Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment Planning Considerations for an MR-Linac

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
A Practical Guide to MR-Linac

Abstract

This chapter presents a practical guide of treatment planning utilizing MR-Linac delivery platforms and planning systems. Hardware and software requirements for treatment planning systems, as well as the commissioning and quality assurance practices, are described. We provide a general overview of contouring recommendations related to MR-Linac treatment planning, including current contouring initiatives and guidelines, margins, gating, and adaptive considerations. Contouring recommendations are followed by a practical guide to methods for estimating electron density and applications utilizing CT-based planning and MR-based planning. The chapter includes an overview of treatment plan optimization and a review of dose calculation algorithm requirements in MR-Linac treatment planning, as well as their impact on online adaptive treatment planning. We further discuss adaptive planning considerations including offline, online, and real-time adaptive planning techniques that account for anatomical and functional changes in the patient model. Finally, we conclude with an overview of plan evaluation techniques including the impact of dose calculation accuracy, evaluation metrics, and plan summation techniques related to adaptive planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Azria D, Bohoudi O, Boldrini L, et al. ESTRO-ACROP recommendations on the clinical implementation of hybrid MR-linac systems in radiation oncology. Radiother Oncol. 2021;159:146–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kishan AU, Ma TM, Lamb JM, Casado M, Wilhalme H, Low DA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided vs computed tomography-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the MIRAGE randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9(3):365.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudra S, Jiang N, Rosenberg SA, Olsen JR, Roach MC, Wan L, et al. Using adaptive magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy for treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer. Cancer Med. 2019;8(5):2123–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan H, Stewart J, Ruschin M, Wang MH, Myrehaug S, Tseng CL, et al. Inter-fraction dynamics during post-operative 5 fraction cavity hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with a MR LINAC: a prospective serial imaging study. J Neuro-Oncol. 2022;156(3):569–77.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, Kutcher G, Starkschall G, Stern R, et al. American Association of Physicists in Medicine Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 1998;25(10):1773–829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Siochi RA, Balter P, Bloch CD, Santanam L, Blodgett K, Curran BH, et al. Report of Task Group 201 of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine: quality management of external beam therapy data transfer. Med Phys. 2021;48(6):e86–e114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Glide-Hurst CK, Lee P, Yock AD, Olsen JR, Cao M, Siddiqui F, et al. Adaptive radiation therapy (ART) strategies and technical considerations: a state of the ART review from NRG oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(4):1054–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. IAEA TRS-430, Commissioning and quality assurance of computerized planning systems for radiation treatment of cancer. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smilowitz JB, Das IJ, Feygelman V, Fraass BA, Kry SF, Marshall IR, et al. AAPM medical physics practice guideline 5.a.: commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations - megavoltage photon and electron beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(5):14–34.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Geurts MW, Jacqmin DJ, Jones LE, Kry SF, Mihailidis DN, Ohrt JD, et al. AAPM medical physics practice guideline 5.b: commissioning and QA of treatment planning dose calculations—megavoltage photon and electron beams. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23(9):e13641.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Das IJ, Cheng C-W, Watts RJ, Ahnesjö A, Gibbons J, Li XA, et al. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35(9):4186–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, LoSasso TJ, Mechalakos JG, Mihailidis D, et al. IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys. 2009;36(11):5359–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma CMC, Chetty IJ, Deng J, Faddegon B, Jiang SB, Li J, et al. Beam modeling and beam model commissioning for Monte Carlo dose calculation-based radiation therapy treatment planning: report of AAPM Task Group 157. Med Phys. 2020;47(1):e1–e18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chetty IJ, Curran B, Cygler JE, DeMarco JJ, Ezzell G, Faddegon BA, et al. Report of the AAPM Task Group No. 105: issues associated with clinical implementation of Monte Carlo-based photon and electron external beam treatment planning. Med Phys. 2007;34(12):4818–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen X, Paulson ES, Ahunbay E, Sanli A, Klawikowski S, Li XA. Measurement validation of treatment planning for a MR-Linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(7):28–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Shortall J, Vasquez Osorio E, Aitkenhead A, Berresford J, Agnew J, Budgell G, et al. Experimental verification the electron return effect around spherical air cavities for the MR-Linac using Monte Carlo calculation. Med Phys. 2020;47(6):2506–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elter A, Rippke C, Johnen W, Mann P, Hellwich E, Schwahofer A, et al. End-to-end test for fractionated online adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy using a deformable anthropomorphic pelvis phantom. Phys Med Biol. 2021;66(24).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hoffmans D, Niebuhr N, Bohoudi O, Pfaffenberger A, Palacios M. An end-to-end test for MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2020;65(12):125012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kisling K, Keiper TD, Branco D, Kim GG, Moore KL, Ray X. Clinical commissioning of an adaptive radiotherapy platform: results and recommendations. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23(12):e13801.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Noel CE, Parikh PJ, Spencer CR, Green OL, Hu Y, Mutic S, et al. Comparison of onboard low-field magnetic resonance imaging versus onboard computed tomography for anatomy visualization in radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2015;54(9):1474–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bauman G, Haider M, Van der Heide UA, Ménard C. Boosting imaging defined dominant prostatic tumors: a systematic review. Radiother Oncol. 2013;107(3):274–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Dunlop A, Mitchell A, Tree A, Barnes H, Bower L, Chick J, et al. Daily adaptive radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer using a high field MR-linac: initial clinical experiences and assessment of delivered doses compared to a C-arm linac. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020;23:35–42.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Winkel D, Bol GH, Kroon PS, van Asselen B, Hackett SS, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy: the Elekta Unity MR-linac concept. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019;18:54–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Winkel D, Bol GH, Werensteijn-Honingh AM, Intven MPW, Eppinga WSC, Hes J, et al. Target coverage and dose criteria based evaluation of the first clinical 1.5T MR-linac SBRT treatments of lymph node oligometastases compared with conventional CBCT-linac treatment. Radiother Oncol. 2020;146:118–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hall WA, Heerkens HD, Paulson ES, Meijer GJ, Kotte AN, Knechtges P, et al. Pancreatic gross tumor volume contouring on computed tomography (CT) compared with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): results of an international contouring conference. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8(2):107–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Heerkens HD, Hall WA, Li XA, Knechtges P, Dalah E, Paulson ES, et al. Recommendations for MRI-based contouring of gross tumor volume and organs at risk for radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017;7(2):126–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lukovic J, Henke L, Gani C, Kim TK, Stanescu T, Hosni A, et al. MRI-based upper abdominal organs-at-risk atlas for radiation oncology. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;106(4):743–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Vasmel JE, Groot Koerkamp ML, Kirby AM, Russell NS, Shaitelman SF, Vesprini D, et al. Consensus on contouring primary breast tumors on MRI in the setting of neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation in trials. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2020;10(6):e466–e74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen X, Ma X, Yan X, Luo F, Yang S, Wang Z, et al. Personalized auto-segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging-guided adaptive radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Med Phys. 2022;49(8):4971–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ding J, Zhang Y, Amjad A, Xu J, Thill D, Li XA. Automatic contour refinement for deep learning auto-segmentation of complex organs in MRI-guided adaptive radiation therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022;7(5):100968.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Kawula M, Hadi I, Nierer L, Vagni M, Cusumano D, Boldrini L, et al. Patient-specific transfer learning for auto-segmentation in adaptive 0.35 T MRgRT of prostate cancer: a bi-centric evaluation. Med Phys. 2023;50:1573.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Liang Y, Schott D, Zhang Y, Wang Z, Nasief H, Paulson E, et al. Auto-segmentation of pancreatic tumor in multi-parametric MRI using deep convolutional neural networks. Radiother Oncol. 2020;145:193–200.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sharp G, Fritscher KD, Pekar V, Peroni M, Shusharina N, Veeraraghavan H, et al. Vision 20/20: perspectives on automated image segmentation for radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2014;41(5):050902.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Eccles CL, Adair Smith G, Bower L, Hafeez S, Herbert T, Hunt A, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging sequence evaluation of an MR Linac system; early clinical experience. Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol. 2019;12:56–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Whiteside L, McDaid L, Hales RB, Rodgers J, Dubec M, Huddart RA, et al. To see or not to see: evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging sequences for use in MR Linac-based radiotherapy treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2022;53(3):362–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Klüter S. Technical design and concept of a 0.35 T MR-Linac. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2019;18:98–101.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Heerkens HD, Reerink O, Intven MPW, Hiensch RR, van den Berg CAT, Crijns SPM, et al. Pancreatic tumor motion reduction by use of a custom abdominal corset. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2017;2:7–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Owrangi AM, Greer PB, Glide-Hurst CK. MRI-only treatment planning: benefits and challenges. Phys Med Biol. 2018;63(5):05tr1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yang B, Yuan J, Poon DMC, Geng H, Lam WW, Cheung KY, et al. Assessment of planning target volume margins in 1.5 T magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. Precision. Radiat Oncol. 2022;6(2):127–35.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Corradini S, Alongi F, Andratschke N, Belka C, Boldrini L, Cellini F, et al. MR-guidance in clinical reality: current treatment challenges and future perspectives. Radiat Oncol. 2019;14(1):92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Devic S. MRI simulation for radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 2012;39(11):6701–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Das IJ, Sanfilippo NJ, Fogliata A, Cozzi L, Physics Io. Intensity modulated radiation therapy: a clinical overview. IOP Publishing; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hawranko R, Sohn JJ, Neiderer K, Bump E, Harris T, Fields EC, et al. Investigation of isotoxic dose escalation and plan quality with TDABC analysis on a 0.35 T MR-Linac (MRL) system in ablative 5-fraction stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) for primary pancreatic cancer. J Clin Med. 2022;11(9):2584.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Hansen AT, Poulsen PR, Høyer M, Worm ES. Isotoxic dose prescription level strategies for stereotactic liver radiotherapy: the price of dose uniformity. Acta Oncol. 2020;59(5):558–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Warren M, Webster G, Ryder D, Rowbottom C, Faivre-Finn C. An isotoxic planning comparison study for stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer: is intensity-modulated radiotherapy the answer? Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2014;26(8):461–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Kim A, Lim-Reinders S, McCann C, Ahmad SB, Sahgal A, Lee J, et al. Magnetic field dose effects on different radiation beam geometries for hypofractionated partial breast irradiation. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18(6):62–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Kirkby C, Stanescu T, Fallone BG. Magnetic field effects on the energy deposition spectra of MV photon radiation. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(2):243–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Wang Y, Mazur TR, Green O, Hu Y, Li H, Rodriguez V, et al. A GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo dose calculation platform and its application toward validating an MRI-guided radiation therapy beam model. Med Phys. 2016;43(7):4040.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Khan AU, Simiele EA, Lotey R, DeWerd LA, Yadav P. Development and evaluation of a GEANT4-based Monte Carlo Model of a 0.35 T MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) linear accelerator. Med Phys. 2021;48(4):1967–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ahmad SB, Sarfehnia A, Paudel MR, Kim A, Hissoiny S, Sahgal A, et al. Evaluation of a commercial MRI Linac based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm with GEANT4. Med Phys. 2016;43(2):894–907.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li Y, Ding S, Wang B, Liu H, Huang X, Song T. Extension and validation of a GPU-Monte Carlo dose engine gDPM for 1.5 T MR-LINAC online independent dose verification. Med Phys. 2021;48(10):6174–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Raaijmakers AJ, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ. Magnetic-field-induced dose effects in MR-guided radiotherapy systems: dependence on the magnetic field strength. Phys Med Biol. 2008;53(4):909.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Raaijmakers AJ, Raaymakers BW, van der Meer S, Lagendijk JJ. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: impact of the surface orientation on the entrance and exit dose due to the transverse magnetic field. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(4):929–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kurz C, Buizza G, Landry G, Kamp F, Rabe M, Paganelli C, et al. Medical physics challenges in clinical MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2020;15(1):93.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Raaijmakers AJ, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue-air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(7):1363–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Huang C-Y, Yang B, Lam WW, Geng H, Cheung KY, Yu SK. Magnetic field induced dose effects in radiation therapy using MR-linacs. Med Phys. 2023;50:3623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Oborn BM, Metcalfe PE, Butson MJ, Rosenfeld AB. Monte Carlo characterization of skin doses in 6 MV transverse field MRI-linac systems: effect of field size, surface orientation, magnetic field strength, and exit bolus. Med Phys. 2010;37(10):5208–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Godoy Scripes P, Subashi E, Burleson S, Liang J, Romesser P, Crane C, et al. Impact of varying air cavity on planning dosimetry for rectum patients treated on a 1.5 T hybrid MR-linac system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(7):144–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Paudel MR, Kim A, Sarfehnia A, Ahmad SB, Beachey DJ, Sahgal A, et al. Experimental evaluation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose calculation algorithm in the Monaco treatment planning system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(6):230–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Uilkema S, van der Heide U, Sonke JJ, Moreau M, van Triest B, Nijkamp J. A 1.5 T transverse magnetic field in radiotherapy of rectal cancer: impact on the dose distribution. Med Phys. 2015;42(12):7182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Menten MJ, Fast MF, Nill S, Kamerling CP, McDonald F, Oelfke U. Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy with an MR-linac–quantifying the impact of the magnetic field and real-time tumor tracking. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119(3):461–6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. van Heijst TC, den Hartogh MD, Lagendijk JJ, van den Bongard HJ, van Asselen B. MR-guided breast radiotherapy: feasibility and magnetic-field impact on skin dose. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58(17):5917–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Bol G, Hissoiny S, Lagendijk J, Raaymakers B. Fast online Monte Carlo-based IMRT planning for the MRI linear accelerator. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(5):1375.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. McDonald BA, Vedam S, Yang J, Wang J, Castillo P, Lee B, et al. Initial feasibility and clinical implementation of daily MR-guided adaptive head and neck cancer radiation therapy on a 1.5 T MR-linac system: prospective R-ideal 2a/2b systematic clinical evaluation of technical innovation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021;109(5):1606–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. McCulloch MM, Lee C, Rosen BS, Kamp JD, Lockhart CM, Lee JY, et al. Predictive models to determine clinically relevant deviations in delivered dose for head and neck cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9(4):422–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Tyran M, Jiang N, Cao M, Raldow A, Lamb JM, Low D, et al. Retrospective evaluation of decision-making for pancreatic stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2018;129(2):319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Green OL, Henke LE, Hugo GD. Practical clinical workflows for online and offline adaptive radiation therapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):219–27.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  68. Hunt A, Hansen VN, Oelfke U, Nill S, Hafeez S. Adaptive radiotherapy enabled by MRI guidance. Clin Oncol. 2018;30(11):711–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Langen KM, Jones DT. Organ motion and its management. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001;50(1):265–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Yan D, Lockman D. Organ/patient geometric variation in external beam radiotherapy and its effects. Med Phys. 2001;28(4):593–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Van Herk M, Witte M, Van Der Geer J, Schneider C, Lebesque JV. Biologic and physical fractionation effects of random geometric errors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;57(5):1460–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Bortfeld T, Jiang SB, Rietzel E. Effects of motion on the total dose distribution. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14(1):41–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Purdy JA. Current ICRU definitions of volumes: limitations and future directions. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14(1):27–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Schaly B, Kempe JA, Bauman GS, Battista JJ, Van Dyk J. Tracking the dose distribution in radiation therapy by accounting for variable anatomy. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(5):791–805.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Mutic S, Dempsey JF. The ViewRay system: magnetic resonance–guided and controlled radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24(3):196–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gupta A, Dunlop A, Mitchell A, McQuaid D, Nill S, Barnes H, et al. Online adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancers on the MR linear accelerator: introducing a novel modified adapt-to-shape approach. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022;32:48–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Heijkoop ST, Langerak TR, Quint S, Bondar L, Mens JWM, Heijmen BJM, et al. Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(3):673–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Meijer GJ, van der Toorn P-P, Bal M, Schuring D, Weterings J, de Wildt M. High precision bladder cancer irradiation by integrating a library planning procedure of 6 prospectively generated SIB IMRT plans with image guidance using lipiodol markers. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105(2):174–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Vestergaard A, Muren LP, Søndergaard J, Elstrøm UV, Høyer M, Petersen JB. Adaptive plan selection vs. re-optimisation in radiotherapy for bladder cancer: a dose accumulation comparison. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109(3):457–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Beekman C, van Triest B, van Beek S, Sonke JJ, Remeijer P. Margin and PTV volume reduction using a population based library of plans strategy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2018;45(10):4345–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Korsholm ME, Waring LW, Edmund JM. A criterion for the reliable use of MRI-only radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9(1):16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Ruggieri R, Rigo M, Naccarato S, Gurrera D, Figlia V, Mazzola R, et al. Adaptive SBRT by 1.5 T MR-linac for prostate cancer: on the accuracy of dose delivery in view of the prolonged session time. Phys Med. 2020;80:34–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Naccarato S, Rigo M, Pellegrini R, Voet P, Akhiat H, Gurrera D, et al. Automated planning for prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy on the 1.5 T MR-Linac. Adv Radiat Oncol. 2022;7(3):100865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Tyagi N, Liang J, Burleson S, Subashi E, Godoy Scripes P, Tringale KR, et al. Feasibility of ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy of pancreas cancer patients on a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance-linac system using abdominal compression. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;19:53–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Brennan VS, Burleson S, Kostrzewa C, Godoy Scripes P, Subashi E, Zhang Z, et al. SBRT focal dose intensification using an MR-Linac adaptive planning for intermediate-risk prostate cancer: an analysis of the dosimetric impact of intra-fractional organ changes. Radiother Oncol. 2023;179:109441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Paulson ES, Ahunbay E, Chen X, Mickevicius NJ, Chen G-P, Schultz C, et al. 4D-MRI driven MR-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for abdominal stereotactic body radiation therapy on a high field MR-Linac: implementation and initial clinical experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2020;23:72–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Alam S, Veeraraghavan H, Tringale K, Amoateng E, Subashi E, Wu AJ, et al. Inter- and intrafraction motion assessment and accumulated dose quantification of upper gastrointestinal organs during magnetic resonance-guided ablative radiation therapy of pancreas patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2022;21:54–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Fast MF, Nill S, Bedford JL, Oelfke U. Dynamic tumor tracking using the Elekta Agility MLC. Med Phys. 2014;41(11):111719.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Glitzner M, Woodhead P, Borman P, Lagendijk J, Raaymakers B. MLC-tracking performance on the Elekta unity MRI-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64(15):15NT02.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Feldman AM, Modh A, Glide-Hurst C, Chetty IJ, Movsas B. Real-time magnetic resonance-guided liver stereotactic body radiation therapy: an institutional report using a magnetic resonance-linac system. Cureus. 2019;11(9):e5774.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. Akdag O, Borman PTS, Woodhead P, Uijtewaal P, Mandija S, Van Asselen B, et al. First experimental exploration of real-time cardiorespiratory motion management for future stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation treatments on the MR-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2022;67(6).

    Google Scholar 

  92. Zhang Y, Cao Y, Kashani R, Lawrence TS, Balter JM. Real-time prediction of stomach motions based upon gastric contraction and breathing models. Phys Med Biol. 2022;68(1):015001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. Keall P, Nguyen DT, O’Brien R, Hewson E, Ball H, Poulsen P, et al. Real-time image guided ablative prostate cancer radiation therapy: results from the TROG 15.01 SPARK trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2020;107(3):530–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Keall PJ, Sawant A, Berbeco RI, Booth JT, Cho B, Cerviño LI, et al. AAPM Task Group 264: the safe clinical implementation of MLC tracking in radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2021;48(5):e44–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Uijtewaal P, Borman PT, Woodhead PL, Kontaxis C, Hackett SL, Verhoeff J, et al. First experimental demonstration of VMAT combined with MLC tracking for single and multi fraction lung SBRT on an MR-linac. Radiother Oncol. 2022;174:149–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. NCT03621644. Stereotactic MRI-guided On-table Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Stereotactic MRI-guided On-table Adaptive Radiation Therapy (SMART) for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer.

    Google Scholar 

  97. Marino MA, Helbich T, Baltzer P, Pinker-Domenig K. Multiparametric MRI of the breast: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47(2):301–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Hoetker AM, Garcia-Aguilar J, Gollub MJ. Multiparametric MRI of rectal cancer in the assessment of response to therapy: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(6):790–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Gürses B, Böge M, Altınmakas E, Balık E. Multiparametric MRI in rectal cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2019;25(3):175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Mahajan A, Engineer R, Chopra S, Mahanshetty U, Juvekar S, Shrivastava S, et al. Role of 3T multiparametric-MRI with BOLD hypoxia imaging for diagnosis and post therapy response evaluation of postoperative recurrent cervical cancers. Eur J Radiol Open. 2016;3:22–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Clemente EJI, Navarro OM, Navallas M, Ladera E, Torner F, Sunol M, et al. Multiparametric MRI evaluation of bone sarcomas in children. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  102. Necchi A, Bandini M, Calareso G, Raggi D, Pederzoli F, Farè E, et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging as a noninvasive assessment of tumor response to neoadjuvant pembrolizumab in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: preliminary findings from the PURE-01 study. Eur Urol. 2020;77(5):636–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Rossi SH, Prezzi D, Kelly-Morland C, Goh V. Imaging for the diagnosis and response assessment of renal tumours. World J Urol. 2018;36:1927–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Haider M, Yao X, Loblaw A, Finelli A. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review. Clin Oncol. 2016;28(9):550–67.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  105. Padhani AR, Miles KA. Multiparametric imaging of tumor response to therapy. Radiology. 2010;256(2):348–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Kooreman ES, van Houdt PJ, Nowee ME, van Pelt VWJ, Tijssen RHN, Paulson ES, et al. Feasibility and accuracy of quantitative imaging on a 1.5 T MR-linear accelerator. Radiother Oncol. 2019;133:156–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Kooreman ES, van Houdt PJ, Keesman R, Pos FJ, van Pelt VWJ, Nowee ME, et al. ADC measurements on the Unity MR-linac - a recommendation on behalf of the Elekta Unity MR-linac consortium. Radiother Oncol. 2020;153:106–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  108. van Houdt PJ, Saeed H, Thorwarth D, Fuller CD, Hall WA, McDonald BA, et al. Integration of quantitative imaging biomarkers in clinical trials for MR-guided radiotherapy: conceptual guidance for multicentre studies from the MR-Linac Consortium Imaging Biomarker Working Group. Eur J Cancer. 1990;2021(153):64–71.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Kooreman ES, van Houdt PJ, Keesman R, van Pelt VWJ, Nowee ME, Pos F, et al. Daily intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in prostate cancer patients during MR-guided radiotherapy-a multicenter study. Front Oncol. 2021;11:705964.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  110. Kooreman ES, Tanaka M, Ter Beek LC, Peters FP, Marijnen CAM, van der Heide UA, et al. T(1ρ) for radiotherapy treatment response monitoring in rectal cancer patients: a pilot study. J Clin Med. 2022;11(7):1998.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Kooreman ES, van Pelt V, Nowee ME, Pos F, van der Heide UA, van Houdt PJ. Longitudinal correlations between intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI during radiotherapy in prostate cancer patients. Front Oncol. 2022;12:897130.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Mickevicius NJ, Kim JP, Zhao J, Morris ZS, Hurst NJ Jr, Glide-Hurst CK. Toward magnetic resonance fingerprinting for low-field MR-guided radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2021;48(11):6930–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Steenbergen P, Haustermans K, Lerut E, Oyen R, De Wever L, Van den Bergh L, et al. Prostate tumor delineation using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: inter-observer variability and pathology validation. Radiother Oncol. 2015;115(2):186–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Dinh CV, Steenbergen P, Ghobadi G, van der Poel H, Heijmink SW, de Jong J, et al. Multicenter validation of prostate tumor localization using multiparametric MRI and prior knowledge. Med Phys. 2017;44(3):949–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. van Schie MA, Steenbergen P, Dinh CV, Ghobadi G, van Houdt PJ, Pos FJ, et al. Repeatability of dose painting by numbers treatment planning in prostate cancer radiotherapy based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(14):5575–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Subashi E, LoCastro E, Apte A, Zelefsky MJ, Tyagi N. Quantitative relaxometry for target localization and response assessment in ultra-hypofractionated MR-guided radiotherapy to the prostate and DIL. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;114(3, Supplement):S33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. Kerkmeijer LGW, Groen VH, Pos FJ, Haustermans K, Monninkhof EM, Smeenk RJ, et al. Focal boost to the intraprostatic tumor in external beam radiotherapy for patients with localized prostate cancer: results from the FLAME randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021;39(7):787–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJ, Kotte AN, Jette D, Lagendijk JJ. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose deposition in a transverse magnetic field. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(17):4109–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  119. Hissoiny S, Ozell B, Bouchard H, Després P. GPUMCD: a new GPU-oriented Monte Carlo dose calculation platform. Med Phys. 2011;38(2):754–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Hissoiny S, Raaijmakers AJ, Ozell B, Després P, Raaymakers BW. Fast dose calculation in magnetic fields with GPUMCD. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(16):5119–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  121. Wooten HO, Green O, Yang M, DeWees T, Kashani R, Olsen J, et al. Quality of intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment plans using a 60Co magnetic resonance image guidance radiation therapy system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;92(4):771–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Li Y, Wang B, Ding S, Liu H, Liu B, Xia Y, et al. Feasibility of using a commercial collapsed cone dose engine for 1.5T MR-LINAC online independent dose verification. Phys Med. 2020;80:288–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Kry SF, Feygelman V, Balter P, Knöös T, Charlie Ma C-M, Snyder M, et al. AAPM Task Group 329: reference dose specification for dose calculations: dose-to-water or dose-to-muscle? Med Phys. 2020;47(3):e52–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Shortall J, Vasquez Osorio E, Chuter R, McWilliam A, Choudhury A, Kirkby K, et al. Assessing localized dosimetric effects due to unplanned gas cavities during pelvic MR-guided radiotherapy using Monte Carlo simulations. Med Phys. 2019;46(12):5807–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Xia W, Zhang K, Li M, Tian Y, Men K, Wang J, et al. Impact of magnetic field on dose distribution in MR-guided radiotherapy of head and neck cancer. Front Oncol. 2020;10:1739.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  126. Chen X, Prior P, Chen GP, Schultz CJ, Li XA. Dose effects of 1.5 T transverse magnetic field on tissue interfaces in MRI-guided radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2016;43(8 Part 1):4797–802.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  127. Chetty IJ, Rosu M, Kessler ML, Fraass BA, Ten Haken RK, Kong FM, et al. Reporting and analyzing statistical uncertainties in Monte Carlo-based treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(4):1249–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Brock KK, Mutic S, McNutt TR, Li H, Kessler ML. Use of image registration and fusion algorithms and techniques in radiotherapy: report of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group No. 132. Med Phys. 2017;44(7):e43–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  129. Rong Y, Rosu-Bubulac M, Benedict SH, Cui Y, Ruo R, Connell T, et al. Rigid and deformable image registration for radiation therapy: a self-study evaluation guide for NRG oncology clinical trial participation. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2021;11(4):282–98.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  130. Swaminath A, Massey C, Brierley JD, Dinniwell R, Wong R, Kim JJ, et al. Accumulated delivered dose response of stereotactic body radiation therapy for liver metastases. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015;93(3):639–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. Jaffray DA, Lindsay PE, Brock KK, Deasy JO, Tomé WA. Accurate accumulation of dose for improved understanding of radiation effects in normal tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76(3 Suppl):S135–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  132. Sonke JJ, Aznar M, Rasch C. Adaptive radiotherapy for anatomical changes. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):245–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  133. Chetty IJ, Rosu-Bubulac M. Deformable registration for dose accumulation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):198–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Veiga C, Lourenço AM, Mouinuddin S, van Herk M, Modat M, Ourselin S, et al. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: uncertainties in dose warping due to the choice of deformable registration algorithm. Med Phys. 2015;42(2):760–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Heukelom J, Fuller CD. Head and neck cancer adaptive radiation therapy (ART): conceptual considerations for the informed clinician. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2019;29(3):258–73.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  136. Kadoya N, Nakajima Y, Saito M, Miyabe Y, Kurooka M, Kito S, et al. Multi-institutional validation study of commercially available deformable image registration software for thoracic images. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96(2):422–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  137. Zhang Y, Balter JM, Dow JS, Cao Y, Lawrence TS, Kashani R. Development of an abdominal dose accumulation tool and assessments of accumulated dose in gastrointestinal organs. Phys Med Biol. 2023;68.

    Google Scholar 

  138. Kontaxis C, Bol G, Lagendijk J, Raaymakers B. A new methodology for inter-and intrafraction plan adaptation for the MR-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(19):7485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Menten MJ, Mohajer JK, Nilawar R, Bertholet J, Dunlop A, Pathmanathan AU, et al. Automatic reconstruction of the delivered dose of the day using MR-linac treatment log files and online MR imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2020;145:88–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Fast M, van de Schoot A, van de Lindt T, Carbaat C, van der Heide U, Sonke J-J. Tumor trailing for liver SBRT on the MR-Linac. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019;103(2):468–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Lim SY, Tran A, Tran ANK, Sobremonte A, Fuller CD, Simmons L, et al. Dose accumulation of daily adaptive plans to decide optimal plan adaptation strategy for head-and-neck patients treated with MR-Linac. Med Dosim. 2022;47(1):103–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  142. Willigenburg T, van der Velden JM, Zachiu C, Teunissen FR, Lagendijk JJ, Raaymakers BW, et al. Accumulated bladder wall dose is correlated with patient-reported acute urinary toxicity in prostate cancer patients treated with stereotactic, daily adaptive MR-guided radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2022;171:182–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  143. McDonald BA, Zachiu C, Christodouleas J, Naser MA, Ruschin M, Sonke JJ, et al. Dose accumulation for MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy: from practical considerations to state-of-the-art clinical implementation. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1086258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Noel CE, Santanam L, Parikh PJ, Mutic S. Process-based quality management for clinical implementation of adaptive radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2014;41(8Part1):081717.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  145. Cai B, Green OL, Kashani R, Rodriguez VL, Mutic S, Yang D. A practical implementation of physics quality assurance for photon adaptive radiotherapy. Z Med Phys. 2018;28(3):211–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  146. Yang J, Zhang P, Tyagi N, Scripes PG, Subashi E, Liang J, et al. Integration of an independent monitor unit check for high-magnetic-field MR-guided radiation therapy system. Front Oncol. 2022;12:747825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  147. Chen X, Ahunbay E, Paulson ES, Chen G, Li XA. A daily end-to-end quality assurance workflow for MR-guided online adaptive radiation therapy on MR-Linac. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(1):205–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  148. Hackett S, van Asselen B, Feist G, Pencea S, Akhiat H, Wolthaus J, et al. Collapsed cone algorithm can be used for quality assurance for Monaco treatment plans for the MR-Linac. Med Phys. 2016;43(6 Part 11):3441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. Lim SB, Godoy Scripes P, Napolitano M, Subashi E, Tyagi N, Cervino Arriba L, et al. An investigation of using log-file analysis for automated patient-specific quality assurance in MRgRT. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(9):183–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  150. Peng C, Chen G, Ahunbay E, Wang D, Lawton C, Li XA. Validation of an online replanning technique for prostate adaptive radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(12):3659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Altman MB, Kavanaugh JA, Wooten HO, Green OL, DeWees TA, Gay H, et al. A framework for automated contour quality assurance in radiation therapy including adaptive techniques. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60(13):5199–209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Chen HC, Tan J, Dolly S, Kavanaugh J, Anastasio MA, Low DA, et al. Automated contouring error detection based on supervised geometric attribute distribution models for radiation therapy: a general strategy. Med Phys. 2015;42(2):1048–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Huq MS, Fraass BA, Dunscombe PB, Gibbons JP Jr, Ibbott GS, Mundt AJ, et al. The report of Task Group 100 of the AAPM: application of risk analysis methods to radiation therapy quality management. Med Phys. 2016;43(7):4209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  154. Liang J, Scripes PG, Tyagi N, Subashi E, Wunner T, Cote N, et al. Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5 T MR-Linac adapt-to-position workflow. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;24:e13850.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Henry Ford Health, Department of Radiation Oncology, Detroit, MI, USA

    Justine M. Cunningham, Jennifer L. Dolan & Kate Aldridge

  2. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medical Physics, New York, NY, USA

    Ergys Subashi

Authors
  1. Justine M. Cunningham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jennifer L. Dolan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kate Aldridge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ergys Subashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Justine M. Cunningham .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

    Indra J. Das

  2. Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar di Valpolicella, Verona, Italy

    Filippo Alongi

  3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

    Poonam Yadav

  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

    Bharat B. Mittal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cunningham, J.M., Dolan, J.L., Aldridge, K., Subashi, E. (2024). Treatment Planning Considerations for an MR-Linac. In: Das, I.J., Alongi, F., Yadav, P., Mittal, B.B. (eds) A Practical Guide to MR-Linac. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48165-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48165-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48164-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48165-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation