Abstract
Though mathematics represents the last letter in STEM, many believe that it is ranked first with regard to importance. Mathematics contributes to the understanding of the ideas and concepts of all other subjects, especially in integrating STEM education programs. The objective of this research is to give information on student mathematics performance and make suggestions about how the results may affect learning about STEM subjects. A total of 510 Form 1 students, on average, 13 years old, consisted of 235 males and 275 females, participated in this cross-sectional study. A year-end mathematics examination consisted of 44 items in a partial credit format is used as an instrument. Using the Rasch measurement model framework, responses from the exam were utilized to calibrate the items according to their level of difficulty. The results show that students have difficulty in answering items related to the topic of (1) linear inequalities, followed by (2) ratios, rates, and proportions, as well as (3) algebraic expressions. However, they demonstrate mastery in answering items related to the topics of (1) linear equations, (2) factors and multiples, and (3) perimeters and areas. We believe that knowledge in these areas would enable teachers to prepare more successful activities related to the inclusion of STEM subjects in classroom instruction and learning. Creating a robot or building models is meaningless if students are unable to obtain a deep understanding of the concepts associated with mathematics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Azman MNA, Aisyah S, Balakrishnan B, Yaacob MIH, Bahrom S, Hanim H, Harfiez F, Samar N (2018) Retooling science teaching on stability topic for STEM education: Malaysian case study journal of engineering. Sci Technol 13(10):3116–3128
Becker K, Park K (2011) Effect of integrative approaches among science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) subjects on students’ learning: a preliminary meta-analysis. J STEM Edu: Innov Res 12:23–37
Bond TG, Fox CM (2015) Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences, 3rd edn. Routledge, New York
Bybee RW (2010) Advancing STEM education: a 2020 vision. Technol Eng Teach 70:30–35
Capraro M, Joffrion H (2006) Algebraic equations: can middle school students meaningfully translate from words to mathematical symbols? Read Psychol 27(2–3):147–164
Cheryan S, Master A, Meltzoff AN (2015) Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Front Psychol 6:49
Dasgupta N, Stout JG (2014) Girls and women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Steming the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers policy insights from the. Behav Brain Sci 21–29:21
Eakman AM (2012) Measurement characteristics of the engagement in meaningful activities survey in an age-diverse sample. Am J Occup Ther 66(2):e20–e29
Facione PA (2011) Critical thinking: what it is and why it counts. California Academic Press, Millbrae
Furner J, Kumar D (2007) The mathematics and science integration argument: a stand for teacher education Eurasia journal of mathematics. Sci Technol 3(3):185–189
Givvin KB, Stigler JW, Thompson B (2011) What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics, part 2: The interviews. MathAMATYC Educator 2(3):4–18
Hughes RM, Nzekwe B, Molyneaux KJ (2013) The single sex debate for girls in science: a comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Res Sci Educ 43(5):1997–2007
Jayarajah R, Saat RM, Rauf RA (2014) A review of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education research from 1999-2013: a Malaysian perspective Eurasia journal of mathematics. Sci Technol Edu 10(3):155–163
Karatas I, Baki A (2013) The effect of learning environments based on problem solving on students’ achievements of problem solving international electronic journal of elementary. Education 5(3):249–267
Khairani AZ (2017) Assessing urban and rural teachers’ competencies in STEM integrated education in Malaysia MATEC Web of Conferences, 87, 04004
Knuth E, Peressini D (2001) Unpacking the nature of discourse in mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 6(5):320–325
Linacre JM (2002) What do infit and outfit, mean-square and standardized mean. Rasch Measurement Transactions 16(2):878
Masters G (1982) A Rasch model for partial credit scoring. Psychometrika 47:149–174
Ministry of Education Malaysia (2016) Secondary school standard curriculum: mathematics form 1. Ministry of Education, Putrajaya
Mohtar LE, Halim L, Rahman NA, Maat SM, Iksan ZH, Osman K (2019) A model of interest in stem careers among secondary school students. J Balt Sci Educ 18(3):404–416
Morrison JS (2006) TIES STEM Education Monograph Series: Attributes of STEM Education. Retrieved on 17 December 2018 from https://www.partnersforpubliced.org/uploadedFiles/TeachingandLearning/Career_and_Technical_Education/Attributes%20of%20STEM%20Education%20with%20Cover%202%20.pdf
Nadelson LS, Seifert AL (2017) Integrated STEM defined: contexts, challenges and the future. J Educ Res 110(3):221–223
Ng CH, Adnan M (2018) Integrating STEM education through project-based inquiry learning (PIL) in topic space among year one pupils IOP conference series. Mater Sci Eng 296:012020
Pape SJ, Bell CV, Yetkin IE (2003) Developing mathematical thinking and self-regulated learning: A teaching experiment in a seventh-grade mathematics classroom. Edu Stud Math 53:179–202
Schmidt WH, Houang RT (2007) Lack of focus in the mathematics curriculum: a symptom or a cause? In: Loveless T (ed) Lessons learned: what international assessments tell us about math achievement. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, pp 65–84
Semerci C (2005) The influence of the critical thinking skills on the students’ achievement Pakistan journal of. Soc Sci 3(4):598–602
Shaughnessy M (2013) Mathematics in a STEM context Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 18(6): 324
Siegler RS, Lortie-Forgues H (2017) Hard lessons: why rational number arithmetic is so difficult for so many people. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 26(4):346–351
Siegler RS, Pyke AA (2013) Developmental and individual differences in understanding fractions. Dev Psychol 49:1994–2004
Stigler JW, Givvin KB, Thompson B (2010) What community college developmental mathematics students understand about mathematics. MathAMATYC Educator 1(3):4–16
Tspuros N, Kohler R, Hallinen J (2009) STEM education: a project to identify the missing components. In: STEM Education and Leonard Gelfand Centre for Service Learning and Outreach. Carnegie Mellon University, Pennsylvania
Wang WC, Yao G, Tsai YJ, Wang JD, Hsieh CL (2006) Validating, improving reliability and estimating correlation of the four subscales in the WHOQOL-BREF using multidimensional Rasch analysis. Qual Life Res 15(4):607–620
Wright BD, Masters GN (1982) Rating scale analysis: Rasch measurement. MESA Press, Chicago
Yaki AA, Saat MR, Sathasivam VR, Zulnaidi H (2019) Enhancing science achievement utilising an integrated STEM approach. Malays J Learn Instr 16(1):181–205
Acknowledgments
The research was funded by the Ministry of Education through the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS/1/2020/SSI0/USM/02/5). We wish to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia for providing the opportunity to conduct this study as well as all students and teachers for their time and willingness to participate.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Khairani, A.Z., Ishak, N.A., Idris, I., Shamsuddin, H. (2024). Student Performance in Mathematics and its Impact on Learning STEM Subjects. In: Mansour, N., Bujosa, L. (eds) Islamic Finance. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48769-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48770-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)