Skip to main content

A Follow-Up to an Age-Friendly Protocol to Support Investigations of Autonomous Driving Disengagement on Driver Safety: Results and Recommendations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2023)

Abstract

Driving cessation in old age is linked to negative mental and physical health outcomes. Autonomous vehicles offer an opportunity to maintain independence and mobility for older adults. However, vehicle automation can compromise driver engagement, posing risks to drivers and the public. The concern is particularly significant for older and novice drivers who are already overrepresented in accident statistics. Driving simulators provide a safe environment to evaluate performance and assess driver skills and engagement. This study employed a specialized protocol to accommodate older drivers and minimize the adverse effects of simulated driving. The complete number of participants included older (n = 13) and novice drivers (n = 9), who underwent manual and semi-autonomous driving simulations. Results included positive impacts of the simulator modifications with only two dropouts (both from the older group) resulting in a total dropout rate of 9% (15% of older drivers). Driver engagement varied between driving conditions, with superior performance in responding to surprise events during manual driving condition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Almallah, M., Hussain, Q., Reinolsmann, N., Alhajyaseen, W.K.M.: Driving simulation sickness and the sense of presence: Correlation and contributing factors. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 78, 180–193 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brightman, K., et al.: Age-friendly protocol to support investigations of autonomous driving disengagement on driver Safety. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds.) HCI International 2022 Posters: 24th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, HCII 2022, Virtual Event, June 26 – July 1, 2022, Proceedings, Part IV, pp. 147–154. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06394-7_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks, J.O., et al.: Simulator sickness during driving simulation studies. Accid. Anal. Prev. 42(3), 788–796 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.04.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, W., Sawaragi, T., Horiguchi, Y.: Measurement of driver’s mental workload in partial autonomous driving. IFAC-PapersOnLine 52(19), 347–352 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.083

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cunningham, M.L., Regan, M.A.: Driver distraction and inattention in the realm of automated driving. IET Intel. Transport Syst. 12(6), 407–413 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2017.0232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, S., Nesbitt, K., Nalivaiko, E.: Comparing the onset of cybersickness using the Oculus Rift and two virtual roller coasters. Undefined (2015). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Comparing-the-onset-of-cybersickness-using-the-Rift-Davis-Nesbitt/7300bdd5ad6abd25b6c6e9b5484e423f410a8630

  7. Dużmańska, N., Strojny, P., Strojny, A.: Can simulator sickness be avoided? A review on temporal aspects of simulator sickness. Front. Psychol. 9, 2132 (2018). https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02132

  8. Edwards, J., Lunsman, M., Perkins, M., Rebok, G., Roth, D.: Driving cessation and health trajectories in older adults. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 64(12), 1290–1295 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kennedy, R.S., Stanney, K.M., Dunlap, W.P.: Duration and exposure to virtual environments: sickness curves during and across sessions. Presence: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 9(5), 463–472 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566952

  10. Keshavarz, B., Ramkhalawansingh, R., Haycock, B., Shahab, S., Campos, J.L.: Comparing simulator sickness in younger and older adults during simulated driving under different multisensory conditions. Transport. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 54, 47–62 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Matas, N.A., Nettelbeck, T., Burns, N.R.: Dropout during a driving simulator study: a survival analysis. J. Safety Res. 55, 159–169 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2015.08.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. McKnight, A.J., McKnight, A.S.: Young novice drivers: careless or clueless? Accid. Anal. Prev. 35(6), 921–925 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-4575(02)00100-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Min, B.-C., Chung, S.-C., Min, Y.-K., Sakamoto, K.: Psychophysiological evaluation of simulator sickness evoked by a graphic simulator. Appl. Ergon. 35(6), 549–556 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.06.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Highway Accident Report: Collision Between a Car Operating With Automated Vehicle Control Systems and a Tractor-Semitrailer Truck Near Williston, Florida, May 7, 2016 (NTSB/HAR-17/02) (2017). https://trid.trb.org/view/1485316

  15. Park, G.D., Allen, R.W., Fiorentino, D., Rosenthal, T.J., Cook, M.L.: Simulator sickness scores according to symptom susceptibility, age, and gender for an older driver assessment study. Proc. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. Ann. Meet. 50(26), 2702–2706 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605002607

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The work was supported by the Transport Canada Enhanced Road Safety Transfer Payment Program (ERSTPP). This work was also supported in part by the AGE-WELL NCE Inc. And the AGE-WELL National Innovation Hub Program. F. Knoefel acknowledges funding for the University of Ottawa Brain and Mind – Bruyère Research Institute Chair in Primary Health Care Dementia Research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirsten Brightman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brightman, K. et al. (2024). A Follow-Up to an Age-Friendly Protocol to Support Investigations of Autonomous Driving Disengagement on Driver Safety: Results and Recommendations. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S., Salvendy, G. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1958. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_48

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49215-0_48

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49214-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49215-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics