Skip to main content

Effectuation and Bricolage and their Applicability to Sub-Saharan African Entrepreneurship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa

Abstract

Traditional, Western approaches to entrepreneurship do not adequately capture what is occurring in the sub-Saharan African context. This paper reviews the extent to which specific alternative theoretical perspectives of entrepreneurship are present/applicable in/to sub-Saharan Africa. Over the past two decades, more established economics-based views of entrepreneurial behavior have been supplemented with alternative theoretical approaches to scholarship in the entrepreneurship field; including effectuation and entrepreneurial bricolage. This chapter reviews these literatures with a view to what is occurring and applicable in/to the sub-Saharan African environment. There is increasing evidence of effectuation and bricolage in the activities of entrepreneurial actors in resource-constrained environments such as much of sub-Saharan Africa. Emphasizing affordable loss as opposed to expected returns; exploiting networks and social capital through collaboration rather than obsessing over competitive analysis; leveraging contingencies rather than exploiting pre-existing intellectual capital; and adapting to an unpredictable future rather than forecasting an uncertain one, effectuation and bricolage appear to be relevant and exploited entrepreneurial approaches in much of Africa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Afutu-Kotey, R. L., & Gough, K. V. (2022). Bricolage and informal businesses: Young entrepreneurs in the mobile telephony sector in Accra Ghana. Futures, 135, 102487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer, G., Baker, T., & Mauer, R. (2009). Towards an alternative theory of entrepreneurial success: Integrating bricolage, effectuation and improvisation. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 29(6), 4–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend, R. J., Sarooghi, H., & Burkemper, A. C. (2015). Effectuation as ineffectual? Applying the 3E theory-assessment framework to a proposed new theory of entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Review, 40(4), 630–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atarah, B. A., Peprah, A. A., Okoe Amartey, A. F., & Bamfo, B. A. (2021). Making do by doing without: Bricolage in the funding sources of female entrepreneurs in resource-constrained environments. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Avillez, M.M., Greenman, A. & Marlow, S. Ethical judgments about social entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa: The influence of Spatio-cultural meanings. Journal of Business Ethics, 161, 877–892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04344-z.

  • Bacq, S., Ofstein, L. F., Kickul, J. R., & Gundry, L. K. (2015). Bricolage in social entrepreneurship: How creative resource mobilization fosters greater social impact. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(4), 283–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating something from nothing: Resource construction through entrepreneurial bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. A. (2009). Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision making: Differences between experts and novices. Does experience in starting new ventures change the way entrepreneurs think? Perhaps, but for now, “caution” is essential”. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 310–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, C., Eisenhardt, K., Kotha, S., Meyer, A., & Rajagopalan, N. (2012). The role of the entrepreneur in technology entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 6(3), 203–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bojica, A. M., Ruiz Jiménez, J. M., Ruiz Nava, J. A., & Fuentes-Fuentes, M. M. (2018). Bricolage and growth in social entrepreneurship organisations. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3–4), 362–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, M. J. (2012). Social innovation, an analytical grid for understanding the social economy: The example of the Quebec housing sector. Service Business, 6(1), 47–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brieger, S. A., & De Clercq, D. (2019). Entrepreneurs’ individual-level resources and social value creation goals: The moderating role of cultural context. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 25(2), 193–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busch, C., & Barkema, H. (2021). From necessity to opportunity: Scaling bricolage across resource-constrained environments. Strategic Management Journal, 42, 741–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiles, T. H., Bluedorn, A. C., & Gupta, V. K. (2007). Beyond creative destruction and entrepreneurial discovery: A radical Austrian approach to entrepreneurship. Organization Studies, 28(4), 467–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinyoka, S. (2017). Bricolage: A state of entrepreneurial excellence. Asian Business Research, 2(3), 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinyoka, S. (2020a). Understanding the roles of effectuation and bricolage in the opportunity creation framework. Asian Business Research, 5(1), 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chinyoka, S. (2020b). The effects of resource dependence and resource-based theories on bricolage in social enterprises. International Journal of Economics, Business and Management Research, 4(1), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciambotti, G., Littlewood, D., Sottini, A., & M’ithiria, E.N. (2020). Building and scaling social enterprise business models for BOP markets in Kenya, in Base of the Pyramid markets in Africa, in Judy N. Muthuri, M. G. Arnold, S. Gold, & X. Rueda (Eds.). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciambotti, G. Sgrò, F., Bontis, N., & Zaccone, M. C. (2021). Local relationships matter! The impact of intellectual capital on entrepreneurial bricolage in African social entrepreneurs, Knowledge and Process Management, available online at: https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.1678.

  • Ciambotti, G., & Pedrini, M. (2021). Hybrid harvesting strategies to overcome resource constraints: evidence from social enterprises in Kenya. Journal of Business Ethics, 168, 631–650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04256-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciambotti, G., Zaccone, M. C., & Pedrini, M. (2023). Enabling bricolage in resource-constrained contexts: The role of sense of community and passion in African social entrepreneurs. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(1), 167–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, F. (2002). Reinventing institutions: Bricolage and the social embeddedness of natural resource management. The European Journal of Development Research, 14, 11–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corner, P. D., & Ho, M. (2010). How opportunities develop in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(4), 635–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers Scheepers, M., Boshoff, C., & Oostenbrink, M. (2017). Entrepreneurial women’s cognitive ambidexterity: Career and cultural influences. South African Journal of Business Management, 48(4), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajbm.v48i4.40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desa, G. (2012). Resource mobilization in international social entrepreneurship: Bricolage as a mechanism of institutional transformation. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4), 727–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or bricolage? Overcoming resource constraints in global social entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Domenico, M., Haugh, H., & Tracey, P. (2010). Social bricolage: Theorizing social value creation in social enterprises. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(4), 681–703.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivedi, A., & Weerawardena, J. (2018). Conceptualizing and operationalizing the social entrepreneurship construct. Journal of Business Research, 86, 32–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle, R. L., Dimitriadi, N., Gavidia, J. V., Schlaegel, C., Delanoe, S., Alvarado, I., He, X., Buame, S., & Wolff, B. (2010). Entrepreneurial intent: A twelve-country evaluation of Ajzen’s model of planned behavior. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16(1), 36–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Essen, B. (2019). Influence of uncertainty intolerance and entrepreneurial passion on the approach for decision-making in venture creation; causation or effectuation—The case of South Africa. MSc Business Administration thesis. University of Twente. Accessed at http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/79892.

  • Eyana, S. M., Masurel, E., & Paas, L. J. (2018). Causation and effectuation behaviour of Ethiopian entrepreneurs: Implications on performance of small tourism firms. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(5), 791–817.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatoki, O., & Dzomonda, O. (2019). Entrepreneurial bricolage, subjective wellbeing and performance of new small and medium enterprises in the retail sector of South Africa. Journal of Reviews on Global Economics, 8, 1224–1233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, G. (2012). Effectuation, causation, and bricolage: A behavioral comparison of emerging theories in entrepreneurship research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(5), 1019–1051.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frese, T., Geiger, I., & Dost, F. (2020). An empirical investigation of determinants of effectual and causal decision logics in online and high-tech start-up firms. Small Business Economics, 54, 641–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futterer, F., Schmidt, J., & Heidenreich, S. (2018). Effectuation or causation as the key to corporate venture success? Investigating effects of entrepreneurial behaviors on business model innovation and venture performance. Long Range Planning, 51(1), 64–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R., Gehman, J., & Giuliani, A. (2018). Why not take a performative approach to entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 9, 60–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghorbel, F., & Boujelbène, Y. (2013). A comprehensive literature review of effectuation theory from 1999 to 2011. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 5(2), 168–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin-El, E., & Olabisi, J. (2020). Non-liability of “Foreignness”: Theorizing immigrant entrepreneurs in the practice of bricolage. Academy of Management Proceedings, published online 29 Jul 2020https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.20444abstract.

  • Grzeslo, J. (2020). A generation of bricoleurs: Digital entrepreneurship in Kenya. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 16(4), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJEMSD-10-2019-0078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartikainen, E. (2014). Effectual framework for supporting sustainable entrepreneurship with development cooperation: case study of Mozambique, Master’s thesis, Department of Management and International Business, Aalto University, retrieved at: https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/handle/123456789/13638.

  • Hassenforder, E., Ferrand, N., Pittock, J., Daniell, K. A., & Barreteau, O. (2015). A participatory planning process as an arena for facilitating institutional bricolage: Example from the Rwenzori region Uganda. Society and Natural Resources, 28(9), 995–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haugh, H. (2005). A research agenda for social entrepreneurship. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heydenrych, J. (2013). The influence of effectuation and technology orientation on firm performance in the renewable energy sector of South Africa, Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, University of the Witwatersrand, accessed at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/39671828.pdf.

  • Holt, D., & Littlewood, D. (2017). Waste livelihoods amongst the poor—Through the lens of bricolage. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(2), 253–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, L., & Lean, J. (2018). Entrepreneurial learning—a social context perspective: Evidence from Kenya and Tanzania. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(4), 609–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, F., Fayolle, A., & Wuilaume, A. (2018). Researching bricolage in social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3–4), 450–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johannisson, B. (2018). Disclosing everyday practices constituting social entrepreneuring—a case of necessity effectuation. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3–4), 390–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, J., & Rouse, J. (2020). Contesting effectuation theory: Why it does not explain new venture creation. International Small Business Journal, 38(6), 515–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langevang, T., & Namatovu, R. (2019). Social bricolage in the aftermath of war. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 31(9–10), 785–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, C. (1996). The savage mind. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. (1959). The science of “muddling through.” Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lingelbach, D., Sriram, V., Mersha, T., & Saffu, K. (2015). The innovation process in emerging economies. An effectuation perspective. Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 16(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, D. (2009). African Ubuntu philosophy and global management. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(S3), 313–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2009). Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 419–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKague, K., & Oliver, C. (2016). Network bricolage as the reconciliation of indigenous and transplanted institutions in Africa. Africa Journal of Management, 2(3), 300–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvie, A., Chandler, G., DeTienne, D., & Johansson, A. (2020). The measurement of effectuation: Highlighting research tensions and opportunities for the future. Small Business Economics, 54, 689–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, M. L., & King, J. S. (2015). Extending constructivist perspectives on opportunity production through an incorporation of effectual logics. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 5(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2014-0025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirvis, P., & Googins, B. (2018). Catalyzing social entrepreneurship in Africa: Roles for western universities Ngos and corporations. Africa Journal of Management, 4(1), 57–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mthanti, T. S. (2012). The impact of effectuation on the performance of South African medium and high technology firms, Doctoral thesis, Faculty of Commerce, Law and Management, University of the Witwatersrand, accessed at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/39671215.pdf

  • Mthanti, T. S., & Urban, B. (2014). Effectuation and entrepreneurial orientation in high-technology firms. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 26, 121–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musona J. (2021). New business models for frugal innovation: experience from an enterprise supporting sustainable smallholder agriculture in Kenya. In: N. Agarwal, & A. Brem (Eds.) Frugal innovation and its implementation. Contributions to management science. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-67119-8_8.

  • Musona, J., Sjögrén, H., Puumalainen, K., & Syrjä, P. (2020). Bricolage in environmental entrepreneurship: How environmental innovators “make do” at the bottom of the pyramid. Business Strategy and Development, 3(4), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Namatovu, R. (2018), bricolage behaviour in small established firms operating in resource constrained environments. Ph.D. thesis, Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, Hatfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neneh, N. B., & Vanzyl, J. (2012). Towards establishing long-term surviving small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in South Africa: An entrepreneurial approach. African Journal of Business Management, 6, 8327–8343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newth, J. (2016). Social enterprise innovation in context: Stakeholder influence through contestation. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 6(4), 369–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newth, J., & Woods, C. (2014). Resistance to social entrepreneurship: How context shapes innovation. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 5(2), 192–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogunleye, M. (2019). Social Entrepreneurship: Exploring the bricolage model in Nigeria. Ph.D. thesis, Walden dissertations and doctoral studies. 6640. Available at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations/6640.

  • Onwuegbuzie, H. N., & Mafimisebi, O. P. (2021). Global relevance of scaling African indigenous entrepreneurship. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 166, 120629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owusu, W. A., & Janssen, F. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship: Effectuation and bricolage approaches to venture establishment in West Africa. In 4th EMES International Research Conference on Social Enterprise, 01/07/2013–04/07/2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Packard, M. D. (2017). Where did interpretivism go in the theory of entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing, 32(5), 536–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parris, D. L., & McInnis-Bowers, C. V. (2014). Social entrepreneurship questioning the status quo: Waste as a resource. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(2), 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pattinson, S., Ciesielska, M., Preece, D., Nicholson, J. D., & Alexandersson, A. (In press). The “Tango Argentino”: A metaphor for understanding effectuation processes. Journal of Management Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492618776102.

  • Perry, J. T., Chandler, G. N., & Markova, G. (2012). Entrepreneurial effectuation: A review and suggestions for future research. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 36(4), 837–861.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., Lee, H., Ghobadian, A., O’Regan, N., & James, P. (2015). Social innovation and social entrepreneurship: A systematic review. Group and Organization Management, 40(3), 428–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, S., Song, M., & Smit, W. (2009). A meta-analytic review of effectuation and venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(6), 573–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rod, M., & Rod, G. (2020). Reviewing effectuation and bricolage in the context of social entrepreneurship multisector collaborations. International Journal of Business and Management Research, 8(3), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Jiménez, J. M., Ruiz-Arroyo, M., & del Mar Fuentes-Fuentes, M. (2021). The impact of effectuation, causation, and resources on new venture performance: Novice versus expert entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 57, 1761–1781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabdia, K. (2014). Effectuation as a construct for new business formation in South Africa (MBA mini-dissertation). Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria. Retrieved from http://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/1818.

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., & Read, S. (2015), Expertise and entrepreneurship. Wiley Encyclopedia of Management, Vol. 3, Entrepreneurship, pp. 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001). What makes entrepreneurs entrepreneurial? Darden Business Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D. (2008). Effectuation: Elements of entrepreneurial expertise. Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy, S. D., Kumar, K., York, J. G., & Bhagavatula, S. (2014). An effectual approach to international entrepreneurship: Overlaps, challenges, and provocative possibilities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, S. (2018). Grassroots entrepreneurs and social change at the bottom of the pyramid: The role of bricolage. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3–4), 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuld, L. (2018). The role of entrepreneurial bricolage and design thinking in opportunity development: A design-centred entrepreneurship perspective, (MBA mini-dissertation). Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria. Retrieved from https://repository.up.ac.za/bitstream/handle/2263/71757/Schuld_Role_2018.pdf?sequence=1.

  • Servantie, V., & Rispal, M. H. (2018). Bricolage, effectuation, and causation shifts over time in the context of social entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 30(3/4), 310–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soer, T. (2019). The influence of uncertainty and cultural tightness- looseness on the decision-making processes of entrepreneurs in South Africa. M.Sc. Business Administration thesis, University of Twente. Accessed at: http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/79904.

  • Sunduramurthy, C., Zheng, C., Musteen, M., Francis, J., & Ryne, L. (2016). Doing more with less, systematically? Bricolage and engineering in successful social ventures. Journal of World Business, 51(5), 855–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran, T. (2020). Intolerance of uncertainty and culturalttightness-looseness - two antecedents of effectuation-causation: evidence from South Africa. M.Sc. Business Administration thesis. University of Twente. Accessed at http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/82786.

  • Tsotetsi, T. (2020). The role of social capital in entrepreneurial effectuation: The South African experience. MBA thesis, Gordon Institute of Business Science, University of Pretoria, accessed at: https://repository.up.ac.za/handle/2263/79667.

  • Urban, B. (2018). Effectuation and opportunity recognition in the renewable energy sector in South Africa: A focus on environmental dynamism and hostility. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 1850010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban, B., & Heydenrych, J. (2015). Technology orientation and effectuation-links to firm performance in the renewable energy sector of South Africa. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 26(3), 125–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Walt, A., & Whittaker, L. (2020). Exploring migrant micro-entrepreneurs’ use of social capital to create opportunity in South Africa’s informal market: A qualitative approach. Southern African Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, 12(1), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeire, J. A. L., & Bruton, G. D. (2016). Entrepreneurial opportunities and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa: A review and agenda for the future. Africa Journal of Management, 2(3), 258–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vreugdenhil, H. G. (2020). To predict, or to control that is the question: the influence of intolerance of uncertainty on entrepreneurial decision-making behaviour, MSc Business Administration thesis. University of Twente. Accessed at http://purl.utwente.nl/essays/82791.

  • Welter, C., & Kim, S. (2018). Effectuation under risk and uncertainty: A simulation model. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(1), 100–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welter, C., Mauer, R., & Wuebker, R. J. (2016). Bridging behavioral models and theoretical concepts: Effectuation and bricolage in the opportunity creation framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(1), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiltbank R., & Sarasvathy, S. D. (2010). What effectuation is not: Further development of an alternative to rational choice. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf, J., & Sloan, M. F. (2015). Effectual processes in nonprofit start-ups and social entrepreneurship: An illustrated discussion of a novel decision-making approach. American Review of Public Administration, 45(4), 417–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zivdar, M., Imanipour, N., Talebi, K., & Hosseini, S. R. (2017). An explorative study of inputs for entrepreneurs’ decision-making to create new venture in a high-tech context. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 18(4), 243–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Rod .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rod, M. (2024). Effectuation and Bricolage and their Applicability to Sub-Saharan African Entrepreneurship. In: Kabongo, J., Sigué, S., Baba Abugre, J. (eds) Understanding Entrepreneurship in Sub-Saharan Africa. Palgrave Studies of Entrepreneurship and Social Challenges in Developing Economies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50128-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics