Abstract
In this chapter, we realize a comparative study between the use of bifacial modules and conventional monofacial modules in APV systems. To this aim, we carried out simulations using SAM and PVsyst software to evaluate the energetic and economic performances of an APV system installed in AGADIR, Morocco. This PV system has an installed capacity of 2.1 kW for bifacial and monofacial modules mounted on a Fixed Tilted (Optimal) and Fixed Vertical and Horizontal Axis Tracking (HSAT) structure. The structures are raised to a sufficient height above a wheat field, for which the estimated albedo variation is a function of their growing. Simulation results indicate that the fixed-tilt bifacial module produces an energy gain of about 6 and a 2% reduction in LCOE compared to monofacial modules. Similarly, a bifacial module with HSAT produces the best results. This system increases energy production by up to 20% with an LCOE of about $23/MWh and a capacity factor of 28%. Given the results, ground albedo is a significant factor in the variation in energy production in the bifacial system, particularly in vertical systems. However, the variation of albedo in APV fields depends on the crop and the season.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- APV:
-
AgriVoltaics
- BG:
-
Bifacial gain
- bPV:
-
Bifacial photovoltaic
- CF:
-
Capacity factor
- CAPEX:
-
Capital expenditures
- HSAT:
-
Horizontal single-axis Tracking
- LCOE:
-
Levelized cost of electricity
- mPV:
-
Monofacial photovoltaic
- OPEX:
-
Operating expenses
- PR:
-
Performance ratio
- SAM:
-
System advisor model
References
Adeh EH, Selker JS, Higgins CW (2018) Remarkable agrivoltaic influence on soil moisture, micrometeorology and water-use efficiency. PLoS ONE 13(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0203256
Agrivoltaïque—Wikipédia. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agrivoltaïque. Accessed 01 Feb 2022
Berkane S, Mahrane A, Chikh M, Haddadi M (2018) A one year performance evaluation of an amorphous grid connected pv system facade mounted at Bou-Ismail, Algeria. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference of computer science and renewable energies, ICCSRE 2018, no March 2021, pp 397–404. https://doi.org/10.5220/0009775003970404
Bouchakour S et al (2021) Monofacial electrical models †
Cho J, Park SM, Reum Park A, Lee OC, Nam G, Ra IH (2020) Application of photovoltaic systems for agriculture: a study on the relationship between power generation and farming for the improvement of photovoltaic applications in agriculture. Energies 13(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184815
Gu W, Ma T, Ahmed S, Zhang Y, Peng J (2020) A comprehensive review and outlook of bifacial photovoltaic (bPV) technology. Energy Convers Manag 223(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113283
https://sam.nrel.gov/download/32-sam-2018-11-11-for-windows.html
Iii R, De Parcevaux S, Itier B (1975) Rapport III.1. Albedo et agriculture. In: Influence des activités de l'homme sur le cycle hydrométéorologique. Compte rendu des treizièmes journées de l'hydraulique. Paris, 16-18 septembre 1974. Tome 1, 1975. https://www.persee.fr/doc/jhydr_0000-0001_1975_act_13_1_4416
Imran H, Riaz MH (2021) Investigating the potential of east/west vertical bifacial photovoltaic farm for agrivoltaic systems. J Renew Sustain Energy 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0054085
Katsikogiannis OA, Ziar H, Isabella O (2022) Integration of bifacial photovoltaics in agrivoltaic systems: a synergistic design approach. Appl Energy 309(November 2021):118475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.118475
Marion B (2021) Measured and satellite-derived albedo data for estimating bifacial photovoltaic system performance. Sol Energy 215(December 2020):321–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.12.050
Oguntunde PG, Van De Giesen N (2004) Crop growth and development effects on surface albedo for maize and cowpea fields in Ghana, West Africa. Int J Biometeorol 49(2):106–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-004-0216-4
Patel MT, Khan MR, Sun X, Alam MA (2019) A worldwide cost-based design and optimization of tilted bifacial solar farms. Appl Energy 247:467–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.03.150
Rodríguez-Gallegos CD, Bieri M, Gandhi O, Singh JP, Reindl T, Panda SK (2018) Monofacial vs. bifacial Si-based PV modules: which one is more cost-effective? Sol Energy 176(August):412–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.10.012
Shoukry I, Libal J, Kopecek R, Wefringhaus E, Werner J (2016) Modelling of bifacial gain for stand-alone and in-field installed bifacial PV modules. Energy Procedia 92:600–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.025
Singh JP, Walsh TM, Aberle AG (2012) Performance investigation of bifacial PV modules in the tropics. In: Proceedings of the 27th European photovoltaic solar energy conference and exhibition, no September, pp 3263–3266
Trommsdorff M, Dhal IS, Özdemir ÖE, Ketzer D, Weinberger N, Rösch C (2022) Agrivoltaics: solar power generation and food production. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-89866-9.00012-2
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Benbba, R., Akhsassi, M., Ait Si Ahmed, O., El Mouden, H., Wifaya, A., Outzourhit, A. (2024). Assessment of Bifacial Modules in an AgriVoltaic System Installed in Agadir, Morocco. In: Bendaoud, M., El Fathi, A., Bakhsh, F.I., Pierluigi, S. (eds) Advances in Electrical Systems and Innovative Renewable Energy Techniques. ICESA 2023. Advances in Science, Technology & Innovation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49772-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49772-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49771-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49772-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)