Abstract
The advent of digital communication technologies has notably fostered remote collaboration. While platforms like Zoom are prevalent, emerging Virtual Reality (VR) technologies like Meta Quest 2 introduce new dimensions for virtual collaboration. This study investigates whether VR-based group meetings are more conducive to participant engagement, motivation, and non-hindrance of collaboration than traditional video conferencing platforms such as Zoom. This study is novel in employing Electroencephalogram (EEG) technology and questionnaires to assess the human factors of engagement, valence, arousal, motivation, flow, system usability, emotional state, and social presence. In this study, participants were engaged in a collaborative turn-based drawing activity in two distinct environments - a traditional video conferencing setting using Zoom and a VR-based setting using Horizon Workrooms. Both environments were configured to maintain equivalent functionality and settings. EEG data was collected using an EMOTIV EPOC + 14 channel wireless EEG headset. Findings reveal that the activity in VR was more intrinsically motivating than the activity in Zoom, independent of the participants’ previous VR experience. Additionally, participants reported greater enjoyment (higher valence) and excitement (higher arousal) in the VR setting, with significant results from questionnaires. A strong correlation was found between EEG and questionnaire assessed arousal. Contrary to expectations, no significant differences were observed in usability, co-presence, focus, stress, and effort between the two platforms. These results provide insights into the potential of VR as a tool for fostering engagement and motivation in remote group activities and call for further investigation into the underlying mechanisms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hamad, A., Jia, B.: How virtual reality technology has changed our lives: an overview of the current and potential applications and limitations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19, 11278 (2022)
Allcoat, D., von Mühlenen, A.: Learning in virtual reality: effects on performance, emotion and engagement. Res. Learn. Technol. 26, 2140 (2018)
Bowman, D.A., McMahan, R.P.: Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Comput. 40, 36–43 (2007)
VR for business & business VR headsets | Meta for Work. https://forwork.meta.com/. Accessed 25 July 2023
Abramczuk, K., Bohdanowicz, Z., Muczyński, B., Skorupska, K.H., Cnotkowski, D.: Meet me in VR! can VR space help remote teams connect: a seven-week study with horizon work-rooms. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 179, 103104 (2023)
Steinicke, F., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Meinecke, A.L.: A first pilot study to compare virtual group meetings using video conferences and (immersive) virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Symposium on Spatial User Interaction, pp. 1–2. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020)
Campbell, A.G., Holz, T., Cosgrove, J., Harlick, M., O’Sullivan, T.: Uses of virtual reality for communication in financial services: a case study on comparing different telepresence interfaces: virtual reality compared to video conferencing. In: Arai, K., Bhatia, R. (eds.) Advances in Information and Communication, pp. 463–481. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020)
Horvat, M., Dobrinić, M., Novosel, M., Jerčić, P.: Assessing emotional responses induced in virtual reality using a consumer EEG headset: a preliminary report. In: 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), pp. 1006–1010 (2018)
Krogmeier, C., Mousas, C.: Exploring EEG-annotated affective animations in virtual reality: suggestions for improvement. Presented at the November 30 (2022)
Mai, C., Hassib, M., Königbauer, R.: Estimating visual discomfort in head-mounted displays using electroencephalography. In: Bernhaupt, R., Dalvi, G., Joshi, A., K. Balkrishan, D., O’Neill, J., and Winckler, M. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2017, pp. 243–252. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68059-0_15
Kavanagh, S., Luxton-Reilly, A., Wuensche, B., Plimmer, B.: A systematic review of Virtual Reality in education. Themes Sci. Technol. Educ. 10, 85–119 (2017)
Xie, B., et al.: A review on Virtual Reality skill training applications. Front. Virtual Real. 2, 645153 (2021)
Finn, J.D., Zimmer, K.S.: Student engagement: what is it? why does it matter? In: Christen-son, S.L., Reschly, A.L., Wylie, C. (eds.) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 97–131. Springer, US, Boston, MA (2012)
