Skip to main content

Kinematic Alignment Technique for Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

Abstract

The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a simple, safe, more anatomical, more physiological and probably clinically advantageous method compared to traditional mechanical alignment. The KA technique for UKA aims to produce “true” joint surfacing by restoring the level and three-dimensional orientation of the native joint space in the implanted knee compartment. It is biomechanically healthy and conserves ligament balance, knee kinematics and transmission of stresses to the metaphyseal bone. The KA technique for UKA is likely to better reproduce natural frontal alignment of the limb when the knee is flexed due to conservation of the posterior tibial slope. It may reduce the risk of fracture and secondary residual pain in remodelling metaphyseal bone. KA-UKA enables optimal dynamic interaction of prosthetic components, reduces risks of overlap and underdimensioning, and is biomechanically healthy. Studies have reported good long-term results, with acceptable lifespan, high functional performance, and high patient satisfaction. KA for UKA is a technique with independent sectioning that can be performed with manual instrumentation, measuring the thickness of bone resection with vernier callipers, and using three-dimensional planning. Tibial resection for medial Oxford® UKA involves assessing the posterior slope and anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions, and measuring the thickness of the Oxford® tibial implant. Femoral resection for medial Oxford® UKA involves axial and frontal rotations, frontal alignment, thickness verification, and distal femoral reaming. The kinematic alignment technique for UKA is a simple, safe, more anatomical, physiological and clinically advantageous method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, et al. Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(7):1047–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Whiteside LA. Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:2–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker PN, Petheram T, Avery PJ, Gregg PJ, Deehan DJ. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):e126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. NJR 15th Annual report 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lunebourg A, Viehweger E, Argenson J-N. The John Insall award: no functional benefit after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific instrumentation: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):60–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fu J, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopade. 2018;47(12):1009–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rivière C, Vigdorchik JM, Vendittoli P-A. Mechanical alignment: the end of an era! Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(7):1223–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rivière C, Sivaloganathan S, Cartier P, Villet L, Vendittoli PA, Cobb J. Kinematic Alignment Is A Reliable Technique For Implanting medial UKA: a systematic review. KSSTA. 2020;30(3):1082–94.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rivière C, Harman C, Leong A, Cobb J, Maillot C. Kinematic alignment technique for medial OXFORD UKA: an in-silico study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1):63–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Deschamps G, Chol C. Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients’ selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(6):648–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cartier P. Story of my passion. Knee. 2014;21(1):349–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplast. 1996;11(7):782–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sampath SA, Lewis S, Fosco M, Tigani D. Trabecular orientation in the human femur and tibia and the relationship with lower-limb alignment for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Biomech. 2015;48(6):1214–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Asada S, Inoue S, Tsukamoto I, Mori S, Akagi M. Obliquity of tibial component after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2019;26(2):410–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, et al. Mechanical alignment technique for TKA: are there intrinsic technical limitations? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(7):1057–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chatellard R, Sauleau V, Colmar M, Robert H, Raynaud G, Brilhault J. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(4):S219–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee SY, Bae JH, Kim JG, et al. The influence of surgical factors on dislocation of the meniscal bearing after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case–control study. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(7):914–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lo Presti M, Raspugli GF, Reale D, et al. Early failure in medial unicondylar arthroplasty: radiographic analysis on the importance of joint line restoration. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(09):860–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zambianchi F, Digennaro V, Giorgini A, et al. Surgeon’s experience influences UKA survivorship: a comparative study between all-poly and metal back designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(7):2074–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dai X, Fang J, Jiang L, Xiong Y, Zhang M, Zhu S. How does the inclination of the tibial component matter? A three-dimensional finite element analysis of medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee. 2018;25(3):434–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Inoue S, Akagi M, Asada S, Mori S, Zaima H, Hashida M. The valgus inclination of the Tibial component increases the risk of medial tibial condylar fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(9):2025–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu G-D, Guo W-S, Zhang Q-D, Liu Z-H, Cheng L-M. Finite element analysis of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the influence of Tibial component coronal alignment. Chin Med J. 2015;128(21):2873–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Wahal N, Gaba S, Malhotra R, Kumar V, Pegg EC, Pandit H. Reduced bearing excursion after Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with poor functional outcomes. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(2):366–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Cartier P. UKA after spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a retrospective analysis. Arc Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(5):613–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P. Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee. 2012;19(5):585–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Franz A, Boese C, Matthies A, Leffler J, Ries C. Mid-term clinical outcome and reconstruction of posterior Tibial slope after UKA. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(05):468–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bruni D, Akkawi I, Iacono F, et al. Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2462–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Soavi R, Loreti I, Bragonzoni L, La Palombara PF, Visani A, Marcacci M. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2002;17(5):556–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Ensini A, Barbadoro P, Leardini A, Catani F, Giannini S. Early migration of the cemented tibial component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiostereometry study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2474–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Barbadoro P, Ensini A, Leardini A, et al. Tibial component alignment and risk of loosening in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiographic and radiostereometric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(12):3157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones GG, Clarke S, Harris S, et al. A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2019;26(6):1421–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Freeman MA, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech. 2005;38(2):197–208.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Medacta for providing the images illustrating kinematic alignment of the MOTO® implant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rivière, C.C.J., Cartier, P., Maillot, C. (2024). Kinematic Alignment Technique for Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. In: Clavé, A., Dubrana, F. (eds) Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48332-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48332-5_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48331-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48332-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics