Abstract
The kinematic alignment (KA) technique for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a simple, safe, more anatomical, more physiological and probably clinically advantageous method compared to traditional mechanical alignment. The KA technique for UKA aims to produce “true” joint surfacing by restoring the level and three-dimensional orientation of the native joint space in the implanted knee compartment. It is biomechanically healthy and conserves ligament balance, knee kinematics and transmission of stresses to the metaphyseal bone. The KA technique for UKA is likely to better reproduce natural frontal alignment of the limb when the knee is flexed due to conservation of the posterior tibial slope. It may reduce the risk of fracture and secondary residual pain in remodelling metaphyseal bone. KA-UKA enables optimal dynamic interaction of prosthetic components, reduces risks of overlap and underdimensioning, and is biomechanically healthy. Studies have reported good long-term results, with acceptable lifespan, high functional performance, and high patient satisfaction. KA for UKA is a technique with independent sectioning that can be performed with manual instrumentation, measuring the thickness of bone resection with vernier callipers, and using three-dimensional planning. Tibial resection for medial Oxford® UKA involves assessing the posterior slope and anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions, and measuring the thickness of the Oxford® tibial implant. Femoral resection for medial Oxford® UKA involves axial and frontal rotations, frontal alignment, thickness verification, and distal femoral reaming. The kinematic alignment technique for UKA is a simple, safe, more anatomical, physiological and clinically advantageous method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, et al. Alignment options for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(7):1047–56.
Whiteside LA. Making your next unicompartmental knee arthroplasty last. J Arthroplast. 2005;20:2–3.
Baker PN, Petheram T, Avery PJ, Gregg PJ, Deehan DJ. Revision for unexplained pain following unicompartmental and total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94(17):e126.
NJR 15th Annual report 2018.
Ollivier M, Parratte S, Lunebourg A, Viehweger E, Argenson J-N. The John Insall award: no functional benefit after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty performed with patient-specific instrumentation: a randomized trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016;474(1):60–8.
Fu J, Wang Y, Li X, et al. Robot-assisted vs. conventional unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: systematic review and meta-analysis. Orthopade. 2018;47(12):1009–17.
Rivière C, Vigdorchik JM, Vendittoli P-A. Mechanical alignment: the end of an era! Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(7):1223–6.
Rivière C, Sivaloganathan S, Cartier P, Villet L, Vendittoli PA, Cobb J. Kinematic Alignment Is A Reliable Technique For Implanting medial UKA: a systematic review. KSSTA. 2020;30(3):1082–94.
Rivière C, Harman C, Leong A, Cobb J, Maillot C. Kinematic alignment technique for medial OXFORD UKA: an in-silico study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019;105(1):63–70.
Deschamps G, Chol C. Fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Patients’ selection and operative technique. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(6):648–61.
Cartier P. Story of my passion. Knee. 2014;21(1):349–50.
Cartier P, Sanouiller JL, Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery: 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplast. 1996;11(7):782–8.
Sampath SA, Lewis S, Fosco M, Tigani D. Trabecular orientation in the human femur and tibia and the relationship with lower-limb alignment for patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Biomech. 2015;48(6):1214–8.
Asada S, Inoue S, Tsukamoto I, Mori S, Akagi M. Obliquity of tibial component after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2019;26(2):410–5.
Rivière C, Iranpour F, Auvinet E, et al. Mechanical alignment technique for TKA: are there intrinsic technical limitations? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2017;103(7):1057–67.
Chatellard R, Sauleau V, Colmar M, Robert H, Raynaud G, Brilhault J. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(4):S219–25.
Lee SY, Bae JH, Kim JG, et al. The influence of surgical factors on dislocation of the meniscal bearing after Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement: a case–control study. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(7):914–22.
Lo Presti M, Raspugli GF, Reale D, et al. Early failure in medial unicondylar arthroplasty: radiographic analysis on the importance of joint line restoration. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(09):860–5.
Zambianchi F, Digennaro V, Giorgini A, et al. Surgeon’s experience influences UKA survivorship: a comparative study between all-poly and metal back designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(7):2074–80.
Dai X, Fang J, Jiang L, Xiong Y, Zhang M, Zhu S. How does the inclination of the tibial component matter? A three-dimensional finite element analysis of medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental arthroplasty. Knee. 2018;25(3):434–44.
Inoue S, Akagi M, Asada S, Mori S, Zaima H, Hashida M. The valgus inclination of the Tibial component increases the risk of medial tibial condylar fractures in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2016;31(9):2025–30.
Zhu G-D, Guo W-S, Zhang Q-D, Liu Z-H, Cheng L-M. Finite element analysis of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: the influence of Tibial component coronal alignment. Chin Med J. 2015;128(21):2873–8.
Wahal N, Gaba S, Malhotra R, Kumar V, Pegg EC, Pandit H. Reduced bearing excursion after Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is associated with poor functional outcomes. J Arthroplast. 2018;33(2):366–71.
Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Cartier P. UKA after spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: a retrospective analysis. Arc Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011;131(5):613–7.
Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Peersman G, Cartier P. Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee. 2012;19(5):585–91.
Franz A, Boese C, Matthies A, Leffler J, Ries C. Mid-term clinical outcome and reconstruction of posterior Tibial slope after UKA. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(05):468–74.
Bruni D, Akkawi I, Iacono F, et al. Minimum thickness of all-poly tibial component unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger than 60 years does not increase revision rate for aseptic loosening. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2462–7.
Soavi R, Loreti I, Bragonzoni L, La Palombara PF, Visani A, Marcacci M. A roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2002;17(5):556–61.
Ensini A, Barbadoro P, Leardini A, Catani F, Giannini S. Early migration of the cemented tibial component of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiostereometry study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21(11):2474–9.
Barbadoro P, Ensini A, Leardini A, et al. Tibial component alignment and risk of loosening in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a radiographic and radiostereometric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22(12):3157–62.
Jones GG, Clarke S, Harris S, et al. A novel patient-specific instrument design can deliver robotic level accuracy in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2019;26(6):1421–8.
Freeman MA, Pinskerova V. The movement of the normal tibio-femoral joint. J Biomech. 2005;38(2):197–208.
Acknowledgements
We wish to thank Medacta for providing the images illustrating kinematic alignment of the MOTO® implant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rivière, C.C.J., Cartier, P., Maillot, C. (2024). Kinematic Alignment Technique for Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. In: Clavé, A., Dubrana, F. (eds) Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48332-5_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48332-5_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48331-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48332-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)