Skip to main content

Scope Assessment Methodology for Agile Projects Using Automated Requirements Gathering from Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Software Technologies (ICIST 2023)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1979))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 149 Accesses

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of effective scope assessment in Agile projects. The adoption of Agile principles and methods has replaced the traditional waterfall approach, leading to better involvement of clients and teams in gathering requirements, regular review of results, and flexible adaptation to changes. However, Agile implementation projects lack the opportunity to pay detailed attention to the analysis phase, which makes scope assessment crucial. The article proposes using Story Map and UML models to analyze the scope of Agile projects, as their ability to visualize information and act as a source of truth. The methodology helps to integrate models, compile functional and non-functional requirements, perform cross-checking of the requirements, and create an initial scope assessment. Proper preparation for scope assessment is necessary for successful Agile implementation and can lead to understanding project goals and objectives, prioritizing work, managing stakeholder expectations, estimating timelines, and enhancing team collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thesing, T., Feldmann, C., Burchardt, M.: Agile versus waterfall project management: decision model for selecting the appropriate approach to a project. Procedia Comput. Sci. 181, 746–756 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beng Leau, Y., Khong Loo, W., Yip Tham, W., Fun, S.: Software development life cycle AGILE vs traditional approaches. IPCSIT 37, 162–167 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dvir, D., Raz, T., Shenhar, A.J.: An empirical analysis of the relationship between project planning and project success. Int. J. Project Manag. 21, 89–95 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Rajabi Asadabadi, M., Zwikael, O.: Integrating risk into estimations of project activities’ time and cost: a stratified approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 291(2), 482–490 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sarmad Ali, S., Shoaib Zafar, M., Tallal Saeed, M.: Effort estimation problems in software maintenance – a survey. In: 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET), pp. 1–9 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ravi Kiran, M., Manmohan, S.: Study on agile story point estimation techniques and challenges. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 174, 9–14 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Adomavicius, A.: The Secret Source. ASIN: B0937NCNHC. Publisher: Devbridge; 1st edition (April 21, 2021). Publication date, 21 April 2021

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bart, C.K.: Product innovation charters: mission statements for new products. R&D Manag. 32(1), 23–34 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooke-Davies, T.: The, real success factors on projects. Int. J. Project Manag. 20(3), 185–190 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Serrador, P., Pinto, J.K.: Does agile work? - A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int. J. Project Manag. 33(5), 1040–1051 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Primadhika, M., Raharjo, T., Hardian, B., Prasetyo, A.: Agile project management challenge in handling scope and change: a systematic literature review. Procedia Comput. Sci. 197, 290–300 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharon, A., Dori, D.: A model-based approach for planning work breakdown structures of complex systems projects. IFAC Proc. Vol. 45(6), 1083–1088 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abd El Hameed, T., Abd EL Latif, M., Kholief, S.: Identify and classify critical success factor of agile software development methodology using mind. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 7(5), 83–92 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Williams, L.: Agile software development methodologies and practices. Adv. Comput. 80, 1–44 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Di Martino, S., Ferrucci, F., Gravino, C., Sarro, F.: Web effort estimation: function point analysis vs. COSMIC. Inf. Softw. Technol. 72, 90–109 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Azzeh, M., Bou Nassif, A., Basem Attili, I.: Predicting software effort from use case points: a systematic review. Sci. Comput. Program. 204(1), 102596 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liebel, G., Knauss, E.: Aspects of modeling requirements in very-large agile systems engineering. J. Syst. Softw. 199, 111628 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lina Bisikirskiene .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bisikirskiene, L., Grigonyte, E. (2024). Scope Assessment Methodology for Agile Projects Using Automated Requirements Gathering from Models. In: Lopata, A., GudonienÄ—, D., ButkienÄ—, R. (eds) Information and Software Technologies. ICIST 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1979. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48981-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48981-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48980-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48981-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics