Abstract
This chapter highlights the challenges involved in the type approval testing of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS). IMO required such tests with its Guidelines G8. This guideline was prepared with best efforts during substantial debates, but in practice, some requirements turned out not to be relevant, and other important aspects were found to be missing. It was concluded at IMO that the Guidelines G8 requirements do not represent enough challenging test conditions to represent all waters where ballast water is taken up by vessels. Therefore, BWMS which have received type approval under the previous Guidelines G8 may be found non-compliant if BWMS is operated in more challenging water conditions as the system was exposed to during the tests. MEPC67 (October 2014) agreed that Guidelines G8 should be revised. The revision process ended at MEPC70 in October 2016. In further discussions, BWM Convention Contracting Governments expressed the view that the new Guidelines G8 should not have a voluntary or recommending nature but should become a mandatory instrument. Therefore, the language in this guideline was edited accordingly and it was renamed as a code, i.e., Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS Code). This book chapter describes the Guidelines G8/BWMS Code editing suggestions of the authors, which were based on their long-lasting experience in testing BWMS, and it continues to describe the agreed BWMS Code amendments. Independently of IMO work, the United States Coast Guard established their own BWMS test guidelines. The differences of these guidelines compared to the BWMS Code are also discussed, and recommendations are suggested to improve the test regime to make BWMS more fit for purpose.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
https://cgmix.uscg.mil/EQlabs/EqLabsSearch.aspx (last accessed March 2024).
References
Bai M, Zheng Q, Tian Y, Zhang Z, Chen C, Cheng C, Meng X (2016) Inactivation of invasive marine species in the process of conveying ballast water using OH based on a strong ionization discharge. Water Res 96:217–224
Balaji R, Yaakob O, King Koh K (2014) A review of developments in ballast water management. Environ Rev 22:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0073
Bergemann M (2004) Die Trübungszone in der Tideelbe. Beschreibung der räumlichen und zeitlichen Entwicklung. Technical report, Wassergütestelle Elbe, Hamburg. 8 pp
Casas-Monroy O, Linley RD, Adams JK, Chan FT, Drake DAR, Bailey SA (2015) Relative invasion risk for plankton across marine and freshwater systems: examining efficacy of proposed international ballast water discharge standards. PLoS One 10(3):e0118267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118267
David M, Gollasch S (eds) (2015) Global maritime transport and ballast water management – issues and solutions. Invading Nature, Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 8. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht
DNV (2017) Augmentation of challenge water – Oxidant consumption of natural waters. DNV GL result on TRO consumption of natural waters (BWMS Correspondence J-300). Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway
ETV Protocol (2010) EPA/600/R-10/146, Generic Protocol for the Verification of Ballast Water Treatment Technologies, Version 5.1, (dated September 2010)
First MR, Robbins-Wamsley SH, Riley SC, Fisher JI, Smith JP, Drake LA (2014) Examination of additives used to augment “challenge water” used in verification testing of ballast water management systems: mass yields and biological impacts. Manag Biol Invasions 5(4):395–405
Gaumert T (2002) Typisierung des Übergangsgewässers in der Flussgebietseinheit Elbe nach EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für die Reinhaltung der Elbe (ARGE ELBE). Wassergütestelle Elbe, Hamburg, p 6
Gollasch S, David M (2015) Recommendations for IMO on the BWM Convention and the improvement of its supporting guidelines with an emphasis on the shipboard test aspects of the guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems (G8). Prepared for Interreg IVB North Sea Ballast Water Opportunity project: 21 pp
Gollasch S, David M (2021) Abiotic and biological differences in ballast water uptake and discharge samples. Mar Pollut Bull 164:112046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112046
IMO (2004) International convention for the control and management of ships’ ballast water and sediments, 2004. International Maritime Organization, 13 February 2004. London
IMO (2008) Guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems (G8). Marine Environment Protection Committee, Resolution MEPC.174(58), 10 October 2008. International Maritime Organization, London
IMO (2016) Report of the Marine Environment Protection Committee on its Seventieth Session. MEPC 70/18/Add.1. International Maritime Organization, London
IMO (2018) Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS CODE). Resolution MEPC.300(72), Adopted on 13 April 2018, 39 pp. International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom
Jang P-G, Hyun B, Shin K (2020) Ballast water treatment performance evaluation under real changing conditions. J Mar Sci Eng 8(10):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100817
Lawrence DJ, Cordell JR (2010) Relative contributions of domestic and foreign sourced ballast water to propagule pressure in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Biol Conserv 143:700–709
Lloyd’s Register Report (2012) Ballast Water Treatment Technology Update March 2012. London
Moreno-Andres J, Peperzak L (2019) Operational and environmental factors affecting disinfection byproducts formation in ballast water treatment systems. Chemosphere 232:496–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.152
Peperzak L (2023) The critical adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration in treated ballast water. Mar Pollut Bull 187:114506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114506
Peperzak L, van Bleijswijk J (2021) False-positive enterococci counts in seawater with the IDEXX Enterolert-E most probable number technique caused by Bacillus licheniformis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:10654–10660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11342-6
Peperzak L, Stuut J-BW, van der Woerd HJ (2022) Suspended matter filtration causes a counterintuitive increase in UV-absorption. Mar Pollut Bull 183:114012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114012
Ren Z, Zhang L, Shi Y, Leng X, Shao J (2016) Effect and mechanism of a High Gradient Magnetic Separation (HGMS) and ultraviolet (UV) composite process on the inactivation of microbes in ballast water. Mar Pollut Bull 108:180–185
Ruiz GM, Rawlings TK, Dobbs FC, Drake LA, Mullady T, Huq A, Colwell RR (2000) Global spread of microorganisms by ships. Ballast water discharged from vessels harbours a cocktail of potential pathogens. Nature 408:49–50
Stehouwer P, Buma A, Peperzak L (2015) A comparison of six different ballast water treatment systems based on UV radiation, electrochlorination and chlorine dioxide. Environ Technol 36:2094–2104
Tsolaki E, Diamadopoulos E (2010) Technologies for ballast water treatment: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gollasch, S., David, M., van Slooten, C., Peperzak, L. (2024). Type Approval Tests of Ballast Water Management Systems, What Have We Learned in >10 Years Testing. In: David, M., Gollasch, S. (eds) Global Maritime Transport and Ballast Water Management. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48193-2_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48193-2_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48192-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48193-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)