Skip to main content

Ballast Water Discharges and Safety Aspects of Using Active Substances for Ballast Water Treatment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Maritime Transport and Ballast Water Management

Part of the book series: Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology ((INNA,volume 16))

  • 15 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of the safety aspects of discharging ballast water into the environment due to the disinfection of the ballast water by the ship’s ballast water management systems (BWMS) using active substances (AS). Such a system is required to undergo a testing process according to the International Maritime Organization (IMO) BWMS Code and Procedure (G9). The BWMS Code describes to which level the discharge of ballast water may contain harmful aquatic organisms and pathogens (standard D-2), which is not dealt with in the current chapter. Procedure (G9) describes the procedure for approval of BWMS that make use of AS, which is the topic of this chapter. The consequences of the application of AS to the BWMS may be the formation of disinfection by-products (DBPs). Therefore, a technical working group has been established to ensure that the discharge of AS and DBPs remains below predefined acceptable limits to protect the environment, the crew and the ship against any side effects of the treatment by the BWMS. A risk assessment (RA) methodology has been developed by the Ballast Water Working Group of the UN Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Environment Protection (GESAMP-BWWG). The methodology is based on internationally accepted RA procedures. The RA deals with the potential risks for the environment due to the direct discharge and for human health due to potential direct exposure of the crew of the ship or port State control officers when conducting their regular activities onboard, or due to the indirect exposure of the general public by swimming or by eating contaminated seafood. In case the treatment of the ballast water may cause a risk to the environment, the workers onboard, or the general public, such BWMS may not receive an approval recommendation by GESAMP-BWWG. The final decision about the acceptability of BWMS, and therefore, the allowance to market BWMS, is taken by the Marine Environmental Protection Committee of IMO based on the recommendation of GESAMP-BWWG. This chapter presents GESAMP-BWWG RA methodology with the theoretical background and the insights after >10 years of its application and improvements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://globaltestnet.org/ last accessed March 2024.

References

  • David M, Linders J, Gollasch S, David J (2018) Is the aquatic environment sufficiently protected from chemicals discharged with treated ballast water from vessels worldwide? A decadal environmental perspective and risk assessment. Chemosphere 207:590–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.136

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dock A, Linders J, David M, Gollasch S, David J (2019) Is human health sufficiently protected from chemicals discharged with treated ballast water from vessels worldwide? – A decadal perspective and risk assessment. Chemosphere 235:194–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.06.101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dock A, Linders J, David M, Gollasch S, David J, Ziegler G (2020) Are workers on board vessels involved with chemicals from treated ballast water sufficiently protected? – A decadal perspective and risk assessment. Chemosphere 247:125824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.125824

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ECHA (2012) Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.8: Characterisation of dose [concentration]-response for human health. Version 2.1 November 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHA (2016) Guidance on Information Requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment. Chapter R.15: Consumer exposure assessment. Version 3.0 July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • ECHA (2017) Guidance on Information requirements and Chemical Safety Assessment, Chapter R.7c: Endpoint specific guidance, Version 3.0

    Google Scholar 

  • EUSES (European Union) (2016). https://echa.europa.eu/nl/support/dossier-submission-tools/euses Last accessed 1 March 2023

  • EUSES (European Union) (2023) European Union System for the Evaluation of Substances, New update, to be published in spring 2023

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) Food consumption quantity (g/capita/day) (g), year 2003. http://faostat.fao.org/site/610/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=610 26/10/2009

  • GESAMP (2022) Report on the Annual meeting of GESAMP (in press), London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Grote M, Boudenne J-L, Croué J-P, Escher BI, von Gunten U, Hahn J, Höfer T, Jenner H, Jiang J, Karanfil T, Khalanski M, Kim D, Linders J, Manasfi T, Polman H, Quack B, Tegtmeier S, Werschkun B, Zhang X, Ziegler G (2022) Inputs of disinfection by-products to the marine environment from various industrial activities: comparison to natural production. Water Res 217:118383

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2004) International convention for the control and management of ships’ ballast water and sediments, 2004. International Maritime Organization, 13 February 2004. London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2008) Procedure for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems that make use of Active Substances (G9). Resolution MEPC,169(57), MEPC 57/21 Annex 1. International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2017) Methodology for information gathering and conduct of work of the GESAMP-BWWG. BWM.2/Circ.13/Rev.4. International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2018) Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS CODE). Resolution MEPC.300(72). International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2019) Complying with the ballast water management convention. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/BWM/Documents/BWM%20infographic_FINAL.pdf. Accessed 25 January 2019

  • IMO (2020) List of ballast water management systems that make use of Active Substances which received Basic and Final Approval. BWM.2/Circ.34/Rev.9. International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2022a) Methodology for information gathering and conduct of work of the GESAMP-Ballast Water Working Group; BWM.2/Circ.13/Rev.5; International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2022b) Ninth Stocktaking Workshop on the activity of the GESAMP-Ballast Water Working Group. MEPC 78/4/2. International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2022c) Report of the marine environment protection committee on its seventy-eighth session. MEPC 78/17. International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Shah AD, Liu ZQ, Salhi E, Höfer T, Werschkun B, von Gunten U (2015) Formation of disinfection by-products during ballast water treatment with ozone, chlorine, and peracetic acid: influence of water quality parameters. Environ Sci Water Res Technol 1:465–480. https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ew00061k

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Slooff W, van Oers JAM, de Zwart D (1986) Margins of uncertainty in ecotoxicological hazard assessment. Environ Toxicol Chem 5(9):841–852. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620050909

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1989) Risk Assessment – Guidance for superfund. Vol 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (1997) Exposure Factors Handbook Vol. I–III. (Update to Exposure Factors Handbook EPA/600/8–89/043 – May 1989). US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Office of Research and Development, EPA/600/P-95/002Fa, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2003) User’s Manual Swimmer Exposure Assessment Model (SWIMODEL) Version 3.0. US EPA, Office of Pesticide Programs, Antimicrobials Division, Washington, DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Hattum B, van Gils J, Markus A, Elzinga H, Jansen M, Baart A (2016) User Manual – Quick Guide MAMPEC 3.1 MAMPEC-BW 3.1, Deltares, Delft, Netherlands. 57 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Zipperle A, van Gils J, van Hattum B, Heise S (2011) Guidance document for a harmonized Emission Scenario Document (ESD) on Ballast Water discharge. Report 36301205 prepared for Umweltbundesamt, Dessau, Germany. BIS-Beratungszentrum für Integriertes Sediment Management, Technische Hochschule Hamburg-Harburg, Hamburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Linders, J., Dock, A., Werschkun, B. (2024). Ballast Water Discharges and Safety Aspects of Using Active Substances for Ballast Water Treatment. In: David, M., Gollasch, S. (eds) Global Maritime Transport and Ballast Water Management. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48193-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics