Skip to main content

Risk Assessment of Industrial Collaborative Welding Robots: A Critical Review of Methodologies and Limitations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Light of the Armed Conflicts (HCC 2022)

Abstract

This review presents a comprehensive analysis of the risk assessment of collaborative welding robots in industrial applications that are designed to work alongside human operators, offering potential benefits such as increased productivity and improved worker safety. However, the use of this type of collaboration also introduces new risks, including collision with human operators and exposure to welding toxic hazards. In this paper, we will discuss various approaches for hazard identification and risk analysis through a general examination of the relevant literature on risk assessment methodologies including ISO Standards, the case studies highlight the importance of considering factors such as the robot’s speed and trajectory, welding materials, and the operator’s proximity to the robot, and strategies on how to eliminate the identified hazards or mitigate risks associated with the deployment of collaborative welding robots in industrial settings. This review provides valuable insights for industries or companies aiming to implement collaborative welding robots in their work environments while minimizing the potential hazards or risks associated with their use and ensuring the safety and well-being of their human operators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fairbrother A, Turnley JG (2005) Predicting risks of uncharacteristic wildfires: application of the risk assessment process. For Ecol Manag 211(1–2):28–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tóth-Laufer E, Takács M, Rudas IJ (2015) Fuzzy logic-based risk assessment framework to evaluate physiological parameters. Acta Polytechn Hung 12(2):159–178

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu F (2004) Mycotoxin risk assessment for the purpose of setting international regulatory standards

    Google Scholar 

  4. Landoll D (2021) The security risk assessment handbook: a complete guide for performing security risk assessments. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yemelin PV, Kudryavtsev SS, Yemelina NK (2019) Information and analytical system for hazard level assessment and emergency risk forecasting. Acta Polytech 59(2):182–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ladewski BJ, Al-Bayati AJ (2019) Quality and safety management practices: the theory of quality management approach. J Saf Res 69:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sorokin AE, Bulychev SN, Novikov SV, Gorbachev SI (2019) Information science in occupational safety management. Russ Eng Res 39(4):324–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vorotnikov S, Ermishin K, Nazarova A, Yuschenko A (2018) Multi-agent robotic systems in collaborative robotics. In: International conference on interactive collaborative robotics. Springer, Cham, pp 270–279

    Google Scholar 

  9. Robla-Gómez S, Becerra VM, Llata JR, Gonzalez-Sarabia E, Torre-Ferrero C, Perez-Oria J (2017) Working together: a review on safe human-robot collaboration in industrial environments. IEEE Access 5:26754–26773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Inam R, Raizer K, Hata A, Souza R, Forsman E, Cao E, Wang S (2018) Risk assessment for human-robot collaboration in an automated warehouse scenario. In: 2018 IEEE 23rd international conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), vol 1. IEEE, pp 743–751

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boden M, Bryson J, Caldwell D, Dautenhahn K, Edwards L, Kember S et al (2017) Principles of robotics: regulating robots in the real world. Conn Sci 29(2):124–129

    Google Scholar 

  12. Weistroffer V (2020) La «cobotique» et l’interaction homme-robot. In: Intelligences artificielles et humaines, quelles interactions?, vol 10

    Google Scholar 

  13. Segura P, Lobato-Calleros O, Ramírez-Serrano A, Soria I (2021) Human-robot collaborative systems: structural components for current manufacturing applications. Adv Ind Manuf Eng 3:100060

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenstrauch MJ, Krüger J (2017) Safe human-robot-collaboration-introduction and experiment using ISO/TS 15066. In: 2017 3rd international conference on control, automation, and robotics (ICCAR). IEEE, pp 740–744

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee IJ, Lee S, Park J (2009) Precise 3D lug pose detection sensor for automatic robot welding using a structured-light vision system. Sensors 9(9):7550–7565. https://doi.org/10.3390/s90907550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Krolczyk JB, Legutko S, Bialek P (2017) The modernization of the production system of the selected type of synchronizer ring. MATEC Web Conf 121:02007. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712102007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. The myths no one is talking about with cobot welding—until now (n.d.). https://blog.daihen-usa.com/the-myths-no-one-is-talking-about-with-cobot-welding-until-now

  18. Pires JN, Loureiro A, Bölmsjo G (2006) Welding robots: technology, system issues and application. Springer Science & Business Media

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rooks B (1997) Robot welding in shipbuilding. Ind Rob Int J

    Google Scholar 

  20. Brogardh T (2007) Present and future robot control development—an industrial perspective. Annu Rev Control 31(1):69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kah P, Shrestha M, Hiltunen E, Martikainen J (2015) Robotic arc welding sensors and programming in industrial applications. Int J Mech Mater Eng 10(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Magrini E, De Luca A (2016) Hybrid force/velocity control for physical human-robot collaboration tasks. In: 2016 IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS). IEEE, pp 857–863

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhang G, Liu Y, Shi Y, Fan D, Zhang Y (2019) Modeling and optimization of adjustment of human welder on weld pool dynamics for intelligent robot welding. In: Transactions on intelligent welding manufacturing, vol 2, no 3. Springer Singapore, pp 3–26

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alvarado ML (2002) A risk assessment of human-robot interface operations to control the potential of injuries/losses at XYZ manufacturing company

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tünde Anna Kovács .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Aichaoui, N.E.Y., Kovács, T.A. (2024). Risk Assessment of Industrial Collaborative Welding Robots: A Critical Review of Methodologies and Limitations. In: Kovács, T.A., Nyikes, Z., Berek, T., Daruka, N., Tóth, L. (eds) Critical Infrastructure Protection in the Light of the Armed Conflicts. HCC 2022. Advanced Sciences and Technologies for Security Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47990-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47990-8_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47989-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47990-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics