Abstract
This chapter shows some evidence that sovereign risk remains a significant concern for European ‘Global Systemically Important Banks’ (G-SIBs) despite the lessons learned from the euro area sovereign debt crisis. Analysis of data from the European Banking Authority (EBA) reveals that many of these banks continue to hold substantial levels of sovereign debt exposure to GIIPS (Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, and Spain) countries, with exposure ranging from 10% to 20%. Notably, UniCredit and Santander stand out with exposure levels exceeding 25% towards GIIPS nations, exposing them to potential sovereign risk from market disturbances within those countries. We also show that partial correlations between Credit Default Swaps (CDS) spreads of certain G-SIBs and GIIPS countries remain relatively high, likely influenced by the significant sovereign debt exposure these banks maintain. Furthermore, the high Debt-to-GDP ratios of GIIPS countries, along with the potential cascading effects of a government’s failure on financial institutions, highlight the interconnectedness and vulnerability of the European banking system.
While regulatory frameworks like the Basel Accords have played a crucial role in maintaining financial stability, the approach to risk-weighted assets associated with sovereign debts remains contentious. The allowance for a 0% risk weight on sovereign bonds issued by EU member states, as part of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR), may incentivize increased holdings of such debts, amplifying sovereign risk. Moreover, High Quality Liquid Assets (HQLA) regulations encouraging banks to retain sovereign debt result in an increased risk for a new sovereign-bank nexus. Our findings reveal potential weaknesses within the European banking system, emphasizing the need for thorough scrutiny and systemic management of this persisting issue.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acharya, V. V., & Steffen, S. (2015). The “greatest” carry trade ever? Understanding eurozone bank risks. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.11.004
Article 114 – European Banking Authority. (2022, January 25). European Banking Authority. https://www.eba.europa.eu/regulation-and-policy/single-rulebook/interactive-single-rulebook/1158
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2017). The regulatory treatment of sovereign exposures. Discussion Paper. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d425.pdf
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (1988). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards. Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs04a.pdf
Bodellini, M. (2019). The long ‘journey’ of banks from Basel I to Basel IV: Has the banking system become more sound and resilient than it used to be? ERA Forum, 20(1), 81–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-019-00557-x
Bolton, P., & Jeanne, O. (2011). Sovereign default risk and bank fragility in financially integrated economies. IMF Economic Review, 59(2), 162–194. https://doi.org/10.1057/imfer.2011.5
Buch, C. M., Koetter, M., & Ohls, J. (2016). Banks and sovereign risk: A granular view. Journal of Financial Stability, 25, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2016.05.002
Deslandes, J., & Magnus, M. (2019). Which supervisory or regulatory treatment of banks’ exposures to sovereign risks? In European Parliament. Retrieved May 29, 2023, from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/624434/IPOL_BRI(2019)624434_EN.pdf
Financial Stability Board. (2022, November 21). 2022 List of Global Systemically Important Banks (G-SIBs). https://www.fsb.org
Gyntelberg, J., Hördahl, P., Ters, K., & Urban, J. (2018). Price discovery in euro area sovereign credit markets and the ban on naked CDS. Journal of Banking and Finance, 96, 106–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2018.08.008
Kim, S. H. (2015). ppcor: An R package for a fast calculation to semi-partial correlation coefficients. Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods, 22(6), 665–674. https://doi.org/10.5351/csam.2015.22.6.665
Lane, P. R. (2012). The European sovereign debt crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(3), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.3.49
Verdun, A. (2015). A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.994023
Vlassopoulos, T., & Andreeva, D. C. (2016). Home bias in bank sovereign bond purchases and the bank-sovereign nexus. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2910883
Zahariadis, N. (2017). Bargaining power and negotiation strategy: Examining the Greek bailouts, 2010–2015. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(5), 675–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1154977
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alvarez, L., Ters, K. (2023). Evolution of Sovereign Risk of European G-SIBs. In: Hüttche, T. (eds) Finance in Crises. Contributions to Finance and Accounting. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48071-3_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48071-3_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48070-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48071-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)