Skip to main content

Online PID Tuning of a 3-DoF Robotic Arm Using a Metaheuristic Optimisation Algorithm: A Comparative Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Software Technologies (ICIST 2023)

Abstract

This paper presents a metaheuristic algorithm-based proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller tuning method for a 3 degrees of freedom (DoF) robotic manipulator. In particular, the War Strategy Optimisation Algorithm (WSO) is applied as a metaheuristic algorithm for PID tuning of the manipulator, and the performance of the controller is compared with Particle Swarm Optimisation (PSO) and Grey Wolf Optimisation (GWO) algorithms. According to the simulation outcomes, the WSO algorithm exhibits superior performance compared to the other two algorithms with respect to settling time, overshoot, and steady-state error. The proposed technique provides an effective approach for enhancing the performance of robotic manipulators and can be extended to other applications that require optimal PID controller tuning.

This work is supported by the Biomechatronics and Collaborative Robotics Group at the Top Research Centre Mechatronics (TRCM), University of Agder, Grimstad, Norway.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ayala, H.V.H., dos Santos Coelho, L.: Tuning of PID controller based on a multiobjective genetic algorithm applied to a robotic manipulator. Expert Syst. Appl. 39(10), 8968–8974 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ayyarao, T.S., et al.: War strategy optimization algorithm: a new effective metaheuristic algorithm for global optimization. IEEE Access 10, 25073–25105 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bingül, Z., Karahan, O.: A fuzzy logic controller tuned with PSO for 2 DOF robot trajectory control. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(1), 1017–1031 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Das, K.R., Das, D., Das, J.: Optimal tuning of PID controller using GWO algorithm for speed control in dc motor. In: 2015 International Conference on Soft Computing Techniques and Implementations (ICSCTI), pp. 108–112. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dehghani, M., Ahmadi, M., Khayatian, A., Eghtesad, M., Farid, M.: Neural network solution for forward kinematics problem of HEXA parallel robot. In: 2008 American Control Conference, pp. 4214–4219. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Desborough, L., Miller, R.: Increasing customer value of industrial control performance monitoring-Honeywell’s experience. In: AIChE Symposium Series, pp. 169–189. New York; American Institute of Chemical Engineers; 1998 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gani, M.M., Islam, M.S., Ullah, M.A.: Optimal PID tuning for controlling the temperature of electric furnace by genetic algorithm. SN Appl. Sci. 1, 1–8 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson, M.A., Moradi, M.H.: PID Control. Springer, London (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-148-2_1

  9. Kang, R., Chanal, H., Bonnemains, T., Pateloup, S., Branson, D.T., Ray, P.: Learning the forward kinematics behavior of a hybrid robot employing artificial neural networks. Robotica 30(5), 847–855 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kapoor, N., Ohri, J.: Improved PSO tuned classical controllers (PID and SMC) for robotic manipulator. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. 7(1), 47 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim, E.J., Seki, K., Iwasaki, M., Lee, S.H.: Ga-based practical auto-tuning technique for industrial robot controller with system identification. IEEJ J. Ind. Appl. 1(1), 62–69 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Knospe, C.: PID control. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 26(1), 30–31 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lochan, K., Roy, B.K.: Control of two-link 2-DOF robot manipulator using fuzzy logic techniques: a review. In: Das, K.N., Deep, K., Pant, M., Bansal, J.C., Nagar, A. (eds.) Proceedings of Fourth International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving. AISC, vol. 335, pp. 499–511. Springer, New Delhi (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-2217-0_41

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Nahapetian, N., Motlagh, M.J., Analoui, M.: PID gain tuning using genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic for robot manipulator control. In: 2009 International Conference on Advanced Computer Control, pp. 346–350. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ouyang, P., Pano, V.: Comparative study of DE, PSO and GA for position domain PID controller tuning. Algorithms 8(3), 697–711 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Rawat, D., Gupta, M.K., Sharma, A.: Intelligent control of robotic manipulators: a comprehensive review. Spat. Inf. Res. 1–13 (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sanfilippo, F., Hatledal, L.I., Schaathun, H.G., Pettersen, K.Y., Zhang, H.: A universal control architecture for maritime cranes and robots using genetic algorithms as a possible mapping approach. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), pp. 322–327. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sanfilippo, F., Hatledal, L.I., Zhang, H., Fago, M., Pettersen, K.Y.: Controlling Kuka industrial robots: flexible communication interface JOpenShowVar. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 22(4), 96–109 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanfilippo, F., Hatledal, L.I., Zhang, H., Fago, M., Pettersen, K.Y.: JOpenShowVar: an open-source cross-platform communication interface to Kuka robots. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Information and Automation (ICIA), pp. 1154–1159 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Solihin, M.I., Tack, L.F., Kean, M.L.: Tuning of PID controller using particle swarm optimization (PSO). In: Proceeding of the International Conference on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, vol. 1, pp. 458–461 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Su, Y., Müller, P.C., Zheng, C.: Global asymptotic saturated PID control for robot manipulators. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 18(6), 1280–1288 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Tuan, H.M., Sanfilippo, F., Hao, N.V.: A novel adaptive sliding mode controller for a 2-DOF elastic robotic arm. Robotics 11(2), 47 (2022)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valluru, S.K., Singh, M.: Optimization strategy of bio-inspired metaheuristic algorithms tuned PID controller for PMBDC actuated robotic manipulator. Procedia Comput. Sci. 171, 2040–2049 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filippo Sanfilippo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Zafar, M.H., Younus, H.B., Moosavi, S.K.R., Mansoor, M., Sanfilippo, F. (2024). Online PID Tuning of a 3-DoF Robotic Arm Using a Metaheuristic Optimisation Algorithm: A Comparative Analysis. In: Lopata, A., GudonienÄ—, D., ButkienÄ—, R. (eds) Information and Software Technologies. ICIST 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1979. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48981-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48981-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48980-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48981-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics