Skip to main content

Government Procurement and Sustainable Development in the WTO

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Finances and the Law

Part of the book series: Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship ((EALELS,volume 16))

  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

If government authorities are committed to a more sustainable economy, a redirection of their public procurement can help to create the critical mass necessary for the existence and viability of important markets for the production of technologies, services and products with a reduced environmental impact (clean energy, electrical cars, smart buildings, etc.) and make an important contribution to the achievement of the goals established in relation to the fight against the main environmental and other problems at the local, national and international level. Although the preamble to the Government Procurement Agreement of 2012 does not mention the objective of sustainable development (contrary to the preamble to the Agreement establishing the World Trade Organization), it is very relevant that trade is mentioned nine times in the current Sustainable Development Goals, that national governments have formally recognized the role of public procurement in supporting sustainability (Goal 12.7) and that the WTO Government Procurement Agreement, far from being an obstacle for its Parties to use public procurement to pursue the objective of sustainable development, is increasingly a central force in public procurement worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Yang (2012), p. 373.

  2. 2.

    United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Competition policy and public procurement (TD/B/C.I/CLP/14), 24.4.2012, 3.

  3. 3.

    The size of general government procurement spending is estimated using data from the OECD National Accounts Statistics (database) based on the System of National Accounts (SNA). General government procurement is defined as the sum of intermediate consumption (goods and services purchased by governments for their own use such as accounting or information technology services), gross fixed capital formation (acquisition of capital excluding sales of fixed assets, such as building new roads), and social transfers in kind via market producers (purchases by general government of goods and services produced by market producers and supplied to households). Public corporations were excluded in the estimation of procurement spending. The distribution between central and sub-national governments’ overall public procurement spending remains broadly unchanged with 64% of OECD-European Union countries’ procurement spending taking place at the sub-national level. Health expenditures represented the largest share of public procurement spending, averaging 29.3% across OECD countries in 2019. In Italy, Japan, and the Slovak Republic, almost 45% of public expenditure for procurement was in the health sector. Notable exceptions to this include Lithuania and the United States where economic affairs represented the largest share of government spending and Switzerland where general public services, and social protection formed the largest share. The next largest areas of public procurement spending across OECD countries were economic affairs (16.7%), education (11.6%), defence (10.5%), and social protection (10%) with relatively little variability among countries. OECD (2021), p. 162.

  4. 4.

    Woolcock and Grier (2015), p. 298.

  5. 5.

    Grandia (2016), pp. 124, 183.

  6. 6.

    According to recent estimates, the world’s annual public procurement spending in 2018 was about USD 13 trillion, equivalent to one-sixth of the global GDP (Uehara, Thiago. 2020. Public procurement for sustainable development: A framework for the public sector, Royal Institute of International Affairs, London, November 4) and over USD 10 trillion (77% of the total) is spent by 16 countries. China is, by far, the largest procurer at USD 4.2 trillion, and the United States spends USD 1.8 trillion. Id., 2.

  7. 7.

    Cheng et al. (2018), p. 771.

  8. 8.

    At the same time, there is a risk that, if the price difference between environmentally friendly and conventional products increases, private consumers who previously purchased green products will begin to purchase other types of products. A sectoral legislation that establishes a higher environmental standard for all suppliers and not just for the public sector would leave no room for the so-called demand substitution. On the other hand, substitution risks depend on the share of private consumption in the relevant market. Halonen (2021), pp. 549–550.

  9. 9.

    Koch (2020), p. 24.

  10. 10.

    Witjes and Lozano (2016), pp. 112, 39.

  11. 11.

    Ruttan (2006), p. 176.

  12. 12.

    Id., 177. See also Brenton et al. (2011).

  13. 13.

    The Rio 92 summit and Agenda 21 were the first international policy documents of high profile to include a direct reference to the role and impact that public procurement could have on the environment. Correia et al. (2013), p. 59.

  14. 14.

    http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/WSSD_PlanImpl.pdf.

  15. 15.

    Since the new GPA was officially adopted at a meeting of the Government Procurement Committee held on 30 March 2012, it should be known as the GPA 2012 and not the GPA 2014 (the agreement entered into force on 6 April 2014). It is generally accepted that the relevant date for the purposes of Art. 30 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties of 23 May 1969 is the date of conclusion or adoption of a treaty regardless of whether the treaty may have been ratified or entered into force at different times. Pauwelyn (2002), pp. 40–41.

