Skip to main content

Informed Consent for Anterior Lumbar Access Surgery

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lumbar Spine Access Surgery
  • 88 Accesses

Abstract

Informed consent is a keystone of the surgeon-patient relationship rooted in the ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence. Many stakeholders (e.g., healthcare institutions, legislators, the courts, state and federal regulators, and professional societies) contribute to an informed consent process in constant evolution. Informed consent also remains important for patients undergoing spine access and spine surgery. Many of the material risks have been identified. Patients need to be told if their surgery will overlap with that of another. Medical malpractice lawsuits often allege lack of consent against neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons who perform spine surgery. Novel approaches are ongoing in the effort to improve the process of informed consent. Elements of social justice should be considered in spine access and spinal operations to ensure all patients can give fully informed consent. This chapter will touch upon all these elements of the informed consent process.

This chapter is written for educational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. Should specific legal questions arise, consult your Office of General Counsel or other attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. Pronouncement and practice in clinical medicine. In: Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, King N, editors. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986. p. 53–113.

    Google Scholar 

  2. President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Vol. 1: report: making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. ASI 16088--1.1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospitals 211 N.Y.125, 105 N.E. 92 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 317 P.2d 170 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Natanson v. Kline 350 P.2d 1093 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Canterbury v. Spence 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Conditions of Participation. Quality, safety & oversight – certification & compliance. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/CertificationandComplianc/Hospitals. Last accessed 26 Jan 2022.

  8. Raper SE, Joseph J. Informed consent for academic surgeons: a curriculum-based update. MedEdPORTAL. 2020;16:10985. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10985.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Wert WG Jr, Sellers W, Mariner D, Obmann M, Song B, Ryer EJ, Nikam S. Identifying risk factors for complications during exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16792. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16792.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Momin AA, Barksdale EM III, Lone Z, Enders JJ, Nowacki AS, Winkelman RD, Krantz M, Hardy DM, Steinmetz MP. Exploring perioperative complications of anterior lumber interbody fusion in patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Spine J. 2020;20:1037–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Manunga J, Alcala C, Smith J, Mirza A, Titus J, Skeik N, Senthil J, Stephenson E, Alexander J, Sullivan S. Technical approach, outcomes, and exposure-related complications in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73:992–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aguirre AO,·Soliman MAR, Azmy S, Khan A, Jowdy PK, Mullin JP, Pollina J. Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a retrospective comparative study and systematic literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45(2):1275-1289 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01699-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Powell JM, Rai A, Foy M, Casey A, Dabke H, Gibson A, Hutton M. The ‘three-legged stool’: a system for spinal informed consent. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:1427–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenway F, Tulloch I, Laban J. Consent for postoperative visual loss in prone spinal surgery: aligning clinical practice with legal standards. Br J Neurosurg. 2018;32(6):604–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2018.1519111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lattig F, Fekete TF, O’Riordan D, Kleinstück FS, Jeszenszky D, Porchet F, Mutter U, Mannion AF. A comparison of patient and surgeon preoperative expectations of spinal surgery. Spine. 2013;38(12):1040–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. American College of Surgeons Statements on Principles. https://www.facs.org/about-acs/statements/stonprin#iid. Last visited 22 Jan 2022.

  17. Position statement on intraoperative responsibility of the primary neurosurgeon. https://www.aans.org/-/media/Files/AANS/Advocacy/PDFS/Position-Statements/Neurosurgery-Position-Statement-on-Overlapping-Surgery-FINAL.ashx. Last visited 22 Jan 2022.

  18. Senate Finance Committee. Concurrent and overlapping surgeries: additional measures warranted. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Concurrent%20Surgeries%20Report%20Final.pdf. Last visited 21 Jan 2022.

  19. Fiani B, Cathel A, Arshad M, Hadi H, Khan YR, Quadri SA, Alastra A, Siddiqi J. Patient perspectives on the participation of neurosurgery resident physicians in their care. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e6880. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6880.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim A, Alluri R, Kang H, Wang J, Hah R. Not without my attending: a survey of patient and family member attitudes and perceptions about concurrent and overlapping surgery. Spine J. 2021;21(6):889–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Epstein NE. What can spine surgeons do to improve patient care and avoid medical negligence suits? Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11(38):1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jackson KL, Rumley J, Griffith M, Linkous TR, Agochukwu U, DeVine J. Medical malpractice claims and mitigation strategies following spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2021;11(5):782–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Machin JT, Hardman J, Harrison W, Briggs TWR, Hutton M. Can spinal surgery in England be saved from litigation: a review of 978 clinical negligence claims against the NHS. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:2693–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5739-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Makhni MC, Park PJ, Jimenez J, Saifi C, Caldwell JM, Ha A, Figueroa-Santana B, Lehman RA Jr, Weidenbaum M. The medicolegal landscape of spine surgery: how do surgeons fare? Spine J. 2018;18:209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Agarwal N, Gupta R, Agarwal P, Matthew P, Wolferz R Jr, Shah A, Adeeb N, Prabhu AV, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Kojo Hamilton D. Descriptive analysis of state and federal spine surgery malpractice litigation in the United States. Spine. 2018;43(14):984–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Madkouri R, Grelat M, Vidon-Buthion A, Lleu M, Beaurain J, Mourier K-L. Assessment of the effectiveness of SFCR patient information sheets before scheduled spinal surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102:479–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Liew Y, Beveridge E, Demetriades AK, Hughes MA. 3D printing of patient-specific anatomy: a tool to improve patient consent and enhance imaging interpretation by trainees. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(5):712–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2015.1026799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mawhinney G, Thakar C, Williamson V, Rothenfluh DA, Reynolds J. (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027712. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027712.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Renovanz M, Julian Haaf J, Nesbigall R, Gutenberg A, Laubach W, Ringel F, Fischbeck S. Information needs of patients in spine surgery: development of a question prompt list to guide informed consent consultations. Spine J. 2019;19:523–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fischbeck S, Petrowski K, Renovanz M, Nesbigall R, Haaf J, Ringel F. Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:2360–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zahrai A, Bhanot K, Mei XY, Crawford E, Tan Z, Yee A, Palda V. Surgeon clinical practice variation and patient preferences during the informed consent discussion: a mixed-methods analysis in lumbar spine surgery. Can J Surg. 2020;63(3):E284–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Mauffrey C, Prempeh EM, John J, Vasario G. The influence of written information during the consenting process on patients’ recall of operative risks. A prospective randomised study. Int Orthop. 2008;32:425–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bethune A, Davila-Foyo M, Valli M, da Costa L. e-Consent: approaching surgical consent with mobile technology. Can J Surg. 2018;61(5):339–44.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein JN, Ciol MA, Kreuter W, Howe JF. Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine. 2001;26(2):206–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Raper SE, Clapp JT, Fleisher LA. Improving surgical informed consent: unanswered questions. Ann Surg. 2021;2(1):e030–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nathan A, Shlobin NA, Mark Sheldon M, Sandi LS. Informed consent in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(5):E6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lo WB, McAuley CP, Gillies MJ, Grover PJ, Pereira EAC. Consent: an event or a memory in lumbar spinal surgery? A multi-centre, multi-specialty prospective study of documentation and patient recall of consent content. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:2789–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5107-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Ng ALC, McRobb LS, White SJ, Cartmill JA, Cyna AM, Seex K. Consent for spine surgery: an observational study. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91:1220–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven E. Raper .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Raper, S.E. (2023). Informed Consent for Anterior Lumbar Access Surgery. In: O'Brien, J.R., Weinreb, J.B., Babrowicz, J.C. (eds) Lumbar Spine Access Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48034-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48034-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48033-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48034-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics