Skip to main content

Design of Audit Programs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Audit Analytics

Part of the book series: Use R! ((USE R))

  • 111 Accesses

Abstract

Audit programs—from a scientific perspective, natural experiments—are empirical studies in which the activities of firms, individuals, or groups are exposed to the experimental and control conditions that are determined by nature or by other factors outside the control of the auditors. This chapter details the cost-effective planning for an audit, based on a deep understanding of natural experiments and the proper analytical tools needed to draw conclusions from them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bickel, Peter J. 1992. Inference and Auditing: The Stringer Bound. International Statistical Review/Revue Internationale de Statistique, 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carman, Lewis A. 1933. The Efficacy of Tests. The American Accountant 360–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, William G. 2007. Sampling Techniques. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob. 1992a. A Power Primer. Psychological Bulletin 112(1): 155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Jacob. 1992b. Statistical power analysis. Current Directions in Psychological Science 1(3): 98–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fienberg, Stephen E., John Neter, and Robert A. Leitch. 1977. Estimating the Total Overstatement Error in Accounting Populations. Journal of the American Statistical Association 72(358): 295–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garstka, Stanley J. 1977. Models for Computing Upper Error Limits in Dollar-Unit Sampling. Journal of Accounting Research 15: 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, William H. 1994. Accounting for Excess Zeros and Sample Selection in Poisson and Negative Binomial Regression Models.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keenan, Michael R., and Paul G. Kotula. 2004. Accounting for Poisson Noise in the Multivariate Analysis of ToF-SIMS Spectrum Images. Surface and Interface Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to the Development and Application of Techniques for the Analysis of Surfaces, Interfaces and Thin Films 36(3): 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kish, Leslie, and Martin Richard Frankel. 1974. Inference from Complex Samples. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 36(1): 1–22.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura, Ella Mae, and Kam-Wah Tsui. 1982. Stein-Type Poisson Estimators in Audit Sampling. Journal of Accounting Research 20: 162–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Breed D. 1995. Natural and Quasi-experiments in Economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13(2): 151–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pap, Gyula, and Martien C.A. van Zuijlen. 1995. The Stringer Bound in Case of Uniform Taintings. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 29(10): 51–59.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Raiffa, Howard, and Robert Schlaifer. 1961. Applied Statistical Decision Theory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Repin, Sergey, Stefan Sauter, and Anton Smolianski. 2004. A Posteriori Error Estimation for the Poisson Equation with Mixed Dirichlet/Neumann Boundary Conditions. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 164: 601–612.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor, George W., and Witiiam G. Cochran. 1956. Statistical Methods Applied to Experiments in Biology and Agriculture. Iowa: Iowa State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, Stephen. 2008. Fisher and the 5% Level. Chance 21(4): 12.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Stringer, Kenneth W. 1961. Some Basic Concepts of Statistical Sampling in Auditing. Journal of Accountancy (Pre-1986) 112(000005): 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1963. Practical Aspects of Statistical Sampling in Auditing. In Proceedings of the Business and Economic Statistics Section, 405–411. Washington, DC: American Statistical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. A Statistical Technique for Analytical Review. Journal of Accounting Research 13: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1979. Statistical Sampling in Auditing. The State of Art. Annual Accounting Review 1: 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, Kam-Wah, Ella Mae Matsumura, and Kwok-Leung Tsui. 1985. Multinomial-Dirichlet Bounds for Dollar-Unit Sampling in Auditing. Accounting Review 60: 76–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Ross L., and Richard W. Leftwich. 1977. The Time Series of Annual Accounting Earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 15: 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westland, J. Christopher, and Eric Wing Kuen See-To. 2007. The Short-Run Price-Performance Dynamics of Microcomputer Technologies. Research Policy 36(5): 591–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Christopher Westland .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christopher Westland, J. (2024). Design of Audit Programs. In: Audit Analytics. Use R!. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47464-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics