Abstract
The current study seeks to determine the stages of high school graduates’ decision to enroll in higher education institutions (HEIs) by examining the influencing factors in relation to the student’s university choice decision-making process in Malaysia. The survey has been done by collecting quantitative data. Over the 6-month collecting data process, 253 students responded, with 220 surveys completed. Usable data from surveys were analyzed using the AMOS 24.0 software. The study employed a 20-item adopted and adapted questionnaire measuring the mentioned factors. The study discovered that university reputation, teaching staff quality, and campus facilities significantly influenced school leavers’ university choices, but the promotion variable did not. Gender moderated the relationship between university reputation, staff quality, and students’ enrolment intentions. These findings are essential for decision-making and can guide higher education marketers in improving strategies to attract students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Absah Y, Karina B, Harahap RH (2021) Strategies to improve student satisfaction through the quality of online learning facilities and infrastructure, characteristics of academic staff, lecturers competence, and good university governance in Medan. Syst Rev Pharm 12(3)
Alam MS, Saadat Z (2020) Factors affecting the reversal of gender disparity in higher education institutions (HEIS): a systematic review: factors affecting the reversal of gender disparity. Asia Proc Soc Sci 6(3):272–276
Adefulu AD, Farinloye T, Mogaji E (2020) Factors influencing postgraduate students’ university choice in Nigeria. Springer International Publishing, pp 187–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39379-3_8
Alrefaie Z, Hassanien M (2020) Monitoring online learning during COVID-19 pandemic; suggested online learning portfolio (COVID-19 OLP). MedEdPublish 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000110.1
Binyamin SS, Rutter MJ, Smith S (2018) The influence of computer self-efficacy and subjective norms on the students’ use of learning Management Systems at King Abdulaziz University. Int J Inform Edu Technol 8(10):693–699. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.10.1124
Binyamin SS, Rutter M, Smith S (2019) Extending the technology acceptance model to understand students’ use of learning Management Systems in Saudi Higher Education. Int J Emerg Technol Learn (IJET) 14(03):4. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732
Bordon P, Canals C, Mizala A (2020) The gender gap in college major choice in Chile. Econ Educ Rev 77:102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2020.102011
Brown T, Morrison IC, Stagnitti K (2010) The convergent validity of two sensory processing scales used with school-age children: comparing the sensory profile and the sensory processing measure. New Zealand J Occup Ther 57(2):56–65
Canever MD, Barral MRM, Ribeiro FG (2017) How does the public and private university environment affect students’ entrepreneurial intention? Education + Training 59(6):550–564. https://doi.org/10.1108/et-12-2016-0187
Card D, Payne AA (2021) High school choices and the gender gap in stem. Econ Inq 59(1):9–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12934
Ciriaci D, Muscio A (2014) University choice, research quality and graduates’ employability: evidence from Italian National Survey Data. European Edu Res J 13(2):199–219. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2014.13.2.199
Dowling-Hetherington L (2020) Transnational higher education and the factors influencing student decision-making: the experience of an Irish university. J Stud Int Educ 24(3):291–313
Dodd RH, Dadaczynski K, Okan O, McCaffery K, Pickles K (2021) Psychological wellbeing and academic experience of university students in Australia during COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18(3):866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18030866
Eldegwy A, Elsharnouby TH, Kortam W (2023) Blue blood students of occupational dynasties and their university choice: the moderating role of parent–child occupational following. J Mark High Educ 1–24:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841241.2022.2163334
Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research 18(1):39–50
Frazer C, Sullivan DH, Weatherspoon D, Hussey L (2017) Faculty perceptions of online teaching effectiveness and indicators of quality. Nurs Res Pract 2017:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9374189
Ganapathy D, Deepak S (2023) A study on reskilling and networking on Linkedin on employee recruitment success and career advancement. In: Aloysius Edward J, Jaheer Mukthar KP, Asis ER, Sivasubramanian K (eds) Current trends in economics, business and sustainability. ICEBS 2023. Contributions to environmental sciences & innovative business technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3366-2_29
Ghazali I (2005) Model Persamaan Struktural–Konsep dan Aplikasi dengan Program AMOS Ver. 5.0. Badan Penerbitan Universitas Dipenogora, Semarang, Indonesia
Hair JFJ, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, 7th edn. Pearson, London
Hair JF (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage
Heathcote D, Savage S, Hosseinian-Far A (2020) Factors affecting university choice behavior in the UK higher education. Edu Sci 10(8):199
Heng HK, Wang RX, Peng FGSZ, Abidin IS, Vejaratnam N, Abdullah N, Abdullah AS (2022) The mediating role of institutional support on relationship between technology acceptance model (TAM) and student satisfaction to use ELearning during Covid-19 pandemic: the study of private University in Malaysia. Int J Spec Edu (IJSE) 37(3):742–752
Hieu VT, Xuyen NT, Hung DD (2020) Factors influencing to the university choice of high-schools pupils–an empirical study of lam dong province, Vietnam. J Crit Rev 7(8):1656–1665. http://www.jcreview.com/index.php?mno=16459
Hunter M (2020) The collapse of Malaysian private universities., Asia Sentinel
Jiani MA (2017) Why and how international students choose mainland China as a higher education study abroad destination. High Educ 74(4):563–579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-016-0066-0
Kusumawati A, Perera N, Yanamandram VK (2019) Modelling trade-offs in students’ choice set when determining universities. Int J Educ Manag 33(5):979–989. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-01-2018-0007
Mikhno N, Sorokina L (2017) Trend analysis of the educational choice of university entrants as tool to improve the quality of educational service. Int J Informa Comm Technol Edu 6:36. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijicte-2017-0014
Moores E, Burgess AP (2023) Financial support differentially aids retention of students from households with lower incomes: a UK case study. Stud High Educ 48(1):220–231
Mustafa SA, Sellami A, Elmaghraby E, Al-Qassass H (2018) Determinants of college and university choice for high-school students in Qatar. Int J Higher Edu 7(3):1. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n3p1
Onsardi, Wulandari K, Finthariasari M, Yulinda AT (2021) Impact of service marketing on student decisions. JBMP (Jurnal Bisnis, Manajemen Dan Perbankan) 7(2):48–68. https://doi.org/10.21070/jbmp.v7i2.1521
Porter C, Serra D (2020) Gender differences in the choice of major: the importance of female role models. Am Econ J Appl Econ 12(3):226–254. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20180426
Qasim AM, Al-Askari PSM, Massoud H, Ayoubi RM (2021) Student university choice in Kurdistan-Iraq: what factors matter? J Furth High Educ 45(1):120–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2020.1742298
Raju V (2023) A case study on the buying behaviour of online customers in Bangalore. In: Aloysius Edward J, Jaheer Mukthar KP, Asis ER, Sivasubramanian K (eds) Current trends in economics, business and sustainability. ICEBS 2023. Contributions to environmental sciences & innovative business technology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-3366-2_7
Ranwala L, Siriwardena S, Kurukulaarachchi V, Edirisinghe L (2020) Determinants of university choice for the academic disciplines in the tertiary education in Sri Lanka
Renn KA, Reason RD (2021) College students in the United States: characteristics, experiences, and outcomes. Stylus Publishing, LLC
Sadeghi T, Heidarzadeh Hanzaee K (2010) Customer satisfaction factors (CSFs) with online banking services in an Islamic country. J Islamic Market 1(3):249–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/17590831011082428
Saunders M, Lewis P, Thornhill A (2019) Research methods for business students, 8th edn. Pearson
Shahzad A, Hassan R, Aremu AY, Hussain A, Lodhi RN (2021) Effects of COVID-19 in E-learning on higher education institution students: the group comparison between male and female. Quality & quantity 55:805–826
Stahl JF, Schober PS, Spiess CK (2018) Parental socio-economic status and childcare quality: early inequalities in educational opportunity? Early Child Res Q 44:304–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2017.10.011
Sudari SA, Tarofder AK, Khatibi A, Tham J (2019) Measuring the critical effect of marketing mix on customer loyalty through customer satisfaction in food and beverage products. Manag Sci Lett 9(9):1385–1396. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2019.5.012
Taha MH, Abdalla ME, Wadi M, Khalafalla H (2020) Curriculum delivery in medical education during an emergency: a guide based on the responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish 9(1). https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000069.1
Vincent-Ruz P, Schunn CD (2018) The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. Int J STEM Education 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0140-5
Wong P, Ng PML, Lee DR, Lam R (2019) Examining the impact of perceived source credibility on attitudes and intentions towards taking advice from others on university choice. Int J Educ Manag 34(4):709–724. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijem-06-2019-0190
Yeap CK, Hoe FT, Ira SO, Eng SB, Heng HK (2022) Identification factors affecting E-learning satisfaction during pandemic period among students at UiTM Melaka Malaysia. Int J Innov Creativity Chang 16(1):416–430
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Heng, H.K., Wang, R.X., Yeap, C.K., Ithnan, I.H.M., Abidin, I.S.b.Z., Lai, P.Y. (2024). Breaking Barriers: Exploring the Gender Moderation in Factors Affecting University Choice for Students. In: Mansour, N., Bujosa, L. (eds) Islamic Finance. Contributions to Management Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48770-5_28
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48769-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48770-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)