  16. 16.

    The text of the GPA 2012 can be found in the Official Journal of the European Union L 68, 7.3.2014, 1–24.

  17. 17.

    WTO Panel Report, United States – Imposition of Anti-Dumping Duties on Imports of Fresh and Chilled Atlantic Salmon from Norway (ADP/87), 27.4.1994, para. 369.

  18. 18.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Import Prohibition of certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (WT/DS58/AB/R), 12.10.1998, para. 153.

  19. 19.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Import Prohibition of Certain Shrimp and Shrimp Products (WT/DS58/AB/R), 12.10.1998, paras. 129–131.

  20. 20.

    In the Shrimp/Turtles case, the Appellate Body ignored “the State Consent aspects” of the WTO agreements and assumed “the legislative role of the Ministerial Council under the guise of interpretation.” Kelly (2005), p. 476.

  21. 21.

    Imperiale (2001), p. 242.

  22. 22.

    Mavroidis (2008a), p. 354.

  23. 23.

    Lida (2004), p. 219.

  24. 24.

    The Appellate Body’s decision in this case “was nothing short of shocking.” Chaudhary (2005), p. 181.

  25. 25.

    The application of the principle of evolutionary interpretation can also give rise to problems of conciliation with the principle of legal certainty as it results from the Pacta sunt servanda principle and from Art. 3:2 of the Memorandum of Understanding on the Resolution of Disputes. Canal-Forgues (2008), p. 122.

  26. 26.

    Jackson (2008), p. 450.

  27. 27.

    Reif and Eckert (2004), p. 686.

  28. 28.

    The International Law Commission also applauded the evolutionary interpretation adopted by the Appellate Body. International Law Commission, 58th Session, Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law, Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission - Finalised by Martti Koskenniemi (A/CN.4/L.682), 13.4.2006, para. 478.

  29. 29.

    Reimers (2021), p. 222.

  30. 30.

    Zarbiyev (2012), p. 276.

  31. 31.

    Mavroidis (2008b), p. 445.

  32. 32.

    Howse (2001), p. 56.

  33. 33.

    The use of life-cycle costing or life-cycle cost (LCC) assessment in public procurement is not a recent idea:

    Already in the 1960s the Department of Defence of the United States Government applied LCC in the procurement of military equipment as they found that acquisition costs only accounted for a small part of the total costs of weapon systems, while operation and support costs represented up to two-thirds of overall costs. Querol et al. (2021), p. 50.

  34. 34.

    At the same time, the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade specifically adds, with respect to the adherence to existing international standards, that these need not be followed when they would be “ineffective or inappropriate, for instance, because of an insufficient level of protection or fundamental climatic or geographical factors or fundamental technological problems” (Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards, point F). This arguably amounts to a clear opportunity for states to determine their own level of desired protection and, even though scientific evidence may facilitate proof that no unnecessary obstacle to trade has been put in place, such proof is arguably not dependent upon the production of scientific evidence.

  35. 35.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, United States - Measures Concerning the Importation, Marketing and Sale of Tuna and Tuna Products (WT/DS381/AB/R), 16.5.2012, para. 322.

  36. 36.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, European Communities – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Asbestos Containing Products (WT/DS135/AB/R), 12.3.2001, para. 172.

  37. 37.

    The Energy Star is the most widespread standard to estimate energy consumption (in kWh/year), which can easily be transformed into costs with the energy price of the contracting authority. Querol et al. (2021), p. 60.

  38. 38.

    It is estimated that compliance with the Energy Star label by the United States Federal Administration resulted in a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions equivalent to 22 million tons of carbon dioxide. van Asselt et al. (2006), p. 220.

  39. 39.

    Dragos and Neamtu (2021), p. 26.

  40. 40.

    Van Calster (2009), p. 366.

  41. 41.

    Van Calster (2002), p. 302.

  42. 42.

    The Forest Stewardship Council has members of very diverse natures including environmental and social non-governmental organizations, private companies, academic institutions, religious organizations, and individuals from over 60 countries. Röben (2010), para. 10.

  43. 43.

    On the distinction between product/process or production method, see, for example, Silva et al. (2015), pp. 97–132.

  44. 44.

    The subsequent Shrimp-Turtles case (1998) does not call into question the earlier GATT 1947 case law concerning the scope of application of Art. III, since the trade measures in question applied by the United States were analysed by the Appellate Body in the context of the general exceptions of Art. XX, with all of the resulting consequences in terms of the burden of proof. At the same time, the fact that the Appellate Body carefully reviewed the United States measure and specifically criticized the way in which the United States was implementing it clearly demonstrates that unincorporated production processes and methods can be justified under GATT Art. XX.

  45. 45.

    McCrudden (1999), p. 36.

  46. 46.

    Kunzlik (2003), p. 110.

  47. 47.

    Hanley (2002), p. 722.

  48. 48.

    van Asselt et al. (2006), p. 223.

  49. 49.

    The text of the GPA 1994 can be found in the Official Journal of the European Union C 256, 3.9.1996, 1–18.

  50. 50.

    Arrowsmith (2011), p. 323.

  51. 51.

    Davies (2009), p. 295.

  52. 52.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, Canada – Certain Measures Affecting the Renewable Energy Generation Sector/Measures Relating to the Feed-In Tariff Program (WT/DS412/AB/R, WT/DS426/AB/R), 6.5.2013, footnote 499.

  53. 53.

    Baron (2014), p. 25; Hollander and Marx (2014), p. 5.

  54. 54.

    Rainville (2017), p. 1034. “Our analysis, based on ISO-14001 adoption levels in 147 countries over the 1999-2014 period, shows that a greater uptake of the ISO-14001 standard is associated with lower levels of emissions of greenhouse gases (GHGs), namely carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4).” Ubaldo et al. (2022), p. 2.

  55. 55.

    Tarullo (2000), p. 173.

  56. 56.

    Reich (2009), p. 1012.

  57. 57.

    Giles (2018), pp. 407–408. See also Uysal (2021), p. 53: “Considering the role of the state in protection of human rights, it is only natural to expect the government to have business relations with the enterprises that are considerate of human rights effects of their conduct.”

  58. 58.

    OECD (2021), p. 164.

  59. 59.

    Koch (2020), p. 98.

  60. 60.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, United States – Tax Treatment for “Foreign Sales Corporations”, Recourse to Article 21.5 of the DSU by the European Communities (WT/DS108/AB/RW), 14.1.2002, paras. 132-133.

  61. 61.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, European Communities - Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones) (WT/DS26/AB/R, WT/DS48/AB/R), 16.1.1998, para. 104.

  62. 62.

    Van den Bossche (2006), 320.

  63. 63.

    Orakhelashvili (2007), p. 166.

  64. 64.

    Cottier and Delimatsis (2008), p. 337.

  65. 65.

    International Courte of Justice, Dispute Regarding Navigational and Related Rights (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua), Judgment of 13.7.2009, para. 48.

  66. 66.

    WTO Appellate Body Report, Brazil – Measures Affecting Imports of Retreaded Tyres (WT/DS332/AB/R), 3.12.2007, para. 151.

  67. 67.

    Brenton et al. (2011), p. 22.

  68. 68.

    Vogel (1995), p. 6.

  69. 69.

    Vogel (2000), pp. 269–270.

  70. 70.

    Perkins and Neumayer (2012), p. 232.

  71. 71.

    Kullmann (2018), p. 122; Marty (2014), p. 7.

  72. 72.

    Wiesbrock (2013), p. 121.

  73. 73.

    European Commission, Guidance on Innovation Procurement (2021/C 267/01), Official Journal of the European Union C 267, 6.7.2021, 41.

  74. 74.

    European Commission, Green Paper on the modernisation of EU public procurement policy: Towards a more efficient European Procurement Market COM (2011) 15 final, Brussels, 27.1.2011, 5.

  75. 75.

    Tosoni (2013), p. 46.

  76. 76.

    Kunzlik (2003), p. 115.

  77. 77.

    Dragos and Neamtu (2021), p. 25.

  78. 78.

    For example, because of Burma’s (nowadays Myanmar) registration on the protection of human rights, Massachusetts adopted, on 25 June 1996, the so-called Act Regulating State Contracts with Companies doing Business with or in Burma, passing to apply an automatic 10% markup to the prices quoted by companies determined to do business with Burma. The increase applied to both US and foreign companies carrying out commercial transactions with Burma. One year after the adoption of the Burma Act by Massachusetts, the European Communities requested the United States to carry out consultations under Art. 4 of the WTO Dispute Settlement System, alleging that Massachusetts law violated, for example, the following provisions of the GPA 1994:

    1. i)

      Art. VIII(b), as it imposed conditions on the bidding company that were not essential to ensure its ability to fulfill the contract;

    2. ii)

      Art. X, since it applied qualification criteria based on political and non-economic considerations; and

    3. iii)

      Art. XIII, as it allowed the award of contracts to be based on political rather than economic considerations (WTO, United States – Measures Affecting Government Procurement, Request for Consultations by the European Communities (GPA/D2/1, WT/DS88/1), 26.6.1997).

    As the consultations did not put an end to the dispute, the European Communities requested, on 8 September 1998, the creation of a panel that was created at the meeting of the Dispute Settlement Body held on 21 October 1998. However, the Federal District Court of Massachusetts having declared the law of the state of Massachusetts unconstitutional on 4 November 1998, the European Communities applied to the WTO on 10 February 1999 for the suspension of the dispute settlement procedures because they understood that the Burma Law had become obsolete in practice. It should also be noted that some indicate that the security exception provided in the GPA 1994 was invoked by the United States in order to defend the so-called Act Regulating State Contracts with Companies doing Business with or in Burma adopted by Massachusetts on 25 June 1996 (Goodman 2001, pp. 101–102). Moreover, the security exception seems to be moving towards a greater scope in terms of its scope of application. For example, Annex 8-E to Art. 28.6 of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (National Security) between Canada and the European Union states that “measures related to the maintenance of international peace and security” include the protection of human rights.

  79. 79.

    Hamilton (2022), p. 24.

  80. 80.

    Baron (2014), p. 16.

  81. 81.

    European Commission (2016), p. 22.

  82. 82.

    Art. 69:3 of the current Public Procurement Directive provides that, if the reason why the tender is abnormally low is due to the fact that the obligations under Art. 18:2 are not complied with, the tender shall be rejected. It results from Art. 18:2 that “Member States shall take appropriate measures to ensure that in the performance of public contracts economic operators comply with applicable obligations in the fields of environmental, social and labour law established by Union law, national law, collective agreements or by the international environmental, social and labour law provisions listed in Annex X”, ie: International Labour Organization (ILO) Convention 87 on Freedom of Association and the Protection of the Right to Organise; ILO Convention 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining; ILO Convention 29 on Forced Labour; ILO Convention 105 on the Abolition of Forced Labour; ILO Convention 138 on Minimum Age; ILO Convention 111 on Discrimination (Employment and Occupation); ILO Convention 100 on Equal Remuneration; ILO Convention 182 on Worst Forms of Child Labour; Vienna Convention for the protection of the Ozone Layer and its Montreal Protocol on substances that deplete the Ozone Layer; Basel Convention on the Control of Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal (Basel Convention); Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (Stockholm POPs Convention); Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade (UNEP/FAO) (PIC Convention) and its 3 regional Protocols.

  83. 83.

    Semple (2017), p. 303.

  84. 84.

    Nações Unidas, World Summit on Sustainable Development - Plan of Implementation of the World Summit on Sustainable Development (A/CONF.199/20), 4.9.2002, paras. 4 and 19.

  85. 85.

    Green Public Procurement (GPP) refers to the inclusion of environmental criteria in the public procurement process. Thereby, the term is narrower than the more frequently used term “sustainable public procurement” since the latter encompasses not only environmental but also social and economic aspects. The European Commission defines the GPP as a process whereby public authorities seek to procure goods, services and works with a reduced environmental impact throughout their life-cycle when compared to goods, services and works with the same primary function that would otherwise be procured. Koch (2020), p. 21.

  86. 86.

    Schefer and Woldesenbet (2018), p. 1131.

  87. 87.

    Chabrost (2021), p. 129.

  88. 88.

    Chabrost (2021), p. 129.

  89. 89.

    Abbott (2001), p. 275.

  90. 90.

    Darleen Druyun “was the senior career civilian procurement official-second only to the political appointees that cycle through the Assistant Secretary of the Air Force for Acquisition position. In other words, she was the highest-ranking long-term procurement official providing continuity to the Air Force acquisition community throughout changes in administrations.” Branstetter (2005), p. 444.

  91. 91.

    Ibid.

  92. 92.

    Dietrich (2005), p. 522.

  93. 93.

    Branstetter (2005), p. 446.

  94. 94.

    Yukins and Schooner (2007), pp. 548-549. Darleen Druyun was convicted in 2004.

  95. 95.

    Pauwelyn (2013), p. 248. The GPA 1994 does not contain any special rules against or explicitly mention corruption in public procurement. However, indirectly, it is evident that the agreement contributed to fighting corruption through the principles of non-discrimination and transparency. On the other hand, there are other commercial instruments that have helped to strengthen the relationship between trade and the fight against corruption. For example, the European Union’s system of generalized preferences has offered additional trade preferences to developing countries that ratify and implement certain conventions on principles of governance, including the United Nations Convention against Corruption.

  96. 96.

    The text of the United Nations Convention against Corruption, signed in 2003 and in force since 14 December 2005, can be found in Diário da República, I Série, No. 183, 21.9.2007, 6718-6738. It is interesting to note that many of the current parts of the GPA are not parties to the United Nations Convention and that this convention specifically contains an article for public procurement, Art. 9, entitled “Public Procurement and Management of Public Finances”. It calls for transparency ex ante in the sense that clear criteria regarding the upcoming procurement should be established as well as ex post by stressing the need for accountability of the procuring entities.

  97. 97.

    Despite the absence of a clear definition of corruption, this “can be defined as the abuse of entrusted power for individual or collective, direct or indirect personal gain, and whereas acts of corruption include the crimes of bribery, embezzlement, trading in influence, abuse of functions and illicit enrichment, as defined by the United Nations Convention against Corruption; whereas fraud, extortion, blackmail, abuse of discretionary powers, favouritism, nepotism, clientelism and illegal political contributions are closely linked to corruption.” European Parliament, Corruption in the public and private sectors: the impact on human rights in third countries European Parliament resolution of 8 October 2013 on corruption in the public and private sectors: the impact on human rights in third countries (2013/2074(INI)), Official Journal of the European Union C/181, 19.5.2016, 4.

  98. 98.

    The text of the OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (signed on 17 December 1997 and in force since 15 February 1999) can be found in Diário da República, I Série A, No. 77, 31.3.2000, 1408-1411.

  99. 99.

    The text of the Inter-American Convention against Corruption adopted in Caracas on March 29, 1996 and in force since March 6, 1997 can be found in OAS :: SLA :: Department of International Law (DIL) :: Inter-American Treaties.

  100. 100.

    Lo (2015), p. 39; Pauwelyn (2013), p. 256.

  101. 101.

    Lo (2015), p. 28.

  102. 102.

    https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=XVIII-14&chapter=18&lang=en (page visited on 9.6.2022).

  103. 103.

    Anderson et al. (2017), p. 95.

  104. 104.

    Harpaz and Peled (2020), p. 225.

  105. 105.

    Anderson et al. (2019), p. 1293.

  106. 106.

    Anderson, et al. (2019), p. 1236.

  107. 107.

    European Commission, Making Public Procurement work in and for Europe, COM (2017) 572 final, Strasbourg, 3.10.2017, 2.

  108. 108.

    Halonen (2021), p. 546.

  109. 109.

    In fact, collusion is a recurrent feature in some public procurement markets, and up to 20% can be added to the price otherwise paid in competitive markets. European Commission, Making Public Procurement work in and for Europe, COM(2017) 572 final, Strasbourg, 3.10.2017, 13.

  110. 110.

    European Commission, Notice on tools to fight collusion in public procurement and on guidance on how to apply the related exclusion ground (2021/C 91/01), Official Journal of the European Union C 91, 18.3.2021, 3.

  111. 111.

    Anderson, et al. (2019), p. 1294.

  112. 112.

    European Commission, Notice on tools to fight collusion in public procurement and on guidance on how to apply the related exclusion ground (2021/C 91/01), Official Journal of the European Union C 91, 18.3.2021, 24.

  113. 113.

    Dawar et al. (2019), pp. 614, 621, 628 and 633.

  114. 114.

    In September 2015, world leaders adopted the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, a global effort under the auspices of the United Nations (UN) to tackle poverty, climate change, and violence while promoting more equal, inclusive, and prosperous societies. They agreed on 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and 169 ambitious SDG targets covering all areas of human development and the environment to guide development efforts through the 2030 time horizon. Some of the SDGs explicitly call for the active use of trade measures, in particular Goal 2 (Zero Hunger) includes a call to correct and prevent trade restrictions and distortions in world agricultural markets, Goal 14 (Life Below Water) points to the need to reduce fishery subsidies to avoid overcapacity and overfishing, and trade benefits for poorer states are also explicitly raised in Goal 17 (Partnership for the Goals). From a broader economic perspective, general economic growth remains the most important channel through which trade can support the SDGs. The agenda itself affirms that “international trade is an engine for inclusive economic growth and poverty reduction, and contributes to the promotion of sustainable development” (United Nations 2015, para. 68).

  115. 115.

    As of October 2022, the WTO had 164 members.

  116. 116.

    Anderson. et al. (2011), p. 561.

  117. 117.

    Anderson et al. (2015), p. 20.

  118. 118.

    Gourdon and Messent (2019), p. 700. Countries are increasingly including disciplines on government procurement in their bilateral and preferential trade agreements. In 1990, only seven international trade agreements included provisions regarding government procurement; by 2010, this number had grown to at least 70, and these numbers have risen further since then. Id., 682.

  119. 119.

    World Bank, News Press Release, New World Bank Procurement Framework Approved, 21.7.2015.

  120. 120.

    Yukins and Schnitzer (2015), p. 118.

  121. 121.

    It is important to note that the European Union legislative public procurement framework and Member States’ (all parts of the GPA) implementation laws have to meet the requirements of the GPA. See, for example, Article 25 of Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament ando f the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, Official Journal of the European Union L 94, 28.3.2014, 65-242.

  122. 122.

    Yukins and Schnitzer (2015), p. 91.

  123. 123.

    Hoekman (2015), p. 4.

References

  • Abbott K (2001) Rule-making in the WTO: lessons from the case of bribery and corruption. J Int Econ Law 4:275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson RD et al (2011) Government procurement provisions in regional trade agreements: a stepping stone to GPA accession? In: Arrowsmith S, Anderson RD (eds) The WTO Regime on Government Procurement: Challenge and Reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 561

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R et al (2015) Regional trade agreements & procurement rules: facilitators or hindrances?, European University Institute - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies - Global Governance Programme, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/81, 20

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R et al (2017) Promoting competition and deterring corruption in public procurement markets: synergies with trade liberalisation. Public Procurement Law Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R et al (2019) Preventing corruption, supplier collusion, and the corrosion of civic trust: a procompetitive program to improve the effectiveness and legitimacy of public procurement. George Mason Law Rev 26(4):1233

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrowsmith S (2011) The revised agreement on government procurement: changes to the procedural rules and other transparency provisions. In: Arrowsmith S, Anderson RD (eds) The WTO regime on government procurement: challenge and reform. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron R (2014) The role of public procurement in low-carbon innovation, background paper for the 33rd round table on sustainable development 12–13 April 2016. OECD Headquarters, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Branstetter J (2005) Darleen Druyun: an evolving case study in corruption, power, and procurement. Public Contract Law J 34(3):443–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton J et al (2011) Issues and tensions in public procurement of ‘green innovation’: A cross-country study, The Graduate Institute/Genebra, The Centre for Trade and Economic Integration, Working Paper 2011–09

    Google Scholar 

  • Canal-Forgues E (2008) Le règlement des différends à l’OMC. Bruylant, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chabrost M (2021) Challenges in public procurement corruption and probity in public procurement. In: Castelli A et al (eds) The challenges of public procurement reforms. Routledge, Milton Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary O (2005) The Propriety of Preferences: An Evaluation of EC and U.S. GSP Schemes in the Wake of EC –Preferences, Asper Review

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng W et al (2018) Green Public Procurement, missing concepts and future trends - A critical review. J Cleaner Production

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia F et al (2013) Low carbon procurement: An emerging agenda, Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottier T, Delimatsis P (2008) Article XIVbis GATS security exceptions. In: Wolfrum R et al (eds) WTO – trade in services, max Planck Institute for Comparative Public law and International law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden-Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies A (2009) Government procurement. In: Lester S, Mercurio B (eds) Bilateral and regional trade agreements: commentary and analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawar K et al (2019) Does the WTO government procurement agreement deliver what it promises? World Trade Rev 18(4):609–634

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Ubaldo M et al (2022) Voluntary programs and emissions revisited: what is the effect of EU trade agreements with environmental provisions?, working paper RSC 2022/05. Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich E (2005) The potential for criminal liability in government contracting: a closer look at the procurement integrity act. Public Contract Law J 34:521–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Dragos DC, Neamtu B (2021) Life-cycle thinking in EU public procurement moving beyond a simple ‘buzz word’. In: Castelli A et al (eds) The challenges of public procurement reforms. Routledge, Milton Park

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2016) Buying green! A handbook on green public procurement, 3rd edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg, p 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles N (2018) The World Trade Organization's missed opportunity: how the agreement on government procurement can be transformed from a vehicle of trade to one of human rights. Public Contract Law J 47(3)

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman R (2001) Norms and National Security: the WTO as a catalyst for inquiry. Chic J Int Law 2:7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gourdon J, Messent J (2019) How government procurement measures can affect trade. J World Trade 53

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandia J (2016) Finding the missing link: examining the mediating role of sustainable public procurement behaviour. J Clean Prod

    Google Scholar 

  • Halonen K-M (2021) Is public procurement fit for reaching sustainability goals? A law and economics approach to green public procurement. Maa J Eur Comp Law 28(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton S (2022) Public procurement – price-taker or market-shaper? Crit Perspect Int Bus ahead-of-print

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanley C (2002) Avoiding the issue: the commission and human rights conditionality in public procurement. Eur Law Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Harpaz MD, Peled H (2020) The stalemate in China’s GPA accession negotiations – is there a way out? Asian J Int Law 15(1):209–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekman B (2015) International Cooperation on Public Procurement Regulation, European University Institute - Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies - Global Governance Programme, EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2015/88

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollander D, Marx A (2014) Strengthening private certification systems through public regulation: the case of sustainable public procurement. Sustain Account Manag Policy J 5(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Howse R (2001) Adjudicative legitimacy and treaty interpretation in international trade law: the early years of WTO jurisprudence. In: Weiler J (ed) The EU, the WTO, and the NAFTA: towards a common law of international trade? Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperiale V (2001) Characterizing air as an exhaustible natural resource. In: Jackson J, Weiss EB (eds) Reconciling environment and trade. Transnational Publishers, Ardsley-New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J (2008) The case of the World Trade Organization. Int Aff 84:437–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly JP (2005) The seduction of the appellate body: shrimp/sea turtle I and II and the proper role of states in WTO governance. Cornell Int Law J 38:34

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch R (2020) Green public procurement under WTO law: experience of the EU and prospects for Switzerland. In: European yearbook of international economic law monographs - studies in European and international economic law, vol 9. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Kullmann M (2018) Promoting social and environmental sustainability: what role for public procurement. Comp Labor Law Policy J 40(1):109–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzlik P (2003) International procurement regimes and the scope for the inclusion of environmental factors in public procurement. OECD J Budg 3(4):155–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Lida K (2004) Is WTO dispute settlement effective?, Global Governance

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo C-F (2015) Making the anti-corruption provisions in the new government procurement agreement under the WTO operable. Trade, Law Dev VII(1):21–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Marty F (2014) Les clauses environnementales dans les marchés publics: perspectives économiques, Working Paper No. 2012–01. Group de Recherche en Droit, Économie, Gestion, Paris, Revisée Mars

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavroidis P (2008a) Legal eagles? The WTO appellate Body’s first ten years. In: Janow M et al (eds) The WTO: governance, dispute settlement, and developing countries. Juris Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavroidis P (2008b) No outsourcing of law? WTO law as practiced by WTO courts. Am J Int Law 102

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrudden C (1999) International economic law and the pursuit of human rights: a framework for discussion of the legality of ‘selective purchasing’ Laws under the WTO government procurement agreement. J Int Econ Law

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2021) Government at a Glance. OECD Publishing, Paris, p 162

    Google Scholar 

  • Orakhelashvili A (2007) Interpretation of jurisdictional instruments in international dispute settlement. In: Law and practice of international courts and tribunals. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn J (2002) The Nature of WTO Obligations, Jean Monnet Working Paper 1/02 – New York University School of Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauwelyn J (2013) Different means, same end: the contribution of trade and investment treaties to anti-corruption policy. In: Rose-Ackerman S, Carrington P (eds) Anti-corruption policy can international actors play a constructive role? Carolina Academic Press, Durham-North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins R, Neumayer E (2012) Does the ‘California effect’ operate across borders? Trading- and investing-up in automobile emission standards. J Eur Publ Policy 19:217–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Querol ÁA et al (2021) LCC and GPP: competing or complementary approaches? In: Castelli A et al (eds) The challenges of public procurement reforms. Routledge, Milton Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainville A (2017) Standards in green public procurement - a framework to enhance innovation. J Clean Prod

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich A (2009) The new text of the agreement on government procurement: an analysis and assessment. J Int Econ Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Reif T, Eckert J (2004) Courage you Can’t understand: how to achieve the right balance between shaping and policing commerce in disputes before the World Trade Organization. Columbia J Transnational Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Reimers LL (2021) International trade law legal: entanglement on the WTO’s own terms. In: Krisch N (ed) Entangled legalities beyond the state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Röben V (2010) Eco-labelling, max Planck Encyclopedia of public international law, Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan V (2006) Is war necessary for economic growth? Military procurement and technology development. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schefer K, Woldesenbet M (2018) The revised agreement on government procurement and corruption. J World Trade

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple A (2017) Socially Responsible Public Procurement (SRPP) under EU Law and International Agreements: The GPA, CETA and the EU-Ukraine Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area, European Procurement and Public Private Partnership Law Review 2017/3

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MP et al (eds) (2015) A Organização Mundial do Comércio e a Proteção do Ambiente: A Distinção Produto/Processo de Produção, Anais do II Congresso Luso-Brasileiro do Núcleo de Estudos Luso-Brasileiro. Editora Vestnik, Brasília

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarullo D (2000) The relationship of WTO obligations to other international arrangements. In: Bronckers M, Quick R (eds) New directions in international economic law: essays in honour of John Jackson. Kluwer Law International, Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosoni L (2013) The impact of the revised WTO government procurement agreement on the EU procurement rules from a sustainability perspective. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uysal E (2021) Business and human rights: the state as a buyer. European Procurement & Public Private Partnership Law Review 16(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • van Asselt H et al (2006) Greener public purchasing: opportunities for climate-friendly government procurement under WTO and EU rules. Clim Pol 6:217–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Calster G (2002) Green procurement and the WTO – shades of Grey. Rev Eur Comp Int Environ Law 11:298–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Calster G (2009) Procurement and the World Trade Organization: purchase power or pester power? In: Cottier T et al (eds) International trade regulation and the mitigation of climate change, world trade forum. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bossche P (2006) From afterthought to centerpiece: the WTO appellate body and its rise to prominence in the world trading system. In: Sacerdoti G et al (eds) The WTO at ten: the contribution of the dispute settlement system. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel D (1995) Trading up: consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel D (2000) Environmental regulation and economic integration. J Int Econ Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesbrock A (2013) An obligation for sustainable procurement? Gauging the potential impact of article 11 TFEU on public contracting in the EU. Legal Issues Econ Integr

    Google Scholar 

  • Witjes S, Lozano R (2016) Towards a more Circular Economy: Proposing a framework linking sustainable public procurement and sustainable business models, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 112

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolcock S, Grier JH (2015) TTIP and public procurement. In: Hamilton DS, Pelkmans J (eds) Rule-makers or rule-takers? Exploring the transatlantic trade and investment partnership, Center for Transatlantic Relations. Johns Hopkins University/Centre for European Policy Studies, Rowman & Littlefield International, Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang J (2012) Expansion of the government procurement agreement: time to concentrate on depth as well as width. J East Asian Economic Integr 16(4):363–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yukins C, Schnitzer J (2015) GPA Accession: Lessons Learned on the Strengths and Weaknesses of the WTO Government Procurement Agreement. Trade, Law and Development VII(1):91

    Google Scholar 

  • Yukins C, Schooner S (2007) Incrementalism: eroding the impediments to a global public procurement market. Georgetown J Int Law 38:529–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarbiyev F (2012) Judicial activism in international law - a conceptual framework for analysis. J Int Dispute Settlement 3(2)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro Infante Mota .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mota, P.I. (2024). Government Procurement and Sustainable Development in the WTO. In: Saraiva, R., Pardal, P.A. (eds) Sustainable Finances and the Law. Economic Analysis of Law in European Legal Scholarship, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49460-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics