Abstract
In this chapter, we present DisCrit-informed person-centered strategies to reframe inclusive education tools used in Italian public schools. It draws on findings from a qualitative case study we previously carried out in Rome, Italy, to advance practices that inform the design and implementation of Individualised Education Programs (IEPs) and Personalized Teaching Plans (Piano Didattico Personalizzato [PDP]), through non-deficit, intersectional, and culturally relevant approaches. The chapter highlights the challenges that teachers face in including students at the intersections of race, ability, language, and citizenship, in the context of Italy. As such, through this chapter, we intend to create a dialogue between practitioners and scholars, to advance critical thinking about the use of inclusive tools, and the importance of reframing them through the DisCrit framework, rooted in indigenous theory (Annamma & Morrison, DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.008, 2018). Ultimately, through this chapter, we show the practical applications of an intersectional understanding of inclusive education, which hopefully will inspire practitioners and educators globally.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Report on Teacher Shortage in OECD Countries: https://www.oecd.org/education/research/oecdreportwarnsofgrowingriskofteachershortagesinoecdcountries.htm
- 2.
Information on the new recruitment system of special education teachers put in place by the Italian Ministry of Education:https://www.orizzontescuola.it/docenti-di-sostegno-oltre-13-mila-assunti-in-ruolo-2400-con-la-call-veloce-per-le-supplenze-si-va-verso-i-100-mila-posti-in-deroga/
- 3.
Petition against the fast-tracking of special education and general teachers: https://www.orizzontescuola.it/no-al-reclutamento-dei-docenti-senza-verificare-che-conoscano-la-loro-disciplina-lappello-degli-intellettuali/
- 4.
A list of the participants for this case study can be found in Table A.3, Appendix A.
- 5.
The medical model of disability is driven by the imperative to “healthy normalcy,” whose defining characteristic is the location of disability within the individual with biological impairments, ignoring macro-socio political contexts of racism, ableism, and other intersecting systems of oppression.
- 6.
With the passing of the Interministerial Decree n. 182/2020, the old procedure that required local health authorities to issue a Dynamic Functional Profile (originally passed in 1994) has been substituted with the writing of a functioning profile based on new identification and assessment criteria resulting from the International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (World Health Organization, 2001). However, a court ruling passed last September 2021 has canceled the decree 182/2020. Consequently, the Italian Ministry of Education has passed new guidelines for the writing and implementation of the IEP. The new IEPs will become compulsory starting in the school year 2021–2022. Despite the Ministry of Education’s clear attempt to focus more on environmental barriers to participation and less on individual functioning (MIUR, 2009), the International Classification of Functioning is nevertheless still used to boost the medical perspective of disability (D’Alessio, 2007, 2011).
- 7.
The seven tenets of DisCrit are: (1) DisCrit focuses on ways that racism and ableism circulate interdependently; (2) DisCrit values multidimensional identities; (3) DisCrit emphasizes social constructions of race and ability; (4) DisCrit privileges the voices of marginalized populations; (5) DisCrit considers legal and historical aspects of disability and race; (6) DisCrit recognizes whiteness and ability as property; (7) DisCrit requires activism (Annamma et al., 2013).
References
Annamma, S. A., & Handy, T. (2019). DisCrit solidarity as curriculum studies and transformative praxis. Curriculum Inquiry, 49(4), 442–463.
Annamma, S., & Morrison, D. (2018). DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.03.008
Annamma, S. A., Connor, D., & Ferri, B. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2012.730511
Artiles, A. (2023). Untangling the racialization of disability in Europe., ECER Symposium session.
Banks, J. (2017). ‘These People Are Never Going to Stop Labeling Me’: Educational Experiences of African American Male Students Labeled with Learning Disabilities. Equity & Excellence in Education, 50(1), 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2016.1250235
Beukelman, D., & Mirenda, P. (2013). Augmentative and alternative communication: Supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. Brookes.
Broderick, A., & Lalvani, P. (2017). Dysconscious ableism: Toward a liberatory praxis in teacher education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(9), 894–905.
Connor, D., & Gabel, S. L. (2013). ‘Cripping’ the curriculum through academic activism: Working toward increasing global exchanges to reframe (dis)ability and education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 46(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/10665684.2013.750186
D’Alessio, S. (2007). ‘Made in Italy’: Integrazione scolastica and the new vision of inclusive education. In L. Barton & F. Armstrong (Eds.), Policy, experience and change: Cross-cultural reflections on inclusive education (pp. 53–72). Springer.
D’Alessio, S. (2011). Inclusive education in Italy: A critical analysis of the policy of integrazione scolastica. Sense Publishers.
D’Alessio, S. (2014). Le normative sui bisogni educativi speciali in Europa e in Italia. Verso un’educazione inclusive? La prospettiva dei disability studies [The regulations on special educational needs in Europe and in Italy: Toward an inclusive education? The perspective of disability studies, and P. Gaspari (Ed.), Pedagogia speciale e ‘BES’: Spunti per una riflessione critica verso la scuola inclusiva [Special pedagogy and ‘BES’: Ideas for a critical reflection toward inclusive school] (pp. 217–244)]. Pensa Multimedia.
Downing, J. E., Hanreddy, A., & Peckham-Hardin, K. (2015). Teaching communication skills to students with severe disabilities (3rd ed.). Brookes Publishing.
Ferri, D. (2019). The past, present and future of the right to inclusive education in Italy. In G. de Beco, S. Quinlivan, & J. E. Lord (Eds.), The right to inclusive education in international human rights law (pp. 547–579). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316392881.023
Giroux, H. (2021). Race, politics and pandemic pedagogy. Bloomsbury.
Goodley D., D’Alessio S., Ferri, B., Monceri F., Titchkosky T., Vadalà G., Valtellina E., Migliarini, V., Bocci F., Marra A. D., & Medeghini, R. (2018). Disability studies e inclusione. Per una lettura critica delle politiche e pratiche educative. Erickson.
Hayes, A. M., Elder, B. C., & Bulat, J. (2020). Assessment as a service not a place: Transitioning assessment centers to school-based identification systems. RTI Press Publication No. OP-0064-2004. RTI Press. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2020.op.0064.2004
Haynes-Mendez, K., & Engelsmeier, J. (2020). Cultivating cultural humility in education. Childhood Education, 96(3), 22–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2020.1766656
Hernández-Saca, D. I. (2019). Youth at the intersections of dis/ability, other markers of identity and emotionality: Toward a critical pedagogy of student knowledge, emotion, feeling, affect and being. Teachers College Press Records Yearbook: Emotions for Teaching, 121(13), 1–16.
King, M. L., Jr. (1968). The role of the behavioral scientist in the civil rights movement. American Psychologist, 23(3), 180.
Migliarini, V., & Annamma, S. (2019). Applying Disability Critical Race Theory (DISCRIT) in the practice of teacher education in the United States. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Education. https://oxfordre.com/education/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.001.0001/acrefore-9780190264093-e-783
Migliarini, V., & Cioè-Peña, M. (2022). Performing the good(im)migrant: Inclusion and expectations of linguistic assimilation, International Journal of Inclusive Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2022.2112770
Migliarini, V., Stinson, C., & D’Alessio, S. (2019). ‘SENitizing’ migrant children in inclusive settings: Exploring the impact of the Salamanca Statement thinking in Italy and the United States. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(7–8), 754–767. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2019.1622804
Migliarini, V., Stinson, C., & Hernandez-Saca, D. (2022). ‘It feels like living in a limbo’: Exploring the limits of inclusion for children living at the global affective intersections of dis/ability, language, and migration in Italy and the United States. In S. A. Annamma, B. Ferri, & D. Connor (Eds.), DisCrit expanded: Reverberations, ruptures, inquiries. Teachers College Press.
Ministero Dell’istruzione, D., & Della Ricerca (MIUR). (2009). Linee guida per l’integrazione scolastica degli alunni con disabilità [Guidelines for the scholastic integration of students with disability]. Italian Ministry of Education. https://www.miur.gov.it/documents/20182/0/Linee±guida±sull%27integrazione±scolastica±degli±alunni±con±disabilit%C3%A0.pdf/7e814545-e019-e34e-641e-b091dfae19f0
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR). (2014a). Linee Guida per l’Accoglienza e l’Integrazione degli Alunni Stranieri. [Guidelines for the integration of Foreign Students]. http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2014/linee_guida_integrazione_alunni_stranieri.pdf
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR). (2014b). Linee Guida per l’Accoglienza e l’Integrazione degli Alunni Stranieri. http://www.istruzione.it/allegati/2014/linee_guida_integrazione_alunni_stranieri.pdf.
Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca (MIUR). (2020). D.M. n. 182/2020 ‘Adozione del modello nazionale di PEI’—prime indicazioni [D.M. n. 182/2020 ‘Adoption of the national IEP model’—First indications]. Italian Ministry of Education. https://www.istruzioneer.gov.it/2021/01/25/d-m-n-182-2020-adozione-del-modello-nazionale-di-pei-prime-indicazioni/
Mount, B. (2000). Person-centered planning: A sourcebook of values, ideals, and methods to encourage person-centered development. Capacity Works.
Nomikoudis, M., & Starr, M. (2016). Cultural humility in education and work: A valuable approach for teachers, learners and professionals. In Universities, the citizen scholar and the future of higher education (pp. 69–84). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Pearpoint, J., O’Brien, J., & Forest, M. (1991). PATH: A workbook for planning positive possible futures. Inclusion Press.
Rogoff, B. (1994). Developing understanding of the idea of communities of learners. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 1(4), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039409524673
Skrtic, T. M. (1987). An organizational analysis of special education reform. University Press of Kansas.
Smull, M. W., & Harrison, S. B. (1992). Supporting people with severe reputations in the community. National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disabilities Services. Johns Hopkins University, Department of Pediatrics.
Spratt, J., & Florian, L. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy: From learning to action. Supporting each individual in the context of ‘everybody’. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.03.006
Tomlinson, S. (2017). A sociology of special and inclusive education: Exploring the manufacture of inability. Taylor & Francis.
Vandercook, T., York, J., & Forest, M. (1989). The McGill Action Planning System (MAPS): A strategy for building the vision. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 14(3), 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698901400306
Weishaar, P. M. (2010). Twelve ways to incorporate strengths-based planning into the IEP process. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(6), 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505381
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250945
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning disability and health. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
Zembylas, M. (2013). The ‘crisis of pity’ and the radicalization of solidarity: Toward critical pedagogies of compassion. Educational Studies, 49(6), 504–521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2013.844148
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Migliarini, V., Elder, B.C. (2023). Moving Forward: DisCrit-Informed Person-Centered Strategies for Inclusive Education. In: The Future of Inclusive Education. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49242-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49242-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49241-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49242-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)