Abstract
The chapter discusses son preference in India. The analysis is based on fertility preference as measured by the NFHS-5 and shows that Indian women are always more likely to desire another birth if they have had only girls, but there are significant variations across Indian regions. The spatial analysis conducted at the district level shows a clear north/south divide. Regions with entrenched son preference are mainly in Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Delhi, Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand, and Madhya Pradesh. In contrast, the northeastern states behave similarly to the southern states with lower levels of son preference.
Policy options to reduce son preference include encouraging women’s participation in the labor force and addressing social norms promoting son preference.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
References
Arnold, F., Choe, M. K., & Roy, T. K. (1998). Son preference, the family-building process and child mortality in India. Population Studies, 52(3), 301–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/0032472031000150486
Arokiasamy, P. (2002). Gender preference, contraceptive use and fertility in India: Regional and development influences. International Journal of Population Geography, 8(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijpg.236
Bhat, P. N. M., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2003). Fertility decline and gender bias in India. Demography, 40(4), 637–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/1515201
Bhat, P. N. M., & Zavier, A. J. F. (2007). Factors influencing the use of prenatal diagnostic techniques and the sex ratio at birth in India. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(24), 2292–2303.
Clark, S. (2000). Son preference and sex composition of children: Evidence from India. Demography, 37(1), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.2307/2648099
Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.2307/1972894
Guilmoto, C. Z. (2012). Son preference, sex selection, and kinship in Vietnam. Population and Development Review, 38(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00471.x
Gupta, M. D., et al. (2003). Why is son preference so persistent in East and South Asia? A cross-country study of China, India and the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 153–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380412331293807
IIPS and ICF. (2017). National Family Health Survey (NFHS-4) 2015–16: India. IIPS.
Jayachandran, S., & Kuziemko, I. (2011). Why do mothers breastfeed girls less than boys? Evidence and implications for child health in India*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(3), 1485–1538. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr029
Leone, T., Matthews, Z., & Zuanna, G. D. (2003). Impact and determinants of sex preference in Nepal. International Family Planning Perspectives, 29(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3181060
Mishra, V., Roy, T. K., & Retherford, R. D. (2004). Sex differentials in childhood feeding, healthcare, and nutritional status in India. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 269–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2004.013_1.x
Pande, R. P. (2003). Selective gender differences in childhood nutrition and immunization in rural India: The role of siblings. Demography, 40(3), 395–418. https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2003.0029
Pandey, R. P., & Astone, N. M. (2007). Explaining son preference in rural India: The independent role of structural versus individual factors. Population Research and Policy Review, 26(1), 1–29.
Registrar General of India. (2015). Compendium of India’s fertility and mortality indicators, 1971–2013. Office of the Registrar General of India.
Singh, A., Kumar, K., Yadav, A. K., James, K. S., McDougal, L., Atmavilas, Y., & Raj, A. (2021). Factors influencing the sex ratio at birth in India: A new analysis based on births occurring between 2005 and 2016. Studies in Family Planning, 52(1), 41–58.
Singh, A., Upadhyay, A. K., Kumar, K., Singh, A., Johnson, F. A., & Padmadas, S. S. (2022). Spatial heterogeneity in son preference across India’s 640 districts. Demographic Research, 47, 793–842. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2022.47.26
Yadav, A. K., Anand, A., Singh, R. A., & Jungari, S. (2020). Sex composition and son preference in India and major states: Evidence from the National Family Health Survey-4 (2015–16). Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health, 8(4), 1140–1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2020.04.005
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Singh, A., Upadhyay, A.K. (2023). Spatial Patterns of Son Preference in India. In: Guilmoto, C.Z. (eds) Atlas of Gender and Health Inequalities in India. Demographic Transformation and Socio-Economic Development, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47847-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47847-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47846-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47847-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)