Skip to main content

Anterior and Lateral Interbody Techniques for Revision Lumbar Fusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lumbar Spine Access Surgery

Abstract

Revision lumbar fusion is commonly performed in the setting of pseudarthrosis and adjacent segment disease after primary lumbar fusion. Anterior interbody techniques may prove invaluable in this setting by avoiding previously used approaches to the spine, provision of improved stability and surface for fusion, restoration of alignment, and indirect decompression of neural elements. This review aims to discuss the utility of anterior interbody techniques and the technical challenges and considerations in the revision setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Selznick LA, Shamji MF, Isaacs RE. Minimally invasive interbody fusion for revision lumbar surgery: technical feasibility and safety. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22:207–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, Groff MW, Khoo L, Matz PG, Mummaneni P, Watters WC, Wang J, Walters BC, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 7: intractable low-back pain without stenosis or spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:670–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham BW, Polly DW Jr. The use of interbody cage devices for spinal deformity: a biomechanical perspective. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;394:73–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deyo RA, Martin BI, Kreuter W, Jarvik JG, Angier H, Mirza SK. Revision surgery following operations for lumbar stenosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011;93:1979–86.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown CW, Orme TJ, Richardson HD. The rate of pseudarthrosis (surgical nonunion) in patients who are smokers and patients who are nonsmokers: a comparison study. Spine. 1986;11:942–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chun DS, Baker KC, Hsu WK. Lumbar pseudarthrosis: a review of current diagnosis and treatment. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cleveland M, Bosworth DM, Thompson FR. Pseudarthrosis in the lumbosacral spine. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1948;30A:302–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Rhim S, Cheh G. Pseudarthrosis in long adult spinal deformity instrumentation and fusion to the sacrum: prevalence and risk factor analysis of 144 cases. Spine. 2006;31:2329–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bederman SS, Le VH, Pahlavan S. An approach to lumbar revision spine surgery in adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016;24:433–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bono CM, Lee CK. Critical analysis of trends in fusion for degenerative disc disease over the past 20 years: influence of technique on fusion rate and clinical outcome. Spine. 2004;29:455–63; discussion Z5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Airaksinen O, Herno A, Turunen V, Saari T, Suomlainen O. Surgical outcome of 438 patients treated surgically for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine. 1997;22:2278–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Omidi-Kashani F, Hasankhani EG, Ashjazadeh A. Lumbar spinal stenosis: who should be fused? An updated review. Asian Spine J. 2014;8:521.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Hironaka Y, Morimoto T, Motoyama Y, Park Y-S, Nakase H. Surgical management of minimally invasive anterior lumbar interbody fusion with stand-alone interbody cage for L4-5 degenerative disorders: clinical and radiographic findings. Neurol Med Chir. 2013;53:861–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee J, Park Y-S. Proximal junctional kyphosis: diagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment. Asian Spine J. 2016;10:593–600.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Park P, Garton HJ, Gala VC, Hoff JT, McGillicuddy JE. Adjacent segment disease after lumbar or lumbosacral fusion: review of the literature. Spine. 2004;29:1938–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Phillips FM, Reuben J, Wetzel FT. Intervertebral disc degeneration adjacent to a lumbar fusion. An experimental rabbit model. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:289–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee CS, Hwang CJ, Lee S-W, Ahn Y-J, Kim Y-T, Lee D-H, Lee MY. Risk factors for adjacent segment disease after lumbar fusion. Eur Spine J. 2009;18:1637–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Crock HV. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982;165:157–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kadam A, Wigner N, Saville P, Arlet V. Overpowering posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion with hyperlordotic anterior lumbar interbody cages followed by posterior revision: a preliminary feasibility study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017;27:650–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Phan K, Xu J, Scherman DB, Rao PJ, Mobbs RJ. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion with and without an “Access Surgeon”. Spine. 2017;42:E592–601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Moisi M, Page J, Paulson D, Oskouian RJ. Technical note—lateral approach to the lumbar spine for the removal of interbody cages. Cureus. 2015;7:e268. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.268.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Gumbs AA, Hanan S, Yue JJ, Shah RV, Sumpio B. Revision open anterior approaches for spine procedures. Spine J. 2007;7:280–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rothenfluh DA, Mueller DA, Rothenfluh E, Min K. Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch predisposes to adjacent segment disease after lumbar spinal fusion. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:1251–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zdeblick TA, David SM. A prospective comparison of surgical approach for anterior L4-L5 fusion: laparoscopic versus mini anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2000;25:2682–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg. 2015;1:2–18.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hsieh PC, Koski TR, O’Shaughnessy BA, Sugrue P, Salehi S, Ondra S, Liu JC. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion in comparison with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: implications for the restoration of foraminal height, local disc angle, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal balance. J Neurosurg Spine. 2007;7:379–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Phan K, Thayaparan GK, Mobbs RJ. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion—systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg. 2015;29:705–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Malham GM, Parker RM, Ellis NJ, Blecher CM, Chow FY, Claydon MH. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a prospective study of complications. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:851–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Rao PJ, Maharaj MM, Phan K, Abeygunasekara ML, Mobbs RJ. Indirect foraminal decompression after anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a prospective radiographic study using a new pedicle-to-pedicle technique. Spine J. 2015;15:817–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Cohn EB, Ignatoff JM, Keeler TC, Shapiro DE, Blum MD. Exposure of the anterior spine: technique and experience with 66 patients. J Urol. 2000;164:416–8. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Gumbs AA. The open anterior Paramedian retroperitoneal approach for spine procedures. Arch Surg. 2005;140:339.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Brau SA, Delamarter RB, Schiffman ML, Williams LA, Watkins RG. Vascular injury during anterior lumbar surgery. Spine J. 2004;4:409–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Faciszewski T, Winter RB, Lonstein JE, Denis F, Johnson L. The surgical and medical perioperative complications of anterior spinal fusion surgery in the thoracic and lumbar spine in adults. A review of 1223 procedures. Spine. 1995;20:1592–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Silvestre C, Mac-Thiong J-M, Hilmi R, Roussouly P. Complications and morbidities of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lumbar interbody fusion in 179 patients. Asian Spine J. 2012;6:89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Molinares DM, Davis TT, Fung DA. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs: an MRI study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2016;24:248–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Molloy S, Butler JS, Benton A, Malhotra K, Selvadurai S, Agu O. A new extensile anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar interbody fusion from L1 to S1: a prospective series with clinical outcomes. Spine J. 2016;16:786–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Davis TT, Hynes RA, Fung DA, Spann SW, MacMillan M, Kwon B, Liu J, Acosta F, Drochner TE. Retroperitoneal oblique corridor to the L2-S1 intervertebral discs in the lateral position: an anatomic study. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:785–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jagannathan J, Chankaew E, Urban P, Dumont AS, Sansur CA, Kern J, Peeler B, Elias WJ, Shen F, Shaffrey ME, et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes following paramedian and anterolateral retroperitoneal access in anterior lumbar spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine. 2008;9:454–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Li JXJ, Phan K, Mobbs R. Oblique lumbar interbody fusion: technical aspects, operative outcomes, and complications. World Neurosurg. 2017;98:113–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Orita S, Inage K, Furuya T, Koda M, Aoki Y, Kubota G, Nakamura J, Shiga Y, Matsuura Y, Maki S, et al. Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion (OLIF): indications and techniques. Oper Tech Orthop. 2017;27:223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Li R, Li X, Zhou H, Jiang W. Development and application of oblique lumbar interbody fusion. Orthop Surg. 2020;12:355–65.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhu G, Hao Y, Yu L, Cai Y, Yang X. Comparing stand-alone oblique lumbar interbody fusion with posterior lumbar interbody fusion for revision of rostral adjacent segment disease: a STROBE-compliant study. Medicine. 2018;97:e12680.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Jung J, Lee S, Cho D-C, Han I-B, Kim CH, Lee Y-S, Kim K-T. Usefulness of oblique lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery: comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes between primary and revision surgery. World Neurosurg. 2021;149:e1067–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hentenaar B, Spoor AB, de Waal Malefijt J, Diekerhof CH, den Oudsten BL. Clinical and radiological outcome of minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion in primary versus revision surgery. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Lee YS, Park SW, Kim YB. Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological outcomes. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2014;55:248–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Miyagi M, Suzuki M, Kubota G, Inage K, et al. Change of lumbar ligamentum flavum after indirect decompression using anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Asian Spine J. 2017;11:105–12.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Sato J, Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, Eguchi Y, Ochiai N, Kuniyoshi K, Aoki Y, Nakamura J, Miyagi M, et al. Radiographic evaluation of indirect decompression of mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for degenerated lumbar spondylolisthesis. Eur Spine J. 2017;26:671–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR. Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J. 2006;6:435–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Park DK, Lee MJ, Lin EL, Singh K, An HS, Phillips FM. The relationship of Intrapsoas nerves during a Transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010;23:223–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Berjano P, Lamartina C. Far lateral approaches (XLIF) in adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2013;22(Suppl 2):S242–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Billinghurst J, Akbarnia BA. Extreme lateral interbody fusion—XLIF. Curr Orthop Pract. 2009;20:238–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Pimenta L, Turner AWL, Dooley ZA, Parikh RD, Peterson MD. Biomechanics of lateral interbody spacers: going wider for going stiffer. ScientificWorldJournal. 2012;2012:381814.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Le TV, Baaj AA, Dakwar E, Burkett CJ, Murray G, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Subsidence of polyetheretherketone intervertebral cages in minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2012;37:1268–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Palejwala SK, Sheen WA, Walter CM, Dunn JH, Baaj AA. Minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion using a stand-alone construct for the treatment of adjacent segment disease of the lumbar spine: review of the literature and report of three cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;124:90–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tobert DG, Makanji HS, Cha TD. Lumbar interbody fusion for adjacent segment disease: An illustrative case of the lateral transpsoas approach (XLIF-DLIF). Semin Spine Surg. 2018;30:258–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Khan MH, Rihn J, Steele G, Davis R, Donaldson WF, Kang JD, Lee JY. Postoperative management protocol for incidental Dural tears during degenerative lumbar spine surgery. Spine. 2006;31:2609–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Phan K, Rao PJ, Scherman DB, Dandie G, Mobbs RJ. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion for sagittal balance correction and spinal deformity. J Clin Neurosci. 2015;22:1714–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Younus A, Kelly A, Lekgwara P. Minimally invasive extreme lateral lumbar interbody fusion (XLIF) to manage adjacent level disease—a case series and literature review. Interdiscip Neurosurg. 2021;23:101014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. McMains MC, Jain N, Malik AT, Cerier E, Litsky AS, Yu E. A biomechanical analysis of lateral interbody construct and supplemental fixation in adjacent-segment disease of the lumbar spine. World Neurosurg. 2019;128:e694–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Liang Z, Cui J, Zhang J, He J, Tang J, Ren H, Ye L, Liang D, Jiang X. Biomechanical evaluation of strategies for adjacent segment disease after lateral lumbar interbody fusion: is the extension of pedicle screws necessary? BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):117. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.17339/v2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Al-Rabiah AM, Alghafli ZI, Almazrua I. Using an extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in revising failed Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with exchange of cage. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e14123. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.14123.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Rodgers WB, Gerber EJ, Cox C. Minimally invasive treatment (XLIF) of adjacent segment disease after prior lumbar fusions. Internet J Minim Invasive Spinal Technol. 2009;3:3.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Aichmair A, Alimi M, Hughes AP, Sama AA, Du JY, Hartl R, Cammisa FP, Girardi FP. Single-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of adjacent segment disease: a retrospective two-center study. Spine J. 2014;14:S158–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Wang MY, Vasudevan R, Mindea SA. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation. J Neurosurg Spine. 2014;21:861–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fakhre, E., Lockey, S.D., Elkadi, S., Kalantar, S.B. (2023). Anterior and Lateral Interbody Techniques for Revision Lumbar Fusion. In: O'Brien, J.R., Weinreb, J.B., Babrowicz, J.C. (eds) Lumbar Spine Access Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48034-8_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48034-8_27

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48033-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48034-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics