Skip to main content

Type Approval Tests of Ballast Water Management Systems, What Have We Learned in >10 Years Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Global Maritime Transport and Ballast Water Management

Part of the book series: Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology ((INNA,volume 16))

  • 10 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter highlights the challenges involved in the type approval testing of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS). IMO required such tests with its Guidelines G8. This guideline was prepared with best efforts during substantial debates, but in practice, some requirements turned out not to be relevant, and other important aspects were found to be missing. It was concluded at IMO that the Guidelines G8 requirements do not represent enough challenging test conditions to represent all waters where ballast water is taken up by vessels. Therefore, BWMS which have received type approval under the previous Guidelines G8 may be found non-compliant if BWMS is operated in more challenging water conditions as the system was exposed to during the tests. MEPC67 (October 2014) agreed that Guidelines G8 should be revised. The revision process ended at MEPC70 in October 2016. In further discussions, BWM Convention Contracting Governments expressed the view that the new Guidelines G8 should not have a voluntary or recommending nature but should become a mandatory instrument. Therefore, the language in this guideline was edited accordingly and it was renamed as a code, i.e., Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS Code). This book chapter describes the Guidelines G8/BWMS Code editing suggestions of the authors, which were based on their long-lasting experience in testing BWMS, and it continues to describe the agreed BWMS Code amendments. Independently of IMO work, the United States Coast Guard established their own BWMS test guidelines. The differences of these guidelines compared to the BWMS Code are also discussed, and recommendations are suggested to improve the test regime to make BWMS more fit for purpose.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://cgmix.uscg.mil/EQlabs/EqLabsSearch.aspx (last accessed March 2024).

References

  • Bai M, Zheng Q, Tian Y, Zhang Z, Chen C, Cheng C, Meng X (2016) Inactivation of invasive marine species in the process of conveying ballast water using OH based on a strong ionization discharge. Water Res 96:217–224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji R, Yaakob O, King Koh K (2014) A review of developments in ballast water management. Environ Rev 22:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2013-0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergemann M (2004) Die Trübungszone in der Tideelbe. Beschreibung der räumlichen und zeitlichen Entwicklung. Technical report, Wassergütestelle Elbe, Hamburg. 8 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas-Monroy O, Linley RD, Adams JK, Chan FT, Drake DAR, Bailey SA (2015) Relative invasion risk for plankton across marine and freshwater systems: examining efficacy of proposed international ballast water discharge standards. PLoS One 10(3):e0118267. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • David M, Gollasch S (eds) (2015) Global maritime transport and ballast water management – issues and solutions. Invading Nature, Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 8. Springer Science + Business Media, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • DNV (2017) Augmentation of challenge water – Oxidant consumption of natural waters. DNV GL result on TRO consumption of natural waters (BWMS Correspondence J-300). Det Norske Veritas, Høvik, Norway

    Google Scholar 

  • ETV Protocol (2010) EPA/600/R-10/146, Generic Protocol for the Verification of Ballast Water Treatment Technologies, Version 5.1, (dated September 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • First MR, Robbins-Wamsley SH, Riley SC, Fisher JI, Smith JP, Drake LA (2014) Examination of additives used to augment “challenge water” used in verification testing of ballast water management systems: mass yields and biological impacts. Manag Biol Invasions 5(4):395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaumert T (2002) Typisierung des Übergangsgewässers in der Flussgebietseinheit Elbe nach EG-Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Arbeitsgemeinschaft für die Reinhaltung der Elbe (ARGE ELBE). Wassergütestelle Elbe, Hamburg, p 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollasch S, David M (2015) Recommendations for IMO on the BWM Convention and the improvement of its supporting guidelines with an emphasis on the shipboard test aspects of the guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems (G8). Prepared for Interreg IVB North Sea Ballast Water Opportunity project: 21 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gollasch S, David M (2021) Abiotic and biological differences in ballast water uptake and discharge samples. Mar Pollut Bull 164:112046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2021.112046

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2004) International convention for the control and management of ships’ ballast water and sediments, 2004. International Maritime Organization, 13 February 2004. London

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2008) Guidelines for approval of ballast water management systems (G8). Marine Environment Protection Committee, Resolution MEPC.174(58), 10 October 2008. International Maritime Organization, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2016) Report of the Marine Environment Protection Committee on its Seventieth Session. MEPC 70/18/Add.1. International Maritime Organization, London

    Google Scholar 

  • IMO (2018) Code for Approval of Ballast Water Management Systems (BWMS CODE). Resolution MEPC.300(72), Adopted on 13 April 2018, 39 pp. International Maritime Organization, London, United Kingdom

    Google Scholar 

  • Jang P-G, Hyun B, Shin K (2020) Ballast water treatment performance evaluation under real changing conditions. J Mar Sci Eng 8(10):817. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8100817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence DJ, Cordell JR (2010) Relative contributions of domestic and foreign sourced ballast water to propagule pressure in Puget Sound, Washington, USA. Biol Conserv 143:700–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd’s Register Report (2012) Ballast Water Treatment Technology Update March 2012. London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Andres J, Peperzak L (2019) Operational and environmental factors affecting disinfection byproducts formation in ballast water treatment systems. Chemosphere 232:496–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.05.152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak L (2023) The critical adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentration in treated ballast water. Mar Pollut Bull 187:114506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak L, van Bleijswijk J (2021) False-positive enterococci counts in seawater with the IDEXX Enterolert-E most probable number technique caused by Bacillus licheniformis. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:10654–10660. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11342-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peperzak L, Stuut J-BW, van der Woerd HJ (2022) Suspended matter filtration causes a counterintuitive increase in UV-absorption. Mar Pollut Bull 183:114012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2022.114012

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Z, Zhang L, Shi Y, Leng X, Shao J (2016) Effect and mechanism of a High Gradient Magnetic Separation (HGMS) and ultraviolet (UV) composite process on the inactivation of microbes in ballast water. Mar Pollut Bull 108:180–185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz GM, Rawlings TK, Dobbs FC, Drake LA, Mullady T, Huq A, Colwell RR (2000) Global spread of microorganisms by ships. Ballast water discharged from vessels harbours a cocktail of potential pathogens. Nature 408:49–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stehouwer P, Buma A, Peperzak L (2015) A comparison of six different ballast water treatment systems based on UV radiation, electrochlorination and chlorine dioxide. Environ Technol 36:2094–2104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tsolaki E, Diamadopoulos E (2010) Technologies for ballast water treatment: a review. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 85:19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.2276

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephan Gollasch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gollasch, S., David, M., van Slooten, C., Peperzak, L. (2024). Type Approval Tests of Ballast Water Management Systems, What Have We Learned in >10 Years Testing. In: David, M., Gollasch, S. (eds) Global Maritime Transport and Ballast Water Management. Invading Nature - Springer Series in Invasion Ecology, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48193-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics