Abstract
Controversy arose when a humanoid robot named “Sophia” was given citizenship and did performances all over the world. Why should some robots gain citizenship? Going beyond recent discussions in robot ethics and human–robot interaction, and drawing on phenomenological approaches to political philosophy, actor-network theory, and performance-oriented philosophy of technology, we propose to interpret and discuss the world tour of Sophia as a political choreography: we argue that the media performances of the Sophia robot were politically choreographed to advance economic interests. Using a phenomenological approach and attending to the performance and movement of robots and illustrating our discussion with media material of the Sophia performance, we explore the mechanisms through which the media spectacle and robotic performance advanced the economic interests of technology industries and their governmental promotors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bryson, J. (2010). Robots should be slaves. In Y. Wilks (Ed.), Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues (pp. 63–74). John Benjamins.
Butterworth, J., & Wildschut, L. (Eds.). (2009). Contemporary choreography: A critical reader. Routledge.
Calo, R. (2016). Robots in American law (University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2016–04). Retrieved September 13, 2022, from http://euro.ecom.cmu.edu/program/law/08-732/AI/Calo.pdf
Coeckelbergh, M. (2010). Robot rights? Towards a social-relational justification of moral consideration. Ethics and Information Technology, 12, 209. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-010-9235-5
Coeckelbergh, M. (2012). Growing moral relations: Critique of moral status ascription. Palgrave Macmillan.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2014). The moral standing of machines: Towards a relational and non-cartesian moral hermeneutics. Philosophy & Technology, 27(1), 61–77.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2019a). Moved by machines: Performance metaphors and philosophy of technology. Routledge.
Coeckelbergh, M. (2019b). Technoperformances: Using metaphors from the performance arts for a postphenomenology and posthermeneutics of technology use. AI & SOCIETY. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-019-00926-7
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus. University of Minnesota Press.
Demetriou, D. (2014, May 27). My day: Robot scientist Tomotaka Takahash. BBC News. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-27573546
Dourish, P. (2004). Where the action is. The foundations of embodied interaction. The MIT Press.
Gunkel, D. J. (2018). Robot rights. The MIT Press.
Hansen, M. (2006). Bodies in code: Interfaces with digital media. Routledge.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan_Meets_OncoMouse. Routledge.
Hauser, H., & Francesco, C. (2017). Morphosis—Taking morphological computation to the next level. In C. Laschi, J. Rossiter, F. Iida, M. Cianchetti, & L. Margheri (Eds.), Soft robotics: Trends, applications and challenges (pp. 117–122). Springer.
IFR (International federation of Robotics Executive). (2018). Summary world robotics 2018 service robots. Retrieved September 7, 2022, from https://ifr.org/downloads/press2018/Executive_Summary_WR_Service_Robots_2018.pdf
Ihde, D. (2002). Bodies in technology. University of Minnesota Press.
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32(2), 101–125.
Kozel, S. (2007). Closer. Performance, technologies, phenomenology. The MIT Press.
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
Leeker, M., Schipper, I., & Beyes, T. (Eds.). (2017). Performing the digital. Performativity and performance studies in digital cultures. transcript.
Ley, M. (2023). Care ethics and the future of work: A different voice. Philosophy and Technology, 36(7). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00604-5
Manning, E. (2016). The minor gesture. Duke University Press.
Mori, M. (1970). Bukimi no tani. English edition: Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley (K. F. MacDorman, M. Minato, Trans.). Energy, 4(7), 33–35.
Müller, M., & Schur, C. (2016). Assemblage thinking and actor-network theory: Conjunctions, disjunctions, cross-fertilisations. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41, 217–229. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12117
Nail, T. (2017). What is an assemblage? SubStance, 46(1), 21–37.
Nielsen, J. (1994). Usability engineering. Morgan Kaufmann.
Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (Eds.). (1986). User centered system design. New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Parson, A.-B. (2022). The choreography of everyday life. Verso.
Parviainen, J. (2010). Choreographing resistances: Kinaesthetic intelligence and bodily knowledge as political tools in activist work. Mobilities, 5(3), 311–330.
Parviainen, J. (2016). Quantified bodies in the checking loop: Analyzing the choreographies of biomonitoring and generating Big Data. Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments, 12(1), 56–73.
Parviainen, J., & Ridell, S. (2020). Infrastructuring bodies: Choreographies of power in the computational city. In M. Nagenborg, T. Stone, M. González Woge, & P. Vermaas (Eds.), Technology and the city: Towards a philosophy of Urban Technologies. Springer.
Parviainen, J., Van Aerschot, L., Särkikoski, T., Pekkarinen, S., Melkas, H., & Hennala, L. (2019). Motions with emotions? A phenomenological approach to understand the simulated aliveness of a robot body. Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology, 23(3), 318–341.
Roozen, I., Raedts, M., & Yanycheva, A. (2023). Are retail customers ready for service robot assistants? International Journal of Social Robotics, 15, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-022-00949-z
Schiller, G., & Rubidge, S. (Eds.). (2014). Choreographic dwellings: Practising place. Palgrave Macmillan.
Søraa, R. A. (2018). Mecha-media: How are androids, cyborgs, and robots presented and received through the media? In S. J. Thompson (Ed.), Androids, cyborgs, and robots in contemporary culture and Society (pp. 96–119). IGI Global.
Thrift, N. J. (2000). Afterwords. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 18, 213–255.
Valuates. (2022). Global social robots market research report. https://reports.valuates.com/market-reports/360I-Auto-5N278/the-global-social-robots
Van Aerschot, L., & Parviainen, J. (2020). Robots responding to care needs? A multitasking care robot pursued for 25 years, available products offer simple entertainment and instrumental assistance. Ethics and Information Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-020-09536-0
van Wynsberghe, A., & Robbins, S. (2018). Critiquing the reasons for making artificial moral agents. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0030-8
Wajcman, J. (2004). TechnoFeminism. Polity Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Parviainen, J., Coeckelbergh, M. (2024). Sophia the Robot as a Political Choreography to Advance Economic Interests: An Exercise in Political Phenomenology and Critical Performance-Oriented Philosophy of Technology. In: Breyer, T., Gerner, A.M., Grouls, N., Schick, J.F. (eds) Diachronic Perspectives on Embodiment and Technology. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 46. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50085-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50085-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50084-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50085-5
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)