L. K., Gaddefors, J., Melyoki, L., & Otto, O. (2020). The role of spatial context for women’s engagement in rural entrepreneurship in Tanzania. Business Management Review, 23(2), 48–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • World bank. (2009). Gender in agriculture sourcebook. In Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-7587-7.

  • Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and method. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Merezia Wilson Bambaganya .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bambaganya, M.W., Gaddefors, J. (2024). Challenging Established Structures: Gender and Rural Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Kabongo, J., Sigué, S., Baba Abugre, J. (eds) Understanding Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa. Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship and Social Challenges in Developing Economies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50128-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics