Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Acceptance of Insect-Containing Foods: A Pilot Study Exploring the Use of Insects as a Meat Alternative

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability (ICoWEFS 2023) (ICoWEFS 2023)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 69 Accesses

Abstract

Entomophagy is currently increasing in popularity due to its potential as a sustainable alternative to conventional meat. However, acceptability of entomophagy amongst European consumers is still low. The aim of this study was to determine the factors affecting the acceptability of insect burgers (relative to plant and beef burgers) amongst consumers in Ireland through an affective sensory test. A total of 29 naïve consumers participated in a blind liking test which was conducted in isolated sensory booths. The beef burger received the highest overall liking score (7.03 ± 1.84) followed by the plant (6.31 ± 1.69) and lastly the insect burger (6.24 ± 1.66). Qualitative findings, however, revealed that the most negative comments were made for the plant burger. Participants’ meat attachment and perception of entomophagy had a significant effect (p < 0.05) on the acceptance of the insect burgers. The lower the meat attachment and the more positive participants’ entomophagy perception was, the more inclined they were to accept the insect burger. The taste, texture, and appearance of the burgers also significantly affected participants’ overall liking of them. Future interventions should focus on improving the sensory attributes of insect-containing foods and expanding the study to a representative sample of the population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ritchie, H., Roser, M.: Environmental Impacts of Food Production. Our World in Data, (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Poore, J., Nemecek, T.: Reducing food’s environmental impacts through producers and consumers. Science 360(6392), 987–992 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clark, M., Domingo, N., Colgan, K., Thakrar, S., Tilman, D., Lynch, J., Azevedo, I., Hill, J.: Global food system emissions could preclude achieving the 1.5 ˚C and 2 ˚C climate change targets. Science 370(6517), 705–708 (2020).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Steinfield, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M., De Haan, C.: Livestock’s long shadow: Environmental issues and options. FAO, Rome (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  5. United Nations.: World Population Prospects 2022. Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Dynamics (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henchion, M., Hayes, M., Mullen, A.M., Fenelon, M., Tiwari, B.: Future protein supply and demand: strategies and factors influencing a sustainable equilibrium. Foods 6(7) 53 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Huis, A., Dicke, M., Van Loon, J.J.A.: Insects to feed the world. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed 1(1) 3–5 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Huis, A.: Edible Insects contributing to food security? Agriculture & Food Security 4(20) 1–9 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rumpold, B.A., Schlüter, O.K.: Nutritional composition and safety aspects of edible insects. Molecular Nutrition & Food Research 57(5) 802–823 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kusch, S., Fiebelkorn, F.: Environmental impact judgements of meat, vegetarian, and insect burgers: Unifying the negative footprint illusion and quantity insensitivity. Food Quality and Preference 78 103731 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Smetana, S., Mathys, A., Knock, A., Heinz, V.: Meat alternatives: life cycle assessment of most known meat substitutes. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 20(9) 1254–1267 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Oonincx, D.G., De Boer, I.J.: Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans-a life cycle assessment. PLoS ONE 7(12) e51145 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gahukar, R.T.: Entomophagy and human food security. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 31(3) 129–144 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liceaga, A.M.: Approaches for utilizing insect protein for human consumption: Effect of enzymatic hydrolysis on protein quality and functionality. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 112(6) 529–532 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Turck, D., Bohn, T., Castenmiller, J., De Henauw, S., Hirsch‐Ernst, K.I., Maciuk, A., Mangelsdorf, I., McArdle, H.J., Naska, A., Pelaez, C.: Safety of frozen and dried formulations from whole yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA Journal 19(8) e06778 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  16. EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Turck, D., Castenmiller, J., De Henauw, S., Hirsch‐Ernst, K.I., Kearney, J., Maciuk, A., Mangelsdorf, I., McArdle, H.J., Naska, A., Pelaez, C.: Safety of frozen and dried formulations from migratory locust (Locusta migratoria) as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA Journal 19(7) e06667 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  17. EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA), Turck, D., Bohn, T., Castenmiller, J., De Henauw, S., Hirsch‐Ernst, K.I., Maciuk, A., Mangelsdorf, I., McArdle, H.J., Naska, A., Pelaez, C.: Safety of frozen and dried formulations from whole house crickets (Acheta domesticus) as a Novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA Journal 19(8) e06779 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2022/169.: Authorising the placing on the market of frozen, dried and powder forms of yellow mealworm (Tenebrio molitor larva) as a novel food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Official Journal of the European Union (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2021/1975.: Authorising the placing on the market of frozen, dried and powder forms of Locusta migratoria as a novel food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Official Journal of the European Union (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2022/188.: Authorising the placing on the market of frozen, dried and powder forms of Acheta domesticus as a novel food under Regulation (EU) 2015/2283 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/2470. Official Journal of the European Union (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Naranjo‐Guevara, N., Fanter, M., Conconi, A.M., Floto‐Stammen, S.: Consumer acceptance among Dutch and German students of insects in feed and food. Food Science & Nutrition 9(1) 414–428 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kane, B., Dermiki, M.: Factors and conditions influencing the willingness of Irish consumers to try insects: a pilot study. Irish Journal of Agricultural and Food Research 60 1–16 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Verbeke, W.: Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Quality and Preference 39 147–155 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ruby, M.B., Rozin, P., Chan, C.: Determinants of willingness to eat insects in the USA and India. Journal of Insects as Food and Feed. 1(3) 215–225 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Barton, A., Richardson, C.D., McSweeney, M.B.: Consumer attitudes toward entomophagy before and after evaluating cricket (Acheta domesticus)-based protein powders. Journal of Food Science 85(3) 781–788 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lensvelt, E.J., Steenbekkers, L.P.A.: Exploring consumer acceptance of entomophagy: a survey and experiment in Australia and the Netherlands. Ecology of Food and Nutrition 53(5) 543-561 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Graça, J., Calheiros, M.M., Oliveira, A.: Attached to meat? (Un) Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet. Appetite 95 113–125 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Census of Agriculture 2020 Detailed Results Homepage, Census of Agriculture 2020 Detailed Results - CSO - Central Statistics Office, last accessed 2023/01/10.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bord Bia.: Meat & Livestock Review 2020/21. Bord Bia (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Herbert, M., Beacom, E.: Exploring Consumer Acceptance of Insect-based Snack Products in Ireland. Journal of Food Products Marketing 27(6) 267–290 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Irish Universities Nutrition Alliance.: National Adult Nutrition Survey. Ireland (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shahbandeh, M.: Consumption of meat in Ireland 2010–2021. Statista (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sachs, J., Lafortune, G., Kroll, C., Fuller, G., Woelm, F.: From Crisis to Sustainable Development: the SDGs as a Roadmap to 2013 and Beyond. Sustainable Development Report 2022. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lafortune, G., Fuller, G., Bermont-Diaz, L., Kloke-Lesch, A., Koundouri, P., Riccaboni, A.: Achieving the SDGs: Europe’s Compass in a Multipolar World. Europe Sustainable Development Report 2022. SDSN and SDSN Europe. France, Paris (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Megido, R.C., Gierts, C., Blecker, C., Brostaux, Y., Haubruge, É., Alabi, T., Francis, F.: Consumer acceptance of insect-based alternative meat products in Western countries. Food Quality and Preference 52, 237–243 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee, H.J., Yong, H.I., Kim, M., Choi, Y.S., Jo, C.: Status of meat alternatives and their potential role in the future meat market—A review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences 33(10) 1533 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Food Safety Authority of Ireland Homepage, Temperature Control | FAQs | The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (fsai.ie) and Domestic Practice | FAQ’s | The Food Safety Authority of Ireland (fsai.ie), last accessed 2023/01/11.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health and Nutritional Sciences, Atlantic Technological University, Ash Lane, Sligo, F91 YW50, Ireland

    Leocardia Ranga, Jennifer Vance & Maria Dermiki

Authors
  1. Leocardia Ranga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer Vance
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Maria Dermiki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Dermiki .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Leiria, Portugal

    João Rafael da Costa Sanches Galvão

  2. Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Portalegre, Portugal

    Paulo Brito

  3. Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Leiria, Portugal

    Filipe dos Santos Neves

  4. Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Leiria, Portugal

    Henrique de Amorim Almeida

  5. Instituto Politécnico de Leiria, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Leiria, Portugal

    Sandra de Jesus Martins Mourato

  6. Instituto Politécnico de Portalegre, Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Portalegre, Portugal

    Catarina Nobre

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ranga, L., Vance, J., Dermiki, M. (2024). Acceptance of Insect-Containing Foods: A Pilot Study Exploring the Use of Insects as a Meat Alternative. In: Galvão, J.R.d.C.S., Brito, P., Neves, F.d.S., Almeida, H.d.A., Mourato, S.d.J.M., Nobre, C. (eds) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Water Energy Food and Sustainability (ICoWEFS 2023). ICoWEFS 2023. Springer Proceedings in Earth and Environmental Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48532-9_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48532-9_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48531-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48532-9

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation