Abstract
In risk management, the probability distribution must adequately capture the risks that matter most, namely the outliers. I estimate the parameters as if the sample were upper censored to put the focus to the most negative observations (non-censored outliers) and then only estimate the probability that I obtain an “ordinary” observation (censored). The left tail is assumed to follow a location-scale Student’s t-distribution, yet no distributional assumptions are made outside the tail. Cauchy’s and Gauss’ distributions are two special cases of Student’s t-distribution. For empirical stock index returns, the left tail is neither Gauss nor Cauchy, a Student’s t-distribution with around four degrees of freedom offers the best fit. As an empirical application, I compare the pricing of a short-term far out-of-the-money put option on the Dow Jones with a Gauss, a Cauchy, and a Student left tail. The Gaussian Black–Scholes model underprices such insurance contracts, Cauchy overprices them, and the Student model, however, is a good match.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bachelier, L. (1900). Théorie de la spéculation. Annales Scientifiques de L’Ecole Normale Supérieure, 17, 21–88. Reprinted in Cootner, P. H. (Ed.). (1964). The random character of stock market prices. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 637–659.
Blattberg, R. C., & Gonedes, N. J. (1974). A comparison of the stable and student distributions as statistical models for stock prices. The Journal of Business, 47(2), 244–280. ISSN 00219398, 15375374. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2353383.
Bollerslev, T. (1986). Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327.
Cassidy, D. T., Hamp, M. J., & Ouyed, R. (2010). Pricing European options with a log student’s t-distribution: A Gosset formula. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 389(24), 5736–5748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.08.037. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.physa.2010.08.037.
Derman, E., & Taleb, N. N. (2005). The illusions of dynamic replication. Quantitative Finance, 5(4), 323–326. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:taf:quantf:v:5:y:2005:i:4:p:323-326.
Derman, E., Kani, I., & Zou, J. Z. (1996). The local volatility surface: Unlocking the information in index option prices. Financial Analysts Journal, 52(4), 25–36. ISSN 0015198X. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4479931.
Dupire, B. (1994). Pricing with a smile. Risk, 7, 18–20.
Eberlein, E., & Keller, U. (1995). Hyperbolic distributions in finance. Bernoulli, 1(3), 281–299. ISSN 13507265. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3318481.
Efron, B. (1979). Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife. The Annals of Statistics, 7(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176344552.
Engle, R. (1982). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of U.K. inflation. Econometrica, 50, 987–1008.
Fama, E. F. (1963). Mandelbrot and the stable Paretian hypothesis. The Journal of Business, 36(4), 420–429. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ucp:jnlbus:v:36:y:1963:p:420.
Fama, E. F. (1965). The behavior of stock-market prices. Journal of Business, 38(1), 34–105.
Foresi, S., & Wu, L. (2005). Crash-o-phobia: A domestic fear or a worldwide concern? Journal of Derivatives, 13(2), 8–12. Winter.
Hakansson, N. H. (1979). The fantastic world of finance: Progress and the free lunch. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 14(4), 717–734. ISSN 00221090, 17566916. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2330448.
Hamilton, J. D. (1994). Time series analysis. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
Jarrow, R., & Rudd, A. (1982). Approximate option valuation for arbitrary stochastic processes. Journal of Financial Economics, 10(3), 347–369. ISSN 0304-405X. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(82)90007-1. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0304405X82900071.
Karr, A. F. (1993). Probability. New York: Springer.
Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mandelbrot, B. (1963). The variation of certain speculative prices. Journal of Business, 36, 394–419.
Mandelbrot, B., & Hudson, R. (2010). The (Mis)Behaviour of markets: A fractal view of risk, ruin and reward. Profile. ISBN 978-18-47651-55-6. https://books.google.ch/books?id=zg91TAIs6bgC.
Mandelbrot, B. B., & Taleb, N. N. (2010). Mild vs. wild randomness: Focusing on those risks that matter, pp. 47–58.
Mefford, R., Tay, N., Doyle, B., & Ohara, F. (2017). Portfolio risk management using six sigma quality principles. Quality Management Journal, 24, 6–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10686967.2017.11918506.
Merton, R. (1973). The theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4, 141–183.
Rubinstein, M. (1994). Implied binomial tree. Journal of Finance, 69, 771–818.
Taleb, N. N. (2008). The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable (1st ed.). London: Random House. ISBN 1-40-006351-5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blöchlinger, A. (2023). Gauss Versus Cauchy: A Comparative Study on Risk. In: Hüttche, T. (eds) Finance in Crises. Contributions to Finance and Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48071-3_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48071-3_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48070-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48071-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)