Abstract
The assumption sustained in this article is as basic as it is simple: theory is an integrated dimension of any work of fiction, not a conceptual construct imposed on it from outside as a tool to be applied to the text. The genitive of my title is a subjective genitive. This approach is not primarily concerned with works having an artist as their protagonist, loaded with art discussion, exposing metafictional features; nor does it set out to thematize the ontological differences between art and life or to extract social and psychological theories that might have inspired the authors. Instead, the focus is that any interpretation or creation, even of the most unique work of art, calls upon generalized reflections beyond the confines of the cover if we want to claim that we have interpreted it or made it emerge at all, even in its singularity. This quest for generality—which Aristotle would have called its inherent formal identity—is embedded, nolens volens, in any work of art as its minimal inherent theoretical dimension. My paper will take the discussion in two directions. One leads us to the problem of genre, which is both exemplified and contested by the protean genre of the novel. As Mihail Bakhtin has succinctly pointed out, the novel has no stable form and, hence, shows an ambiguity with regard to generality; yet, nevertheless, and for that reason, the novel has mushroomed to be a genre with a global success in its experimental unfolding. In other words, by its mere existence each novel calls for a theory to define it as a novel. The other direction taken by my discussion points to the problem of interpretation. Having in mind Wolfgang Iser’s notion of Leerstellen, any text, and in fact any semiotic product, have cracks and cavities that require a theoretical engagement from the reader to be interpreted in a wider perspective without reducing their ambiguities. Thus texts, not least works of fiction like my examples from Henry James and Honoré de Balzac, both call for theories and resist their assumed generality.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“At last—here you are!…” cried she, finding her voice again. “My dearest, henceforth where you go I go, for I cannot again endure the torture of such waiting… I pictured you stumbling over a curbstone, with a fractured skull! Killed by thieves!… No, a second time I know I should go mad… Have you enjoyed yourself so much … without me? Bad boy?” (Balzac 2010, 372, modified).
- 2.
“Perpetual work is the law of art, as it is the law of life, for art is idealized creation” (Balzac 2010, 340).
- 3.
“This retreat, the impulse of a virtuous woman who is crushing a passion in the depths of her heart, was a thousand times more effective than the most reckless avowal” (Balzac 2010, 361).
- 4.
“A few tears rose to Hortense's eyes, and Lisbeth drank them with her eyes as a cat laps milk” (Balzac 2010, 332).
- 5.
“Monsieur the Mayor, a political personage, now wore black broadcloth. His face, at the top of this solemn suit, shone like a full moon rising above a mass of dark clouds. His shirt, buttoned with three large pearls worth five hundred francs a piece, gave a great idea of his … thoracic capacity, and he was apt to say, ‘In me you see the coming athlete of the tribune!’” (Balzac 2010, 473–474).
- 6.
“In Paris the different types contributing to the physiognomy of any portion of that monstrous city harmonize admirably with the character of the ensemble.” (Balzac 1974, 112).
- 7.
“like the mud of Paris, the pavements of Paris, just as the water of the Seine” (Balzac 1974, 94).
- 8.
“A women in every sense of the word, but less than a woman and more than a woman. A painter of manners can only cope with certain details in so vast a portrait: a complete one would reach out to infinity” (Balzac 1974, 95).
- 9.
“[D]iscovery” (Balzac 1974, 148).
- 10.
“In the midst of the mother’s wailings, a doctor diagnosed asphyxia caused by invasion of black blood into the pulmonary system, and that was it” (Balzac 1974, 148).
- 11.
“[A]n astounding assemblage of movements, of machines” (Balzac 1974, 33).
Bibliography
Bakhtin, Mihail. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination, translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Balzac, Honoré de. 1966a [1833]. Ferragus. La comédie humaine 4: 13–53. Paris: Seuil.
Balzac, Honoré de. 1966b [1846]. La cousine Bette. La comédie humaine 5: 9–163. Paris: Seuil.
Balzac, Honoré de. 1974. Ferragus. In History of the Thirteen, translated by Herbert J. Hunt, 29‒154. London: Penguin.
Balzac, Honoré de. 2010. Cousin Bette, translated by James Waring (= Ellen Marriage). Auckland: The Floating Press.
Coetzee, John Maxwell. 1992 [1986]. “Into the Dark Chamber.” In Doubling the Point: Essays and Interviews, 61‒69. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Derrida, Jacques. 1980. “La loi du genre/The Law of Genre.” Glyph 7: 176–201.
Fishelov, David. 1993. Metaphors of Genre. The Role of Analogy in Genre Theory. University Park: Penn State University Press.
Fowler, Alastair. 1982. Kinds of Literature. Oxford: Clarendon.
Iser, Wolfgang. 1997. The Act of Reading. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
James, Henry. 1962. The Art of the Novel. New York: Scribner's Sons.
Kertész, Imre. 2001. “Who Owns Auschwitz?” The Yale Journal of Criticism 14 (1): 267–272.
Kertész, Imre. 2011. Fiasco, translated by Tim Wilkinson. New York: Melville House.
Larsen, Svend Erik. 2005. “Self-Reference: Theory and Didactics between Language and Literature.” The Journal of Aesthetic Education 39 (1): 13–30.
Larsen, Svend Erik. 2011. “What Is Literary Historiography?” In New Literary Theory and Hermeneutics (Interpretations, vols. 4–5), edited by Katica Kulavkova and Natasha Avramovska, 67–92. Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Science and Arts.
Laxness, Halldór. 2004. Under the Glacier. New York: Vintage.
Miller, Carolyn. 1984. “Genre as Social Action.” Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
Nesci, Catherine. 2000. “Balzac ou la séduction du corps passant.” Orbis Litterarum 55 (6): 399–417.
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1993. Essai sur l‘origine des langues. Paris: Flammarion.
Schön, Donald A. 1993. “Generative Metaphor.” In Metaphor and Thought, edited by Andrew Ortony, 137–163. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schütz, Alfred. 1955. “Symbol, Reality, and Society.” In Symbol and Reality, edited by Lyman Bryson e.a, 135–203. New York: Praeger.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsen, S.E. (2024). Literature’s Theories. In: Beganović, D., Božić, Z., Milanko, A., Perica, I. (eds) Procedures of Resistance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49386-7_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49386-7_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49385-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49386-7
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)