Abstract
The key idea of the work is that the techno-economic paradigm determines the type of society and the type of security. It is believed that civilization and barbarism are two parallel processes. In addition, it is believed that technology has a broader negative impact on security. Technological (r)evolution impacts security evolution. It further means rise of the new threats and security challenges and consequentially forms of risk prevention and mitigation. Due to the new technological evolutions, it can also affect rise of the new security and arms race but this time in the artificial intelligence arena. Moreover, all of that directly impacts the security of individual, which becomes politically framed concept. Such impacts are comprehensive and include many elements including health, environment, political, economic and community challenges. In addition, AI will have its own impact in the respective context. Paper also returns to the past ideas regarding cooperation of cultures, privacy, protecting others and oneself from one’s own self, as well as developing compassion, conscientiousness and morality. It seems that some ideas from the past creates the framework of the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Autonomous AI includes, for example, drones as well, which belong to the so-called swarm technology. Swarm intelligence is otherwise an AI concept, which represents the collective behavior of decentralized and independently organized systems. The system is composed of a large number of actors that interact with each other, as well as with their environment. The key advantage of this system is the ability of these machines to cooperate together in large numbers and, finally, make an autonomous joint decision (for example, the American DARPA, through the CODE (Collaborative Operations in Denied Environment) project, created squads of drones capable of adapting and responding to unforeseen challenges). And that's exactly what makes them autonomous weapons. The potential beginning of the arms race is confirmed here as well. Namely, the biggest current producers of drones and robots are the USA, Israel and China.
When it comes to autonomous AI, it finds its application in medicine. Precisely it finds its application in the possible process of making an autonomous joint decision in the future.
References
Morin, E.: Evropska civilizacija i evropsko barbarstvo, AGM, Zagreb (2006)
Benjamin, W.: On the Concept of History, CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform (2009)
Bouthoul, G.: War, Psychology and sociology, Sun Book SB3, Walker (1962)
Harari, J.N.: Sapijens—kratka istorija ljudskog roda, Biblioner, Beograd (2014)
Moseley, A.: A Philosophy of War. Agora Publishing, New York (2002)
Heilbroner, R. L.: Do Machines Make History? in Does Technology Drive History? The Dilemma of Technological Determinism, MIT Press
Creebs, R. E.: Groundbreaking scientific exeriments, inventions and discoveries of the Middle Age and the Reneissance Greenwood Press, London (2004)
Beck, U.: World Risk Society. Polity, Cambridge (1999)
Friedman, M., Friedman, R.: Capitalism and Freedom, University of Chicago Press (2002)
Vukotić, V.: Istorija Budućnosti, CID, Podgorica (2011)
Waltz, K.: Man, the State and the War. Columbia University Press, New York (1959)
Encyclopedia Britannica, https://www.britannica.com/technology/history-of-technology
Jovetic, I.: Economics and Security: The Paradigm (R)Evolution, Journal of International Business and Economics, American Research Institute for Policy Development (2021)
Krenenburg V.R.: Identifying the real and absolute enemy as chapter 13 in Cyberspace: Malevolent Actors, Criminal Opportunities and Strategic Competition (2016)
Geers, K.: Strategic Cyber Security, NATO CCoE, Tallinn, Estonia (2012)
Kuhn, T.S.: The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Nolit, Belgrade (1974)
ISIS Europe: The EU, NATO and Emerging Security Challenges in 2012 (2012)
Kenney, M.: Cyberterrorism in a Post-Stuxnet World as Chapter 3 in Cyberspace: Malevolent Actors, Criminal Opportunities and Strategic Competition (2016)
Jovetic, I.: Implications of Technological Changes on Policies and Strategy of Security and Defense, ISC Ohrid, Faculty for Security, Skopje (2016)
Tikk, E.: Global Cyber Security—Thinking About the Niche for NATO, The SAIS Review of International Affairs (2010)
Jovetic, I.: Civilization and Terrorism (2012)
Lee, K.-F.: AI Super-powers China, Silicon Valley and the new world order, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston, New York (2018)
Munich Security Report, MSC (2019)
Smith, A.: The Theory of Moral Sentiments, Gutenberg Publishers, (2011)
Akerlof, G.A., Kranton, R.E.: Ekonomija Identiteta, Mate, Zagreb, (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jovetic, I., Katnic, I. (2024). The Security Framework: Determined and AI Impact?. In: Badnjević, A., Gurbeta Pokvić, L. (eds) MEDICON’23 and CMBEBIH’23. MEDICON CMBEBIH 2023 2023. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 93. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49062-0_74
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-49062-0_74
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-49061-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-49062-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)