Abstract
Adaptation to new devices and interfaces is actively studied by user experience and human-computer interaction specialists but is typically neglected by organizers and researchers of corporate training with virtual reality. The study tests how the adaptation phase to technology affects the educational outcome and cognitive load. For the study, 102 people (35.3 ± 11.2 years old), including students and working managers, were trained to give feedback to a colleague. They were divided into three groups: general adaptation, specialized adaptation for communication training, and no adaptation. EEG was used to measure cognitive load score. As a result, it was found that both groups with pre-adaptation showed higher educational outcomes and experienced less cognitive load during the main training. No difference was found between the types of adaptation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Kleinsmith, A., Rivera-Gutierrez, D., Finney, G., Cendan, J., Lok, B.: Understanding empathy training with virtual patients. Comput. Hum. Behav. 52, 151–158 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.033
Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Leitner, M., Hann, P.: Virtual reality in professional training: an example from the field of bank counselling. In: 2020 6th International Conference of the Immersive Learning Research Network (ILRN), pp. 210–214. IEEE, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA (2020). https://doi.org/10.23919/iLRN47897.2020.9155083
Yuan, S.N.V., Ip, H.H.S.: Using virtual reality to train emotional and social skills in children with autism spectrum disorder. London Journal of Primary Care 10(4), 110–112 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2018.1483000
Angel-Urdinola, D.F., Castillo-Castro, C., Hoyos, A.: Meta-Analysis Assessing the Effects of Virtual Reality Training on Student Learning and Skills Development. The World Bank (2021). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-9587
Hamilton, D., McKechnie, J., Edgerton, E., Wilson, C.: Immersive virtual reality as a pedagogical tool in education: a systematic literature review of quantitative learning outcomes and experimental design. J. Comput. Educ. 8(1), 1–32 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-020-00169-2
Williams, M.D., Dwivedi, Y.K., Lal, B., Schwarz, A.: Contemporary trends and issues in it adoption and diffusion research. J. Inf. Technol. 24(1), 1 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2008.30
Syed-Abdul, S., et al.: Virtual reality among the elderly: a usefulness and acceptance study from Taiwan. BMC Geriatr. 19(1), 223 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-019-1218-8
Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., Valléry, G.: User acceptance of virtual reality: an extended technology acceptance model. Int. J. Hum.-Comp. Intera. 36(11), 993–1007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2019.1708612
Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T.S., Mayer, R.E.: Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learn. Instr. 60, 225–236 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.007
McFaul, H., FitzGerald, E.: A realist evaluation of student use of a virtual reality smartphone application in undergraduate legal education. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 51(2), 572–589 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12850
Virvou, M., Katsionis, G.: On the usability and likeability of virtual reality games for education: the case of VR-ENGAGE. Comput. Educ. 50(1), 154–178 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2006.04.004
Mayer, R.E., (ed.): The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369
Sweller, J., Ayres, P., Kalyuga, S.: Cognitive Load Theory. Springer New York, New York, NY (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4
Madden, J., Pandita, S., Schuldt, J.P., Kim, B., Won, A.S., Holmes, N.G.: Ready student one: exploring the predictors of student learning in virtual reality. PLoS ONE 15(3), e0229788 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229788
Krigolson, O.E., Williams, C.C., Norton, A., Hassall, C.D., Colino, F.L.: Choosing MUSE: Validation of a Low-Cost, Portable EEG System for ERP Research. Front. Neurosci. 11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2017.00109
Trejo, L.J., Kubitz, K., Rosipal, R., Kochavi, R.L., Montgomery, L.D.: EEG-based estimation and classification of mental fatigue. PSYCH 06(05), 572–589 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2015.65055
Meyer, O.A., Omdahl, M.K., Makransky, G.: Investigating the effect of pre-training when learning through immersive virtual reality and video: a media and methods experiment. Comput. Educ. 140, 103603 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103603
Everaert, P., Opdecam, E., Maussen, S.: The relationship between motivation, learning approaches, academic performance and time spent. Acc. Educ. 26(1), 78–107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2016.1274911
Balk, S.A., Bertola, M.A., Inman, V.W.: In: Proceedings of the 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training, and Vehicle Design: Driving Assessment 2013, pp. 257–263. University of Iowa, Bolton Landing, New York, USA (2013). https://doi.org/10.17077/drivingassessment.1498
Blagov, E., Eroshkin, D.: Platform solution for building project teams on the cognitive styles synergy basis. In: ECKM 2021- Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Knowledge Management, 975–978. Academic Conferences limited, Coventry, UK (2021)
Yoshida, K., Hirai, F., Miyaji, I.: Learning system using simple electroencephalograph feedback effect during memory work. Procedia Computer Science 35, 1596–1604 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.08.243
Mazher, M., Abd Aziz, A., Malik, A.S., Ullah Amin, H.: An EEG-based cognitive load assessment in multimedia learning using feature extraction and partial directed coherence. IEEE Access 5, 14819–14829 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2731784
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the St. Petersburg State University Graduate School of Management for providing the space for the study, the Modum Lab LLC for the development of the dialog simulation and technical support of the project, and the Knowledge Lab LLC for neural signal processing software.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Vinitskiy, D. et al. (2024). Role of Adaptation Phase in Educational Results of Virtual Reality Communication Training for Managers. In: Bourguet, ML., Krüger, J.M., Pedrosa, D., Dengel, A., Peña-Rios, A., Richter, J. (eds) Immersive Learning Research Network. iLRN 2023. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1904. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47328-9_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-47327-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-47328-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)