Abstract
Informed consent is a keystone of the surgeon-patient relationship rooted in the ethical principles of autonomy and beneficence. Many stakeholders (e.g., healthcare institutions, legislators, the courts, state and federal regulators, and professional societies) contribute to an informed consent process in constant evolution. Informed consent also remains important for patients undergoing spine access and spine surgery. Many of the material risks have been identified. Patients need to be told if their surgery will overlap with that of another. Medical malpractice lawsuits often allege lack of consent against neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons who perform spine surgery. Novel approaches are ongoing in the effort to improve the process of informed consent. Elements of social justice should be considered in spine access and spinal operations to ensure all patients can give fully informed consent. This chapter will touch upon all these elements of the informed consent process.
This chapter is written for educational purposes only and should not be taken as legal advice. Should specific legal questions arise, consult your Office of General Counsel or other attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Faden RR, Beauchamp TL. Pronouncement and practice in clinical medicine. In: Faden RR, Beauchamp TL, King N, editors. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press; 1986. p. 53–113.
President’s Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Vol. 1: report: making health care decisions: the ethical and legal implications of informed consent in the patient-practitioner relationship. ASI 16088--1.1. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1982.
Schloendorff v Society of New York Hospitals 211 N.Y.125, 105 N.E. 92 (1914).
Salgo v. Leland Stanford Jr. University Board of Trustees, 317 P.2d 170 (1957).
Natanson v. Kline 350 P.2d 1093 (1960).
Canterbury v. Spence 464 F.2d 772 (D.C. Cir. 1972).
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Hospital Conditions of Participation. Quality, safety & oversight – certification & compliance. https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Provider-Enrollment-and-Certification/CertificationandComplianc/Hospitals. Last accessed 26 Jan 2022.
Raper SE, Joseph J. Informed consent for academic surgeons: a curriculum-based update. MedEdPORTAL. 2020;16:10985. https://doi.org/10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10985.
Wert WG Jr, Sellers W, Mariner D, Obmann M, Song B, Ryer EJ, Nikam S. Identifying risk factors for complications during exposure for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Cureus. 2021;13(7):e16792. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16792.
Momin AA, Barksdale EM III, Lone Z, Enders JJ, Nowacki AS, Winkelman RD, Krantz M, Hardy DM, Steinmetz MP. Exploring perioperative complications of anterior lumber interbody fusion in patients with a history of prior abdominal surgery: a retrospective cohort study. Spine J. 2020;20:1037–43.
Manunga J, Alcala C, Smith J, Mirza A, Titus J, Skeik N, Senthil J, Stephenson E, Alexander J, Sullivan S. Technical approach, outcomes, and exposure-related complications in patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Vasc Surg. 2021;73:992–8.
Aguirre AO,·Soliman MAR, Azmy S, Khan A, Jowdy PK, Mullin JP, Pollina J. Incidence of major and minor vascular injuries during lateral access lumbar interbody fusion procedures: a retrospective comparative study and systematic literature review. Neurosurg Rev 2022;45(2):1275-1289 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-021-01699-8.
Powell JM, Rai A, Foy M, Casey A, Dabke H, Gibson A, Hutton M. The ‘three-legged stool’: a system for spinal informed consent. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B:1427–30.
Greenway F, Tulloch I, Laban J. Consent for postoperative visual loss in prone spinal surgery: aligning clinical practice with legal standards. Br J Neurosurg. 2018;32(6):604–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/02688697.2018.1519111.
Lattig F, Fekete TF, O’Riordan D, Kleinstück FS, Jeszenszky D, Porchet F, Mutter U, Mannion AF. A comparison of patient and surgeon preoperative expectations of spinal surgery. Spine. 2013;38(12):1040–8.
American College of Surgeons Statements on Principles. https://www.facs.org/about-acs/statements/stonprin#iid. Last visited 22 Jan 2022.
Position statement on intraoperative responsibility of the primary neurosurgeon. https://www.aans.org/-/media/Files/AANS/Advocacy/PDFS/Position-Statements/Neurosurgery-Position-Statement-on-Overlapping-Surgery-FINAL.ashx. Last visited 22 Jan 2022.
Senate Finance Committee. Concurrent and overlapping surgeries: additional measures warranted. https://www.finance.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Concurrent%20Surgeries%20Report%20Final.pdf. Last visited 21 Jan 2022.
Fiani B, Cathel A, Arshad M, Hadi H, Khan YR, Quadri SA, Alastra A, Siddiqi J. Patient perspectives on the participation of neurosurgery resident physicians in their care. Cureus. 2020;12(2):e6880. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.6880.
Kim A, Alluri R, Kang H, Wang J, Hah R. Not without my attending: a survey of patient and family member attitudes and perceptions about concurrent and overlapping surgery. Spine J. 2021;21(6):889–98.
Epstein NE. What can spine surgeons do to improve patient care and avoid medical negligence suits? Surg Neurol Int. 2020;11(38):1–5.
Jackson KL, Rumley J, Griffith M, Linkous TR, Agochukwu U, DeVine J. Medical malpractice claims and mitigation strategies following spine surgery. Global Spine J. 2021;11(5):782–91.
Machin JT, Hardman J, Harrison W, Briggs TWR, Hutton M. Can spinal surgery in England be saved from litigation: a review of 978 clinical negligence claims against the NHS. Eur Spine J. 2018;27:2693–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-018-5739-1.
Makhni MC, Park PJ, Jimenez J, Saifi C, Caldwell JM, Ha A, Figueroa-Santana B, Lehman RA Jr, Weidenbaum M. The medicolegal landscape of spine surgery: how do surgeons fare? Spine J. 2018;18:209–15.
Agarwal N, Gupta R, Agarwal P, Matthew P, Wolferz R Jr, Shah A, Adeeb N, Prabhu AV, Kanter AS, Okonkwo DO, Kojo Hamilton D. Descriptive analysis of state and federal spine surgery malpractice litigation in the United States. Spine. 2018;43(14):984–90.
Madkouri R, Grelat M, Vidon-Buthion A, Lleu M, Beaurain J, Mourier K-L. Assessment of the effectiveness of SFCR patient information sheets before scheduled spinal surgery. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016;102:479–83.
Liew Y, Beveridge E, Demetriades AK, Hughes MA. 3D printing of patient-specific anatomy: a tool to improve patient consent and enhance imaging interpretation by trainees. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29(5):712–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2015.1026799.
Mawhinney G, Thakar C, Williamson V, Rothenfluh DA, Reynolds J. (OxVIC): a pilot study of informed video consent in spinal surgery and preoperative patient satisfaction. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e027712. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-027712.
Renovanz M, Julian Haaf J, Nesbigall R, Gutenberg A, Laubach W, Ringel F, Fischbeck S. Information needs of patients in spine surgery: development of a question prompt list to guide informed consent consultations. Spine J. 2019;19:523–31.
Fischbeck S, Petrowski K, Renovanz M, Nesbigall R, Haaf J, Ringel F. Anxiety is associated with unfulfilled information needs and pain at the informed consent consultation of spine surgery patients: a longitudinal study. Eur Spine J. 2021;30:2360–7.
Zahrai A, Bhanot K, Mei XY, Crawford E, Tan Z, Yee A, Palda V. Surgeon clinical practice variation and patient preferences during the informed consent discussion: a mixed-methods analysis in lumbar spine surgery. Can J Surg. 2020;63(3):E284–91.
Mauffrey C, Prempeh EM, John J, Vasario G. The influence of written information during the consenting process on patients’ recall of operative risks. A prospective randomised study. Int Orthop. 2008;32:425–9.
Bethune A, Davila-Foyo M, Valli M, da Costa L. e-Consent: approaching surgical consent with mobile technology. Can J Surg. 2018;61(5):339–44.
Phelan EA, Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Weinstein JN, Ciol MA, Kreuter W, Howe JF. Helping patients decide about back surgery: a randomized trial of an interactive video program. Spine. 2001;26(2):206–12.
Raper SE, Clapp JT, Fleisher LA. Improving surgical informed consent: unanswered questions. Ann Surg. 2021;2(1):e030–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/AS9.0000000000000030.
Nathan A, Shlobin NA, Mark Sheldon M, Sandi LS. Informed consent in neurosurgery: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2020;49(5):E6.
Lo WB, McAuley CP, Gillies MJ, Grover PJ, Pereira EAC. Consent: an event or a memory in lumbar spinal surgery? A multi-centre, multi-specialty prospective study of documentation and patient recall of consent content. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:2789–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5107-6.
Ng ALC, McRobb LS, White SJ, Cartmill JA, Cyna AM, Seex K. Consent for spine surgery: an observational study. ANZ J Surg. 2021;91:1220–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raper, S.E. (2023). Informed Consent for Anterior Lumbar Access Surgery. In: O'Brien, J.R., Weinreb, J.B., Babrowicz, J.C. (eds) Lumbar Spine Access Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48034-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48034-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48033-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48034-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)