Kuzminykh, A., Rintel, S.: low engagement as a deliberate practice of remote participants in video meetings. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–9. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA (2020)
Nielsen, K., Cleal, B.: Predicting flow at work: Investigating the activities and job characteristics that predict flow states at work. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 15, 180–190 (2010)
Aragon, S.R.: Creating social presence in online environments. New Dir. Adult Contin. Educ. 2003, 57–68 (2003)
Garcia-Palacios, A., Hoffman, H.G., Kwong See, S., Tsai, A., Botella, C.: Redefining therapeu-tic success with virtual reality exposure therapy. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 4, 341–348 (2001)
Emmelkamp, P.M.G., Meyerbröker, K.: Virtual reality therapy in mental health. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 17, 495–519 (2021)
Mystakidis, S.: Metaverse. Encyclopedia. 2, 486–497 (2022)
Ning, H., et al.: A survey on the metaverse: the state-of-the-art, technologies, applications, and challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 10(16), 1–1 (2023). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10130406
Shin, D.: Empathy and embodied experience in virtual environment: to what extent can virtual reality stimulate empathy and embodied experience? Comput. Hum. Behav. 78, 64–73 (2018)
Mütterlein, J.: The Three Pillars of Virtual Reality? Investigating the Roles of Immersion, Pres-ence, and Interactivity. (2018)
Oh, C.S., Bailenson, J.N., Welch, G.F.: A systematic review of social presence: definition, antecedents, and implications. Front. Robot. AI. 5, 409295 (2018)
Sadeghi, A.H., et al.: Remote multidisciplinary heart team meetings in immersive virtual reality: a first experience during the COVID-19 pan-demic. BMJ Innov. 7, 2 (2021)
Chattha, U.A., Janjua, U.I., Anwar, F., Madni, T.M., Cheema, M.F., Janjua, S.I.: Motion sick-ness in Virtual Reality: an empirical evaluation. IEEE Access. 8, 130486–130499 (2020)
Teplan, M.: FUNDAMENTALS OF EEG MEASUREMENT. Meas. Sci. Rev. 2, (2002)
Duvinage, M., Castermans, T., Petieau, M., Hoellinger, T., Cheron, G., Dutoit, T.: Performance of the Emotiv Epoc headset for P300-based applications. Biomed. Eng. OnLine. 12, 56 (2013)
Baumgartner, T., Valko, L., Esslen, M., Jäncke, L.: Neural correlate of spatial presence in an arousing and noninteractive virtual reality: an EEG and psychophysiology study. Cyberpsy-chol. Behav. 9, 30–45 (2006)
Tauscher, J.P., Schottky, F.W., Grogorick, S., Bittner, P.M., Mustafa, M., Magnor, M.: Im-mersive EEG: evaluating electroencephalography in Virtual Reality. In: 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR), pp. 1794–1800 (2019)
Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI) – selfdeterminationtheory.org. https://selfdeterminationtheory.org/intrinsic-motivation-inventory/. Accessed 22 May 2023
Engeser, S., Rheinberg, F.: Flow, performance and moderators of challenge-skill balance. Motiv. Emot. 32, 158–172 (2008)
System Usability Scale (SUS) | Usability.gov. https://www.usability.gov/how-to-and-tools/methods/system-usability-scale.html. Accessed 2023/07/24
Bangor, A., Kortum, P.T., Miller, J.T.: An empirical evaluation of the system usability scale. Int. J. Human-Computer Interact. 24, 574–594 (2008)
Bradley, M.M., Lang, P.J.: Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. J. Behav. Ther. Exp. Psychiatry 25, 49–59 (1994)
Biocca, P.F., Harms, P.C.: Guide to the Networked Minds Social Presence Inventory v. 1.2, https://web-archive.southampton.ac.uk/cogprints.org/6743/, last accessed 2023/06/05
Pope, A.T., Bogart, E.H., Bartolome, D.S.: Biocybernetic system evaluates indices of operator engagement in automated task. Biol. Psychol. 40, 187–195 (1995)
McMahan, T., Parberry, I., Parsons, T.D.: Evaluating Player Task Engagement and Arousal Using Electroencephalography. Procedia Manuf. 3, 2303–2310 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kirchgessner, E., Sothers, M., Aravena, V., Baloian, N., Zurita, G. (2023). The Mind in Virtual Meetings: Comparing VR and Video Conferencing Environments Through Experiential Impact Assessment and EEG Analysis. In: Bravo, J., Urzáiz, G. (eds) Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing & Ambient Intelligence (UCAmI 2023). UCAmI 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 835. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48306-6_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48306-6_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48305-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48306-6
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)