Skip to main content

A Domain-Specific e3value Extension for Analyzing Blockchain-Based Value Networks

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Practice of Enterprise Modeling (PoEM 2023)

Abstract

Adopting blockchain technologies in organizations has multiple implications for business models. To make adoption successful, both the business as well as the technical perspectives must be carefully aligned. However, understanding the impact of the technological changes on business models is a challenge due to the technological complexity, the lack of knowledge in the organization, and regulatory requirements. Further, domain-specific modeling methods that inherently deal with blockchain concepts in business models are currently missing. To address this gap, we present an extension of the \({e}^{3} value\) modeling method to depict blockchain-specific aspects in value networks, including the automatic inference of transparency based on blockchain usage and configuration. The extended modeling method was implemented on the ADOxx metamodeling platform and applied to three exemplary use cases for a first evaluation.

This research was partially funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation [196889].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for example the one by Hilti: https://www.hilti.com/content/hilti/W1/US/en/business/business/equipment/fleet/tools-on-demand.html.

  2. 2.

    https://ethereum.org.

  3. 3.

    https://opensea.io/.

  4. 4.

    https://eips.ethereum.org/EIPS/eip-721.

References

  1. Antonopoulos, A.M., Wood, G.: Mastering Ethereum: Building Smart Contracts and dAPPs. O’reilly Media, Sebastopol (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clohessy, T., Acton, T., Rogers, N.: Blockchain adoption: technological, organisational and environmental considerations. In: Treiblmaier, H., Beck, R. (eds.) Business Transformation through Blockchain, pp. 47–76. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98911-2_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Curty, S., Fill, H.G.: Exploring the systematic design of blockchain-based applications using integrated modeling standards. In: Proceedings of the PoEM 2022 Workshops. CEUR, vol. 3298. CEUR-WS.org (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Curty, S., Fill, H.G.: BLEVEX - Blockchain e3value extension - ADOxx library (2023). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8380715

  5. Curty, S., Härer, F., Fill, H.G.: Towards the comparison of blockchain-based applications using enterprise modeling. In: Proceedings of the ER Demos and Posters 2021. CEUR, vol. 2958, pp. 31–36. CEUR-WS.org (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Curty, S., Härer, F., Fill, H.G.: Design of blockchain-based applications using model-driven engineering and low-code/no-code platforms: a structured literature review. Softw. Syst. Model. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-023-01109-1

  7. de Kruijff, J., Weigand, H.: Understanding the blockchain using enterprise ontology. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) CAiSE 2017. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 29–43. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Fernando, Y., Saravannan, R.: Blockchain technology: energy efficiency and ethical compliance. J. Gov. Integrity 4(2), 88–95 (2021). https://doi.org/10.15282/jgi.4.2.2021.5872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferstl, O.K., Sinz, E.J.: Modeling of business systems using SOM. In: Bernus, P., Mertins, K., Schmidt, G. (eds.) Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems. International Handbooks on Information Systems, pp. 347–367. Springer, Berlin (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26661-5_15

  10. Fill, H.G., Karagiannis, D.: On the conceptualisation of modelling methods using the ADOxx meta modelling platform. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. (EMISAJ) 8(1), 4–25 (2013). https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.8.1.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fill, H.-G., Meier, A. (eds.): Blockchain. EH, Springer, Wiesbaden (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-28006-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Fill, H.-G., Meier, A.: Blockchain kompakt. I, Springer, Wiesbaden (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27461-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Flovik, S., Moudnib, R.A., Vassilakopoulou, P.: Determinants of blockchain technology introduction in organizations: an empirical study among experienced practitioners. Procedia Comput. Sci. 181, 664–670 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Frank, U.: Domain-specific modeling languages: requirements analysis and design guidelines. In: Reinhartz-Berger, I., Sturm, A., Clark, T., Cohen, S., Bettin, J. (eds.) Domain Engineering, pp. 133–157. Springer, Berlin (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36654-3_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Frank, U.: Multi-perspective enterprise modeling: foundational concepts, prospects and future research challenges. Softw. Syst. Model. 13, 941–962 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gómez, C., Pérez Blanco, F.J., Vara, J.M., De Castro, V., Marcos, E.: Design and development of smart contracts for e-government through value and business process modeling. In: HICSS (2021). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2021.254

  17. Gordijn, J., Akkermans, H., Van Vliet, H.: What’s in an electronic business model? In: Dieng, R., Corby, O. (eds.) EKAW 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1937, pp. 257–273. Springer, Heidelberg (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39967-4_19

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R.: E3value User Guide, 1st edn. The Value Engineers B.V., Soest, NL (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Grossman, S.J., Hart, O.D.: The costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J. Political Econ. 94(4), 691–719 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1086/261404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Group, T.O.: ArchiMate® 3.1 specification (2019). https://pubs.opengroup.org/architecture/archimate3-doc/. Accessed 21 June 2023

  21. Härer, F.: Process modeling in decentralized organizations utilizing blockchain consensus. Enterp. Model. Inf. Syst. Architect. (EMISAJ) Int. J. Concept. Model. 15, 1–17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.18417/emisa.15.13

  22. Hillier, B.: The Economics of Asymmetric Information. Macmillan Education, London (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25485-9

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. ISO/TC 307 Technical Committee: ISO/TS 23635:2022: Blockchain and distributed ledger technologies - Guidelines for governance. Standard, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, CH (2022)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Janssen, M., Weerakkody, V., Ismagilova, E., Sivarajah, U., Irani, Z.: A framework for analysing blockchain technology adoption: integrating institutional, market and technical factors. Int. J. Inf. Manage. 50, 302–309 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Jiang, S., Ræder, T.B.: Experience on using ArchiMate models for modelling blockchain-enhanced value chains. In: EASE 2022 Conference, pp. 375–382. ACM (2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3530019.3531346

  26. Kannengiesser, N., Lins, S., Sander, C., Winter, K., Frey, H., Sunyaev, A.: Challenges and common solutions in smart contract development. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2021.3116808

  27. Kim, H.M., Laskowski, M.: Toward an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply-chain provenance. Intell. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. 25(1), 18–27 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lakkakula, P., Bullock, D.W., Wilson, W.W.: Asymmetric information and blockchains in soybean commodity markets. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 44(1), 273–298 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.13159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCarthy, W.E.: The REA accounting model: a generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. Account. Rev. 57(3), 554–578 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nguyen, C.T., Hoang, D.T., Nguyen, D.N., Niyato, D., Nguyen, H.T., Dutkiewicz, E.: Proof-of-stake consensus mechanisms for future blockchain networks: fundamentals. Appl. Opportunit. IEEE Access 7, 85727–85745 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2925010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Osterwalder, A., Pigneur, Y.: Business Model Generation: A Handbook for Visionaries, Game Changers, and Challengers. John Wiley and Sons, Hoboken (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Perrelet, S., Fill, H.G., Dibbern, J.: A modeling approach for blockchain-inspired business models: an extension of the e3 -value method. In: HICSS (2022). https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2022.558

  33. Poels, G., Kaya, F., Verdonck, M., Gordijn, J.: Early identification of potential distributed ledger technology business cases using e3value models. In: Guizzardi, G., Gailly, F., Suzana Pitangueira Maciel, R. (eds.) ER 2019. LNCS, vol. 11787, pp. 70–80. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34146-6_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Sandkuhl, K., Stirna, J., Persson, A., Wißotzki, M.: Enterprise Modeling. TEES, Springer, Heidelberg (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-43725-4

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Sigrist, N.: Innovation in the construction planning phase - how to prevent building models from being subsequently modified (2023). https://www.swisscom.ch/en/business/blockchain/news/innovation-in-der-bauplanung.html

  36. Wang, R., Lin, Z., Luo, H.: Blockchain, bank credit and SME financing. Qual. Quant. 53(3), 1127–1140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-018-0806-6

  37. Wieland, M., Fill, H.: A domain-specific modeling method for supporting the generation of business plans. In: Modellierung 2020, 19–21. February 2020, Wien, Österreich. LNI, vol. P-302, pp. 45–60. Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (2020). https://dl.gi.de/20.500.12116/31846

  38. Wirtz, B.W., Pistoia, A., Ullrich, S., Göttel, V.: Business models: origin, development and future research perspectives. Long Range Plan. 49(1), 36–54 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2015.04.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Curty .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Curty, S., Fill, HG. (2024). A Domain-Specific e3value Extension for Analyzing Blockchain-Based Value Networks. In: Almeida, J.P.A., Kaczmarek-Heß, M., Koschmider, A., Proper, H.A. (eds) The Practice of Enterprise Modeling. PoEM 2023. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 497. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48583-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48583-1_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48582-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48583-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics